Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(2): 919-925, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37776393

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cruciate (ACL) reconstruction at minimum 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Ninety-three patients who underwent primary unilateral ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft, transtibial technique and femoral cortico-cancellous screw suspension device (Athrax, Leader Medica s.r.l) between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up was 136 months. Evaluation was performed using the International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm Knee Score and Tegner Activity Level Scale. Incidence of OA was determined by comparing standard anteroposterior and lateral weightbearing radiographs of the ACL-reconstructed and contralateral knee. Osteoarthritis severity was graded according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score. RESULTS: Median Tegner activity level was 6 (5-7). Lysholm and IKDC scores were 100 (95-100) and 90 (86-95), respectively, KOOS was 98 (95-100). Of ACL-reconstructed knees, 41 (50%) had radiographic OA, of which 6 (7.3%) had severe OA (KL III). Of the contralateral healthy knees, 28 (34.1%) had radiographic evidence of OA. Of these 22 (26.8%) and 6 (7.3%) patients had, respectively, KL-I and KL-II. 11 patients (11.8%) underwent subsequent knee surgery: 5 (5.4%) revisions, 3 (3.2%) meniscal surgeries, 2 (2.2%) other surgeries, 1 (1.1%) contralateral ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that ACL reconstruction with HT autograft and cortico-cancellous screw suspension device determines satisfying clinical results after 10 years of follow-up. From our cohort, a low rate of graft failure has been reported, even though almost 50% of patients present a knee OA greater or equal to grade II KL.


Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Humanos , Tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais/transplante , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autoenxertos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos
2.
J Orthop ; 24: 86-90, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33679033

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the accuracy of an extramedullary guide system for femoral component alignment in TKA. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 87 total knee arthroplasties using a newly developed extramedullary guide system. RESULTS: Correct postoperative coronal plane femoral component, with deviation from neutral alignment by 3° or less, was found in 87% of the study population. The percentages were 100%, 91% and 79% for HKA of 0-3°, 3-10° and >10°respectively. CONCLUSION: The correct use of the extramedullary guide system allows the restoration of the neutral mechanical axes of the lower limb, especially in cases of limited varus deformity.

3.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 27(6): 1873-1881, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29860601

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is debated, with considerable controversy and variability among surgeons. Autograft tendons are actually the most used grafts for primary surgery; however, allografts have been used in greater frequency for both primary and revision ACL surgery over the past decade. Given the great debate on the use of allografts in ACL-R, the "Allografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction" consensus statement was developed among orthopedic surgeons and members of SIGASCOT (Società Italiana del Ginocchio, Artroscopia, Sport, Cartilagine, Tecnologie Ortopediche), with extensive experience in ACL-R, to investigate their habits in the use of allograft in different clinical situations. The results of this consensus statement will serve as benchmark information for future research and will help surgeons to facilitate the clinical decision making. METHODS: In March 2017, a formal consensus process was developed using a modified Delphi technique method, involving a steering group (9 participants), a rating group (28 participants) and a peer-review group (31 participants). Nine statements were generated and then debated during a SIGASCOT consensus meeting. A manuscript has been then developed to report methodology and results of the consensus process and finally approved by all steering group members. RESULTS: A different level of consensus has been reached among the topics selected. Strong agreement has been reported in considering harvesting, treatment and conservation methods relevant for clinical results, and in considering biological integration longer in allograft compared to autograft. Relative agreement has been reported in using allograft as the first-line graft for revision ACL-R, in considering biological integration a crucial aspect for rehabilitation protocol set-up, and in recommending a delayed return to sport when using allograft. Relative disagreement has been reported in using allograft as the first-line graft for primary ACL-R in patients over 50, and in not considering clinical results of allograft superior to autograft. Strong disagreement has been reported in using allograft as the first-line graft for primary ACL-R and for skeletally immature patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this consensus do not represent a guideline for surgeons, but could be used as starting point for an international discussion on use of allografts in ACL-R. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, consensus of experts.


Assuntos
Aloenxertos , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/normas , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Itália , Reoperação , Volta ao Esporte
4.
Joints ; 6(2): 80-84, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30051102

RESUMO

Purpose The aim of the study was to test the distalization and medialization of the tibial tuberosity (DMTT) for the treatment of patellar instability associated with patella alta, focusing on residual instability and pain. Methods Twenty-four consecutive patients (26 knees) suffering from patellofemoral instability and patella alta were treated by DMTT. Two groups were identified, which differed for documented history of frank patella dislocation. The groups were named objective patellar instability (OPI) (history of dislocation) and potential patella instability (PPI) (no dislocation). Outcome was measured with visual analogue scale (VAS), Kujala score, and Tegner score. Comparison between groups was performed using Student's t -test, Wilcoxon rank score, and Fisher's exact test (significance at p < 0.05). Results At 50 ± 18 and 41 ± 18 months of follow-up, respectively, both PPI and OPI groups obtained a significant pain reduction and functional improvement. The PPI group showed a significant decrease of the subjective instability. No procedure-related complications were reported. Conclusion This study suggests that DMTT is a viable option for PPI patients with patella alta. The outcome was comparable between PPI and OPI cases; however, decrease in subjective instability was significantly greater in PPI patients. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA