Evaluation of RTT education - Is it fit for the present: A report on the ESTRO radiation therapist workshop.

Education is key in preparing healthcare professionals for the current and future needs of the clinical environment. Hence, ESTRO facilitated a workshop, with a track focusing on radiation therapists' (RTT) education and whether it is fit for the current demands of RTTs. An international group of participants with academic and clinical backgrounds discussed the current situation in their respective working environments, evaluated the challenges in RTT education, and highlighted opportunities and possible solutions to meet current and future needs. Key outcomes highlighted the importance of strengthening collaboration between clinical and academic staff.

Dose-Escalated 2-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: 28 Gy Versus 24 Gy in 2 Daily Fractions.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastases improves pain response rates compared with conventional external beam radiation therapy; however, the optimal fractionation schedule is unclear. We report local control and toxicity outcomes after dose-escalated 2-fraction spine SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospectively maintained institutional database of over 600 patients and 1400 vertebral segments treated with spine SBRT was reviewed to identify those prescribed 28 or 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions. The primary endpoint was magnetic resonance imaging based local failure (LF), and secondary endpoints included overall survival and vertebral compression fracture (VCF). RESULTS: A total of 947 treated vertebral segments in 482 patients were identified, of which 301 segments in 159 patients received 28 Gy, and 646 segments in 323 patients received 24 Gy in 2 fractions. Median follow-up per patient was 23.5 months, and median overall survival was 49.1 months. In the 28 Gy cohort, the 6-, 12-, and 24-month cumulative incidences of LF were 3.5%, 5.4%, and 11.1%, respectively, versus 6.0%, 12.5%, and 17.6% in the 24 Gy cohort, respectively (P = .008). On multivariable analysis, 24 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.525; 95% confidence interval, 1.039-2.238; P = .031), paraspinal disease extension (HR, 1.422; 95% confidence interval, 1.010-2.002; P = .044), and epidural extension in either radioresistant or radiosensitive histologies (HR, 2.117 and 1.227, respectively; P = .003) were prognostic for higher rates of LF. Risk of VCF was 5.5%, 7.6%, and 10.7% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and was similar between cohorts (P = .573). Spinal malalignment (P < .001), baseline VCF (P = .003), junctional spine location (P = .030), and greater minimum dose to 90% of planning target volume were prognostic for higher rates of VCF. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation to 28 Gy in 2 daily fractions was associated with improved local control without increasing the risk of VCF. The 2-year local control rates are consistent with those predicted by the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic spine tumor control probability model, and these data will inform a proposed dose escalation randomized trial.

A framework for interprofessional team collaboration in a hospital setting: Advancing team competencies and behaviours.

Healthcare teams that practice collaboratively enhance the delivery of person-centred care and improve patient and systems outcomes. Many organizations have adopted existing interprofessional frameworks that define the competencies of individual health professionals that are required to meet practice standards and advance interprofessional goals. However, to support the collective efforts of team members to deliver optimal care within complex hospital settings, healthcare organizations may benefit from adopting team-based competencies for interprofessional collaboration. The Sunnybrook framework for interprofessional team collaboration was intentionally created as a set of collective team competencies. The framework was developed using a comprehensive literature search and consensus building by a multi-stakeholder working group and supported by a broad consultation process that included patient representation, organizational development and leadership, and human resources. The six core competencies are actionable and include associated team behaviours that can be easily referenced by teams and widely implemented across the hospital.

Measuring the Impact of Patient Engagement From the Perspective of Health Professionals Leading Quality Improvement Projects.

