RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Suboptimal weight loss or weight regain may occur after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). For this reason, revisional surgery has gained increasing interest. We aimed to compare the percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL) at one-year follow-up among three different techniques: Jejuno-jejunostomy distalization (JJD), Sleeve resection of the gastrojejunostomy and gastric pouch (SRGJP), and the combination of both (JJD + SRGJP). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent revisional surgery after RYGB (2020-2021). The cohort was stratified by the type of revisional technique performed. Postoperative bariatric outcomes and nutritional deficiencies were compared among groups. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients underwent revisional surgery after RYGB: JJD was performed in 8 (10.3%), SRGJP in 34 (43.6%), and JJD + SRGJP in 36 (46.1%) patients. The most common indication for surgery was weight regain, in 72 (92.3%) patients. The median lengths of the BP limbs before and after distalization, were 50 cm (IQR 40-75 cm) and 175 cm (IQR 150-200 cm), respectively. The median length of the new common limb (NCL) and total alimentary limb length (TALL) were 277 cm (IQR 250-313 cm) and 400 cm (IQR 375-475 cm), respectively. Median percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL) at one year was 15% (IQR 15-19%) for JJD, 20% (IQR 13-26%) for SRGJP, and 21% (IQR 15- 28%) for JJD + SRGJP (p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the combined procedure (JJD + SRGJP) exhibited higher %TBWL at one year, however no statistically significant difference was identified among the three techniques.
Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Reoperação , Redução de Peso , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Coortes , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background: Bariatric surgery is a frequently performed procedure in the United States, accounting for â¼40,000 procedures annually. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are at high risk for postoperative thrombosis, with a venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate of up to 6.4%. Despite this risk, there is a lack of guidelines recommending postoperative VTE prophylaxis and it is not routine practice at most hospitals. The postoperative bleeding rate after bariatric surgery is only 1.5%; however, the risk of bleeding may lead to hesitancy for more liberal VTE prophylaxis. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of bariatric surgeries at a single institution in 2019 and 2021. Data were obtained from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) and electronic medical record review for all patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or conversion to RYGB. The primary outcomes were composite bleeding events, which included postoperative transfusion, postoperative endoscopy or return to operating room (OR) (for bleeding), intra-abdominal hematoma, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, or incisional hematoma. Results: There were a total of 2067 patients in the cohort, with 1043 surgeries in 2019 and 1024 surgeries in 2021. There was no difference between bleeding events after instituting a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis protocol in 2021 (27 versus 28 events, P = .76). There was no difference in individual bleeding events between 2019 and 2021. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the rate of VTE between 2019 and 2021 (2 versus 5 events, P = .28). Conclusions: After instituting a standard protocol of prophylactic heparin postdischarge, we did not find an increased rate of bleeding events in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Thus, surgeons can consider prescribing postdischarge chemical VTE prophylaxis without concern for bleeding.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Cirurgia Bariátrica , Heparina , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Masculino , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Protocolos ClínicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical videos coupled with structured assessments enable surgical training programs to provide independent competency evaluations and align with the American Board of Surgery's entrustable professional activities initiative. Existing assessment instruments for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair (IHR) have limitations with regards to reliability, validity, and usability. A cross-sectional study of six surgeons using a novel objective, procedure-specific, 8-item competency assessment for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair (IHR-OPSA) was performed to assess inter-rater reliability using a "safe" vs. "unsafe" scoring rubric. METHODS: The IHR-OPSA was developed by three expert IHR surgeons, field tested with five IHR surgeons, and revised based upon feedback. The final instrument included: (1) incision/port placement; (2) dissection of peritoneal flap (TAPP) or dissection of peritoneal flap (TEP); (3) exposure; (4) reducing the sac; (5) full dissection of the myopectineal orifice; (6) mesh insertion; (7) mesh fixation; and (8) operation flow. The IHR-OPSA was applied by six expert IHR surgeons to 20 IHR surgical videos selected to include a spectrum of hernia procedures (15 laparoscopic, 5 robotic), anatomy (14 indirect, 5 direct, 1 femoral), and Global Case Difficulty (easy, average, hard). Inter-rater reliability was assessed against Gwet's AC2. RESULTS: The IHR-OPSA inter-rater reliability was good to excellent, ranging from 0.65 to 0.97 across the eight items. Assessments of robotic procedures had higher reliability with near perfect agreement for 7 of 8 items. In general, assessments of easier cases had higher levels of agreement than harder cases. CONCLUSIONS: A novel 8-item minimally invasive IHR assessment tool was developed and tested for inter-rater reliability using a "safe" vs. "unsafe" rating system with promising results. To promote instrument validity the IHR-OPSA was designed and evaluated within the context of intended use with iterative engagement with experts and testing of constructs against real-world operative videos.
Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Estudos Transversais , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Telas CirúrgicasRESUMO
Introduction: Bariatric surgery is routinely performed on obese women of reproductive age, most commonly with the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures (RYGB). This study analyzes the effects of postoperative pregnancy on excess BMI loss percentage (EBMIL%) after SG and RYGB. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with 191 female patients of reproductive age between 20 and 40 years who underwent SG and RYGB performed at our institution between January 2017 and December 2018. A comparison of the results at 4-year follow-up was performed between patients who became pregnant after bariatric surgery with patients who did not. Results: Among 191 total cases, 32 (16.7%) patients became pregnant within a 4-year follow-up period, and 159 (83.2%) patients did not. The median postoperative body mass index (BMI) in the pregnant group was 33.3 kg/m2 (interquartile range [IQR] 30.1-38.5) and 33.5 kg/m2 (IQR 28.9-38.6) in the nonpregnant group. The mean EBMIL% within a 4-year follow-up in the pregnant group was 50.4% (standard deviation [SD] 23.5) and 55.5% (SD 30.4) in the nonpregnant group. The median weight before surgery in the pregnant group was 112 kg (IQR 107.9-132.2) and 117 kg (IQR 106-132.5) in the nonpregnant group. The median weight after surgery in the pregnant group was 89.5 kg (IQR 79.5-111) and 88.9 kg (IQR 78-103) in the nonpregnant group. There was no significant difference between outcomes. Conclusion: Weight loss maintenance after bariatric surgery is not impacted by postoperative pregnancy within a 4-year follow-up after SG and RYGB.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Redução de Peso , Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodosRESUMO
Introduction: Resident participation in advanced minimally invasive and bariatric surgeries is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of resident participation in robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Methods: Prospectively maintained institutional Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent SG, which was performed at our institution between January, 2018, and December, 2021. Operative notes were reviewed to determine the training level of the assistant. These were then classified into 7 groups: postgraduate years 1-5 residents, bariatric fellow (6), and attending surgeons (7). Each group was stratified and their outcomes, which included duration of surgery, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperations, were compared. Results: Out of 2571 cases, the assistants for the procedures were minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellows (n = 863, 58.8%), fifth- and fourth-year residents (n = 228, 15.5%), third- and second-year residents (n = 164, 11.2%), no assistants (n = 212, 14.5%), and 134 robotic SG. Mean body mass index was higher in cases wherein the attending surgeon performed by himself (47.1, standard deviation 7.7) when compared with other groups. There were no conversions to open. Mean LOS was 1.3 days, and there was no difference between groups (P = .242). Postoperative complications were low, with 11 reoperations in 30 days (3.3%) and no difference between groups. There was no mortality in 30 or 90 days. Conclusion: Postoperative outcomes were similar for patients who underwent SG regardless of the assistant's level of training. Including residents in bariatric procedures is safe and does not affect patient safety. Encouraging residents to participate in complex MIS procedures is recommended as part of their training.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Derivação Gástrica , Internato e Residência , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Derivação Gástrica/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To optimize results reporting after penile cancer (PC) surgery, we proposed a Tetrafecta and assessed its ability to predict overall survival (OS) probabilities. METHODS: A purpose-built multicenter, multi-national database was queried for stage I-IIIB PC, requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND), from 2015 onwards. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method assessed differences in OS between patients achieving Tetrafecta or not. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses identified its predictors. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in the analysis. The 45 patients (29%) that achieved the Tetrafecta were younger (59 vs. 62 years; p = 0.01) and presented with fewer comorbidities (ASA score ≥ 3: 0% vs. 24%; p < 0.001). Although indicated, ILND was omitted in 8 cases (5%), while in 16, a modified template was properly used. Although median LNs yield was 17 (IQR: 11-27), 35% of the patients had <7 nodes retrieved from the groin. At Kaplan-Maier analysis, the Tetrafecta cohort displayed significantly higher OS probabilities (Log Rank = 0.01). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses identified age as the only independent predictor of Tetrafecta achievement (OR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.94-0.99; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our Tetrafecta is the first combined outcome to comprehensively report results after PC surgery. It is widely applicable, based on standardized and reproducible variables and it predicts all-cause mortality.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Penianas , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias Penianas/patologia , Neoplasias Penianas/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , PelveRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical pain management is a critical component in the success of bariatric procedures. With the opioid epidemic, there have been increased efforts to decrease opioid use. In 2019, the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program developed the BSTOP protocol, a multimodal perioperative pain management regimen to minimize opioid use. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the BSTOP protocol on patients' need for opioid medications during their perioperative care. METHODS: This is a single-institution prospective cohort study on patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 10/2019 to 5/2021. Data was collected on morphine equivalent dose of opioids during different stages of inpatient and outpatient care. BSTOP was implemented on 7/2020. Primary outcomes were total inpatient and outpatient opioid use as well as hospital length of hospital stay (LOS). Gabapentin was removed from the protocol between 10/20/2020 and 12/31/2020 due to side effects; it was re-implemented on 1/1/2021 due to observed spikes in opioid use during its absence. RESULTS: 1264 patients who had bariatric surgery between 10/2019 and 5/2021 were included in the study, with 409 patients before (pre-BSTOP) and 855 patients after BSTOP implementation. There was a 36% reduction in total inpatient opiate use and a 57% reduction in total outpatient opiate use. LOS also significantly decreased, from 1.53 to 1.28 days. 179 patients received BSTOP without gabapentin. These patients used more opioids in the post-anesthesia care unit and on the inpatient floors compared to pre-BSTOP and BSTOP with gabapentin patients. With total inpatient and outpatient opioid use, patients on BSTOP without gabapentin used fewer opioids than those pre-BSTOP. However, those on BSTOP without gabapentin used more opioids than those with gabapentin. CONCLUSION: The BSTOP protocol significantly reduced inpatient and outpatient opioid use as well as LOS. Gabapentin is a crucial component of the BSTOP protocol.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Gabapentina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etiologia , Prescrições , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study examines referral patterns to surgical clinics from the emergency department and the impact of sociodemographic factors on adherence. METHODS: Patients from 2017 to 2021 were identified who had a referral placed to surgical specialties from the ED. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had a referral to surgery placed during an ED visit but who showed up to surgery clinic visit within 60 days of referral placement. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Referrals were made for 45,237 patients overall and 4130 for general surgery specifically. 44% showed up to general surgery clinic visit. In univariate and multivariate analysis, those who showed up to clinic were older, tended to be female, had a lower social economic status, had Medicaid or Medicare insurance and had more comorbidities compared to those who did not show up. Asians and Hispanics were more likely to show up to clinic compared to Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Assigning navigators in the ED to follow-up with patients who are younger and healthier, with private insurances who have existing PCPs to ensure they follow up as advised is a potential targeted intervention to improve clinic adherence.
