Clinical and humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in patients with immunosuppressants.

BACKGROUND: Despite impaired humoral responses in patients treated with immunosuppressants (ISPs), recent studies found similar severity of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections compared to controls. One potential explanation is the rapid generation humoral responses upon infection, but evidence is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinal dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire after SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron breakthrough infections in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) on ISPs and controls. METHODS: As prospective sub-study of the national Target-to-B! (T2B!) consortium, we included IMID patients on ISPs and controls who reported SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections between July 1, 2021, and April 1, 2022. To get an impression of the dynamics of the antibody repertoire, three antibody titers of wild-type RBD, wild-type S, and omicron RBD were measured at four time points after SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. RESULTS: We included 302 IMID patients on ISPs and 178 controls. Antibody titers increased up to 28 days after breakthrough infections in both groups. However, in IMID patients on anti-CD20 therapy and sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor (S1P) modulators, antibody titers were considerably lower compared to controls. In the anti-TNF group, we observed slightly lower antibody titers in the early stages and a faster decline of antibodies after infection compared to controls. Breakthrough infections were mostly mild and hospitalization was required in less than 1% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Most ISPs do not influence the dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire and exhibit a rapid recall response with cross-reactive antibody clones towards new viral variants. However, in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy or S1P modulators, the dynamics were greatly impaired, and to a lesser extent in those anti-TNF. Nevertheless, only a few severe breakthrough cases were reported.

The intrinsic coagulation pathway plays a dominant role in driving hypercoagulability in ANCA-associated vasculitis.

ABSTRACT: The risk of a venous thrombotic event (VTE) is increased in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV); however, a detailed understanding of the underlying mechanisms of hypercoagulability is limited. We assessed prospectively different coagulation parameters in 71 patients with active AAV at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up. D-dimers and fibrinogen were increased in most patients at presentation and remained elevated in half of the patients. Particularly, thrombin-antithrombin (T:AT) complex and activated coagulation factors in complex with their natural inhibitors of the intrinsic coagulation pathway (ie, activated FXII:C1 esterase inhibitor [FXIIa:C1Inh], FXIa:AT, and FXIa:alpha1-antitrypsin [FXIa:α1AT]) were profoundly elevated in patients at baseline. Thrombin formation was dominantly correlated with coagulation factors of the intrinsic pathway (ie, FXIIa:AT, FXIa:AT, FXIa:α1AT, and FXIa:C1Inh) compared to the extrinsic pathway (ie, FVIIa:AT). Hypercoagulability correlated with higher disease activity, ANCA levels, C-reactive protein, serum creatinine, and proteinuria. VTEs were observed in 5 out of 71 (7%) patients within 1 month (interquartile range, 1-5) after inclusion. Baseline T:AT levels were significantly higher in patients with VTE than in those without VTE (P = .044), but other clinical or laboratory markers were comparable between both groups. Hypercoagulability is dominantly characterized by activation of the intrinsic coagulation pathway and elevated D-dimers in active AAV. The driving factors of hypercoagulability are yet to be studied but are most likely related to an interplay of increased disease activity, vascular inflammation, and endothelial damage. Future targets for intervention could include inhibitors of the intrinsic coagulation pathway and compounds specifically reducing the hyperinflammatory state.

Primary SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: long-term humoral immune responses and effects on disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on immunosuppressants (ISPs) may have impaired long-term humoral immune responses and increased disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to investigate long-term humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 and increased disease activity after a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated IMID patients on ISPs. METHODS: IMID patients on active treatment with ISPs and controls (i.e. IMID patients not on ISP and healthy controls) with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection before first vaccination were included from an ongoing prospective cohort study (T2B! study). Clinical data on infections and increased disease activity were registered using electronic surveys and health records. A serum sample was collected before first vaccination to measure SARS-CoV-2 anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies. RESULTS: In total, 193 IMID patients on ISP and 113 controls were included. Serum samples from 185 participants were available, with a median time of 173 days between infection and sample collection. The rate of seropositive IMID patients on ISPs was 78% compared to 100% in controls (p < 0.001). Seropositivity rates were lowest in patients on anti-CD20 (40.0%) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (60.5%), as compared to other ISPs (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Increased disease activity after infection was reported by 68 of 260 patients (26.2%; 95% CI 21.2-31.8%), leading to ISP intensification in 6 out of these 68 patients (8.8%). CONCLUSION: IMID patients using ISPs showed reduced long-term humoral immune responses after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection, which was mainly attributed to treatment with anti-CD20 and anti-TNF agents. Increased disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported commonly, but was mostly mild. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL74974.018.20, Trial ID: NL8900. Registered on 9 September 2020.