INTRODUCTION: The value of engaging patients and families in health care quality improvement (QI) initiatives is to help align health care system efforts with patient priorities. Meaningful evaluation of engaging with patients and families within QI may promote future collaboration. The aim of this study was to identify the experiential impact of patient engagement from the perspective of health professionals who were leading health care QI projects. METHODS: Point-of-care health professionals who completed a fellowship capacity building program between 2014 and 2018 that provided an opportunity to learn about patient engagement concepts and to engage patients, families, and caregivers in their QI projects were invited to participate in the study. The Most Significant Change technique was used as a participatory approach to obtain qualitative evaluative data from semistructured interviews with health professional fellows. Significant change stories were curated from self-narratives grounded in the experiences of health professional fellows. RESULTS: The stories demonstrated that gaining new knowledge on concepts related to patient engagement as part of a structured curriculum is effective in both supporting engagement in practice and cultivating the importance of patient engagement among health professionals. The early and ongoing involvement of patients was a key factor in shaping the project while fostering a patient-centered focus. Seeking out the patient voice throughout the QI project led to improvements in patient care experiences. DISCUSSION: The findings of this study can inform programs seeking to promote patient engagement in health care QI. The positive changes that stem from aligning capacity building programs with patient-oriented priorities support the vision that patient engagement should be at the foundation of health care QI.

Accuracy and precision of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements on a 1.5 T MR-Linac in central nervous system tumour patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRI linear accelerators (MR-Linacs) may allow treatment adaptation to be guided by quantitative MRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements from DWI on a 1.5 T MR-Linac in patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours through comparison with a diagnostic scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CNS patients were treated using a 1.5 T Elekta Unity MR-Linac. DWI was acquired during MR-Linac treatment and on a Philips Ingenia 1.5 T. The agreement between the two scanners on median ADC over the gross tumour/clinical target volumes (GTV/CTV) and in brain regions (white/grey matter, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)) was computed. Repeated scans were used to estimate ADC repeatability. Daily changes in ADC over the GTV of high-grade gliomas were characterized from MR-Linac scans. RESULTS: DWI from 59 patients was analyzed. MR-Linac ADC measurements showed a small bias relative to Ingenia measurements in white matter, grey matter, GTV, and CTV (bias: -0.05 ± 0.03, -0.08 ± 0.05, -0.1 ± 0.1, -0.08 ± 0.07 µm2/ms). ADC differed substantially in CSF (bias: -0.5 ± 0.3 µm2/ms). The repeatability of MR-Linac ADC over white/grey matter was similar to previous reports (coefficients of variation for median ADC: 1.4%/1.8%). MR-Linac ADC changes in the GTV were detectable. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to obtain ADC measurements in the brain on a 1.5 T MR-Linac that are comparable to those of diagnostic-quality scanners. This technical validation study adds to the foundation for future studies that will correlate brain tumour ADC with clinical outcomes.

Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI in central nervous system tumours on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.

PURPOSE: To describe the implementation and initial results of using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) for monitoring patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumours treated using a 1.5 tesla MR-guided radiotherapy system. METHODS: CNS patients were treated with up to 30 fractions (total dose up to 60 Gy) using a 1.5 T Elekta Unity MR-Linac. CEST scans were obtained in 54 subjects at one or more time points during treatment. CEST metrics, including the amide magnetization transfer ratio (MTRAmide), nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) MTR (MTRNOE) and asymmetry, were quantified in phantoms and CNS patients. The signal was investigated between tumour and white matter, across time, and across disease categories including high- and low-grade tumours. RESULTS: The gross tumour volume (GTV) exhibited lower MTRAmide and MTRNOE and higher asymmetry compared to contralateral normal appearing white matter. Signal changes in the GTV during fractionated radiotherapy were observed. There were differences between high- and low-grade tumours, with higher CEST asymmetry associated with higher grade disease. CONCLUSION: CEST MRI using a 1.5 T MR-Linac was demonstrated to be feasible for in vivo imaging of CNS tumours. CEST images showed tumour/white-matter contrast, temporal CEST signal changes, and associations with tumour grade. These results show promise for the eventual goal of using metabolic imaging to inform the design of adaptive radiotherapy protocols.

Local control and patterns of failure for "Radioresistant" spinal metastases following stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to a "Radiosensitive" reference.

PURPOSE: The concept of a radioresistant (RR) phenotype has been challenged with use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We compared outcomes following SBRT to RR spinal metastases to a radiosensitive cohort. METHODS: Renal cell, melanoma, sarcoma, gastro-intestinal, and thyroid spinal metastases were identified as RR and prostate cancer (PCA) as radiosensitive. The primary endpoint was MRI-based local failure (LF). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF). RESULTS: From a prospectively maintained database of 1394 spinal segments in 605 patients treated with spine SBRT, 173 patients/395 RR spinal segments were compared to 94 patients/185 PCA segments. Most received 24-28 Gy in 2 fractions (68.9%) and median follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 1.4-84.2 months). 1- and 2-year LF rates were 19.2% and 22.4% for RR metastases, respectively, which were significantly greater (p < 0.001) than PCA (3.2% and 8.4%, respectively). Epidural disease (HR: 2.47, 95% CI 1.65-3.71, p < 0.001) and RR histology (HR: 2.41, 95% CI 1.45-3.99, p < 0.001) predicted for greater LF. Median OS was 17.4 and 61.0 months for RR and PCA cohorts, respectively. Lung/liver metastases, polymetastatic disease and epidural disease predicted for worse OS. 2-year VCF rates were ~ 13% in both cohorts. Coverage of the CTV V90 (clinical target volume receiving 90% of prescription dose) by ≥ 87% (HR: 2.32, 95% CI 1.29-4.18, p = 0.005), no prior spine radiotherapy (HR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.09-3.55, p = 0.025), and a greater Spinal Instability Neoplasia Score (p = 0.013) predicted for VCF. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of LF were observed after spine SBRT in RR metastases. Optimization strategies include dose escalation and aggressive management of epidural disease.

Prognostic Factors Associated With Surviving Less Than 3 Months vs Greater Than 3 Years Specific to Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Late Adverse Events.

BACKGROUND: Patient selection is critical for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) given potential for serious adverse effects and the associated costs. OBJECTIVE: To identify prognostic factors associated with dying within 3 mo, or living greater than 3 yr, following spine SBRT, to better inform patient selection. METHODS: Patients living ≤3 mo after spine SBRT and >3 yr after spine SBRT were identified, and multivariable regression analyses were performed. We report serious late toxicities observed, including vertebral compression fractures (VCF) and plexopathy. RESULTS: A total of 605 patients (1406 spine segments) were treated from 2009 to 2018. A total of 51 patients (8.4%) lived ≤3 mo, and 79 patients (13%) survived >3 yr. Significant differences in baseline features were observed. On multivariable analysis, nonbreast/prostate primaries (odds ratio [ORs]: 28.8-104.2, P = .0004), eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) ≥2 (OR: 23.7, 95% CI: 3.2-177, P = .0020), polymetastatic disease (OR: 6.715, 95% CI: 1.89-23.85, P = .0032), painful lesions (OR: 3.833-8.898, P = .0118), and paraspinal disease (OR: 2.874, 95% CI: 1.118-7.393, P = .0288) were prognostic for ≤3 mo survival. The 3- and 5-yr rates of VCF were 10.4% and 14.4%, respectively, and 3- and 5-yr rates of plexopathy were 2.2% and 5.1%, respectively. A single duodenal perforation was observed, and there was no radiation myelopathy events. CONCLUSION: Shorter survival after spine SBRT was seen in patients with less radiosensitive histologies (ie, not breast or prostate), ECOG ≥2, and polymetastatic disease. Pain and paraspinal disease were also associated with poor survival. Fractionated spine SBRT confers a low risk of late serious adverse events.

