Expert Perspectives on Controversies in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Management: Narrative Review and Report of the First US Prostate Cancer Conference Part 2.

Background: Management strategies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have rapidly shifted in recent years. As novel imaging and therapeutic approaches have made their way to the clinic, providers are encountering increasingly challenging clinical scenarios, with limited guidance from the current literature. Materials and Methods: The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) is a multidisciplinary meeting of prostate cancer experts intended to address the many challenges of prostate cancer management. At the first annual USPCC meeting, areas of controversy and consensus were identified during a 2-day meeting that included expert presentations, full-panel discussions, and postdiscussion responses to questions developed by the USPCC cochairs and session moderators. Results: This narrative review covers the USPCC expert discussion and perspectives relevant to mCRPC, including neuroendocrine/aggressive-variant prostate cancer (NEPC/AVPC). Areas of broad agreement identified among USPCC experts include the benefits of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, the use of radioligand therapy in patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive mCRPC, and the need for clinical trials that address real-world clinical questions, including the performance of novel therapies when compared with modern standard-of-care treatment. Ongoing areas of controversy and uncertainty included the appropriateness of PARP inhibitors in patients with non-BRCA1/2 mutations, the optimal definition of PSMA positivity, and systemic therapies for patients with NEPC/AVPC after progression on platinum-based therapies. Conclusions: The first annual USPCC meeting identified several areas of controversy in the management of mCRPC, highlighting the urgent need for clinical trials designed to facilitate treatment selection and sequencing in this heterogeneous disease state.

Expert Perspectives on Controversies in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Management: Narrative Review and Report of the First US Prostate Cancer Conference Part 1.

Purpose: Castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) is a complex and heterogeneous condition encompassing a range of clinical presentations. As new approaches have expanded management options, clinicians are left with myriad questions and controversies regarding the optimal individualized management of CSPC. Materials and Methods: The US Prostate Cancer Conference (USPCC) multidisciplinary panel was assembled to address the challenges of prostate cancer management. The first annual USPCC meeting included experts in urology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine. USPCC co-chairs and session moderators identified key areas of controversy and uncertainty in prostate cancer management and organized the sessions with multidisciplinary presentations and discussion. Throughout the meeting, experts responded to questions prepared by chairs and moderators to identify areas of agreement and controversy. Results: The USPCC panel discussion and question responses for CSPC-related topics are presented. Key advances in CSPC management endorsed by USPCC experts included the development and clinical utilization of gene expression classifiers and artificial intelligence (AI) models for risk stratification and treatment selection in specific patient populations, the use of advanced imaging modalities in patients with clinically localized unfavorable intermediate or high-risk disease and those with biochemical recurrence, recommendations of doublet or triplet therapy for metastatic CSPC (mCSPC), and consideration of prostate and/or metastasis-directed radiation therapy in select patients with mCSPC. Conclusions: CSPC is a diverse disease with many therapeutic options and the potential for adverse outcomes associated with either undertreatment or overtreatment. Future studies are needed to validate and clinically integrate novel technologies, including genomics, AI, and advanced imaging, to optimize outcomes among patients with CSPC.

