RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare autoantibody features in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and individuals presenting antimitochondria antibodies (AMAs) but no clinical or biochemical evidence of disease. METHODS: A total of 212 AMA-positive serum samples were classified into four groups: PBC (definite PBC, n = 93); PBC/autoimmune disease (AID; PBC plus other AID, n = 37); biochemically normal (BN) individuals (n = 61); and BN/AID (BN plus other AID, n = 21). Samples were tested by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on rat kidney (IIF-AMA) and ELISA [antibodies to pyruvate dehydrogenase E2-complex (PDC-E2), gp-210, Sp-100, and CENP-A/B]. AMA isotype was determined by IIF-AMA. Affinity of anti-PDC-E2 IgG was determined by 8 M urea-modified ELISA. RESULTS: High-titer IIF-AMA was more frequent in PBC and PBC/AID (57 and 70 %) than in BN and BN/AID samples (23 and 19 %) (p < 0.001). Triple isotype IIF-AMA (IgA/IgM/IgG) was more frequent in PBC and PBC/AID samples (35 and 43 %) than in BN sample (18 %; p = 0.008; p = 0.013, respectively). Anti-PDC-E2 levels were higher in PBC (mean 3.82; 95 % CI 3.36-4.29) and PBC/AID samples (3.89; 3.15-4.63) than in BN (2.43; 1.92-2.94) and BN/AID samples (2.52; 1.54-3.50) (p < 0.001). Anti-PDC-E2 avidity was higher in PBC (mean 64.5 %; 95 % CI 57.5-71.5 %) and PBC/AID samples (66.1 %; 54.4-77.8 %) than in BN samples (39.2 %; 30.9-37.5 %) (p < 0.001). PBC and PBC/AID recognized more cell domains (mitochondria, nuclear envelope, PML/sp-100 bodies, centromere) than BN (p = 0.008) and BN/AID samples (p = 0.002). Three variables were independently associated with established PBC: high-avidity anti-PDC-E2 (OR 4.121; 95 % CI 2.118-8.019); high-titer IIF-AMA (OR 4.890; 2.319-10.314); antibodies to three or more antigenic cell domains (OR 9.414; 1.924-46.060). CONCLUSION: The autoantibody profile was quantitatively and qualitatively more robust in definite PBC as compared with AMA-positive biochemically normal individuals.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sensitivity and specificity of anti-human tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-htTGA) seem to be superior to those of anti-tissue transglutaminase of guinea pig (anti-gptTGA) for screening patients with celiac disease (CD), but there are still controversies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two INOVA ELISA kits to detect IgA anti-htTGA and anti-gptTGA in patients with and without CD. METHODS: The study groups were comprised of 49 anti-endomysial antibody (EMA)-positive untreated-CD, and 123 controls (EMA-negative treated CD, EMA-negative chronic diarrhea, autoimmune hepatitis, inflammatory bowel disease and healthy people). RESULTS: The agreement between the two ELISAs was statistically significant in all study groups and there was no significant difference between them (92.7% agreement; kappa = 0.70; kappa p = 0.001; McNemar p = 1). All patients with serum reactivity of more than 100 units had histologic diagnosis of CD. In seven of 10 patients with treated-CD who had control biopsies, villous atrophy was still present in four who tested positive by both kits. Two of three celiacs with histologic remission tested positive for both anti-tTGA. CONCLUSIONS: the anti-gptTGA and anti-htTGA determination were equally efficient in identifying patients with untreated-CD with high titers of EMA. Whatever the anti-tTGA ELISA used, the reactivity above 100 units was always related to active CD diagnosed by histologic alterations in intestinal biopsies. The anti-tTGA reactivity by both kits was not only similar in determining histologic activity in the follow-up of CD after a gluten free diet, but also in identifying positive sera from the control groups, regardless if CD has been confirmed by duodenal biopsies.
Assuntos
Anticorpos/sangue , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Fator XIIIa/imunologia , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Adulto , Animais , Doença Celíaca/sangue , Doença Celíaca/imunologia , Doença Crônica , Diarreia/sangue , Diarreia/enzimologia , Diarreia/imunologia , Feminino , Cobaias , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/sangue , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/enzimologia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/imunologia , MasculinoRESUMO
GOALS: To assess maternal and fetal outcomes and clinical management of pregnancy in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information about maternal and fetal outcomes, and AIH activity during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. There is no consensus about the administration of azathioprine during pregnancy and breastfeeding. STUDY: Retrospective analysis of 54 pregnancies (3 still in progress) in 39 AIH patients. RESULTS: The median age at conception was 24 years, and 68.4% of women had liver cirrhosis. Before conception and in early pregnancy, azathioprine and prednisone were administered in 48.1%, but treatment regimen was usually changed further to 20 mg/d prednisone; and 20.4% were off treatment. There were 36 livebirths, and fetal loss rates were 29.4% (13 miscarriages, 1 stillbirth, and 1 ectopic pregnancy). Preterm birth rate was 11.8%. In 2 cases, there was acute fetal distress; and in 2 others congenital malformations (3.9%). The rate of serious maternal complication was 7.8%, with no deaths. There were no flares in 41.2% pregnancies, but aminotransferase elevations occurred in 54.9%, 31.4% of which were true AIH relapses, only registered in the postpartum period. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high fetal miscarriage rate, pregnancy in AIH was safe. Patients needed careful monitoring, especially in the postpartum period because of relapses. There was no evidence of a cause and effect relationship among azathioprine administration and premature births and congenital abnormalities, but more studies are necessary. Higher doses of prednisone may be an alternative option for those who prefer azathioprine withdrawal during pregnancy.
