OCCULT AND SEMI-OCCULT CONSTIPATION IN CHILDREN WITH MONOSYMPTOMATIC OR NON MONOSYMPTOMATIC ENURESIS.

BACKGROUND: Functional constipation and enuresis frequently coexist. Constipation treatment often results in resolution or improvement of the enuresis. However, besides the classical presentation, patients can present with occult constipation (OC) diagnosed in complementary evaluation; in addition, semi-occult constipation (SOC) can be detected by means of a detailed questionnaire. OBJECTIVE: To quantify OC and SOC frequency in children with monosymptomatic or non monosymptomatic enuresis (MNE or NMNE). METHODS: Otherwise healthy children/adolescents, with enuresis refractory to behavioral therapy and denying constipation after simple questions, answered a structured bowel habit questionnaire and were submitted to a plain abdominal radiological exam. Constipation was classified considering the Boston diagnostic criteria (to allow diagnosis at initial stages), and fecal loading in the X-ray quantified ≥10 by the Barr score. Children with constipation received a standardized treatment (except 26 "pilot" children). RESULTS: Out of 81 children, 80 aged 9.34±2.07 years, 52.5% male, were diagnosed with constipation: 30 OC, 50 SOC; 63.75% had MNE, 36.25% NMNE (six NMNE without behavioral therapy). Demographic data and the Barr score were similar for OC and SOC, but SOC children experienced significantly more constipation complications (retentive fecal incontinence and/or recurrent abdominal pain). Not showing the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) to 24 "pilot" children, or absence of constipation symptoms accompanying BSS predominantly type 3, in 13 children, did not significantly impact the detection of constipation by the Barr score. Children identifying BSS 3 or ≤2 had similar results. Twenty-eight children, with adequate follow-up after treatment, improved or recovered from constipation at 44 of their 52 follow-up visits. CONCLUSION: In patients with MNE or NMNE refractory to behavioral therapy, and who initially denied constipation after simple questions, a detailed questionnaire based on the Boston diagnostic criteria detected SOC in 61.7%, and the radiological Barr score revealed fecal loading (OC) in 37.0% of them.

Constipação oculta e semi-oculta em crianças com enurese monossintomática ou não monossintomática / Occult and semi-occult constipation in children with monosymptomatic or non monosymptomatic enuresis

ABSTRACT Background: Functional constipation and enuresis frequently coexist. Constipation treatment often results in resolution or improvement of the enuresis. However, besides the classical presentation, patients can present with occult constipation (OC) diagnosed in complementary evaluation; in addition, semi-occult constipation (SOC) can be detected by means of a detailed questionnaire. Objective: To quantify OC and SOC frequency in children with monosymptomatic or non monosymptomatic enuresis (MNE or NMNE). Methods: Otherwise healthy children/adolescents, with enuresis refractory to behavioral therapy and denying constipation after simple questions, answered a structured bowel habit questionnaire and were submitted to a plain abdominal radiological exam. Constipation was classified considering the Boston diagnostic criteria (to allow diagnosis at initial stages), and fecal loading in the X-ray quantified ≥10 by the Barr score. Children with constipation received a standardized treatment (except 26 "pilot" children). Results: Out of 81 children, 80 aged 9.34±2.07 years, 52.5% male, were diagnosed with constipation: 30 OC, 50 SOC; 63.75% had MNE, 36.25% NMNE (six NMNE without behavioral therapy). Demographic data and the Barr score were similar for OC and SOC, but SOC children experienced significantly more constipation complications (retentive fecal incontinence and/or recurrent abdominal pain). Not showing the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) to 24 "pilot" children, or absence of constipation symptoms accompanying BSS predominantly type 3, in 13 children, did not significantly impact the detection of constipation by the Barr score. Children identifying BSS 3 or ≤2 had similar results. Twenty-eight children, with adequate follow-up after treatment, improved or recovered from constipation at 44 of their 52 follow-up visits. Conclusion: In patients with MNE or NMNE refractory to behavioral therapy, and who initially denied constipation after simple questions, a detailed questionnaire based on the Boston diagnostic criteria detected SOC in 61.7%, and the radiological Barr score revealed fecal loading (OC) in 37.0% of them.

