Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0256352, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403456

RESUMO

Rapid tests for SARS-COV-2 infection are important tools for pandemic control, but current rapid tests are based on proprietary designs and reagents. We report clinical validation results of an open-access lateral flow assay (OA-LFA) design using commercially available materials and reagents, along with RT-qPCR and commercially available comparators (BinaxNOW® and Sofia®). Adult patients with suspected COVID-19 based on clinical signs and symptoms, and with symptoms ≤7 days duration, underwent anterior nares (AN) sampling for the OA-LFA, Sofia®, BinaxNOW ™, and RT-qPCR, along with nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-qPCR. Results indicate a positive predictive agreement with NP sampling as 69% (60% -78%) OA-LFA, 74% (64% - 82%) Sofia®, and 82% (73% - 88%) BinaxNOW™. The implication for these results is that we provide an open-access LFA design that meets the minimum WHO target product profile for a rapid test, that virtually any diagnostic manufacturer could produce.


Assuntos
Antígenos Virais/análise , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Imunoensaio , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , Área Sob a Curva , COVID-19/virologia , Humanos , Nasofaringe/virologia , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , RNA Viral/análise , RNA Viral/metabolismo , Curva ROC , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA