Multi-Institutional Bladder Exstrophy Consortium After 8 Years: The Short- and Intermediate-Term Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Bladder exstrophy (BE) poses challenges both during the surgical repair and throughout follow-up. In 2013, a multi-institutional BE consortium was initiated, which included utilization of unified surgical principles for the complete primary repair of exstrophy (CPRE), real-time coaching, ongoing video capture and review of video footage, prospective data collection, and routine patient data analysis, with the goal of optimizing the surgical procedure to minimize devastating complications such as glans ischemia and bladder dehiscence while maximizing the rate of volitional voiding with continence and long-term protection of the upper tracts. This study reports on our short-term complications and intermediate-term continence outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single prospective database for all patients undergoing surgery with a BE epispadias complex diagnosis at 3 institutions since February 2013 was used. For this study, data for children with a diagnosis of classic BE who underwent primary CPRE from February 2013 to February 2021 were collected. Data recorded included sex, age at CPRE, adjunct surgeries including ureteral reimplantations and hernia repairs at the time of CPRE, osteotomies, and immobilization techniques, and subsequent surgeries. Data on short-term postoperative outcomes, defined as those occurring within the first 90 days after surgery, were abstracted. In addition, intermediate-term outcomes were obtained for patients operated on between February 2013 and February 2017 to maintain a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Outcomes included upper tract dilation on renal and bladder ultrasound, presence of vesicoureteral reflux, cortical defects on nuclear scintigraphy, and continence status. Bladder emptying was assessed with respect to spontaneous voiding ability, need for clean intermittent catheterization, and duration of dry intervals. All operating room encounters that occurred subsequent to initial CPRE were recorded. RESULTS: CPRE was performed in 92 classic BE patients in the first 8 years of the collaboration (62 boys), including 46 (29 boys) during the first 4 years. In the complete cohort, the median (interquartile range) age at CPRE was 79 (50.3) days. Bilateral iliac osteotomies were performed in 89 (97%) patients (42 anterior and 47 posterior). Of those undergoing osteotomies 84 were immobilized in a spica cast (including the 3 patients who did not have an osteotomy), 6 in modified Bryant's traction, and 2 in external fixation with Buck's traction. Sixteen (17%) patients underwent bilateral ureteral reimplantations at the time of CPRE. Nineteen (21%) underwent hernia repair at the time of CPRE, 6 of which were associated with orchiopexy. Short-term complications within 90 days occurred in 31 (34%), and there were 13 subsequent surgeries within the first 90 days. Intermediate-term outcomes were available for 40 of the 46 patients, who have between 4 and 8 years of follow-up, at a median of 5.7 year old. Thirty-three patients void volitionally, with variable dry intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative efforts of prospective data collection have provided granular data for evaluation. Short-term outcomes demonstrate no devastating complications, that is, penile injury or bladder dehiscence, but there were other significant complications requiring further surgeries. Intermediate-term data show that boys in particular show encouraging spontaneous voiding and continence status post CPRE, while girls have required modification of the surgical technique over time to address concerns with urinary retention. Overall, 40% of children with at least 4 years of follow-up are voiding with dry intervals of > 1 hour.

Male epispadias repair: Outcomes at three sites prior to the establishment of a multi-institutional collaboration.

INTRODUCTION: Epispadias, which occurs on the more mild end of the Bladder Exstrophy Epispadias Complex (BEEC) spectrum, presents still with a wide range of severity in boys, from mild glanular epispadias to penopubic epispadias with severe urethral and bladder neck defects. Surgical management ranges from isolated epispadias repair to epispadias repair with bladder neck reconstruction (BNR) with or without pelvic osteotomies. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate outcomes in epispadias treated at three institutions prior to formation of a formal collaboration. In addition, we sought to delineate outcomes based on anatomic severity at time of diagnosis, and initial procedure performed in cases of penopubic epispadias. METHODS: IRB approved databases were retrospectively queried at three institutions for patients who underwent repair of epispadias between 1/1993 and 1/2013. Degree of epispadias, age and technique at initial repair, and self-reported continence status at last follow-up were recorded. Continence was categorized as: wet, intermediate (dry 2-3 h), or dry, while also distinguishing those who void and those who require clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). Those not seen since 1/1/2015, younger than 10 years at last follow up, or in whom continence data were not recorded were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 48 boys were identified; 36 met inclusion criteria. The epispadias cohort consisted of 8 glanular epispadias (GE) (22%); 8 penile epispadias (PE) (22%), and 20 penopubic epispadias (PPE) (56%) with a median follow-up of 11.3 years (3.2-26.2 years). Overall, 33 of 36 (92%) boys void per urethra. Within the group that voids, 19/33 (58%) are completely dry, while 6/33 (18%) are wet. Among patients who underwent initial epispadias repair without concurrent or subsequent bladder neck reconstruction, continence rates were: GE 63% (5/8); PE 75% (6/8); PPE 71% (5/7). Among the 9 boys with PPE who underwent initial epispadias repair with concurrent BNR, 22% (2/9) were dry with no further surgeries. Overall, 8/20 (40%) of boys with PPE void with complete dryness. DISCUSSION: This multi-center retrospective review of continence in epispadias demonstrates that even some boys with glanular and penile epispadias can have challenges with continence, and boys with penopubic epispadias may remain wet despite careful preoperative assessment of bladder neck functionality and concurrent BNR. CONCLUSION: Continence outcomes in boys with all degrees of epispadias can be variable. Even boys with more distal defects may have significant bladder neck deficiency. And those with the most severe form of epispadias may require bladder neck reconstruction to achieve continence.