Clinical, prognostic and pathophysiological implications of MOG-IgG detection in the CSF: the importance of intrathecal MOG-IgG synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG (CSF MOG-IgG) are found in a proportion of patients with MOG antibody-associated disorder (MOGAD) and have been associated with severe disease presentations. However, most studies did not systematically investigate the role of MOG-IgG intrathecal synthesis (ITS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 960 consecutive patients with paired serum and CSF samples screened for MOG-IgG using a live cell-based assays. MOG-IgG-specific antibody index (AIMOG) was systematically calculated using serum and CSF titres to assess MOG-IgG ITS, and clinical features were compared between MOG-IgG CSF+/CSF- and ITS+/ITS- patients. RESULTS: MOG-IgG were found in 55/960 patients (5.7%; serum+/CSF-: 58.2%, serum+/CSF+: 34.5%; serum-/CSF+: 7.3%). Serum/CSF MOG-IgG titres showed a moderate correlation in patients without ITS (ρ=0.47 (CI 0.18 to 0.68), p<0.001), but not in those with ITS (ρ=0.14 (CI -0.46 to -0.65), p=0.65). There were no clinical-paraclinical differences between MOG-IgG CSF+ vs CSF- patients. Conversely, patients with MOG-IgG ITS showed pyramidal symptoms (73% vs 32%, p=0.03), spinal cord involvement (82% vs 39%, p=0.02) and severe outcome at follow-up (36% vs 5%, p=0.02) more frequently than those without MOG-IgG ITS. A multivariate logistic regression model indicated that MOG-IgG ITS was an independent predictor of a poor outcome (OR: 14.93 (CI 1.40 to 19.1); p=0.03). AIMOG correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores at disease nadir and at last follow-up (p=0.02 and p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Consistently with physiopathology, MOG-IgG ITS is a promising prognostic factor in MOGAD, and its calculation could enhance the clinical relevance of CSF MOG-IgG testing, making a case for its introduction in clinical practice.

Autoimmune encephalitis: what the radiologist needs to know.

Autoimmune encephalitis is a relatively novel nosological entity characterized by an immune-mediated damage of the central nervous system. While originally described as a paraneoplastic inflammatory phenomenon affecting limbic structures, numerous instances of non-paraneoplastic pathogenesis, as well as extra-limbic involvement, have been characterized. Given the wide spectrum of insidious clinical presentations ranging from cognitive impairment to psychiatric symptoms or seizures, it is crucial to raise awareness about this disease category. In fact, an early diagnosis can be dramatically beneficial for the prognosis both to achieve an early therapeutic intervention and to detect a potential underlying malignancy. In this scenario, the radiologist can be the first to pose the hypothesis of autoimmune encephalitis and refer the patient to a comprehensive diagnostic work-up - including clinical, serological, and neurophysiological assessments.In this article, we illustrate the main radiological characteristics of autoimmune encephalitis and its subtypes, including the typical limbic presentation, the features of extra-limbic involvement, and also peculiar imaging findings. In addition, we review the most relevant alternative diagnoses that should be considered, ranging from other encephalitides to neoplasms, vascular conditions, and post-seizure alterations. Finally, we discuss the most appropriate imaging diagnostic work-up, also proposing a suggested MRI protocol.

MOG-IgG testing strategies in accordance with the 2023 MOGAD criteria: a clinical-laboratory assessment.

BACKGROUND: Live cell-based assay (LCBA) is the gold standard for MOG-IgG detection, and fixed CBA (FCBA) is a widely used commercial alternative. Recent criteria attributed a diagnostic value to MOG-IgG titration with both LCBA and FCBA, with low-titre samples requiring additional supporting features for MOGAD diagnosis. However, FCBA titration is not validated. We aimed to assess the impact of the criteria-based MOG-IgG testing in MOGAD diagnosis. METHODS: Thirty-eight serum samples of LCBA MOG-IgG1-positive MOGAD patients were titred on MOG-IgG LCBA and FCBA, and the presence of supporting features for MOGAD assessed. MOGAD criteria were evaluated in four testing scenarios: (a) FCBA without titration; (b) FCBA with titration; c) LCBA without titration; (d) LCBA with titration. RESULTS: FCBA without titration failed to reach MOGAD diagnosis in 11/38 patients (28.9%, negative results in 5, lack of supporting features in 6). Patients with unconfirmed diagnosis had optic neuritis (ON, n = 8), or transverse myelitis (TM, n = 3). FCBA with titration allowed MOGAD diagnosis in 4 additional patients. Correlation between LCBA and FCBA titres was moderate (Spearman's rho 0.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FCBA yields high rate of misdiagnosis mainly due a lower analytical sensitivity. FCBA titration provides a moderate diagnostic advantage in FCBA positive patients.

General features, pathogenesis, and laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune encephalitis.

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a group of inflammatory conditions that can associate with the presence of antibodies directed to neuronal intracellular, or cell surface antigens. These disorders are increasingly recognized as an important differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and of other common neuropsychiatric conditions. Autoantibody diagnostics plays a pivotal role for accurate diagnosis of AE, which is of utmost importance for the prompt recognition and early treatment. Several AE subgroups can be identified, either according to the prominent clinical phenotype, presence of a concomitant tumor, or type of neuronal autoantibody, and recent diagnostic criteria have provided important insights into AE classification. Antibodies to neuronal intracellular antigens typically associate with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and poor prognosis, whereas antibodies to synaptic/neuronal cell surface antigens characterize many AE subtypes that associate with tumors less frequently, and that are often immunotherapy-responsive. In addition to the general features of AE, we review current knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these disorders, focusing mainly on the potential role of neuronal antibodies in the most frequent conditions, and highlight current theories and controversies. Then, we dissect the crucial aspects of the laboratory diagnostics of neuronal antibodies, which represents an actual challenge for both pathologists and neurologists. Indeed, this diagnostics entails technical difficulties, along with particularly interesting novel features and pitfalls. The novelties especially apply to the wide range of assays used, including specific tissue-based and cell-based assays. These assays can be developed in-house, usually in specialized laboratories, or are commercially available. They are widely used in clinical immunology and in clinical chemistry laboratories, with relevant differences in analytic performance. Indeed, several data indicate that in-house assays could perform better than commercial kits, notwithstanding that the former are based on non-standardized protocols. Moreover, they need expertise and laboratory facilities usually unavailable in clinical chemistry laboratories. Together with the data of the literature, we critically evaluate the analytical performance of the in-house vs commercial kit-based approach. Finally, we propose an algorithm aimed at integrating the present strategies of the laboratory diagnostics in AE for the best clinical management of patients with these disorders.

Visual System Involvement in Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy: Two Case Reports and a Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibodies can associate with an astrocytopathy often presenting as a meningoencephalitis. Visual involvement has been reported but scarcely defined. We describe 2 cases of GFAP astrocytopathy with predominant visual symptoms and present a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: We describe 2 patients with GFAP astrocytopathy from our neurology department. We performed a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines, including all patients with this disease and available clinical data, focusing on visual involvement. RESULTS: Patient 1 presented with bilateral optic disc edema and severe sudden bilateral loss of vision poorly responsive to therapy. Patient 2 showed bilateral optic disc edema, headache, and mild visual loss with complete recovery after steroids. We screened 275 records and included 84 articles (62 case reports and 22 case series) for a total of 592 patients. Visual involvement was reported in 149/592 (25%), with either clinical symptoms or paraclinical test-restricted abnormalities. Bilateral optic disc edema was found in 80/159 (50%) of patients investigated with fundoscopy, among which 49/80 (61%) were asymptomatic. One hundred (100/592, 17%) reported visual symptoms, often described as blurred vision or transient visual obscurations. Optic neuritis was rare and diagnosed in only 6% of all patients with GFAP astrocytopathy, often without consistent clinical and paraclinical evidence to support the diagnosis. Four patients (including patient 1) manifested a severe, bilateral optic neuritis with poor treatment response. In patients with follow-up information, a relapsing disease course was more frequently observed in those with vs without visual involvement (35% vs 11%, p = 0.0035, OR 3.6 [CI 1.44-8.88]). DISCUSSION: Visual system involvement in GFAP astrocytopathy is common and heterogeneous, ranging from asymptomatic bilateral optic disc edema to severe bilateral loss of vision, but optic neuritis is rare. GFAP CSF antibody testing should be considered in patients with encephalitis/meningoencephalitis or myelitis and bilateral optic disc edema, even without visual symptoms, and in patients with severe bilateral optic neuritis, especially when AQP4 antibodies are negative. Visual symptoms might associate with a higher relapse risk and help to identify patients who may require chronic immunosuppression.