Assessment of longitudinal serum neutrophil extracellular trap-inducing activity in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and glomerulonephritis in a prospective cohort using a novel bio-impedance technique.

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Here, we developed a novel, label-free, high-throughput bio-impedance technique to effectively measure serum NET-inducing activity. Using this technique, NET-inducing activity of serum derived from patients with AAV was assessed in a prospective cohort of 62 patients presenting with active AAV with major organ involvement. Thirty-five patients presented with new and 27 patients presented with relapsing AAV, of whom 38 had kidney and/or 31 had lung involvement. NET-inducing activity was assessed at diagnosis of active AAV (time zero), during the first 6 weeks of treatment, and after 6 months of treatment. Forty-seven patients revealed elevated NET-inducing activity at time zero. After initiation of immunosuppressive treatment, NET-inducing activity was reduced at six weeks. A subsequent increase at six months could potentially identify patients with relapsing disease (hazard ratio, 11.45 [interquartile range 1.36-96.74]). NET-inducing activity at time zero correlated with kidney function and proteinuria. Importantly, in kidney tissue, NETs co-localized with lesions typical of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis and even correlated with systemic serum NET-inducing activity. Thus, our prospective data corroborate the importance of NET formation in AAV and ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis and the potential of longitudinal evaluation, as monitored by our novel bio-impedance assay and detailed histological evaluation.

Disease activity in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases after SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations.

For patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), concerns exist about increased disease activity after vaccination. We aimed to assess changes in disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with IMIDs, and determine risk factors for increased disease activity. In this substudy of a prospective observational cohort study (Target-to-B!), we included patients with IMIDs who received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Patients reported changes in disease activity on a five-point Likert scale every 60 days for up to twelve months after first vaccination. In case of self-reported increased activity, hospital records were screened whether the treating physician reported increased activity, and for potential intensification of immunosuppressive (ISP) treatment. Mixed models were used to study determinants for self-reported increased disease activity. In total, 2111 patients were included for analysis after primary immunization (mean age 49.7 years [SD 13.7], 1329/2111 (63.0%) female), from which 1266 patients for analysis after first additional vaccination. Increased disease activity at 60 days after start of primary immunization was reported by 223/2111 (10.6%). In 96/223 (43.0%) the increase was confirmed by the treating physician and in 36/223 (16.1%) ISP treatment was intensified. Increased disease activity at seven to 60 days after additional vaccination, was reported by 139/1266 (11.0%). Vaccinations were not temporally associated with self-reported increased disease activity. Conversely, increased disease activity before first vaccination, neuromuscular disease, and multiple sclerosis were associated. Altogether, self-reported increased disease activity after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was recorded in a minority of patients and was generally mild. Moreover, multivariate analyses suggest that disease related factors, but not vaccinations are the major determinants for self-reported increased disease activity.

Adding low dose cyclophosphamide to rituximab for remission-induction may prolong relapse-free survival in patients with ANCA vasculitis: A retrospective study.

Objective: Rituximab (RTX) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) are effective remission-induction therapies in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, combining these therapies may favor prognosis in patients with a major disease presentation. We conducted a retrospective study to compare patients treated with a combination of RTX and low dose CYC (RTX-CYC) or with RTX only, both followed by tailored maintenance with RTX, with regard to long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients treated in the Maastricht University Medical Center between March 2007 and January 2019, were screened for eligibility. The primary outcome variable was major relapse rate after two and five years. Secondary outcome variables were clinical data and laboratory parameters. Results: Of the 246 screened patients, 34 received RTX-CYC and 28 RTX only for remission-induction. All patients were followed for at least two years, with a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR 24-60). At baseline, renal involvement was more prevalent in the RTX-CYC patients (85% vs. 61%, P = 0.028). Major relapse rates within two years, but not after five years, were significantly lower in the RTX-CYC group (3% vs. 24%, P = 0.032). The rate of infections, hypogammaglobulinemia, end-stage renal disease, malignancies, and mortality did not differ after two and five years. Conclusion: Adding low dose CYC to RTX is safe and may prevent major relapses in patients with severe AAV in the first two years after remission-induction. Randomized controlled trials that compare the efficacy and safety between RTX and a combination of RTX with CYC are needed.

Annexin A1 Is Associated with Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19.

Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by hyperinflammation, vascular damage, and hypercoagulability. Insufficient responses of Annexin A1 (AnxA1), a pro-resolving inhibitor of neutrophil infiltration and activation, might contribute to a severe course of the disease. We longitudinally evaluated AnxA1's role in terms of inflammation, vascular damage, and clinical outcomes in a large prospective cohort of patients with COVID-19. AnxA1 was measured at presentation and during follow-up in the sera of 220 consecutive patients who presented at our hospital during the first wave. AnxA1 was significantly higher in the moderate and severe cases of COVID-19 compared to the healthy controls. Elevated AnxA1 was associated with markers of inflammation and endothelial damage. AnxA1 was significantly higher in patients with thrombotic events and ICU admission. Multivariable logistic regression indicated baseline AnxA1 (per ten units) as a predictor of thrombotic events. Linear mixed models predicted that AnxA1 tended to increase more steeply over time in patients without adverse events, with a statistically significant rise in patients without thrombotic events. These findings might reflect an insufficient increase in AnxA1 as a response to the excessive hyperinflammation in COVID-19. Future studies should evaluate whether hyperinflammation could be reduced through the administration of human recombinant AnxA1 or Ac2-26 peptide.

Breakthrough infections with the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cumulative incidence and disease severity of reported SARS-CoV-2 omicron breakthrough infections between patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) on immunosuppressants and controls, and to investigate determinants for breakthrough infections. METHODS: Data were used from an ongoing national prospective multicentre cohort study on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses in patients with IMID in the Netherlands (Target-to-B! (T2B!) study). Patients wih IMID on immunosuppressants and controls (patients with IMID not on immunosuppressants and healthy controls) who completed primary immunisation were included. The observation period was between 1 January 2022 and 1 April 2022, during which the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1 and BA.2 subvariant) was dominant. A SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection was defined as a reported positive PCR and/or antigen test at least 14 days after primary immunisation. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to investigate determinants. RESULTS: 1593 patients with IMID on immunosuppressants and 579 controls were included. The cumulative incidence of breakthrough infections was 472/1593 (29.6%; 95% CI 27% to 32%) in patients with IMID on immunosuppressants and 181/579 (31.3%; 95% CI 28% to 35%) in controls (p=0.42). Three (0.5%) participants had severe disease. Seroconversion after primary immunisation (relative risk, RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.96), additional vaccinations (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.76) and a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.75) were associated with decreased risk of breakthrough infection. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative incidence of reported SARS-CoV-2 omicron breakthrough infections was high, but similar between patients with IMID on immunosuppressants and controls, and disease severity was mostly mild. Additional vaccinations and prior SARS-CoV-2 infections may reduce the incidence of breakthrough infections.

Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections with the delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases using immunosuppressants: a substudy of two prospective cohort studies.

Background: Concerns have been raised regarding the risks of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with immunosuppressants, but clinical data on breakthrough infections are still scarce. The primary objective of this study was to compare the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections between patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases using immunosuppressants, and controls (patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases not taking immunosuppressants and healthy controls) who had received full COVID-19 vaccinations. The secondary objective was to explore determinants of breakthrough infections of the delta (B.1.617.2) variant of SARS-CoV-2, including humoral immune responses after vaccination. Methods: In this substudy, we pooled data collected in two large ongoing prospective multicentre cohort studies conducted in the Netherlands (Target to-B! [T2B!] study and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center COVID [ARC-COVID] study). Both studies recruited adult patients (age ≥18 years) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and healthy controls. We sourced clinical data from standardised electronic case record forms, digital questionnaires, and medical files. We only included individuals who were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. For T2B!, participants were recruited between Feb 2 and Aug 1, 2021, and for ARC-COVID, participants were recruited between April 26, 2020, and March 1, 2021. In this study we assessed data on breakthrough infections collected between July 1 and Dec 15, 2021, a period in which the delta SARS-CoV-2 variant was the dominant variant in the Netherlands. We defined a SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection as a PCR-confirmed or antigen test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection that occurred at least 14 days after vaccination. All breakthrough infections during this period were assumed to be due to the delta variant due to its dominance during the study period. We analysed post-vaccination serum samples for anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies to assess the humoral vaccination response (T2B! study only) and anti-nucleocapsid antibodies to identify asymptomatic breakthrough infections (ARC-COVID study only). We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to explore potential clinical and humoral determinants associated with the odds of breakthrough infections. The T2B! study is registered with the Dutch Trial Register, Trial ID NL8900, and the ARC-COVID study is registered with Dutch Trial Register, trial ID NL8513. Findings: We included 3207 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who receive immunosuppressants, and 1807 controls (985 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease not on immunosuppressants and 822 healthy controls). Among patients receiving immunosuppressants, mean age was 53 years (SD 14), 2042 (64%) of 3207 were female and 1165 (36%) were male; among patients not receiving immunosuppressants, mean age was 54 years (SD 14), 598 (61%) of 985 were female and 387 (39%) were male; and among healthy controls, mean age was 57 years (SD 13), 549 (67%) of 822 were female and 273 (33%) were male. The cumulative incidence of PCR-test or antigen-test confirmed SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections was similar in patients on immunosuppressants (148 of 3207; 4·6% [95% CI 3·9-5·4]), patients not on immunosuppressants (52 of 985; 5·3% [95% CI 4·0-6·9]), and healthy controls (33 of 822; 4·0% [95% CI 2·8-5·6]). There was no difference in the odds of breakthrough infection for patients with immune-mediate inflammatory disease on immunosuppressants versus combined controls (ie, patients not on immunosuppressants and healthy controls; adjusted odds ratio 0·88 [95% CI 0·66-1·18]). Seroconversion after vaccination (odds ratio 0·58 [95% CI 0·34-0·98]; T2B! cohort only) and SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination (0·34 [0·18-0·56]) were associated with a lower odds of breakthrough infections. Interpretation: The incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases on immunosuppressants was similar to that in controls. However, caution might still be warranted for those on anti-CD20 therapy and those with traditional risk factors. Funding: ZonMw (the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development) and Reade foundation.