Quantitating Interfraction Target Dynamics During Concurrent Chemoradiation for Glioblastoma: A Prospective Serial Imaging Study.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance image (MRI) guided radiation therapy has the potential to improve outcomes for glioblastoma by adapting to tumor changes during radiation therapy. This study quantifies interfraction dynamics (tumor size, position, and geometry) based on sequential magnetic resonance imaging scans obtained during standard 6-week chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-one patients were prospectively imaged with gadolinium-enhanced T1 (T1c) and T2/FLAIR axial sequences at planning (Fx0), fraction 10 (Fx10), fraction 20 (Fx20), and 1 month after the final fraction of chemoradiation therapy (P1M). Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) were contoured at all time points. Target dynamics were quantified by absolute volume (V), volume relative to Fx0 (Vrel), and the migration distance (dmigrate; the linear displacement of the GTV or CTV relative to Fx0). Temporal changes were assessed using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Median volumes at Fx0, Fx10, Fx20, and P1M for the GTV were 18.4 cm3 (range, 1.1-110.5 cm3), 14.7 cm3 (range, 0.9-115.1 cm3), 13.7 cm3 (range, 0.6-174.2 cm3), and 13.0 cm3 (range, 0.9-76.3 cm3), respectively, with corresponding median Vrel of 0.88 at Fx10, 0.77 at Fx20, and 0.71 at P1M relative to Fx0 (P < .001 for all). The GTV (CTV) migration distances were greater than 5 mm in 46% (54%) of patients at Fx10, 50% (58%) of patients at Fx20, and 52% (57%) of patients at P1M. Dynamic tumor morphologic changes were observed, with 40% of patients exhibiting a decreased GTV (Vrel ≤1) with a dmigrate >5 mm during chemoradiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful tumor dynamics were observed during chemoradiation therapy for glioblastoma, supporting evaluation of daily MRI guided radiation therapy and treatment plan adaptation.

Glioma consensus contouring recommendations from a MR-Linac International Consortium Research Group and evaluation of a CT-MRI and MRI-only workflow.

INTRODUCTION: This study proposes contouring recommendations for radiation treatment planning target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) for both low grade and high grade gliomas. METHODS: Ten cases consisting of 5 glioblastomas and 5 grade II or III gliomas, including their respective gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and OARs were each contoured by 6 experienced neuro-radiation oncologists from 5 international institutions. Each case was first contoured using only MRI sequences (MRI-only), and then re-contoured with the addition of a fused planning CT (CT-MRI). The level of agreement among all contours was assessed using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) with the kappa statistic and Dice similarity coefficient. RESULTS: A high level of agreement was observed between the GTV and CTV contours in the MRI-only workflow with a mean kappa of 0.88 and 0.89, respectively, with no statistically significant differences compared to the CT-MRI workflow (p = 0.88 and p = 0.82 for GTV and CTV, respectively). Agreement in cochlea contours improved from a mean kappa of 0.39 to 0.41, to 0.69 to 0.71 with the addition of CT information (p < 0.0001 for both cochleae). Substantial to near perfect level of agreement was observed in all other contoured OARs with a mean kappa range of 0.60 to 0.90 in both MRI-only and CT-MRI workflows. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus contouring recommendations for low grade and high grade gliomas were established using the results from the consensus STAPLE contours, which will serve as a basis for further study and clinical trials by the MR-Linac Consortium.

CT based quantitative measures of the stability of fractured metastatically involved vertebrae treated with spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Mechanical instability secondary to vertebral metastases can lead to pathologic vertebral compression fracture (VCF) mechanical pain, neurological compromise, and the need for surgical stabilization. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a treatment for spinal metastases is effective for pain and local tumor control, it has been associated with an increased risk of VCF. This study quantified computed tomography (CT) based stability measures in metastatic vertebrae with VCF treated with spine SBRT. It was hypothesized that semi-automated quantification of VCF based on CT metrics would be related to clinical outcomes. 128 SBRT treated spinal metastases patients were identified from a prospective database. Of these, 18 vertebral segments were identified with a VCF post-SBRT. A semi-automated system for quantifying VCF was developed based on CT imaging before and after SBRT. The system identified and segmented SBRT treated vertebral bodies, calculated stability metrics at single time points and changes over time. In the vertebrae that developed a new (n = 7) or progressive (n = 11) VCF following SBRT, the median time to VCF/VCF progression was 1.74 months (range 0.53-7.79 months). Fractured thoracolumbar vertebrae that went on to be stabilized (cemented and/or instrumented), had greater fractured vertebral body volume progression over time (12%) compared to those not stabilized (0.4%, p < 0.05). Neither the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) or any single timepoint stability metrics in post-hoc analyses correlated with future stabilization. This pilot study presents a quantitative semi-automated method assessing fractured thoracolumbar vertebrae based on CT. Increased fractured vertebral body volume progression post-SBRT was shown to predict those patients who were subsequently stabilized, motivating study of methods that assess temporal radiological changes toward augmenting existing clinical management in the metastatic spine.

Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases and the Impact of Epidural Disease Grade.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (pSBRT) is an emerging indication for spinal metastases (SM). OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with pSBRT for SM. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for prospectively collected data of patients treated between September 2008 to December 2015 with pSBRT and followed with serial spinal MRIs every 2 to 3 mo until death or last follow-up. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictive factors. RESULTS: A total of 83 spinal segments in 47 patients treated with a median dose of 24 Gy in 2 fractions were included, with mostly lung and breast primaries. A total of 59.3% had preoperative high-grade epidural disease (ED) and 39.7% were unstable. The 12-mo cumulative incidence of local failure was 17% for all segments, and 33.3%, 21.8%, and 0% in segments with postoperative high-grade, low-grade, and no ED, respectively. Downgrading preoperative ED was predictive of better local control (P = .03). The grade of postoperative ED was also predictive for local control (P < .0001), as was a longer interval between prior radiotherapy and pSBRT in those previously irradiated (P = .004). The 12-mo overall survival rate was 55%. One case of radiculopathy, 3 vertebral compression fractures, and no cases of myelopathy, hardware failure, or skin breakdown were observed. CONCLUSION: pSBRT is an effective and safe treatment. The association between downgrading preoperative ED and better local control following pSBRT is confirmed and supports the concept of separation surgery.

Keeping Up with the Hybrid Magnetic Resonance Linear Accelerators: How Do Radiation Therapists Stay Current in the Era of Hybrid Technologies?

The benefits of integrating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into radiotherapy planning have long been extolled, first appearing in the literature as early as 1986. Most often described as a tool to be used when registered to a planning computed tomography to improve target and organ at risk delineation, the use of MRI for on-board image guidance and as a sole imaging modality throughout the entire radiotherapy pathway is quickly becoming a reality for appropriately selected patient populations in academic centres throughout the world. With the commercialization of these integrated magnetic resonance - radiotherapy delivery systems, an MRI-only workflow will prove beneficial, with MRI being used for treatment planning, localization, and on-treatment plan adaptation. Despite these technological advancements, recent surveys indicate uptake of MRI in radiotherapy as a routine practice has proven challenging. Reasons cited for this slow uptake were primarily related to health economics and/or accessibility. Furthermore, these surveys, like much of the academic literature, shy away from focusing on safe, sustainable staffing models enabled by comprehensive and appropriate education and training. In stark contrast to conebeam computed tomography guided therapy, magnetic resonance - radiotherapy systems are currently being operated by teams of physicians, radiographers, and physicists because of the diverse and complex tasks required to deliver treatment. The pace of innovation in RT remains high and unfortunately the window of opportunity to implement appropriate education continues to narrow. It is vital that we establish a framework to future-proof our profession. In the era of magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy, we have yet to address the question of how to devise a consensus on the requisite knowledge, skills, and competence for radiation therapists and therapy radiographers using and/or operating MRI that provides guidance, without becoming prohibitively costly or time consuming.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases at the Extreme Ends of the Spine: Imaging-Based Outcomes for Cervical and Sacral Metastases.