Beyond PI-RADS: Combining MRI PI-RADS and PSMA-PET/CT PRIMARY Score in a Composite (P) Score for More Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The PI-RADS score is standard of care for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis. The PRIMARY-score (PSMA-PET/CT) also has high diagnostic accuracy for csPCa. This study aimed to develop an easily calculated combined (P) score for csPCa detection (ISUP ≥ 2) incorporating separately read PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores, with external validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two datasets of men with suspected PCa, no prior biopsy, recent MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT, and subsequent trans-perineal biopsy were evaluated. The development sample (n = 291, 56% csPCa) a prospective trial and the validation sample (n = 227, 67% csPCa) a multi-centre retrospective database. Primary outcome was detection of csPCa (ISUP ≥ 2), with ISUP ≥ 3 cancer detection a secondary outcome. Score performance was evaluated by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: The 5-point combined (P) score was developed in a prospective dataset. In the validation dataset, csPCa was identified in 0%, 20%, 52%, 96% and 100% for P score 1 to 5. The AUC was 0.93 (95%CI: 0.90-0.96), higher than PI-RADS 0.89 (95%CI: 0.85-0.93, P = .039) and PRIMARY score alone 0.84 (95%CI: 0.79-0.89, P < .001). Splitting scores at 1/2 (negative) vs 3/4/5 (positive), P score sensitivity was 94% (95%CI: 89-97) compared to PI-RADS 89% (95%CI: 83-93) and PRIMARY score 86% (95%CI: 79-91). For ISUP ≥ 3, P score sensitivity was 99% (95%CI: 95-100) vs 94% (95%CI: 88-98) and 92% (95%CI: 85-97) for PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores respectively. An SUVmax > 12 (P score 5) was ISUP ≥ 2 in all cases with 93% ISUP ≥ 3. CONCLUSIONS: The P-score is easily calculated and improves accuracy for csPCa over both PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores. It should be considered when PSMA-PET is undertaken for diagnosis.

FAPI PET uptake patterns after invasive medical interventions: a single center retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-inhibitor (FAPI)-PET tracers allow imaging of the FAP-expressing cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF) and also the normal activated fibroblasts (NAF) involved in inflammation/fibrosis that may be present after invasive medical interventions. We evaluated [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake patterns post-medical/invasive non-systemic interventions. METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis was conducted in 79 consecutive patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. Investigators reviewed prior patient medical/invasive interventions (surgery, endoscopy, biopsy, radiotherapy, foreign body placement (FBP) defined as implanted medical/surgical material present at time of scan) and characterized the anatomically corresponding FAPI uptake intensity both visually (positive if above surrounding background) and quantitatively (SUVmax). Interventions with missing data/images or confounders of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake (partial volume effect, other cause of increased uptake) were excluded. Available correlative FDG, DOTATATE and PSMA PET/CTs were analyzed when available. RESULTS: 163 medical/invasive interventions (mostly surgeries (49%), endoscopies (18%) and non-surgical biopsies (10%)) in 60 subjects were included for analysis. 43/163 (26%) involved FBP. FAPI uptake occurred in 24/163 (15%) of interventions (average SUVmax 3.2 (mild), range 1.5-5.1). The median time-interval post-intervention to FAPI-PET was 47.5 months and was shorter when FAPI uptake was present (median 9.5 months) than when absent (median 60.1 months; p = 0.001). Cut-off time beyond which no FAPI uptake would be present post-intervention without FBP was 8.2 months, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 82, 90, 99 and 31% respectively. No optimal cutoff point could be determined when considering interventions with FBP. No significant difference was detected between frequency of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 and [18F]FDG uptake in intervention sites. Compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 revealed more frequent and intense post-interventional tracer uptake. CONCLUSION: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake from medical/invasive interventions without FBP appears to be time dependent, nearly always absent beyond 8 months post-intervention, but frequently present for years with FBP.

Randomized Trial of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Before Definitive Radiotherapy for Unfavorable Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer (PSMA-dRT Trial).

This multicenter randomized phase III trial (NCT04457245) evaluated the effect of performing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT before definitive radiotherapy. Methods: Men with unfavorable intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer were randomized 1.08:1 between receiving and not receiving a PSMA PET/CT scan before definitive radiotherapy. All other imaging modalities were allowed in the control arm. The primary endpoint was 5-y progression-free survival. Results: Fifty-four men were randomized between November 2020 and December 2021 (PSMA PET/CT, n = 25; control, n = 29). The trial closed early after approval and insurance coverage of PSMA PET/CT. In the PSMA PET/CT arm, 14 patients had localized disease (miT2b-cN0M0), 6 had locally advanced disease (miT3a-bN0M0), 3 had regional metastasis (miN1M0), and 1 had distant metastasis (miM1b). Four patients were upstaged. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT upstaged 17% of patients, which allowed for more accurate radiotherapy planning. Unfortunately, this trial closed early before completion of target enrollment (54/316, 17%) and was underpowered to assess the effect of PSMA PET/CT on progression-free survival.

RECIP 1.0 Predicts Progression-Free Survival After [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Response Evaluation Criteria in Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Imaging (RECIP) 1.0 is an evidence-based framework to evaluate therapeutic efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of interim PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 with short-term outcome after radiopharmaceutical treatment. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy at 3 academic centers and received PSMA PET/CT at baseline and at 12 wk. Pairs of PSMA PET/CT images were assessed by 5 readers for visual RECIP 1.0. The primary outcome was the association of RECIP with prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: In total, 124 of 287 screened patients met the inclusion criteria, with 0 (0%), 29 (23%), 54 (44%), and 41 (33%) of those 124 patients having complete response, partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease (PD) by visual RECIP 1.0, respectively. Patients with visual RECIP PD had a significantly shorter PSA-PFS than those with RECIP stable disease or with RECIP partial response (2.6 vs. 6.4 vs. 8.4 mo; P < 0.001). The median PSA-PFS among patients with RECIP PD versus those with non-RECIP PD was 2.6 versus 7.2 mo (hazard ratio, 13.0; 95% CI, 7.0-24.1; P < 0.001). Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 after 2 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA is prognostic for PSA-PFS. PSMA PET/CT by RECIP 1.0 may be used in earlier stages of prostate cancer to evaluate drug efficacy and to predict progression-free survival.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-detected Disease Extent and Overall Survival of Patients with High-risk Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: An International Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Previously, we demonstrated that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) revealed distant metastases in 109/200 patients (39% distant nodes, 24% bone, and 6% visceral organ) with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and high-risk features (International Society of Urological Pathology score ≥4 and/or prostate-specific antigen doubling time ≤10 mo) without metastases by conventional imaging. However, the impact of disease extent determined by PSMA-PET on patient outcomes is unknown. We followed these 200 patients for a median of 43 mo after PSMA-PET and retrospectively assessed the association between patient characteristics, PSMA-PET findings, treatment management, and outcomes using a Kaplan-Meier model and Cox multivariable regressions. Among assessed disease characteristics, polymetastatic disease (five or more distant lesions on PET) was independently associated with shorter overall survival (OS; median 61 mo vs not reached; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.81 [1.00-3.27]; p = 0.050) and time to new metastases (median 38 vs 60 mo; 1.80 [1.10-2.96]; p = 0.019), and initial pN1 status with shorter OS (55 mo vs not reached; 1.94 [1.12-3.37]; p = 0.019). Following PSMA-PET, locoregional salvage therapies were used most commonly in no/local disease (58%), and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors were used in distant metastatic disease (51%). PSMA-PET provides additional risk stratification for patients with nmCRPC. Polymetastatic disease (five or more distant lesions) is associated with worse outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: A novel sensitive imaging technology, called prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET), allows doctors to detect the spread of prostate cancer, known as distant metastases, earlier and more accurately than in the past. In our study, PSMA-PET detected none to many metastases in patients who were considered free of distant metastasis by conventional imaging. These findings predicted outcomes and were used to select appropriate treatment.

Systemic and Tumor-directed Therapy for Oligorecurrent Metastatic Prostate Cancer (SATURN): Primary Endpoint Results from a Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Nearly all men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) experience recurrence within 6 mo of testosterone recovery. We conducted a single-arm phase 2 trial to evaluate whether addition of dual androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to intermittent ADT improves recurrence rates for men with between one and five nonvisceral, extrapelvic metastases on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography after prior radical prostatectomy. Patients received 6 mo of androgen annihilation therapy (AAT; leuprolide, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone, and apalutamide) and metastasis-directed SBRT. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <0.05 ng/ml 6 mo after testosterone recovery (≥150 ng/dl), with the study powered to detect an improvement from 1% to 12%. We enrolled 28 men between March 2021 and June 2022. Median follow-up was 20 mo (interquartile range 16-22). Twenty-six patients (93%) completed SBRT with 6 mo of hormone therapy, of whom six discontinued at least one ARPI; two patients withdrew prematurely. At 6 mo after testosterone recovery, PSA was maintained at <0.05 ng/ml in 13/26 patients (50%, 95% confidence interval 32-67%). Rates of grade 2 and 3 AAT toxicity were 21% and 21%. The results confirm that addition of metastasis-directed SBRT to highly potent systemic therapy can maintain low PSA after testosterone recovery, although further studies are needed to clarify the optimal systemic therapy regimen. PATIENT SUMMARY: We tested a combination of intensified hormone therapy (called androgen annihilation therapy) and radiotherapy targeted at metastases in men with recurrence of metastatic prostate cancer. We found that half of patients were recurrence-free 6 months after their testosterone level recovered, and that less than a quarter of patients experienced a severe drug-related side effect. Overall, this appears to be an effective therapy with acceptable side effects. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03902951.

The Potential Contribution of Radiopharmaceutical Therapies in Managing Oligometastatic Disease.

There is a growing understanding of the oligometastatic disease state, characterized by the presence of 5 or fewer lesions. Advanced molecular imaging techniques, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen PET, refines the ability to detect oligometastatic recurrences (oligorecurrences) early. These developments have led to the exploration of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligorecurrent disease as an alternative to or as a means of delaying systemic therapy. Unfortunately, MDT often does not provide a durable cure, and progression-particularly progression in multiple new areas-remains a concern. Simultaneously, developments in radioligand therapy (RLT) have led to studies showing overall survival benefits with α-emitting and ß-emitting RLT in advanced, high-volume, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The success of RLT in late-stage disease suggests that earlier use in the disease spectrum may be impactful. Specifically, integration of RLT with MDT might reduce progression, including polymetastatic progression, in the setting of oligorecurrent disease.

Impact of PSMA PET on Prostate Cancer Management.

OPINION STATEMENT: PSMA-PET has been a practice-changing imaging biomarker for the management of men with PCa. Research suggests improved accuracy over conventional imaging and other PET radiotracers in many contexts. With multiple approved PSMA-targeting radiotracers, PSMA PET will become even more available in clinical practice. Its increased use requires an understanding of the prospective data available and caution when extrapolating from prior trial data that utilized other imaging modalities. Future trials leveraging PSMA PET for treatment optimization and management decision-making will ultimately drive its clinical utility.

Differences and Common Ground in 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Practice Patterns: International Survey of 95 Theranostic Centers.

177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy effectively treats metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients requiring treatment, and consequently the number of theranostic centers, are expected to increase significantly after Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval. This requires standardization or harmonization among theranostic centers. The aim of this study was to assess operational differences and similarities among 177Lu-PSMA treatment centers. Methods: A questionnaire comprising 62 items, designed by a core team of 5 physicians and externally reviewed by international experts, was developed. Study participants were asked to provide answers about their center, patient selection, radiopharmaceuticals, clinical assessment before and after 177Lu-PSMA treatments, laboratory values, treatment discontinuation, posttreatment imaging, and general information. An invitation e-mail to participate in the study was sent in June 2022. Duplicates were removed to allow for only one valid response per center. Results: Ninety-five of 211 (45%) contacted centers completed the questionnaire. Most participating centers were in Europe (51%), followed by America (22%) and Asia (22%). During the 12 mo before this study, a total of 5,906 patients received 177Lu-PSMA therapy at the 95 participating centers. Most of these patients were treated in Europe (2,840/5,906; 48%), followed by Asia (1,313/5,906; 22%) and Oceania (1,225/5,906; 21%). PSMA PET eligibility for 177Lu-PSMA was determined most frequently using 68Ga-PSMA-11 (77%). Additional pretherapy imaging included 18F-FDG PET/CT, CT, renal scintigraphy, and bone scintigraphy at 41 (49%), 27 (32%), 25 (30%), and 13 (15%), respectively, of the 84 centers for clinical standard of care, compassionate care, or local research protocols and 11 (26%), 25 (60%), 9 (21%), and 28 (67%), respectively, of the 42 centers for industry-sponsored trials. PSMA PET eligibility criteria included subjective qualitative assessment of PSMA positivity at 33% of centers, VISION criteria at 23%, and TheraP criteria at 13%. The mean standard injected activity per cycle was 7.3 GBq (range, 5.5-11.1 GBq). Sixty-two (65%) centers applied standardized response assessment criteria, and PSMA PET Progression Criteria were the most applied (37%). Conclusion: Results from this international survey revealed interinstitutional differences in several aspects of 177Lu-PSMA radionuclide therapy, including patient selection, administered activity, and the response assessment strategy. Standardization or harmonization of protocols and dedicated training are desirable in anticipation of increasing numbers of patients and theranostic centers.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen: Gateway to Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as a transmembrane protein is overexpressed by prostate cancer (PC) cells and is accessible for binding antibodies or low-molecular-weight radioligands due to its extracellular portion. Successful targeting of PSMA began with the development of humanized J591 antibody. Due to their faster clearance compared to antibodies, small-molecule radioligands for targeted imaging and therapy of PC have been favored in recent development efforts. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has higher diagnostic performance than conventional imaging for initial staging of high-risk PC and biochemical recurrence detection/localization. However, it remains to be demonstrated how to integrate PSMA PET imaging for therapy response assessment and as an outcome endpoint measure in clinical trials. With the recent approval of 177Lu-PSMA-617 by the US Food and Drug Administration for metastatic castration-resistant PC progressing after chemotherapy, the high value of PSMA-targeted therapy was confirmed. Compared to standard of care, PSMA-based radioligand therapy led to a better outcome and a higher quality of life. This review, focusing on the advanced PC setting, provides an overview of different approved and nonapproved PSMA-targeted imaging and therapeutic modalities and discusses the future of PSMA-targeted theranostics, also with an outlook on non-radiopharmaceutical-based PSMA-targeted therapies.

Impact of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography on Prostate Cancer Salvage Radiotherapy Management: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Phase 3 Trial (PSMA-SRT NCT03582774).

BACKGROUND: Both imaging and several prognostic factors inform the planning of salvage radiotherapy (SRT). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) can localize disease unseen by other imaging modalities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of PSMA-PET on biochemical recurrence-free survival rate after SRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective randomized, controlled, phase 3 clinical trial randomized 193 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy to proceed with SRT (control arm, n = 90) or undergo a PSMA-PET/computed tomography (CT) scan prior to SRT planning (investigational arm, n = 103) from June 2018 to August 2020. Any other approved imaging modalities were allowed in both arms (including fluciclovine-PET). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: This is a secondary endpoint analysis: impact of PSMA-PET on SRT planning. Case-report forms were sent to referring radiation oncologists to collect the management plans before randomization and after completion of SRT. The relative frequency (%) of management changes within each arm were compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The delivered SRT plan was available in 178/193 patients (92.2%; 76/90 control [84.4%] and 102/103 PSMA-PET [99%]). Median prostate-specific antigen levels at enrollment was 0.30 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 0.19-0.91) in the control arm and 0.23 ng/ml (IQR 0.15-0.54) in the PSMA-PET arm. Fluciclovine-PET was used in 33/76 (43%) in the control arm. PSMA-PET localized recurrence(s) in 38/102 (37%): nine of 102 (9%) outside of the pelvis (M1), 16/102 (16%) in the pelvic LNs (N1, with or without local recurrence), and 13/102 (13%) in the prostate fossa only. There was a 23% difference (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-35%, p = 0.002) of frequency of major changes between the control arm (22% [17/76]) and the PSMA-PET intervention arm (45% [46/102]). Of the major changes in the intervention group, 33/46 (72%) were deemed related to PSMA-PET. There was a 17.6% difference (95% CI 5.4-28.5%, p = 0.005) of treatment escalation frequency between the control arm (nine of 76 [12%]) and the intervention arm (30/102 [29%]). Treatment de-escalation occurred in the control and intervention arms in eight of 76 (10.5%) and 12/102 (11.8%) patients, and mixed changes in zero of 76 (0%) and four of 102 (3.9%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized phase 3 study, PSMA-PET findings provided information that initiated major management changes to SRT planning in 33/102 (33%) patients. The final readout of the primary endpoint planned in 2025 may provide evidence on whether these changes result in improved outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography leads to management changes in one-third of patients receiving salvage radiotherapy for post-radical prostatectomy biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Reproducibility and Accuracy of the PRIMARY Score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Within a Real-World Database.

The PRIMARY score is a 5-category scale developed to identify clinically significant intraprostate malignancy (csPCa) on 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA PET) using a combination of anatomic site, pattern, and intensity. Developed within the PRIMARY trial, the score requires evaluation in external datasets. This study aimed to assess the reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of the PRIMARY score in a cohort of patients who underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and 68Ga-PSMA PET before prostate biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods: In total, data from 242 men who had undergone 68Ga-PSMA PET and mpMRI before transperineal prostate biopsy were available for this ethics-approved retrospective study. 68Ga-PSMA PET and mpMRI data were centrally collated in a cloud-based deidentified image database. Six experienced prostate-focused nuclear medicine specialists were trained (1 h) in applying the PRIMARY score with 30 sample images. Six radiologists experienced in prostate mpMRI read images as per the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), version 2.1. All images were read (with masking of clinical information) at least twice, with discordant findings sent to a masked third (or fourth) reader as necessary. Cohen κ was determined for both imaging scales as 5 categories and then collapsed to binary (negative and positive) categories (score 1 or 2 vs. 3, 4, or 5). Diagnostic performance parameters were calculated, with an International Society of Urological Pathology grade group of at least 2 (csPCa) on biopsy defined as the gold standard. Combined-imaging-positive results were defined as any PI-RADS score of 4 or 5 or as a PI-RADS score of 1-3 with a PRIMARY score of 3-5. Results: In total, 227 patients with histopathology, 68Ga-PSMA PET, and mpMRI imaging before prostate biopsy were included; 33% had no csPCa, and 67% had csPCa. Overall interrater reliability was higher for the PRIMARY scale (κ = 0.70) than for PI-RADS (κ = 0.58) when assessed as a binary category (benign vs. malignant). This was similar for all 5 categories (κ = 0.65 vs. 0.48). Diagnostic performance to detect csPCa was comparable between PSMA PET and mpMRI (sensitivity, 86% vs. 89%; specificity, 76% vs. 74%; positive predictive value, 88% vs. 88%; negative predictive value, 72% vs. 76%). Using combined imaging, sensitivity was 94%, specificity was 68%, positive predictive value was 86%, and negative predictive value was 85%. Conclusion: The PRIMARY score applied by first-user nuclear medicine specialists showed substantial interrater reproducibility, exceeding that of PI-RADS applied by mpMRI-experienced radiologists. Diagnostic performance was similar between the 2 modalities. The PRIMARY score should be considered when interpreting intraprostatic PSMA PET images.

Characterizing Normal Variant [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 Uptake in the Epididymis.

The biodistribution of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET tracers includes the kidneys, bladder, uterus, breast, muscles, and bone marrow. We describe its occasional uptake patterns in the epididymis. Methods: Epididymal [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake was retrospectively analyzed in 55 PET/CT studies of 55 men. Uptake intensity (SUV), pattern (diffuse, focal, or multifocal), laterality, and location (epididymal head with or without body/tail) were analyzed. Electronic medical records were reviewed to determine the presence of epididymis-related disease. Results: Epididymal [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake was observed in 8 of 55 (15%) subjects, with bilateral epididymal head uptake in all cases and epididymal body/tail uptake in 6 of 8 (75%) cases, 5 of 6 (83%) bilaterally and 1 of 6 (17%) unilaterally. The average SUVmax was greater in the epididymal heads than in the epididymal bodies/tails, with an SUVmax of 4.1 versus 3.0 (P < 0.001). No subject had epididymal disease related to the uptake. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 uptake in the epididymis occurs occasionally and does not appear related to epididymal disease.