Humoral responses after second and third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders on immunosuppressants: a cohort study.

Background: Disease-specific studies have reported impaired humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders treated with specific immunosuppressants. Disease-overarching studies, and data on recall responses and third vaccinations are scarce. Our primary objective was to investigate the effects of immunosuppressive monotherapies on the humoral immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with prevalent immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Methods: We did a cohort study in participants treated in outpatient clinics in seven university hospitals and one rheumatology treatment centre in the Netherlands as well as participants included in two national cohort studies on COVID-19-related disease severity. We included patients aged older than 18 years, diagnosed with any of the prespecified immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, who were able to understand and complete questionnaires in Dutch. Participants with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders who were not on systemic immunosuppressants and healthy participants were included as controls. Anti-receptor binding domain IgG responses and neutralisation capacity were monitored following standard vaccination regimens and a three-vaccination regimen in subgroups. Hybrid immune responses-ie, vaccination after previous SARS-CoV-2 infection-were studied as a proxy for recall responses. Findings: Between Feb 2 and Aug 1, 2021, we included 3222 participants in our cohort. Sera from 2339 participants, 1869 without and 470 participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed (mean age 49·9 years [SD 13·7]; 1470 [62·8%] females and 869 [37·2%] males). Humoral responses did not differ between disorders. Anti-CD20 therapy, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1P) modulators, and mycophenolate mofetil combined with corticosteroids were associated with lower relative risks for reaching seroconversion following standard vaccination (0·32 [95% CI 0·19-0·49] for anti-CD20 therapy, 0·35 [0·21-0·55] for S1P modulators, and 0·61 [0·40-0·90] for mycophenolate mofetil combined with corticosteroids). A third vaccination increased seroconversion for mycophenolate mofetil combination treatments (from 52·6% after the second vaccination to 89·5% after the third) but not significantly for anti-CD20 therapies (from 36·8% to 45·6%) and S1P modulators (from 35·5% to 48·4%). Most other immunosuppressant groups showed moderately reduced antibody titres after standard vaccination that did not increase after a third vaccination, although seroconversion rates and neutralisation capacity were unaffected. In participants with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were boosted after vaccination, regardless of immunosuppressive treatment. Interpretation: Humoral responses following vaccination are impaired by specific immunosuppressants. After standard vaccination regimens, patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders taking most immunosuppressants show similar seroconversion to controls, although antibody titres might be moderately reduced. As neutralisation capacity and recall responses are also preserved in these patients, this is not likely to translate to loss of (short-term) protection. In patients on immunosuppressants showing poor humoral responses after standard vaccination regimens, a third vaccination resulted in additional seroconversion in patients taking mycophenolate mofetil combination treatments, whereas the effect of a third vaccination in patients on anti-CD20 therapy and S1P modulators was limited. Funding: ZonMw (The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development).