RESUMO Contexto: Constipação funcional e enurese frequentemente coexistem. Tratamento da constipação geralmente resulta em cura ou melhora da enurese. Entretanto, além da apresentação clássica, pode ocorrer constipação oculta (CO), diagnosticada por exame subsidiário; ademais, ao aplicar questionário detalhado, pode-se detectar constipação semioculta (CSO). Objetivo: Obter as frequências de CO e CSO em crianças com enurese mono- ou não monossintomática (EMN ou ENMN). Métodos: Crianças/adolescentes saudáveis, exceto por enurese refratária à terapia comportamental, e que negavam constipação após perguntas simples, respondiam a questionário estruturado sobre hábito intestinal, e realizavam radiografia simples de abdômen. A constipação foi classificada considerando os critérios diagnósticos de Boston (que permitem diagnóstico em fases iniciais) e retenção fecal na radiografia quantificada ≥10 pelo escore de Barr. As crianças com constipação receberam tratamento padronizado (exceto 26 crianças "piloto"). Resultados: Das 81 crianças, 80 com idade 9,34±2,07 anos, 52,5% masculinas, foram diagnosticadas com constipação: 30 CO, 50 CSO; 63.75% tinham EMN, 36.25% ENMN (6 ENMN sem terapia comportamental). Os dados demográficos e o escore de Barr foram semelhantes para CO e CSO, mas as crianças com CSO apresentaram significativamente mais complicações de constipação (incontinência fecal retentiva e/ou dor abdominal recorrente). A não apresentação da Escala Fecal de Bristol (EFB) para 24 crianças "piloto", ou ausência de sintomas de constipação acompanhando EFB predominantemente do tipo 3, em 13 crianças, não teve impacto significativo na detecção de constipação pelo escore de Barr. Crianças que identificaram EFB 3 ou ≤2 tiveram resultados semelhantes. Vinte e oito crianças, com acompanhamento adequado após o tratamento, melhoraram ou se recuperaram da constipação em 44 de seus 52 retornos. Conclusão: Em pacientes com EMN ou ENMN refratária à terapia comportamental, e que inicialmente negavam constipação após perguntas simples, questionário baseado nos critérios diagnósticos de Boston detectou CSO em 61.7%, e o escore radiológico de Barr revelou retenção fecal (CO) em 37% deles.

EMG biofeedback or parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction: A prospective and randomized trial.

AIMS: Evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback and parassacral electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of children with lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction. METHODS: A prospective, randomized study was approved by our Hospital Ethics Committee. We enrolled 64 children, 43 girls and 21 boys, average age of 9.39 years. The initial evaluation consisted of history, physical examination, urine analyses, voiding diary, uroflow, and ultrasound. Dysfunction voiding symptom score (DVSS) questionnaires were applied pre- and post-treatment. The children were divided into two treatment groups independent of the predominant type of voiding dysfunction (dysfunctional or overactive bladder): biofeedback group and TENS group. The criteria for assessing the effectiveness of the techniques was the resolution of daytime and nighttime symptoms including urinary leakage, improvements in voiding diary, DVSS, and changes in uroflow. After 6 months, the children were reassessed with the same work-up of baseline. RESULTS: Regarding daytime symptoms, results for complete response were similar between the two groups (P = 0.483); 54.9% of children treated by the biofeedback group and 60.6% in the TENS group. The same have been observed in the nighttime incontinence with complete resolutions in 29.6% and 25%, respectively ( P = 0.461). Analyzing the voiding diary, uroflow and DVSS questionnaires both groups had significant improvement ( P = 0.001) after treatment. The biofeedback group required fewer sessions than TENS group, 10.9 and 18.1, respectively ( P < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: Both biofeedback and the TENS are equally effective for treating non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction. Biofeedback seems to require a lower number of sessions to obtain similar results of the TENS.