RESUMO
Objectives: To evaluate the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US) fusion biopsy in patients with biopsy-naïve men for varying prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Since MRI can efficiently detect csPCa compared to standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy; however, the optimal PSA threshold for its use is unclear. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed those who underwent MRI/US-fusion and standard biopsy from January 2016 to June 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: PSA <4, 4-10, >10 ng/mL. Propensity scoring was performed to balance the characteristics of the different biopsy groups, and the detection rate of csPCa was compared. Results: Data from a total of 670 males were included in the analysis (standard TRUS, n = 333; MRI/US fusion, n = 337). Prior to matching, patients who received MRI/US-fusion biopsy had lower prostate volume. Propensity score matching balanced this characteristic and generated a cohort comprising 195 patients from each group. In the matched cohort, patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL had a significantly increased risk of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion vs. standard biopsy (35.0% vs. 26.6%, P = 0.033). However, patients with PSA <4 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (12.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.342), whereas, patients with PSA >10 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (78.0% vs. 80.0%, P = 0.596). In multivariate logistic analysis among patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL, MRI/US-fusion biopsy (odds ratio: 2.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.31-4.60, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with a detection of csPCa. Conclusions: Detection of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion biopsy is more efficient in patients with biopsy-naïve men with PSA 4-10 ng/mL. However, standard TRUS biopsy may identify csPCa in patients with PSA <4 ng/mL and ≥10 ng/mL, emphasizing the importance of performing a standard biopsy in conjunction with MRI/US-fusion biopsy in such populations.
RESUMO
AIMS: To descriptively evaluate treatment persistence among adults who received mirabegron or antimuscarinics in South Korea. METHODS: This study involved a retrospective analysis of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) database. Patients (≥18 years) who had a new prescription for an overactive bladder (OAB) target medication (mirabegron/antimuscarinic) within an 8-month index period (July 1, 2015-February 29, 2016) were included. The date when the target (index) medication was dispensed was the index date. The 6-month period before the index date was used to assess patient eligibility. A 12-month post-index period was used to assess medication persistence, which was defined as the time to discontinuation. Overall data were analyzed and the results were also stratified by age group (≤65, >65 years), sex, or prior OAB medication experience. Persistence rates were calculated after the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months. RESULTS: A data set of 52 722 cases was obtained (mirabegron: 11 424, antimuscarinics: 41 298). The mean age was 60.9 ± 16.1 years and the majority of the patients were female (30 862 [58.5%] patients). Median persistence was longer with mirabegron (51 days) versus antimuscarinics (25 days). The persistence rate with mirabegron was higher throughout the study compared with all the antimuscarinics (12-month data: 13.5% and 4.9%, respectively). Longer treatment persistence was noted in older, male, and treatment-experienced patients. CONCLUSION: The results from the HIRA database showed that persistence was longer with mirabegron than with antimuscarinics in South Korea. This finding may help inform clinical decision-making within the South Korean healthcare system.