RESUMO
COPD is common but is under-diagnosed by general practitioners (GP). GP have a major role in the early diagnosis of this disease. GP could have access to spirometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and interpretation of spirometry performed by primary care residents following a short education session. Three residents were trained in spirometry for half a day. They then performed spirometry on all smokers over the age of 35 visiting five general practices. The results were reviewed blindly by an independent specialist pulmonologist to assess their quality and interpretation. Among 184 eligible patients, 89% agreed to participate and 66% (n=107) came for the second appointment. The pulmonologist evaluated the quality of spirometry as good in 72% of cases, of suboptimal but acceptable quality in 20% and of poor quality in 8%. Interpretation was accurate in 91% of tests. The Kappa concordance coefficient between GPs and the expert was 0.93. Airflow obstruction was detected in 17.5% of the screened subjects. The average time for a consultation with spirometry was 19minutes. The consultation dedicated to spirometry was well accepted by patients. A short training has to be structured to allow GPs to perform and interpret spirometry properly. This work needs to be extended to better assess reproducibility in cases of abnormal spirometry.