Progressive post infectious neurological syndromes with a poor outcome: Long term follow-up and neurofilament light chain quantification.

Postinfectious neurological syndromes (PINS), among which acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), are inflammatory and mostly monophasic disorders. We previously reported that PINS patients can show relapses, or even disease progression. Here we describe a cohort of patients with progressive-PINS and >5 years of follow-up, that developed a progressive worsening without radiological/cerebrospinal fluid analysis evidence of inflammation. At onset 5 patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria for ADEM and none for MS. Progression occurred after a median of 22 months from onset (in 4/7 after 1/more relapses), manifesting as ascending tetraparesis with bulbar functions involvement in 5/7. Five/7 patients received high dose steroids and/or IvIG and 6/7 Rituximab(n = 4) and/or cyclophosphamide(n = 2), with no impact on disease progression in 6/7. NfL levels were higher in patients with progressive-PINS compared to monophasic-ADEM (p = 0.023) and healthy controls (p = 0.004). Progression is rare, but possible, in PINS. Immunotherapy seems to be ineffective in these patients, and elevated serum NfL in serum suggest persistent axonal damage.

Comparison of Fixed and Live Cell-Based Assay for the Detection of AChR and MuSK Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Live cell-based assay (CBA) can detect acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) or muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies (Abs) in a proportion of patients with radioimmunoassay (RIA)-double seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSN-MG). A commercial fixed CBA for AChR and MuSK Abs has recently become available; however, comparative studies on fixed and live CBAs are lacking. In this study, we compared the performance of fixed and live CBAs in patients with RIA-dSN MG and assessed their sensitivity in RIA-positive MG samples and their specificity. METHODS: AChR and MuSK Abs were tested in 292 serum samples from 2 Italian MG referral centers by live and fixed CBAs: 192 from patients with MG and 100 from controls. All samples had been previously assessed by RIA: 66 were AChR positive, 40 MuSK positive, and 86 dSN. All controls were negative. Two independent raters assessed the CBA results. Fixed and live CBAs were compared with the McNemar test; interrater and interlaboratory agreement were assessed with Cohen's kappa or interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), as appropriate. RESULTS: In 86 RIA-dSN samples, fixed CBA detected Abs in 10 cases (11.6%, 95% CI 5.7-20.3), whereas live CBA detected Abs in 16 (18.6%, 95% CI 11.0-28.5) (p = 0.0143). Of these sera, those positive by fixed CBA were also positive by live CBA. In addition, live CBA could detect MuSK Abs in 4 and AChR Abs in 2 samples that were negative by fixed CBA, providing an 8% (95% CI 2.9-16.6) further increase in the Ab detection rate. These results were confirmed by flow cytometry. In the RIA-positive cohort, the sensitivity for AChR Abs was 98.5% (95% CI 91.9%-99.9%) for fixed CBA and 100% (95% CI 94.6-100) for live CBA (p = 0.1573). For both assays, the sensitivity for MuSK Abs was 100% (95% CI 91.2-100), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI 96.4-100). Interrater agreement was almost perfect for live and fixed CBAs (Cohen's kappa 0.972 and 0.978, respectively), alike interlaboratory agreement. Interrater agreement for the CBA score ranged from good to excellent (ICC: 0.832-0.973). DISCUSSION: Fixed CBA represents a valuable alternative to RIA for AChR and MuSK Ab detection in patients with MG and could be considered as a first-step diagnostic test. Live CBA can be useful in the serologic evaluation of RIA- and fixed CBA-negative samples.

