The immediate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on polio immunization and surveillance activities.

In addition to affecting individual health the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted efforts to deliver essential health services around the world. In this article we present an overview of the immediate programmatic and epidemiologic impact of the pandemic on polio eradication as well as the adaptive strategic and operational measures taken by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) from March through September 2020. Shortly after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global pandemic on 11 March 2020, the GPEI initially redirected the programme's assets to tackle COVID-19 and suspended house-to-house supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) while also striving to continue essential poliovirus surveillance functions. From March to May 2020, 28 countries suspended a total of 62 polio vaccine SIAs. In spite of efforts to continue poliovirus surveillance, global acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases reported from January-July 2020 declined by 34% compared with the same period in 2019 along with decreases in the mean number of environment samples collected per active site in the critical areas of the African and Eastern Mediterranean regions. The GPEI recommended countries should resume planning and implementation of SIAs starting in July 2020 and released guidelines to ensure these could be done safely for front line workers and communities. By the end of September 2020, a total of 14 countries had implemented circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2) outbreak response vaccination campaigns and Afghanistan and Pakistan restarted SIAs to stop ongoing wild poliovirus type 1 (WPV1) transmission. The longer-term impacts of disruptions to eradication efforts remain to be determined, especially in terms of the effect on poliovirus epidemiology. Adapting to the pandemic situation has imposed new considerations on program implementation and demonstrated not only GPEI's contribution to global health security, but also identified potential opportunities for coordinated approaches across immunization and health services.

Monitoring antimalarial drug efficacy in the Greater Mekong Subregion: an overview of in vivo results from 2008 to 2010.

In vivo Therapeutic Efficacy Studies (TES) have been routinely conducted in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) for decades. Results from the last 10 years have contributed to update national antimalarial drug policies, to identify hotspots of multi-drug resistance and from 2008 onwards, to stimulate ambitious multi-country programs and innovative research projects to contain and eliminate artemisinin resistant Plasmodium falciparum strains in the subregion. This paper describes the results of TES of first-line antimalarials in six countries of the GMS from 2008-2010 using the WHO in vivo standard protocol. A total of 91 studies were conducted at 32 sentinel sites testing dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHA-PIP), artesunate+mefloquine (A+M), and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) against P. falciparum malaria, as well as chloroquine and DHA-PIP against P vivax. Overall, artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) remained efficacious against falciparum malaria with some exceptions. The 42-day adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) for DHA-PIP dropped significantly to 73% (95% CI 53-87) in 2010 in the same hotspot area of western Cambodia known to harbor artemisinin resistant P. falciparum strains. Because P falciparum sensitivity to artemisinin is a major concern, especially on the Cambodia-Thailand border, attempts were also made to strengthen the monitoring of parasite clearance time elsewhere in the region and globally. The proportion of patients still blood-smear positive on Day 3 above 10% is considered a proxy indicator to strongly suspect the appearance of falciparum resistance to artesunate. This has led to substantial extra measures to confirm the suspicion and eventually set up interventions to eliminate artemisinin resistant parasites. Notably, increasing proportions (>10%) of Day 3 positives among falciparum malaria patients treated with DHA-PIP have been observed in western Cambodia, Myanmar, Viet Nam and China from 2008. Percent Day 3 parasitemia associated with A+M has increased along the Thailand-Myanmar border to surpass 10% at several sites, adding to the known pool of sites with 'suspected' artemisinin resistance in the GMS. Chloroquine remains highly effective against P. vivax except for northeastern and north-central Cambodia. TES results from this subregional-wide monitoring of antimalarial efficacy have influenced the changes of 1st line drugs against both P. falciparum and P. vivax in Cambodia, against P. falciparum in selected areas in Thailand, and pinpointed hotspot areas elsewhere that should be closely monitored in order to take action in a timely manner.

Vaccine wastage in Bangladesh.

The Government of Bangladesh and WHO collaborated in a retrospective vaccine wastage study to estimate overall vaccine wastage rates from January to December 2004 for BCG, measles, DTP and TT. Researchers looked at vaccine distribution and usage patterns in randomly selected districts at both fixed (Upazila) and outreach (Ward) service delivery levels. Wastage was similar at both delivery levels but ranged widely among the sites. Average rates were highest for BCG (84.9%, range 55-93%) and measles (69.7%, range 28-86%) and lower for TT (35.5%, range 10-73%) and DTP (44.4%, range 16-77%). Wastage resulted primarily from opened vials at the ward level but this was reduced at fixed sites where the multi-dose vial policy is followed. A large proportion (30-38%) of records were excluded from the analytic vaccine-specific databases due to data recording errors, mismatches between Ward and Upazila databases, or missing data. The study's results may provide methodological and programmatic guidance for other countries in addressing vaccine wastage issues.