Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing-based multi-cancer early detection "liquid biopsy" blood test in over 1,000 dogs using an independent testing set: The CANcer Detection in Dogs (CANDiD) study.

Cancer is the leading cause of death in dogs, yet there are no established screening paradigms for early detection. Liquid biopsy methods that interrogate cancer-derived genomic alterations in cell-free DNA in blood are being adopted for multi-cancer early detection in human medicine and are now available for veterinary use. The CANcer Detection in Dogs (CANDiD) study is an international, multi-center clinical study designed to validate the performance of a novel multi-cancer early detection "liquid biopsy" test developed for noninvasive detection and characterization of cancer in dogs using next-generation sequencing (NGS) of blood-derived DNA; study results are reported here. In total, 1,358 cancer-diagnosed and presumably cancer-free dogs were enrolled in the study, representing the range of breeds, weights, ages, and cancer types seen in routine clinical practice; 1,100 subjects met inclusion criteria for analysis and were used in the validation of the test. Overall, the liquid biopsy test demonstrated a 54.7% (95% CI: 49.3-60.0%) sensitivity and a 98.5% (95% CI: 97.0-99.3%) specificity. For three of the most aggressive canine cancers (lymphoma, hemangiosarcoma, osteosarcoma), the detection rate was 85.4% (95% CI: 78.4-90.9%); and for eight of the most common canine cancers (lymphoma, hemangiosarcoma, osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, mast cell tumor, mammary gland carcinoma, anal sac adenocarcinoma, malignant melanoma), the detection rate was 61.9% (95% CI: 55.3-68.1%). The test detected cancer signal in patients representing 30 distinct cancer types and provided a Cancer Signal Origin prediction for a subset of patients with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the test accurately detected cancer signal in four presumably cancer-free subjects before the onset of clinical signs, further supporting the utility of liquid biopsy as an early detection test. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that NGS-based liquid biopsy can offer a novel option for noninvasive multi-cancer detection in dogs.

Retrospective evaluation of toceranib phosphate (Palladia) in cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Objectives The aim of the study was to determine the clinical benefit and adverse event profile of toceranib phosphate in the treatment of feline oral squamous cell carcinoma (FOSCC). Methods Data obtained from the medical records of cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 treated with toceranib phosphate were compared with medical record data from cats that did not receive toceranib, cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation, to determine the response to toceranib treatment and adverse event profile of toceranib in cats. Concurrent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was allowed. Results Forty-six cats with FOSCC were included; 23 received treatment with toceranib (group 1) and 23 did not (group 2). The overall biological response rate in group 1 was 56.5%. Median survival time of toceranib-treated cats was significantly longer at 123 days compared with 45 days in cats not treated with toceranib ( P = 0.01). Cats achieving stable disease or better on toceranib therapy had significantly longer progression-free survival ( P <0.0001) and median survival ( P = 0.0042) times than those with progressive disease on toceranib. Administration of NSAIDs was also associated with significantly improved survival time ( P = 0.0038) among all cats. Anorexia was common but may reflect the underlying disease in these patients. Toceranib was well tolerated in cats, with the most common side effect being mild gastrointestinal toxicity. Conclusions and relevance Toceranib was well tolerated in cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma and may lead to improved survival times, especially when combined with NSAIDs. NSAID administration was also associated with improved survival times, and the relative benefit of toceranib and NSAIDs is difficult to determine from this retrospective study. Despite improvement in survival times, long-term survival in this patient population remained poor. As toceranib was well tolerated and may improve survival time, prospective evaluation of toceranib alone is warranted to assess response as a single agent and as part of multimodal therapy in an effort to achieve a more durable response in FOSCC.