COVID-19 and Guillain-Barré syndrome: A single-center prospective case series with a 1-year follow-up.

Single reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have been reported worldwide during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. While case reports are likely to be biased toward uncommon clinical presentations, systematic assessment of prospective series can highlight the true clinical features and spectrum. In this prospective, observational study, we included all consecutive patients who developed GBS. In patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection as antecedent, the time-gap between the infection and GBS onset had to be ≤30 days. The referral was a neurological University Research Hospital, in the Italian Region more severely involved by the pandemic, and hospitalizing both COVID+ and non-COVID neurological diseases. Clinical, laboratory, cerebrospinal fluid, and electromyographic features of GBS diagnosed between March 2020 and March 2021 were compared to a retrospective series of GBS diagnosed between February 2019 and February 2020 (control population). Nasopharyngeal swab was still positive at GBS onset in 50% of patients. Mild-to-moderate COVID-related pneumonia, as assessed by X-ray (6 patients) or X-ray plus computerized tomography (2 patients) co-occurred in 6 of 10 patients. GBS diagnosed during the pandemic period, including 10 COVID-GBS and 10 non-COVID-GBS, had higher disability on admission (P = .032) compared to the GBS diagnosed between February 2019 and 2020, possibly related to later hospital referral in the pandemic context. Compared to non-COVID-GBS (n = 10) prospectively diagnosed in the same period (March 2020-2021), post-COVID-GBS (n = 10) had a higher disability score on admission (P = .028), lower sum Medical Research Council score (P = .022) and lymphopenia (P = .025), while there were no differences in GBS subtype/variant, severity of peripheral involvement, prognosis and response to treatment. Cerebrospinal fluid search for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antiganglioside antibodies were negative in all COVID+ patients. Temporal clustering of cases, coinciding with the waves of the pandemic, and concomitant reduction of the incidence of COVID-negative GBSs may indicate a role for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the development of GBS, although the association may simply be related to a bystander effect of systemic inflammation; lack of prevalence of specific GBS subtypes in post-COVID-GBS also support this view. GBS features and prognosis are not substantially different compared to non-COVID-GBS.

Movement disorders associated with neuronal antibodies: a data-driven approach.

BACKGROUND: Movement disorders can be associated with anti-neuronal antibodies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of cases with documented anti-neuronal antibodies in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid published in PubMed before April 1, 2020. Only patients with at least one movement disorder were included. We used random forests for variable selection and recursive partitioning and regression trees for the creation of a data-driven decision algorithm, integrated with expert's clinical feedback. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-seven studies met eligibility criteria, totaling 844 patients and 13 antibodies: amphiphysin, GAD, GlyR, mGluR1, ANNA-2/Ri, Yo/PCA-1, Caspr2, NMDAR, LGI-1, CRMP5/CV2, ANNA-1/Hu, IgLON5, and DPPX. Stiffness/rigidity/spasm spectrum symptoms were more frequently associated with amphiphysin, GAD, and GlyR; ataxia with mGluR1, ANNA-2/Ri, Yo/PCA-1, Caspr2, and ANNA-1/Hu; dyskinesia with NMDAR and paroxysmal movement with LGI1; chorea/choreoathetosis with CRMP5/CV2, IgLON5, and NMDAR; myoclonus with GlyR and DPPX; tremors with ANNA2/Ri and anti-DPPX; and parkinsonism with IgLON5 and NMDAR. Data-driven classification analysis determined the following diagnostic predictions (with probability selection): psychiatric symptoms and dyskinesia predicted NMDAR (71% and 87%, respectively); stiffness/rigidity/spasm and ataxia, GAD (67% and 47%, respectively); ataxia and opsoclonus, ANNA-2/Ri (68%); chorea/choreoathetosis, CRMP5/CV2 (41%). These symptoms remained the top predictors in random forests analysis. The integration with an expert opinion analysis refined the precision of the approach. Breast and lung tumors were the most common tumors. On neuroimaging, cerebellar involvement was associated with GAD and Yo/PCA-1; temporal involvement with Caspr2, LGI-1, ANNA-1/Hu. CONCLUSION: Selected movement disorders are associated with specific anti-neuronal antibodies. The combination of data-driven and expert opinion approach to the diagnosis may assist early management efforts.

