Is chemotherapy always required for cancer in pregnancy? An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer in pregnancy is relatively rare, but the incidence is increasing. Several studies show that cytotoxic agents are safe to use in pregnancy from the second trimester onwards. AIMS: This study assesses the maternal and foetal outcomes of cancers diagnosed during pregnancy. In particular, it focuses on a subset of women who elected to defer systemic chemotherapy until after delivery. This study examines if all cancers need to be treated during pregnancy or if, in certain cases, treatment can be safely deferred until after full-term delivery. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy in an Irish cancer centre over a 27-year period. All women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy who were referred to the medical oncology department for consideration of chemotherapy were included in this study. Medical and pharmacy records were extensively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-five women were diagnosed with cancer in pregnancy and referred to medical oncology for consideration of systemic chemotherapy. Sixteen women (64%) commenced chemotherapy during pregnancy, seven women (28%) did not receive chemotherapy while pregnant, but commenced treatment immediately after delivery, and two (8%) did not receive any systemic chemotherapy at all. Of the seven women who commenced chemotherapy after delivery, six (85.7%) were diagnosed before 30/40 gestation. There were three cases of Hodgkin's lymphoma, two breast cancers and one ovarian cancer. After a median follow-up of 12 years, all six mothers remain disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a select cohort of patients that did not receive chemotherapy during pregnancy. There were no adverse outcomes to mothers due to delayed treatment.

Perioperative chemotherapy in the treatment of osteosarcoma: a 26-year single institution review.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy in the multimodality treatment of osteosarcoma has improved survival. Reported outcomes on adult patients are limited. Poor necrosis rates post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is considered an adverse prognostic factor and attempts have been made to improve survival in this group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult and young adult patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma between January 1986 and August 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients identified were stratified according to stage (localised or metastatic) and age (≤40 and >40 years). Event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were determined. In patients with localised disease ≤40 years, survival was assessed according to necrosis rates post NAC (<90 and ≥90%). NAC consisted of two cycles of methotrexate alternating with doxorubicin/cisplatin (MAP) followed by definitive surgery. Those with ≥90% tumour necrosis continued on MAP. Patients with <90% necrosis received ifosfamide and etoposide (IE) post operatively. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were reviewed and 97 were included. Median age was 23 years (range 16-75) and 70% of patients were male. Five year EFS and OS across all groups was 57% and 63% respectively. Of the patients with localised disease (N = 81), 5-year overall survival (OS), with a median follow up of 7 years (2-26) was 70% (p < 0.0001). Patients aged 16-40 (N = 68) with localised osteosarcoma had a significantly improved 5-year OS (74%) compared to those >40 years (N = 13) (42%) (p = 0.004). Of the 68 patients with localised osteosarcoma ≤40 years, 62 were evaluated according to necrosis rates post MAP. In 33 patients who achieved ≥90% necrosis and continued MAP, 5-year OS was 82%. In 29 patients who had <90% tumour necrosis and received adjuvant IE, 5-year OS was 68% (p = 0.15). Multivariate analysis confirmed age and stage as prognostic factors but not poor necrosis rates in our treated population. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival outcomes in a predominantly adult Irish population are similar to large reported trials. Age and stage at diagnosis are prognostic. Postoperative ifosfamide/etoposide alone in patients with poor necrosis rates is a feasible regimen, but its role in the adjuvant setting remains uncertain.

Biological subtypes of breast cancer: current concepts and implications for recurrence patterns.

Breast cancer is comprised of a number of complex and heterogeneous subtypes with differing clinical behavior and outcomes. In recent years, significant advances have been made in discerning the molecular drivers of this disease, and characterizing distinct subtypes of breast cancer based on gene expression profiles. These advances have begun to translate into greater individualization of treatment for patients. Although these advances have shaped our understanding of the underlying biology of breast cancer, most clinical decisions are currently based on tumor expression of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). These biomarkers have prognostic and predictive significance in breast cancer and have important implications for tumor growth and metastatic patterns. In this review, we focus on the three broad phenotypes of breast cancer used in clinical practice; ER/PR positive, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is characterized by lack of expression of ER, PR and HER2. We discuss the influence of these tumor-related factors as well as histological subtype, on the potential for breast cancer recurrence and patterns of disease spread.