A two-step surgery and a multidisciplinary approach in a centenarian patient with an acute presentation of right colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: As surgery remains the cornerstone of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment, the number of older patients presented for colorectal resection is rapidly increasing. Nevertheless, the choice to operate an oldest-old patient still remain challenging and requires a careful assessment of risk to benefit ratio in order to guarantee appropriate surgical strategies and perioperative management. CASE PRESENTATION: A centenarian patient, acutely admitted to the emergency department, was diagnosed with an ileus caused by stenosing ascending colon cancer with abnormal distension of the right colon at high risk of perforation. Facing with this complex clinical scenario, a lateral decompressive cecostomy as alternative surgical procedure, was performed in local anesthesia in order to avoid the stressful event of an emergency surgery. Thereafter, the patient was admitted to the surgical ward and followed by a geriatrician who performed a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and daily clinical evaluations. This integrated plan of care was mainly focused on rehabilitation, nutritional interventions and therapeutic reconciliation, maximizing patient's clinical conditions and performance status. Then, the second surgical step, the radical colon surgery with curative intent and bowel continuity reestablishment was performed, demonstrating to be feasible and safety also in a very advanced age patient in term of prolonged survival and preservation of an adequate quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case-report that illustrates a successful two step surgery for CRC in a centenarian patient thanks to a multidisciplinary based approach, overwhelming the mere concept of chronological age.

Continuous epidural versus wound infusion plus single morphine bolus as postoperative analgesia in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: We compared a bundle of interventions including wound infiltration and continuous infusion with local anesthetics plus a single morphine bolus (CWI-M) with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) as postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Fifty-one adults undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were randomized in this non-inferiority open-label trial. In the CEI group, patients received thoracic epidural levobupivacaine 0.12% plus sufentanil 0.4 µg/mL infusion for 48 hours. In the CWI-M group, the wound was infiltrated with 10 mL levobupivacaine 0.5%, patients received a morphine bolus before the end of anesthesia and levobupivacaine 0.25% infusion through two multi-holed pre-peritoneal catheters for 48 hours. Systemic morphine was administered as rescue in both groups. The primary endpoint was the mean Numeric Rating Scale score in the first 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Mean NRS was 1.7 (95% CI: from 1.2 to 2.2) in the CEI and 2.2 (95% CI: from 1.7 to 2.7) in the CWI-M group, the 90% CI of difference was from -0.1 to 1.1, not including the non-inferiority margin of 1.3. The cumulative rescue morphine dose per patient was higher in CWI-M than in CEI group (3.7±4.4 vs. 0.8±2.4 mg, P=0.006); moreover, NRS at arousal was higher in CWI-M (P=0.003). No differences were observed in postoperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery-related outcomes, length of stay nor complications. CONCLUSIONS: CWI-M was comparable to CEI in in postoperative pain control, but it was associated with higher need of rescue systemic opiates and with a worse early pain control.