Aspiration of gastric contents: association with prehospital intubation.

We prospectively compared the incidence of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents between patients endotracheally intubated in the prehospital (PH) setting and those intubated in the emergency department (ED). Tracheal aspirates were collected using a standard Leukens trap from all patients as soon as possible after endotracheal intubation. Tracheal aspirates were then tested for the presence of pepsin, a sensitive and specific marker of gastric contents, using a fibrinogen digestion technique. Over 8 months, 168 patients were enrolled. The pepsin assay was positive in 10 of 20 (50%) patients intubated in the PH group, as opposed to 33 of 148 (22%) of those intubated in the ED (chi2 P=.008; odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.34-9.08). Patients endotracheally intubated in the PH setting are more likely to have aspirated gastric contents than those intubated in the ED.

A comparison of trauma intubations managed by anesthesiologists and emergency physicians.

UNLABELLED: Although airway management by emergency physicians has become standard for general emergency department (ED) patients, many believe that anesthesiologists should manage the airways of trauma victims. OBJECTIVES: To compare the success and failure rates of trauma intubations performed under the supervision of anesthesiologists and emergency physicians. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of consecutive endotracheal intubations (ETIs) of adult trauma patients in a single ED over a 46-month period. All ETIs before November 26, 2000, were supervised by anesthesiologists (34 months), and all ETIs from November 26, 2000, onward were supervised by emergency physicians (12 months). Data regarding clinical presentation, personnel involved, medications used, number of attempts required, and need for cricothyrotomy were collected. Study outcomes were: 1) successful intubation within two attempts, and 2) failure of intubation. Failure was defined as inability to intubate, resulting in successful intubation by another specialist, or cricothyrotomy. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to compare results between groups. RESULTS: There were 673 intubations during the study period. Intubation within two attempts was accomplished in 442 of 467 patients (94.6%) managed by anesthesiologists, and in 196 of 206 of patients (95.2%) managed by emergency physicians (OR = 1.109, 95% CI = 0.498 to 2.522). Failure of intubation occurred in 16 of 467 (3.4%) patients managed by anesthesiologists, and in four of 206 (1.9%) patients managed by emergency physicians (OR = 0.558, 95% CI = 0.156 to 1.806). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians can safely manage the airways of trauma patients. Success and failure rates are similar to those of anesthesiologists.

A new pepsin assay to detect pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents among newly intubated patients.

Aspiration of gastric contents by endotracheally intubated patients is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies suggest that pepsin in tracheal aspirates may be a valuable marker of occult aspiration. We sought to show the sensitivity and specificity of a new, pepsin-specific assay in humans. A prospective, case-controlled study was conducted with subjects serving as their own controls. After planned endotracheal and nasogastric intubation for elective surgery, 20 participants had tracheal and gastric aspirates withdrawn. A blinded investigator tested samples for the presence of pepsin using the assay. Positive samples were then tested with pepstatin, a specific pepsin inhibitor, to ensure that positive results were due to pepsin. All tracheal aspirates tested negative and all gastric aspirates tested positive for pepsin. Pepstatin halted pepsin activity in all positive samples, ensuring that positive results were due to pepsin. A pepsin-specific assay is extremely reliable for detecting gastric contents in humans.