Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Update.

Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is a potentially serious and life-threatening complication of SLE. The presentation and severity of neuropsychiatric involvement in SLE may show considerable variability. The disease can affect the neural tissue directly or may be associated with vascular involvement, mainly associated with anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies. A direct causal link with SLE may sometimes be challenging since there are many confounding factors and the symptoms may be non-specific. Despite its remarkable sensitivity in detecting hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, transverse myelitis and ischemic infarction, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lacks the spatial resolution required to identify microvascular involvement. When standard MRI fails to detect a suspicious lesion, it is advisable to use advanced imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or quantitative MRI, if available. Even with these advanced modalities, the specificity of neuroimaging in NPSLE remains inadequate (60-82% for MRI). Neuropsychiatric syndromes, such as cerebrovascular events, seizures and cognitive impairments appear to be associated with serum aPL antibodies. Some studies have shown that anti-ribosomal P antibodies have a low sensitivity for NPSLE and a limited contribution to the differentiation of different clinical entities. Treatment has two main goals: symptomatic relief and treatment of the disease itself. Commonly used immunosuppressants for NPSLE include cyclophosphamide (CYC), azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). According to EULAR's current recommendation, strong immunosuppressants such as CYC and rituximab (RTX) should be preferred. Biologics have also been used in NPSLE. Fingolimod, eculizumab, and JAK inhibitors are potential drugs in the pipeline. Developing targeted therapies will be possible by a better understanding of the pathological mechanisms.

Transitioning from pediatric to adult-oriented healthcare in rheumatology: the pediatric side of the coin.

OBJECTIVES: The transition of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) from pediatric to adult-oriented healthcare may be affected by many factors, including the personal and cultural settings. We aimed to analyze the transition readiness and the factors affecting the transition success in rheumatology. METHODS: Patients older than 12 years were included in this prospective study. All filled out the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) 5.0. AYAs were phone-interviewed after their transfer to adult-oriented healthcare. Drug adherence was evaluated with 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4). AYAs rated their transitional care experience with visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10; 0, the worst; 10, the best). RESULTS: A total of 504 TRAQs were filled out by 406 patients (F/M = 1.5). The total TRAQ score was positively correlated with age and higher in the forms filled out by girls than boys (4.2 vs 4.0, respectively; p= 0.005). The transition was successful for 78 (83.9%) out of 93 patients transferred to adult-oriented healthcare. The VAS for the transition process was lower and the post-transfer MMAS-4 score was worse (8 vs 9, p= 0.030 and 3 vs 4, p= 0.020; respectively) in patients whose transition was not successful when compared with the successfully-transitioned ones. The best-performing TRAQ cut-off value was >4.0 for predicting transfer readiness in rheumatology. CONCLUSION: A TRAQ score of > 4 could be used while deciding about the transfer readiness of AYAs in rheumatology. Improving the AYAs' experience of the transition process and closely monitoring medication adherence during transition are essential for a successful transition.

Factors determining resistance to conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Our study was designed to investigate the reasons for starting the conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and the variables that impact the response to DMARD treatment in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. METHODS: Oligoarticular JIA patients (n = 187) were categorized into two groups: Group A consisted of patients who achieved remission with DMARD, and Group B comprised those who did not respond to DMARD therapy. RESULTS: DMARDs were initiated for various reasons: 68 (36.4%) due to active disease despite nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (± intra-articular corticosteroid) treatment, 59 (31.6%) due to uveitis, 49 (26.2%) due to extended oligoarticular JIA, and 11 (5.9%) due to inflammatory bowel disease. One hundred twenty-three patients (65.8%) achieved remission with DMARDs (Group A), while 64 patients (34.2%) did not respond to DMARD therapy (Group B). In Group B, patients had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as well as higher Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Disease Activity Scores-71 (JADAS-71) at diagnosis (both p < 0.001). Moreover, extended oligoarticular JIA subtype (p = 0.017) and involvement of small joints at diagnosis (p = 0.043) were more prevalent among these patients. Group A exhibited a higher frequency of antinuclear antibody positivity (p = 0.014). Elevated CRP levels (> 1.1 mg/dL) (OR 1.308, 95% CI 1.203-3.574; p < 0.001) and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis (> 15.8) (OR 1.659, 95% CI 1.179-2.941; p < 0.001) were associated with DMARD resistance. CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis were the main factors associated with DMARD resistance in oligoarticular JIA. Prospective long-term studies may help verify the role of these factors associated with DMARD resistance in oligoarticular JIA. Key Points • Conventional DMARDs were most commonly started due to active disease despite NSAID (± intra-articular corticosteroids). • Remission was achieved with DMARD in 65.8% of oligoarticular JIA patients. • Elevated CRP and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis were associated with DMARD resistance.

Treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors in juvenile dermatomyositis: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been increasingly used in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). This review aims to comprehensively analyze previous studies concerning the utilization of JAK inhibitors in JDM patients. METHODS: We conducted a thorough review of MEDLINE and Scopus databases, spanning from their inception to September 1st, 2023, to identify articles involving JDM patients treated with JAK inhibitors. RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 26 articles that encompassed 195 patients with JDM who received JAK inhibitors. The median (min-max) age of the patients was 4.9 (1-17) years (F/M:1.2). The most frequently used JAK inhibitor was tofacitinib (57.4 %), and improvement was achieved in 89.7 % of patients treated with tofacitinib. The improvement rate for ruxolitinib, which was the second most frequently used JAK inhibitor (27.2 %), was 69.2 %. For baricitinib (15.4 %), the improvement rate was 92.7 %. The most prevalent indication for JAK inhibitor use was resistant/recurrent skin involvement (34.7 %) followed by resistant/recurrent muscle involvement (28.6 %). Adverse events were reported in 72.1 % of the patients; an increase in infections (especially upper respiratory tract infections) was the most common side effect. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that JAK inhibitors may be a good therapeutic option, particularly in the management of refractory JDM cases with an acceptable safety profile. However, further controlled studies are essential to establish a higher level of evidence for the optimal use of JAK inhibitors in JDM treatment.

Biologic drugs in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis: a literature review.

There is no clear consensus in the literature regarding the choice of biologic therapies and efficacy in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). In this review, we aimed to examine previous studies regarding biologic drug use in JDM patients. We screened MEDLINE and Scopus for articles involving JDM patients treated with biologic drugs. We identified 74 articles describing 495 JDM patients treated with biologic drugs (538 biologic treatments) during our literature search. The median (min-max) age of these patients was 9.8 (1-17) years (F/M:1.8). The most frequently used biologic drugs were rituximab (RTX, 50%) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (34.8%). In a few cases, abatacept (4.3%), anti-interleukin-1 agents (0.9%), tocilizumab (0.9%), bortezomib (0.4%), ustekinumab (0.2%), eculizumab (0.2%), and golimumab (0.2%) were used. RTX was most frequently preferred in patients with severe skin involvement (46.3%). Improvement with RTX was obtained in 60.1% of RTX treatments. Infliximab was most frequently preferred in calcinosis (43.3%), while adalimumab in skin involvement (50%) and etanercept in resistant/recurrent diseases (80%). Improvement was achieved in 44.4% of anti-TNF treatments. Adverse events were observed in 46.8% (58/124) of all treatments. Our results suggest that biologic agents may be a promising alternative for the treatment of particularly resistant JDM cases. Controlled studies are required to provide higher level of evidence for the timing of biologic use in JDM treatment. Key Points • There is no consensus on the choice and efficacy of biologic therapies in JDM. • RTX and TNF inhibitors are the most commonly used biologic drugs. • Biologics were especially preferred in severe skin involvement, calcinosis, and resistant diseases.

Is it possible to predict a disease course prone to macrophage activation syndrome at systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis diagnosis?

OBJECTIVES: Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a severe complication of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA). We aimed to compare the characteristics of SJIA patients who developed MAS in the disease course to those who never experienced MAS. METHODS: Patients with SJIA were included. The features of the patients at the time of SJIA diagnosis were compared. Multivariate logistic regression and ROC analyses were used while evaluating factors associated with MAS. RESULTS: Overall, 126 SJIA patients (M/F:1.17) were included. Eighty-six (68.2%) never had MAS. At the time of SJIA diagnosis, age was younger; the duration of fever was longer; rash, hepatomegaly, and splenomegaly were more frequent and arthralgia/arthritis was less common among patients who had MAS in the follow-up than those who never had MAS. Also, white blood cell, neutrophil, and platelet counts and fibrinogen were lower, while transaminases, lactate dehydrogenase, triglyceride (TG), and ferritin levels were higher among patients with MAS than those without MAS. The multivariate regression analysis disclosed age at symptom onset, duration of fever, platelet count, TG and ferritin levels as independent MAS predictors. For ferritin level/platelet count (F/P) ratio at the time of SJIA diagnosis, a threshold of ≥1.1 performed best to predict a MAS-prone disease course with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 82.6%. CONCLUSION: The F/P ratio at the time of SJIA diagnosis may be a promising biomarker to predict MAS-prone disease course in SJIA. Determining MAS-prone patients at the time of SJIA diagnosis could assist physicians while tailoring SJIA treatment individually. Key points • Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) differ from SJIA patients who never have MAS, at the time of SJIA diagnosis. • It could be possible to predict a MAS-prone disease course at the time of SJIA diagnosis. • The ferritin/platelet ratio is a promising biomarker for predicting MAS-prone SJIA disease course.

Treatment with Biologic Drugs in Pediatric Behçet's Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Published Data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Behçet's disease (BD) is a variable vessel vasculitis. Biologic drugs are increasingly used in the treatment of BD. We aimed to analyze biologic drug use in the treatment of pediatric BD. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from the inception of these databases until 15 November 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only reports presenting data of pediatric patients with BD (BD diagnosis < 18 years of age) treated with biologic drugs were included. The demographic features, clinical characteristics, and data on treatment were extracted from the included papers. RESULTS: We included 87 articles including 187 pediatric patients with BD treated with biologic drugs (215 biologic treatments). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (176 treatments) were the most frequently used biologic drugs followed by interferons (21 treatments). Other reported biologic treatments were anti-interleukin-1 agents (n = 11), tocilizumab (n = 4), daclizumab (n = 2), and rituximab (n = 1). The most common indication for biologic drug use was ocular involvement (93 treatments) followed by multisystem active disease (29 treatments). Monoclonal TNF-α inhibitors, adalimumab and infliximab, were preferred over etanercept in ocular and gastrointestinal BD. The improvement rates with any TNF-α inhibitor, adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, and interferons were 78.5%, 86.1%, 63.4%, 87.5%, and 70%; respectively. The organ-specific improvement rate with TNF-α inhibitors was 76.7% and 70% for ocular and gastrointestinal system involvement. Adverse events have been reported for TNF-α inhibitors, interferons, and rituximab. Six of these were severe [TNF-α inhibitors (n = 4); interferons (n = 2)]. CONCLUSIONS: The presented systematic literature search revealed that TNF-α inhibitors followed by interferons were the most frequently used biologic drugs in pediatric BD. Both group of biologic treatments appeared to be effective and have an acceptable safety profile in pediatric BD. However, controlled studies are required for analyzing indications for biologic treatments in pediatric BD.

Feasibility of canakinumab withdrawal in colchicine-resistant familial Mediterranean fever.

OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus on canakinumab treatment tapering and discontinuation strategies in colchicine-resistant FMF patients. In this study, we aimed to establish a treatment management and discontinuation protocol in paediatric FMF patients treated with canakinumab. METHODS: Fifty-eight FMF patients treated with canakinumab were included. Since 2020, we have applied a protocol based on our experience whereby canakinumab is administered monthly in the first 6 months, followed by bimonthly for 6 months, and a final period of every 3 months (for 6 months). The patients were divided into two groups: 2012-2019 (group A) and 2020-2022 (group B). RESULTS: In group A (n = 33), the median duration of canakinumab treatment was 2.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.9-3.7]. A total of 25 of 33 patients discontinued canakinumab after a median of 2.1 years (IQR 1.8-3.4). In two patients, canakinumab was restarted because of relapse. In group B (n = 25), canakinumab was discontinued in 18 patients at the end of 18 months. After a median follow-up of 0.8 years (IQR 0.6-1.1), two patients had a relapse and canakinumab treatment was reinitiated. The remaining 16 patients still have clinically inactive disease and are receiving only colchicine. When we compared the characteristics between groups A and B, there were no significant differences regarding demographics, clinical features, and outcomes. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study in the literature suggesting a protocol for discontinuing canakinumab in paediatric FMF patients. It was possible to discontinue canakinumab successfully in more than half of the patients in 18 months. Thus we suggest that this protocol can be used in paediatric FMF patients.

Oxidative Stress in Intoxication Type Inborn Errors of Metabolism using Thiol-Disulfide Ratio.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship of oxidative stress status with follow-up parameters, metabolic control status, and treatment compliance evaluation in patients diagnosed within toxication type inherited metabolic disease (IMDs). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive, analytical study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Dr. Sami Ulus, Maternity and Child Health, Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between September 2019 and March 2020. METHODOLOGY: Sixty-seven patients, who were followed up with a diagnosis of IMDs in the pediatric metabolism outpatient clinic, and 41 healthy volunteers who applied to the social pediatrics outpatient clinic, were evaluated. ​Disulfide/native thiol, disulfide/total thiol, and native thiol/total thiol ratios of the patient and control group were calculated. P <0.05 (*) value was considered significant in statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean native thiol / total thiol ratio of the patient group was significantly lower when compared to the control group (92.0±3.3 vs 94.1±2.7, p=0.001). The median disulfide level [19.8 (11.6-25) vs 14(10.1-18.8), p=0.004], the mean disulfide / native thiol (4.5±2.0 vs 3.2±1.6, p<0.001) and the mean disulfide / total thiol ratios (4.0±1.7 vs 2.9±1.4, p=0.001) were higher in the patient group compared to the control group.The findings showed that oxidative stress status was increased during metabolic attacks. Poor metabolic control and non-compliance to treatment was found to be associated with increased oxidative stress. Oxidative stress parameters were found to be correlated with metabolic chemicals such as ammonia, leucine, and citrulline. There was no correlation between phenylalanine and lactate levels and oxidative stress parameters. CONCLUSION:  Metabolic control status and compliance with treatment are related to oxidative stress level, showing thiol/disulfide balance in urea cycle defects, phenylketonuria, and galactosemia patients. Key Words: Thiol / disulfide, Metabolic diseases, MSUD, Galactosemia, Hyperammonemia.