BACKGROUND: The unique anatomy and biomechanical features of the cervical spine and sacrum may impact treatment outcomes following spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Current data for spine metastases are not specific for these locations. OBJECTIVE: To report imaging-based SBRT outcomes to cervical and sacral metastases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our prospective spine SBRT database for cervical and sacral metastases. Patients were followed at 2- to 3-mo intervals with a clinical visit and full spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and we report overall survival (OS), vertebral compression fracture (VCF), and MR imaging-based local control (LC) rates. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients and 93 treated spinal segments were identified. Fifty-six segments were within the cervical spine and 37 within the sacrum, the median follow-up was 14.4 and 19.5 mo, and the median total dose/number of fractions was 24 Gy/2, respectively. Cumulative LC at 1 and 2 yr were 94.5% and 92.7% for the cervical cohort, and 86.5% and 78.7% in the sacral cohort, respectively. Lack of posterior spinal element involvement in the cervical spine (P < .0001) and absence of epidural disease (hazard ratio 0.275, 95% confidence interval 0.076-0.989, P = .048) in the sacral cohort predicted LC. Median OS was 16.3 and 28.5 mo in the cervical spine and sacrum cohorts, respectively. Two cases of sacral VCF, 1 brachial plexopathy, and 1 lumbar-sacral plexopathy were observed. CONCLUSION: Although high rates of LC were observed, strategies specific to the sacrum may require further optimization.

Imaging-Based Outcomes for 24 Gy in 2 Daily Fractions for Patients with de Novo Spinal Metastases Treated With Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).

PURPOSE: We report mature outcomes for a cohort of patients with no prior radiation (de novo) to the spine treated with 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions for metastases, which represents the same stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimen under evaluation in the current Symptom Control-24 phase 3 randomized trial (NCT02512965). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The cohort consisted of 279 de novo spinal metastases in 145 consecutive patients treated with 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fractions, identified from a prospective single-institution database. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), imaging-based local failure (LF), and cumulative risk of vertebral compression fractures (VCF). RESULTS: The median follow-up per treated metastasis was 15.0 months (range, 0.1-71.6). The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 73.1% and 60.7%, respectively. Presence of epidural disease (P < .0001), lung (P = .0415), and renal cell (P < .0001) primary histologies and baseline diffuse metastases (P = .0034) were significant prognostic factors for OS. The 1-year and 2-year LF rates were 9.7% and 17.6%, respectively, and the median time to LF was 9.2 month (range, 0.4-31.3 months). Only the presence of epidural disease predicted for LF (P < .0001). The cumulative risk of VCF at 1 and 2 years was 8.5% and 13.8%, respectively. Lytic (P = .0143) or mixed lytic/blastic (P = .0214) lesions, spinal malalignment (P = .0121), and the dose to 90% of the planning target volume (P = .0085) were significant predictors for VCF. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four Gray in 2 daily fractions is safe and effective in achieving high tumor control rates for de novo spinal metastases. These outcomes will serve as a benchmark for the ongoing Symptom Control-24 randomized trial comparing 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fractions to 20 Gy delivered in 5 daily conventional fractions.

Postoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases.

Spine is a common site of metastases in cancer patients. Spine surgery is indicated for select patients, typically those with mechanical instability and/or malignant epidural spinal cord (or cauda equina) compression. Although post-operative conventional palliative external beam radiation therapy has been the standard of care, technical improvements in radiation planning and image-guided radiotherapy have allowed for the application of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the spine. Spine SBRT is intended to ablate residual tumor and optimize local control by delivering several fold greater biologically effective doses. Early clinical experience of postoperative spinal SBRT report encouraging results in terms of safety and efficacy. In this review, we summarize the clinical and technical aspects pertinent to a safe and effective practice of postoperative SBRT for spinal metastases.

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Indications, Outcomes, and Points of Caution.

STUDY DESIGN: A broad narrative review. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article is to provide a technical review of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning and delivery, indications for treatment, outcomes, complications, and the challenges of response assessment. The surgical approach to spinal metastases is discussed with an overview of emerging minimally invasive techniques. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted on the techniques, outcomes, and developments in SBRT and surgery for spinal metastases. RESULTS: The optimal management of patients with spinal metastases is complex and requires multidisciplinary assessment from an oncologic team that is familiar with the shifting paradigm as a consequence of evolving techniques in surgery and stereotactic radiation, as well as new developments in systemic agents. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score and the epidural spinal cord compression (Bilsky) grading system are useful tools that facilitate communication among oncologic team members and can direct management by providing a baseline assessment of risks prior to therapy. The combined multimodality approach with "separation surgery" followed by postoperative spine SBRT achieves thecal sac decompression, improves tumor control, and avoids complications that may be associated with more extensive surgery. CONCLUSION: Spine SBRT is a highly effective treatment that is capable of delivering ablative doses to the target while sparing the critical organs-at-risk, chiefly the critical neural tissues, within a short and manageable schedule. At the same time, surgery occupies an important role in select patients, particularly with the expanding availability and expertise in minimally invasive techniques. With rapid adoption of spine SBRT in centers outside of the academic setting, it is imperative for the practicing oncologist to understand the relevance and application of these evolving concepts.

