RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether early echocardiography screening of low systemic blood flow reduces intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study in preterm infants below 33 weeks of gestational age at nine neonatal units. Five units performed early echocardiography screening for low systemic blood flow and guided clinical management (exposure group) and 4 units did not (control group). Our main outcome was ≥grade II intraventricular hemorrhage or death within the first 7 days of life. The main analysis used the inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-two preterm infants (131 in the exposure group and 201 in the control group) were included. Exposure to early echocardiography screening was associated with a significant reduction in ≥grade II intraventricular hemorrhage or early death [odds ratio 0.285 (95% CI: 0.133-0.611); p = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Early echocardiography screening for low systemic blood flow may reduce the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a tool widely used for neuromonitoring in the critical neonate. In the patient with perinatal asphyxia, its interpretation is key to identifying candidates for therapeutic hypothermia, detecting subclinical seizures and providing pronostic information. Our aim was to analyze the concordance in the interpretation of aEEG among neonatologists with different levels of experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Unicenter retrospective study of newborns ≥ 35 weeks with perinatal asphyxia included consecutively over a two-year period and monitored with aEEG for at least 6â¯h. The bedside neonatologist interpreted aEEG regarding background pattern, sleep-wake cycling, and seizures. The aEEG tracings were blindly reviewed by two neonatologists with different experience. The aEEG tracings were divided into periods of 0-3â¯h and 3-6â¯h of life, and the concordance (Cohen Kappa coefficient, k), between the two examiners and that of their consensus with the bedside neonatologist, was analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-five newborns were included, 5 of them were not aEEG-monitored. 132 tracings were analyzed with a very good concordance between the two examiners in the three characteristics of the aEEG. The k for the bedside neonatologist was very good for background pattern (kâ¯=â¯0.93), moderate (kâ¯=â¯0.52) for sleep-wake cycling, and weak (kâ¯=â¯0.32) for seizures. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that background pattern is easily interpreted compared to sleep-wake cycling or crisis, improving when targeted training on aEEG is received.
Assuntos
Asfixia Neonatal , Asfixia , Asfixia Neonatal/diagnóstico , Asfixia Neonatal/terapia , Eletroencefalografia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , ConvulsõesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a widely tool used for neuromonitoring in the critical neonate. In the patient with perinatal asphyxia, its interpretation is key to identifying candidates for therapeutic hypothermia, detecting subclinical seizures and providing pronostic information. Our aim was to analyze the concordance in the interpretation of aEEG among neonatologists with different level of experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Unicenter retrospective study of newborns ≥35 weeks with perinatal asphyxia included consecutively over a two-year period and monitored with aEEG for at least 6h. The bedside neonatologist interpreted aEEG regarding background pattern, sleep-wake cycling, and seizures. The aEEG tracings were blindly reviewed by two neonatologists with different experience. The aEEG tracings were divided into periods of 0-3h and 3-6h of life, and the concordance (Cohen Kappa coefficient, k), between the two examiners and that of their consensus with the bedside neonatologist, was analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-five newborns were included, 5 of them were not aEEG-monitored. 132 tracings were analyzed with a very good concordance between the two examiners in the three characteristics of the aEEG. The k for the bedside neonatologist was very good for background pattern (k=0.93), moderate (k=0.52) for sleep-wake cycling, and weak (k=0.32) for seizures. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports that background pattern is easily interpreted compared to sleep-wake cycling or crisis, improving when targeted training on aEEG is received.