Neuroimaging assessment of facility-bound severely-affected MS reveals the critical role of cortical gray matter pathology: results from the CASA-MS case-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: A subgroup of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) will develop severe disability. The pathophysiology underlying severe MS is unknown. The comprehensive assessment of severely affected MS (CASA-MS) was a case-controlled study that compared severely disabled in skilled nursing (SD/SN) (EDSS ≥ 7.0) to less-disabled (EDSS 3.0-6.5) community dwelling (CD) progressive pwMS, matched on age-, sex- and disease-duration (DDM). OBJECTIVES: To identify neuroimaging and molecular biomarker characteristics that distinguish SD/SN from DDM-CD progressive pwMS. METHODS: This study was carried at SN facility and at a tertiary MS center. The study collected clinical, molecular (serum neurofilament light chain, sNfL and glial acidic fibrillary protein, sGFAP) and MRI quantitative lesion-, brain volume-, and tissue integrity-derived measures. Statistical analyses were controlled for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: 42 SD/SN and 42 DDM-CD were enrolled. SD/SN pwMS showed significantly lower cortical volume (CV) (p < 0.001, d = 1.375) and thalamic volume (p < 0.001, d = 0.972) compared to DDM-CD pwMS. In a logistic stepwise regression model, the SD/SN pwMS were best differentiated from the DDM-CD pwMS by lower CV (p < 0.001) as the only significant predictor, with the accuracy of 82.3%. No significant differences between the two groups were observed for medulla oblongata volume, a proxy for spinal cord atrophy and white matter lesion burden, while there was a statistical trend for numerically higher sGFAP in SD/SN pwMS. CONCLUSIONS: The CASA-MS study showed significantly more gray matter atrophy in severe compared to less-severe progressive MS.

Dynamic disability measures decrease the clinico-radiological gap in people with severely affected multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is limited when utilized in highly disabled people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). OBJETIVE: To explore the relationship between disability measures and MRI outcomes in severely-affected pwMS. METHODS: PwMS recruited from The Boston Home (TBH), a specialized residential facility for severly-affected pwMS and University at Buffalo (UB) MS Center were assessed using EDSS, MS Severity Scale, age-related MSS, Scripps Neurological Rating Scale (SNRS) and Combinatorial Weight-Adjusted Disability Score (CombiWISE). In all scores except SNRS, higher score indicates greater disability. MRI measures of T1, T2-lesion volume (LV), whole brain, gray matter, medulla oblongata and thalamic volumes (WBV, GMV, MOV, TV) and thalamic dysconnectivity were obtained. RESULTS: Greatest disability differences between the TBH and UB pwMS were in SNRS (24.4 vs 71.9, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 4.05) and CombiWISE (82.3 vs. 38.9, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 4.02). In combined analysis of all pwMS, worse SNRS scores were correlated with worse MRI pathology in 8 out of 9 outcomes. EDSS only with 3 measures (GMV, MOV and TV). In severely-affected pwMS, SNRS was associated with T1-LV, T2-LV and WBV (not surviving false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons) whereas EDSS did not. CONCLUSION: Granular and dynamic disability measures may bridge the clinico-radiologcal gap present in severely affected pwMS.

Auditory Test of Processing Speed: Preliminary validation of a smartphone-based test of mental speed.

BACKGROUND: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a gold-standard measure of cognitive efficiency and processing speed for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) but relies on vision and oculomotor function. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a new processing speed test with minimal memory involvement and no eye function requirements. METHODS: We created an Auditory Test of Processing Speed (ATOPS). A total of 122 PwMS, of whom 33 were severely disabled (median Expanded Disability Status Scale 8.0) and 37 healthy volunteers (HVs), were enrolled. We assessed sensitivity to discriminate MS participants from HVs, convergent validity between ATOPS and SDMT, sensitivity to discriminate between cognitively impaired (CI) and cognitively preserved (CP) MS participants, and correlations with MS pathology (overall brain lesion burden). Acceptability was examined with completion rates and participant ratings of ATOPS. RESULTS: ATOPS discriminated PwMS from HVs (d = 0.739-0.856), correlated with SDMT (|r| = 0.528-0.587), discriminated between CI and CP PwMS (d = 0.623-0.776), and correlated with lesion burden (r = 0.332-0.436). All groups indicated high favorability of ATOPS and severely disabled MS patients could be assessed by ATOPS more frequently than by SDMT (100% vs. 72.4% completion). CONCLUSIONS: ATOPS is a novel, accessible, and acceptable cognitive processing speed test that may be useful in clinical and/or research settings.