Volume of Lytic Vertebral Body Metastatic Disease Quantified Using Computed Tomography-Based Image Segmentation Predicts Fracture Risk After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine a threshold of vertebral body (VB) osteolytic or osteoblastic tumor involvement that would predict vertebral compression fracture (VCF) risk after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), using volumetric image-segmentation software. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A computational semiautomated skeletal metastasis segmentation process refined in our laboratory was applied to the pretreatment planning CT scan of 100 vertebral segments in 55 patients treated with spine SBRT. Each VB was segmented and the percentage of lytic and/or blastic disease by volume determined. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of VCF at 3 and 12 months was 14.1% and 17.3%, respectively. The median follow-up was 7.3 months (range, 0.6-67.6 months). In all, 56% of segments were determined lytic, 23% blastic, and 21% mixed, according to clinical radiologic determination. Within these 3 clinical cohorts, the segmentation-determined mean percentages of lytic and blastic tumor were 8.9% and 6.0%, 0.2% and 26.9%, and 3.4% and 15.8% by volume, respectively. On the basis of the entire cohort (n=100), a significant association was observed for the osteolytic percentage measures and the occurrence of VCF (P<.001) but not for the osteoblastic measures. The most significant lytic disease threshold was observed at ≥11.6% (odds ratio 37.4, 95% confidence interval 9.4-148.9). On multivariable analysis, ≥11.6% lytic disease (P<.001), baseline VCF (P<.001), and SBRT with ≥20 Gy per fraction (P=.014) were predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment lytic VB disease volumetric measures, independent of the blastic component, predict for SBRT-induced VCF. Larger-scale trials evaluating our software are planned to validate the results.

Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Following In-Field Failure of Initial SBRT for Spinal Metastases.

PURPOSE: We report our experience in salvaging spinal metastases initially irradiated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), who subsequently progressed with imaging-confirmed local tumor progression, and were re-irradiated with a salvage second SBRT course to the same level. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From a prospective database, 56 metastatic spinal segments in 40 patients were identified as having been irradiated with a salvage second SBRT course to the same level. In addition, 24 of 56 (42.9%) segments had initially been irradiated with conventional external beam radiation therapy before the first course of SBRT. Local control (LC) was defined as no progression on magnetic resonance imaging at the treated segment, and calculated according to the competing risk model. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated for each patient treated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The median salvage second SBRT total dose and number of fractions was 30 Gy in 4 fractions (range, 20-35 Gy in 2-5 fractions), and for the first course of SBRT was 24 Gy in 2 fractions (range, 20-35 Gy in 1-5 fractions). The median follow-up time after salvage second SBRT was 6.8 months (range, 0.9-39 months), the median OS was 10.0 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 48%. A longer time interval between the first and second SBRT courses predicted for better OS (P=.02). The crude LC was 77% (43/56), the 1-year LC rate was 81%, and the median time to local failure was 3.0 months (range, 2.7-16.7 months). Of the 13 local failures, 85% (11/13) and 46% (6/13) showed progression within the epidural space and paraspinal soft tissues, respectively. Absence of baseline paraspinal disease predicted for better LC (P<.01). No radiation-induced vertebral compression fractures or cases of myelopathy were observed. CONCLUSION: A second course of spine SBRT, most often with 30 Gy in 4 fractions, for spinal metastases that failed initial SBRT is a feasible and efficacious salvage treatment option.