Dual IGF1R/IR inhibitors in combination with GD2-CAR T-cells display a potent anti-tumor activity in diffuse midline glioma H3K27M-mutant.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) H3K27M-mutant, including diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), are pediatric brain tumors associated with grim prognosis. Although GD2-CAR T-cells demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity against DMG H3K27M-mutant in vivo, a multimodal approach may be needed to more effectively treat patients. We investigated GD2 expression in DMG/DIPG and other pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGG) and sought to identify chemical compounds that would enhance GD2-CAR T-cell anti-tumor efficacy. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry in tumor tissue samples and immunofluorescence in primary patient-derived cell lines were performed to study GD2 expression. We developed a high-throughput cell-based assay to screen 42 kinase inhibitors in combination with GD2-CAR T-cells. Cell viability, western blots, flow-cytometry, real time PCR experiments, DIPG 3D culture models, and orthotopic xenograft model were applied to investigate the effect of selected compounds on DIPG cell death and CAR T-cell function. RESULTS: GD2 was heterogeneously, but widely, expressed in the tissue tested, while its expression was homogeneous and restricted to DMG/DIPG H3K27M-mutant cell lines. We identified dual IGF1R/IR antagonists, BMS-754807 and linsitinib, able to inhibit tumor cell viability at concentrations that do not affect CAR T-cells. Linsitinib, but not BMS-754807, decreases activation/exhaustion of GD2-CAR T-cells and increases their central memory profile. The enhanced anti-tumor activity of linsitinib/GD2-CAR T-cell combination was confirmed in DIPG models in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. CONCLUSION: Our study supports the development of IGF1R/IR inhibitors to be used in combination with GD2-CAR T-cells for treating patients affected by DMG/DIPG and, potentially, by pHGG.

COVID-19 in patients with myasthenia gravis: Epidemiology and disease course.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, has become a global pandemic. Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), often treated with immunosuppressants, might be at higher risk of developing COVID-19 and of demonstrating a severe disease course. We aimed to study prevalence and describe features of COVID-19 in MG patients. METHODS: In May 2020, we conducted telephonic interviews with MG patients followed at our referral center. We collected structured data regarding MG and COVID-19, which was diagnosed as probable or confirmed according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control case definition. We compared confirmed-COVID-19 prevalence calculated from the beginning of the pandemic in MG patients with that of the overall Pavia district. RESULTS: We interviewed 162 MG patients (median age, 66 y; interquartile range 41-77; males 59.9%), 88 from the Pavia district. Three patients had SARS-CoV-2-confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and eight had probable-COVID-19. In the Pavia district, the prevalence of confirmed-COVID-19 among MG patients (1/88, 1.14%) and overall population (4777/546 515, 0.87%) did not differ (P = .538). Higher Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinicalclass and the need for recent rescue treatment, but not ongoing immunosuppressive treatments, were associated with COVID-19 risk. Of 11 MG patients with probable/confirmed-COVID-19, 3 required ventilator support, and 2 elderly patients died of COVID-19 respiratory insufficiency. Only 1 of11 patients experienced worsening MG symptoms, which improved after increasing their steroid dose. DISCUSSION: The risk of COVID-19 in MG patients seems to be no higher than that of the general population, regardless of immunosuppressive therapies. In our cohort, COVID-19 barely affected MG course.

RFC1 expansions are a common cause of idiopathic sensory neuropathy.

