A Clinical Course of Repeated Supratherapeutic Ingestion of Acetaminophen.

Acute liver failure (ALF) exemplifies a rapid decline in liver function among individuals with previously healthy livers, often manifesting through symptoms such as jaundice, confusion, and potentially life-threatening complications. Timely medical intervention, and, in severe instances, liver transplantation, are essential for enhancing outcomes and averting further deterioration. While the causes of ALF are multifaceted, in developed nations, it predominantly arises from drug-induced liver injury. Treatment primarily revolves around supportive measures, with severe cases necessitating liver transplantation. In instances where acute overdose with acetaminophen serves as the instigating factor, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) emerges as a pivotal component of management, as indicated by the Rumack-Matthew nomogram. The Rumack-Matthew nomogram guides treatment for acetaminophen overdose by correlating serum levels with the risk of liver damage. If levels exceed a set threshold, NAC is administered to prevent toxicity by replenishing glutathione. The decision to administer NAC is typically guided by this clinical tool, which aids healthcare providers in determining the appropriate course of action. NAC assumes a critical role in ameliorating the detrimental effects of acetaminophen overdose, particularly in averting liver damage, thus holding significant importance in patient care and recovery. While chronic acetaminophen overdose cases leading to ALF may also benefit from NAC, the supporting evidence remains weak. In this context, we present a case of ALF stemming from chronic acetaminophen ingestion, managed with NAC when liver transplantation was not a viable option.

Risk of Recall Associated With Modifications to High-risk Medical Devices Approved Through US Food and Drug Administration Supplements.

Importance: High-risk medical devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can undergo modifications to their original premarket approval (PMA) via 1 of 5 types of supplements. Only panel track supplements (approximately 1%) require clinical data for approval. The association between device modifications and risk to patient safety has not previously been analyzed. Objective: To determine the association between PMA supplements and the risk of any device recall and high-risk (class 1) recall. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, the FDA database was queried for original devices approved via PMA from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2019. Supplement and recall data were obtained for these devices from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2021, giving a minimum 2-year follow-up after initial approval. Data were analyzed from July 6 to August 6, 2022. Retrospective, time-to-event analysis investigated the association between the number and type of supplements and risk of recall. Exposures: Supplements submitted by manufacturers for FDA approval to modify devices. Main Outcomes and Measures: A mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression model with frailty terms was used, modeling device recall as an outcome variable during the observation period. A second model was performed for class 1 (high-risk) recall. Explanatory variables are the number of supplements, number of panel track supplements, and cardiovascular devices. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for recall with hazard ratios (HRs) as the main end point. Results: A total of 373 original PMA devices with 10 776 associated supplements were included in the analysis. A median 2.5 (IQR, 1.2-5.0) supplements per device were approved annually. Cardiovascular devices contributed 138 supplements (37.0%), followed by microbiology with 45 (12.1%). No other specialty contributed more than 10%. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that each increase of 1 supplement per year was associated with increased risk of recall (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.15-1.44]; P < .001). For class 1 recall, increased number of supplements (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.06-1.64]; P = .01) and cardiovascular vsnoncardiovascular classification of devices (HR, 3.51 [95% CI, 1.15-10.72]; P = .03) were significantly associated with an increased risk of recall. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that PMA supplements are associated with an approximately 30% increased risk of any recall and class 1 recall. The FDA processes for approving modifications to high-risk medical devices should be reevaluated to optimize patient safety and public health.

Effects of the GluN2B-selective antagonist Ro 63-1908 on acquisition and expression of methamphetamine conditioned place preference in male and female rats.

BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine abuse has increased significantly in recent years. Currently, there are no FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorder. The goal of the current study was to determine if the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) GluN2B-selective antagonist Ro 63-1908 can block the conditioned rewarding effects of methamphetamine as assessed in conditioned place preference (CPP). METHODS: Two main experiments were conducted. In the first experiment, male (n = 24) and female (n = 24) rats received either vehicle or Ro 63-1908 (1.0-10.0 mg/kg) 30 min prior to the posttest to determine if blocking the GluN2B subunit attenuates expression of methamphetamine CPP. In the second experiment, male (n = 18) and female (n = 18) rats received either vehicle or Ro 63-1908 (1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg) 30 min prior to each conditioning session to determine if blocking the GluN2B subunit attenuates acquisition of methamphetamine CPP. RESULTS: Ro 63-1908 (3.0 mg/kg) blocked acquisition of methamphetamine CPP in male rats, but only attenuated CPP in female rats. Ro 63-1908 did not alter expression of CPP in either sex. Increasing the dose of Ro 63-1908 (10.0 mg/kg) failed to block acquisition of CPP in an additional group of female rats (n = 6). A control experiment showed that Ro 63-1908 (3.0 mg/kg) did not produce CPP or conditioned place aversion in male rats (n = 6) or in female rats (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that Ro 63-1908 is able to decrease the conditioned rewarding effects of methamphetamine.

Effects of Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delayed reinforcement in a delay-discounting task in rats: Contribution of delay presentation order.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) blockade has been shown to decrease impulsive choice, as measured in delay discounting. However, several variables are known to influence an animal's discounting, including sensitivity to delayed reinforcement and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude. The goal of this experiment was to determine the effects of mGluR1, as well as mGluR5, antagonism on these parameters. Forty Sprague Dawley rats were trained in delay discounting, in which consistently choosing a small, immediate reward reflects impulsive choice. For half of the rats, the delay to the large reinforcer increased across blocks of trials, whereas the delay decreased across the session for half of the rats. Following training, half of the rats received injections of the mGluR1 antagonist JNJ 16259685 (JNJ; 0, 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0mg/kg; i.p), and half received injections of the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP (0, 1.0, 3.0, or 10.0mg/kg; i.p.). Administration of JNJ increased sensitivity to delayed reinforcement (i.e., promoted impulsive choice), regardless of which schedule was used. However, the order in which delays were presented modulated the effects of JNJ on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude. Specifically, JNJ decreased sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in rats trained on the descending schedule only. MPEP did not alter sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude or sensitivity to delayed reinforcement. These results show that mGluR1 is an important mediator of impulsive choice, and they provide further evidence that delay order presentation is an important variable that influences drug effects in delay discounting.