Assuntos
Hepatite Autoimune , Complicações na Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Aborto Espontâneo , Adolescente , Adulto , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Anormalidades Congênitas , Feminino , Hepatite Autoimune/complicações , Hepatite Autoimune/diagnóstico , Hepatite Autoimune/epidemiologia , Hepatite Autoimune/imunologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/imunologia , Nascimento Prematuro , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Natimorto , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The association of nodular regenerative hyperplasia with celiac disease is not as well established as it is with hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension. IgA anticardiolipin antibodies were reported recently in celiac patients with nodular regenerative hyperplasia. The subject of this study was the description of pulmonary abnormalities and IgA anticardiolipin antibodies in celiac patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension. Five patients with portal hypertension were investigated to diagnose its etiology. Celiac disease was diagnosed by means of autoantibody reactivity and duodenal biopsies. Liver histology revealed nodular regenerative hyperplasia in four patients and suggested its presence in 1 case. Two cyanotic patients had severe hypoxemia with a confirmed diagnosis of hepatopulmonary syndrome. Another case exhibited features of hepatopulmonary syndrome with increased levels of arterial pulmonary pressure. The remaining 2 cases had slight abnormalities of arterial oxygenation. Three patients had reactivity to IgA anticardiolipin antibodies. The concomitance of celiac disease and nodular regenerative hyperplasia, two infrequent conditions, raises suspicion of there being a nonfortuitous coincidence. Pulmonary abnormalities, and especially hepatopulmonary syndrome, are described for the first time in association with celiac disease and nodular regenerative hyperplasia.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Anticardiolipina/análise , Doença Celíaca/imunologia , Hiperplasia Nodular Focal do Fígado/imunologia , Síndrome Hepatopulmonar/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Doença Celíaca/complicações , Feminino , Hiperplasia Nodular Focal do Fígado/complicações , Síndrome Hepatopulmonar/complicações , Humanos , Fígado/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
RACIONAL: Em razão dos riscos relacionados ao tratamento prolongado com prednisona e azatioprina, tenta-se a retirada dessas drogas em pacientes com hepatite auto-imune em remissão. Como há alta taxa de recidiva, a maioria dos pacientes recebe tratamento por tempo indefinido. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a segurança e a eficácia do tratamento de manutenção com cloroquina na prevenção de recidiva da hepatite auto-imune. MÉTODOS: O tratamento convencional foi suspenso após obtenção de remissão bioquímica e histológica. Difosfato de cloroquina foi administrado, 250 mg diariamente, por pelo menos 12 meses ou até a ocorrência de recidiva, definida pela elevação dos níveis de aminotransferases em, pelo menos, duas vezes acima dos valores normais. RESULTADOS: Quatorze pacientes foram consecutivamente tratados e comparados com 18 controles históricos. Houve chance de 6,49 vezes maior de recidiva nos pacientes do grupo de controles históricos, quando comparados com os pacientes do grupo tratado com o difosfato de cloroquina. (72,2% versus 23,5%; P = 0.031). CONCLUSÕES: O grupo tratado com cloroquina teve menor freqüência de recidivas da hepatite auto-imune. Difosfato de cloroquina foi seguro em pacientes com hepatite auto-imune e cirrose hepática sem descompensação clínica, na dose de 250 mg diariamente e até 2 anos de uso. Esses resultados preliminares estimulam a realização de estudos controlados, comparando cloroquina com placebo ou com o tratamento de manutenção.
Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Cloroquina/análogos & derivados , Hepatite Autoimune/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cloroquina/uso terapêutico , Hepatite Autoimune/enzimologia , Projetos Piloto , Indução de Remissão , Recidiva/prevenção & controle , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Due to the risks related to long-term treatment with prednisone and azathioprine, most clinicians try to withdraw these drugs when patients with autoimmune hepatitis are in remission. However, there is a high probability of relapse, and most patients end up receiving maintenance treatment. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of maintenance treatment with chloroquine in the prevention of autoimmune hepatitis relapses. METHODS: Classical treatment was stopped after achievement of biochemical and histological remission of autoimmune hepatitis. Chloroquine diphosphate, 250 mg daily, was given for at least 12 months or until the occurrence of relapses defined by levels of aminotransferases at least twice the upper normal values. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were consecutively treated and compared with 18 historical controls. There was a 6.49 (1.38-30.30) greater chance of relapse in the historical controls when compared with patients treated with chloroquine (72.2% x 23.5%; 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The group treated with chloroquine had a lower frequency of relapses. Chloroquine was safe in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and hepatic cirrhosis without decompensation, on 250 mg daily up to 2 years. These preliminary results provide a basis for upcoming controlled studies comparing chloroquine with placebo or for maintenance treatment with prednisone and/or azathioprine for the prevention of autoimmune hepatitis relapses.