After extensive evaluation, one-third of patients affected by polyneuropathy remain undiagnosed and are labelled as having chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy, which refers to a sensory or sensory-motor, axonal, slowly progressive neuropathy of unknown origin. Since a sensory neuropathy/neuronopathy is identified in all patients with genetically confirmed RFC1 cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome, we speculated that RFC1 expansions could underlie a fraction of idiopathic sensory neuropathies also diagnosed as chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy. We retrospectively identified 225 patients diagnosed with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (125 sensory neuropathy, 100 sensory-motor neuropathy) from our general neuropathy clinics in Italy and the UK. All patients underwent full neurological evaluation and a blood sample was collected for RFC1 testing. Biallelic RFC1 expansions were identified in 43 patients (34%) with sensory neuropathy and in none with sensory-motor neuropathy. Forty-two per cent of RFC1-positive patients had isolated sensory neuropathy or sensory neuropathy with chronic cough, while vestibular and/or cerebellar involvement, often subclinical, were identified at examination in 58%. Although the sensory ganglia are the primary pathological target of the disease, the sensory impairment was typically worse distally and symmetric, while gait and limb ataxia were absent in two-thirds of the cases. Sensory amplitudes were either globally absent (26%) or reduced in a length-dependent (30%) or non-length dependent pattern (44%). A quarter of RFC1-positive patients had previously received an alternative diagnosis, including Sjögren's syndrome, sensory chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and paraneoplastic neuropathy, while three cases had been treated with immune therapies.

Improving laboratory diagnostics in myasthenia gravis.

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototypical autoimmune disease, characterized by pathogenic autoantibodies targeting structures of the neuromuscular junction. Radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPAs) represent the gold standard for their detection. However, new methods are emerging to complement, or overcome RIPAs, also with the perspective of eliminating the use of radioactive reagents.Areas covered: We discuss advances in laboratory methods, prompted especially by cell-based assays (CBAs), for the detection of the autoantibodies of MG diagnostics, above all those to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), and low molecular-weight receptor-related low-density lipoprotein-4 (LRP4).Expert opinion: CBA technology makes AChRs aggregate on cell membranes, thus allowing to detect autoantibodies to clustered AChRs, with reduction of seronegative MG cases. The diagnostic relevance of RIPA/CBA-measurable LRP4 antibodies is still unclear, in Caucasian patients at least. Live CBAs for the detection of AChR, MuSK, and LRP4 antibodies might represent an alternative to RIPAs, but first require full validation. CBAs could be used as screening tests, limiting RIPAs for antibody quantification. To this end, ELISAs might be an alternative.Fixation procedures preserving enough degree of antigen conformationality could yield AChR and MuSK CBAs suitable for a wide use in clinical-chemistry laboratories.

MicroRNAs in Neuroblastoma: Biomarkers with Therapeutic Potential.

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in infancy. The majority of children have a disseminated disease at diagnosis with bone marrow as the most common site of metastasis. Although several prognostic factors have been defined (i.e. age, stage, histology, recurrent genetic anomalies), the identification of non-invasive biomarkers for disease follow-up and therapy monitoring is indeed still a clinical need. Aberrant regulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) expression has been implicated in several malignancies. OBJECTIVES: In this mini-review, we describe the recent findings about miRNAs in neuroblastoma, both in the tumor and circulation, with particular focus on those involved in tumor progression and drug resistance. Furthermore, we will discuss the use of specific miRNAs as potential therapeutic tools in this tumor. RESULTS: Several miRNAs have been identified to be down- or up-regulated in primary tumors and have been associated with MYCN amplification, differentiation, dissemination and chemoresistance. Little evidence is available in the literature about circulating miRNAs which are of particular interest as potential biomarkers for liquid biopsy. CONCLUSION: Identification of body-fluid markers for non-invasive diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment monitoring and tumor follow-up, is gaining growing interest, especially in the pediatric field. miRNAs are suitable candidates as biomarkers in neuroblastoma but further investigations are needed to expand knowledge regarding their role in this malignancy to design specific approaches of miRNAs-mediated therapies.