RESUMO
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a complex hematological malignancy characterized by diverse genetic alterations, each with distinct clinical implications. Chromosome 3 inversion (inv(3)) is a rare genetic anomaly found in approximately 1.4-1.6% of AML cases, which profoundly affects prognosis. This review explores the pathophysiology of inv(3) AML, focusing on fusion genes like GATA2::EVI1 or GATA2::MECOM. These genetic rearrangements disrupt critical cellular processes and lead to leukemia development. Current treatment modalities, including intensive chemotherapy (IC), hypomethylating agents (HMAs) combined with venetoclax, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation are discussed, highlighting outcomes achieved and their limitations. The review also addresses subgroups of inv(3) AML, describing additional mutations and their impact on treatment response. The poor prognosis associated with inv(3) AML underscores the urgent need to develop more potent therapies for this AML subtype. This comprehensive overview aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of inv(3) AML and guide future research and treatment strategies.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Although intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) remains the standard of care for younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), hypomethylating agents + venetoclax (HMA/VEN) can lead to durable remission among older patients with nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations. Whether IC or HMA/VEN is superior in patients aged ≥60 years with NPM1-mutant AML is unknown. We performed an international, multicenter retrospective cohort study of 221 patients (147 IC and 74 HMA/VEN) with previously untreated NPM1-mutant AML. Composite complete remission (cCR) (defined as CR + CR with incomplete count recovery) rate was similar for IC and HMA/VEN (cCR, 85% vs 74%; P = .067). Although overall survival (OS) was favorable with IC in unselected patients compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS, 59% [95% confidence interval (CI), 52-69%] vs 38% [95% CI, 27-55%]; P = .013), it was not statistically different among patients aged 60-75 years (60% [95% CI, 52-70%] vs 44% [95% CI, 29-66%]; P = .069) and patients who received an allogeneic stem cell transplant (70% [95% CI, 58-85%] vs 66% [95% CI, 44-100%]; P = .56). Subgroup analyses suggested that patients with normal cytogenetics (24-month OS, 65% [95% CI, 56-74%] with IC vs 40% [95% CI, 26-60%] with HMA/VEN; P = .009) and without FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations might benefit from IC compared with HMA/VEN (24-month OS, 68% [95% CI, 59-79%] vs 43% [95% CI, 29-63%]; P = .008). In multivariable analysis, OS was not statistically different between patients treated with IC and HMA/VEN (hazard ratio for death with HMA/VEN vs IC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.40-1.27; P = .25).