Assuntos
Medicare , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Medicaid , Assistência Ambulatorial , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been a revolutionary intervention for weight loss with reduction of up to 60-70% of excess body weight. However, these outcomes are not as well validated at the extremes of age, where the safety of the intervention still has some caveats. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of primary LRYGB among different age groups. METHODS: the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent primary LRYGB from January 2014 to December 2017 at a single institution. Four groups were created and compared by dividing our sample by age quartiles. The primary outcome was percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year. Additional operative outcomes and complications were also compared across groups. RESULTS: a total of 1013 patients underwent non-revisional LRYGB during the study period. Mean %EWL at one year was 55%. When compared between quartiles, there was a statistically significant difference in %EWL: 1st 62%, 2nd 57%, 3rd 54% and 4th 47% (p=0.010). The differences in the secondary outcomes between age groups did not demonstrate statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: though patients in the fourth age quartile (range) did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in adverse outcomes, they did lose less weight compared to other cohorts. The %EWL at one year after RYGB varied by age in our cohort. Goals after bariatric surgery should be individualized as weight loss is less robust with aging.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Idoso , Gastrectomia , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de PesoRESUMO
Introduction: The laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) was developed as an alternative for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair. This technique allows the closure of the defect and restoration of the midline without tension by plication of both aponeurosis of the abdominal rectus muscles combined with a minimally invasive intraperitoneal underlay mesh repair. The objective of this study is to report our early experience with the Robotic-LIRA (R-LIRA) technique and its safety and short-term efficacy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing R-LIRA repair for ventral hernias from March 2019 to April 2022. Results: Eight patients underwent R-LIRA from March 2019 to April 2022. Median age was 47 years (interquartile range [IQR] 34.5-62.8). Median body mass index was 34.2 kg/m2 (IQR 29.9-35.2). Four patients (50%) had a primary ventral hernia being one M2, two M3, and one M2/M3. There were three incisional hernias, being one recurrent, 6 patients (75%) had associated diastasis of the rectus muscle and 1 patient presented pure diastasis. The median hernia width was 4 cm (IQR 2-6), and the median defect area was 16 cm2 (IQR 4-42). The median mesh area was 290 cm2 (IQR 211.2-300). In all cases, a barbed suture was also used for mesh fixation, and tackers were added in 4 cases. The median operative time was 172 minutes (IQR 139.8-293.3). The median length of stay was 0.5 days (IQR 0-1.8), and the median follow-up was 20 days (IQR 16-46). Conclusion: The R-LIRA has been shown to be safe and feasible for ventral and incisional hernia repairs with or without Diastasis of the Rectus Abdominis Muscle in the short term.
Assuntos
Hérnia Ventral , Hérnia Incisional , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Hérnia Ventral/complicações , Hérnia Ventral/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Hérnia Incisional/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas CirúrgicasAssuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical centers had to weigh the benefits and risks of conducting bariatric surgery. Obesity increases the risk of developing severe COVID-19 infections, and therefore, bariatric surgery is beneficial. In contrast, surgical patients who test positive for COVID-19 have higher mortality rates. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the national prevalence of postoperative pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic in the bariatric surgery population. SETTING: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study using the ACS-NSQIP database. The population of concern included patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures. Information was extracted on rate of postoperative pneumonia and other 30-day complications between 2018 and 2020. RESULTS: All baseline characteristics were similar among patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2018 and 2020. However, there was a 156% increase in postoperative pneumonia in 2020 compared with the previous year. Furthermore, despite the similar postoperative complication rates across the years, there was a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality in 2020. The multivariate analysis showed that having surgery in 2020 was a statistically significant risk factor for pneumonia development postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of postoperative pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic among bariatric surgery patients. Surgical centers must continuously evaluate the risks associated with healthcare-associated exposure to COVID-19 and weigh the benefits of bariatric surgery.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , COVID-19 , Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Pneumonia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Gastrectomia/métodos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Pandemias , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Increased systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) could lead to the mechanical dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis of the right heart chambers. Echocardiographic strain analysis has not been adequately studied in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Study design and methods: A cross-sectional cohort of patients with suspected PH and echocardiographic strain evaluation was recruited. The cut-off values of peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) with the low probability of PH (≤2.8 m/s), intermediate probability (2.9-3.4 m/s, without other echo PH signs), and high probability of PH (2.9-3.4 m/s with other echo PH signs and >3.4 m/s) categories were studied by right ventricular and right atrial (RA) strain analysis in a sample of 236 patients. Results: The results showed that 58 (56.9%) patients had low, 15 (14.7%) had intermediate, and 29 (28.4%) had a high probability of PH. We observed a negative association between right ventricular free wall strain (RV-FWS) and atrial global strain with sPAP. With the increase in PH severity, RA reservoir, conduit, and contraction (booster) strain values decreased. The identified cut-off values of strain parameters had an adequate ability to detect PH severity categories. In addition, the post-mortem biopsies of right heart chambers from subjects with known severe PH were analyzed to quantify myocardial fibrosis. Our sample of right heart biopsies (n = 12) demonstrated an association between increased sPAP before death and right ventricular and RA fibrosis. Conclusion: Mechanical dysfunction and fibrosis in the right chambers are associated with increased sPAP. Right ventricular and atrial strain could provide enhancement in the diagnosis and categorization of subjects with suspected PH.
RESUMO
Background: International Medical Graduates (IMGs) are an important component of the US healthcare workforce. Prior studies have investigated bias against IMGs during the general surgery residency application in the United States. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a growing field; The MIS fellowship match was established in 2004 and is a competitive process with a match rate of 47%. Opportunities for applicants who are non-US citizens are limited by a series of factors that are not related to their professional qualifications. Objectives: The aim of the study was to explore the challenges faced by IMG in the MIS fellowship match. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study analyzing the minimally invasive surgery application requirements of all the programs listed in the Fellowship Council. Individual program requirements were collected into a database and a descriptive analysis was performed comparing programs who accept IMGs versus those that do not. Further statistical analysis was performed to explore those differences and associated factors. Results: There were 148 MIS fellowship programs and 187 positions offered during the 2021 match year in the US. Ninety-seven programs (65.5%) were found to accept graduates of foreign medical schools if they were US-citizens, whereas only 49 programs (33.1%) were found to accept IMG and sponsor a visa for their training. University affiliated programs (88.9% vs 75.0%, p = 0.04), programs with a general surgery residency (94.4% vs 75.0%, p = 0.003), and older programs (63.0% vs 45.5%, p = 0.04) were more likely to accept IMGs requiring visa sponsorship. Conclusions: There is a significant bias against IMGs in the MIS fellowship match, with a reduced number of positions available based on factors not related to their professional performance or qualifications. Well established programs, university, and residency affiliated programs are more likely to consider these physicians for training.
Assuntos
Médicos Graduados Estrangeiros , Internato e Residência , Estudos Transversais , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Penile aesthetics after partial penectomy (PP) for penile cancer (PC), significantly affect a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-esteem, and sexual function. Satisfactory reconstruction has become a major milestone in the treatment of these patients. METHODS: Clinical charts of all patients that underwent PP and reconstruction with an inverted urethral flap (IUF) were reviewed. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) which were graphically represented by Kaplan-Meier estimates. The key secondary endpoints were Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), erectile function, and lower urinary tract symptoms. RESULTS: Between May 2007 and December 2019, 74 patients with PC underwent PP and IUF reconstruction. The median age was 62 years (IQR 52-76), median follow-up was 72 months (IQR 38-121). Twenty-nine patients (39.2%) underwent inguinal lymph node dissection, 62 (83.8%) underwent dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, RFS, and PFS showed a 6-year OS of 86.5%, 6-year RFS of 90.5%, and a 6-year PFS of 85.1%. Regarding functional outcomes, we found a mean global health score of 84.6% ± 10.4 at the EQ-5D-3L-VAS. The mean Voiding score of the ICIQ-MLUTS was 1.7 ± 3.2 and a mean IIEF-5 score of 17.3 ± 7. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, we report the largest cohort in the literature of PP with IUF reconstruction. These results are important since early-stage PC is the most common stage at diagnosis. In carefully selected patients' preservation of a longer urethral stump to allow for the inverted flap is safe and does not compromise oncological outcomes while preserving HRQoL.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Penianas , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ereção Peniana , Neoplasias Penianas/patologia , Pênis/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Uretra/patologia , Uretra/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While many cases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are mild, patients with underlying medical conditions such as hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), older age, and morbid obesity are at higher risk of hospitalization and death. These conditions are characteristic of patients eligible for bariatric surgery, many of whom underwent weight loss procedures in the months prior to cessation of elective surgery in March 2020. The effects of the virus on these high-risk patients who had increased healthcare exposure in the early days of the pandemic are currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: To describe the experience of patients who underwent bariatric surgery during the early evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including patients from a single center who underwent bariatric surgery from January 1st, 2020 to March 18th, 2020. A database was created to analyze patients' demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes. All patients were contacted and a telephone survey was completed to inquire about COVID-19 exposure, symptoms, and testing 30 days before and after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients underwent bariatric surgery during the study period. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was the most common procedure (71.6%). One hundred seventy-eight patients (93.7%) completed the telephone survey. Postoperatively, 19 patients (10.7%) reported COVID-19 compatible symptoms, and six patients (3.4%) went on to test positive for COVID-19. There were no COVID-19-related hospital admissions or mortalities in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidly obese patients are at high risk of severe disease secondary to COVID-19, and those undergoing bariatric surgery during the evolution of the pandemic reported symptoms at a rate of 10.7% 30 days after the surgery. While none of these patients suffered severe COVID-19 disease, the temporal relationship of their symptomatology and increased exposure to the healthcare system as a result of their surgery suggest an increased risk of disease with elective surgery.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , COVID-19 , Derivação Gástrica , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida , Idoso , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Pandemias , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been established as a leading treatment of obesity. Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain the most common complication. Objective: To compare the incidence of SSIs before and after the implementation of our technique. Methods: Our intraoperative technique limits enteric contact with the abdominal wall through a wound protector at the end-to-end anastomosis stapler port site, with enteric retrieval with a specimen bag followed by betadine irrigation. We analyzed our SSIs outcomes before and after implementation of our technique in all RYGB and laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversions at our institution performed by two providers between January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. We compared patient age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class; and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia. The χ2, Fischer exact, Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests, and multivariate analysis were performed. Results: Four hundred twenty-nine patients underwent LRYGB and sleeve-to-bypass conversion during the two study periods. Group 1 (162 patients, 37.76%) all underwent RYGB. Group 2 (267 patients, 62.24%) of whom 199 underwent RYGB and 68 underwent a laparoscopic sleeve-to-bypass conversion. The SSI rate was 9.26% in Group 1 and 2.62% in Group 2 (p = 0.002514). Statistical significance was also noted for operating room time (137 min vs 123 min, p = 0.02) and hospital length of stay (2 - 3 interquartile range vs 1 - 2 interquartile range, p = 0.04). Conclusion: We propose a safe, reproducible technique that significantly reduces SSI rates during LRYGB.
Assuntos
Parede Abdominal , Derivação Gástrica , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Povidona-Iodo , Índice de Massa CorporalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the gold standard weight-loss procedure. There are different techniques to perform the gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis, but there is no consensus as to which one is superior for weight loss. Our goal in this study was to assess one-year weight loss after LRYGB comparing the three different techniques at our tertiary care center. METHODS: The American college of surgeons (ACS) Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP®) data for Montefiore Medical Center for years 2014-2017 were analyzed. Three surgeons were included in this study; each type of anastomosis was performed by a single surgeon. Patients were included if they underwent primary LRYGB. Patients were designated to one of three different groups depending of the type of gastrojejunal anastomosis performed: hand sewn, circular stapled, or linear stapled. One-year weight loss was assessed as primary endpoint of the study. A descriptive analysis of perioperative variables for each group was included as well. RESULTS: A total of 1011 patients underwent primary LRYGB. 429 (42.1%) were performed with circular-stapled GJ anastomosis, 433 (42.5%) with a hand-sewn GJ anastomosis, and 149 (14.6%) linear-stapled GJ anastomosis. The median BMI was 46.08 ± 6.43, with no difference between groups (p = .405). Procedure time was 106.70 ± 28.23 min for the circular group, 108.27 ± 28.59 min for the hand-sewn group, and 115.78 ± 36.11 min for the linear group (p > 0.005). There were no significant differences in complications except for the need of postoperative transfusions (p < 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in %EWL one year after surgery: %EWL was 58.81 ± 16.54 kg for hand sewn, 58.86 ± 14.84 kg for circular, and 59.20 ± 17.58Kg for linear. (p = .595). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in weight loss one year after LRYGB based on the type of gastrojejunal anastomosis performed.