Risk factors associated with short-term adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested incremental short-term adverse events (AE) after repeated vaccination. In this report, we assessed occurrence and risk factors for short-term AEs following repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). METHODS: Self-reported daily questionnaires on AEs during the first 7 days after vaccination were obtained of 2259 individuals (2081 patients and 178 controls) participating in an ongoing prospective multicenter cohort study on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with various IMIDs in the Netherlands (T2B-COVID). Relative risks were calculated for potential risk factors associated with clinically relevant AE (rAE), defined as AE lasting longer than 2 days or impacting daily life. RESULTS: In total, 5454 vaccinations were recorded (1737 first, 1992 second and 1478 third vaccinations). Multiple sclerosis, Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis were the largest disease groups. rAEs were reported by 57.3% (95% CI 54.8-59.8) of patients after the first vaccination, 61.5% (95% CI 59.2-63.7) after the second vaccination and 58% (95% CI 55.3-60.6) after the third vaccination. At day 7 after the first, second and third vaccination, respectively, 7.6% (95% CI 6.3-9.1), 7.4% (95% CI 6.2-8.7) and 6.8% (95% CI 5.4-8.3) of patients still reported AEs impacting daily life. Hospital admissions and allergic reactions were uncommon (<0.7%). Female sex (aRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.32-1.56), age below 50 (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.23), a preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29) and having an IMID (aRR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.34) were associated with increased risk of rAEs following a vaccination. Compared to the second vaccination, the first vaccination was associated with a lower risk of rAEs (aRR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-0.99) while a third vaccination was not associated with increased risk on rAEs (aRR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.02). BNT162b2 vaccines were associated with lower risk on rAEs compared to CX-024414 (aRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: A third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was not associated with increased risk of rAEs in IMID patients compared to the second vaccination. Patients with an IMID have a modestly increased risk of rAEs after vaccination when compared to controls. Most AEs are resolved within 7 days; hospital admissions and allergic reactions were uncommon. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL74974.018.20 , Trial ID: NL8900. Registered on 9 September 2020.

The anti-C5a antibody vilobelimab efficiently inhibits C5a in patients with severe COVID-19.

Recently, we reported the phase II portion of the adaptive phase II/III PANAMO trial exploring potential benefit and safety of selectively blocking C5a with the monoclonal antibody vilobelimab (IFX-1) in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The potent anaphylatoxin C5a attracts neutrophils and monocytes to the infection site, causes tissue damage by oxidative radical formation and enzyme releases, and leads to activation of the coagulation system. Results demonstrated that C5a inhibition with vilobelimab was safe and secondary outcomes appeared in favor of vilobelimab. We now report the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of the phase II study. Between March 31 and April 24, 2020, 30 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive vilobelimab plus best supportive care or best supportive care only. Samples for measurement of vilobelimab, C3a and C5a blood concentrations were taken. Vilobelimab predose (trough) drug concentrations in plasma ranged from 84,846 to 248,592 ng/ml (571 to 1674 nM) with a geometric mean of 151,702 ng/ml (1022 nM) on day 2 and from 80,060 to 200,746 ng/ml (539 to 1352 nM) with a geometric mean of 139,503 ng/ml (939 nM) on day 8. After the first vilobelimab infusion, C5a concentrations were suppressed in the vilobelimab group (median 39.70 ng/ml 4.8 nM, IQR 33.20-45.55) as compared to the control group (median 158.53 ng/ml 19.1 nM, IQR 60.03-200.89, p = 0.0006). The suppression was maintained on day 8 (p = 0.001). The current PK/PD analysis shows that vilobelimab efficiently inhibits C5a in patients with severe COVID-19.

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of an immunoblot for ANCA and anti-GBM antibody detection.

The use of high-quality antigen-specific immunoassays for detecting anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) and anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) autoantibodies is recommended in patients with suspected ANCA vasculitis and/or anti-GBM disease. We analysed the diagnostic performance of a semi-quantitative and rapid immunoblot (EUROIMMUN AG, Lübeck, Germany) in two settings. Patient sera from different cohorts (ANCA vasculitis n = 187, anti-GBM disease n = 19, and disease controls n = 51) were used. The diagnostic performance of the immunoblot was assessed when used as a confirmatory test for the presence of ANCA in suspected ANCA vasculitis and when evaluating the presence of ANCA and/or anti-GBM antibodies in AAV and/or anti-GBM disease patients with a rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN). In a confirmatory test setting, the immunoblot had an optimal sensitivity and specificity of 97.4 and 98.1% for PR3-ANCA and 98.5 and 96.4% for MPO-ANCA, respectively. With increasing test result ranges, a higher interval likelihood ratio (LR) was found for both ANCA entities. When evaluating for ANCA in patients with RPGN, the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 92.9% and specificity 100%) was obtained by using different cut-off values of positivity for PR3- (>5) and MPO-ANCA (>10). Also, the diagnostic performance for detecting anti-GBM was good (sensitivity 100% and specificity 100%). There are advantages over other assays in terms of time, costs, and interpretation of results. The immunoblot is a useful addition to current guidelines, particularly when a rapid diagnosis is necessary.