ACR-ACNM-ARS-ASTRO-SNMMI Practice Parameter for the Performance of Therapy With Radiopharmaceuticals.

OBJECTIVES: This practice parameter was revised collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American College of Nuclear Medicine, the American Radium Society, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. The document is intended to serve as a resource for appropriately trained and licensed physicians who perform therapeutic procedures with unsealed sources, referred to in the document using the more inclusive terminology of radiopharmaceuticals, for which a written directive is required for authorized users under NRC 10 CFR 35.300. METHODS: This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards ) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology in collaboration with the American Radium Society. RESULTS: This practice parameter addresses the overall role of the applicable physician-authorized user, Qualified Medical Physicist, and other specialized personnel involved in the delivery of radiopharmaceutical therapy. Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals include those administered as elemental radioactive isotopes (radionuclides) or the radioactive element incorporated into a targeting molecule (ligand) by one or more chemical bonds. This document provides guidance regarding general principles of radionuclide therapies and indications of various alpha, beta, gamma, and mixed emission agents with references to several recent practice parameters on new and commonly performed radiopharmaceutical therapies. CONCLUSION: This document addresses clinical circumstances, elements of available agents, and the qualifications and responsibilities of various members of the radiation care team, specifications of consultation and other clinical documentation, post-therapy follow-up, radiation safety precautions, elements of quality control and improvement programs, infection control, and patient education to ensure optimal patient care and safety when utilizing radiopharmaceuticals.

Associations of quantitative whole-body PSMA-PET metrics with PSA progression status under long-term androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether quantitative whole-body (WB) PSMA-PET metrics under long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) are associated with PSA progression. METHODS: Patients who underwent at least 2 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans between October 2016 and April 2021 (n = 372) and started a new line of ADT ± ARSi between PET1 and PET2 were retrospectively screened for inclusion. We investigated the association between PCWG3-defined PSA progression status at PET2 and the following PSMA-PET parameters: appearance of new lesions on PET2, ≥ 20% increase in WB-PSMA tumor volume (WB-PSMA-VOL), progression of disease (PD) by RECIP 1.0, and ≥ 30% increase in WB-PSMA-SUVmean from PET1 to PET2. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the associations. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included: 12/35 (34%) were treated with ADT only and 23/35 (66%) with ARSi ± ADT. The median time between PET1 and PET2 was 539 days. Changes (%) in median PSA levels, WB-PSMA-SUVmean, and WB-PSMA-VOL from PET1 to PET2 were -86%, -23%, and -86%, respectively. WB-PSMA-VOL ≥ 20%, new lesions, RECIP-PD, and WB-PSMA-SUVmean ≥ 30% were observed in 5/35 (14%), 9/35 (26%), 5/35 (14%), and 4/35 (11%) of the whole cohort, in 3/9 (33%), 7/9 (78%), 3/9 (33%), and 2/9 (22%) of patients with PSA progression at PET2, and in 2/26 (8%), 2/26 (8%), 2/26 (8%), and 2/26 (8%) of patients without PSA progression at PET2 (p = 0.058, p < 0.001, p = 0.058, p = 0.238, respectively). Changes in PSA were correlated to percent changes in WB-PSMA-VOL and WB-PSMA-SUVmean (Spearman ρ: 0.765 and 0.633, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Changes in PSA correlated with changes observed on PSMA-PET, although discordance between PSA and PSMA-PET changes was observed. Further research is necessary to evaluate if PSMA-PET parameters can predict progression-free survival and overall survival and serve as novel endpoints in clinical trials.