The effects of oocyte donor and recipient body mass index on live birth rates and pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproduction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of oocyte donor and recipient body mass index (BMI) on outcomes of vitrified donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology (ART). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Private fertility center. PATIENTS: A total of 338 oocyte donors and 932 recipients who underwent 1,651 embryo transfer cycles in 2008-2015. INTERVENTIONS: Multivariable log binomial regression models with cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the adjusted risk ratios. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Live birth, defined as the delivery of at least one live-born infant, including all embryo transfer cycles. Secondary outcomes included birth weight and gestational length only among singleton live births. RESULTS: The mean ± SD body mass indexes (BMIs) of donors and recipients were 22.6 ± 2.5 kg/m2 and 24.6 ± 4.8 kg/m2, respectively. There were no significant associations between donor BMI and probability of live birth. Recipients with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 had a significantly higher probability of live birth compared with normal-weight recipients. Among singleton live births, recipients with BMI <18.5 kg/m2 had a lower risk whereas women with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 had a higher risk of delivery in an earlier gestational week compared with normal weight women. Recipients with a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 also had a higher risk of having a low birth weight infant compared with normal-weight women. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of vitrified donor oocyte ART, recipient BMI was positively associated with probability of live birth but negatively associated with gestational length and birth weight among singleton births.

When using donor oocytes, does embryo stage matter? An analysis of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfers using a cryopreserved donor oocyte bank.

PURPOSE: Oocyte donor in vitro fertilization (IVF) represents an ideal model to study the effects of embryo stage on reproductive success, as embryos come from young women with high-quality oocytes. Our study aimed to determine if embryo transfer stage affected outcomes in oocyte donor IVF, including the common scenario where only a limited number of quality embryos are available after culture. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analyzed anonymous vitrified donor oocyte cycles at a single clinic between 2008 and 2015. Overall, 983 recipients underwent 1178 warming cycles resulting in fresh transfer of one-to-two embryos. Our primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included multiple birth, birthweight, and gestational age. Log binomial regression with cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) accounting for recipient age, race, and transfer year. RESULTS: Among 132 cleavage and 1046 blastocyst transfer cycles, cleavage transfers were associated with lower probability of live birth (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.88). Subgroup analysis focused on cycles with a limited number of quality embryos 3 days post-fertilization (≤2), as clinically these women were most likely to be considered for cleavage transfers. Among these cycles (120 cleavage, 371 blastocyst), cleavage transfers were still associated with lower live birth rates compared to blastocyst (aRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.87) CONCLUSIONS: Even in a donor oocyte model with high-quality oocytes, there was a benefit to extended culture and blastocyst transfer, including when only one-to-two quality embryos were available after early culture. This is possibly owed to improved uterine synchronicity or decreased contractility.

The effect of donor and recipient race on outcomes of assisted reproduction.

BACKGROUND: A growing literature suggests that minority races, particularly Black women, have a lower probability of live birth and higher risk of perinatal complications after autologous assisted reproductive technology. However, questions still remain as to whether these racial disparities have arisen because of associations between race and oocyte/embryo quality, the uterine environment, or a combination of the two. Oocyte donation assisted reproductive technology represents a unique approach to examine this question. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the associations between the race of female oocyte donors and recipients and live birth rates following vitrified donor oocyte assisted reproductive technologies. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single, private fertility clinic that included 327 oocyte donors and 899 recipients who underwent 1601 embryo transfer cycles (2008-2015). Self-reported race of the donor and recipient were abstracted from medical records. Live birth was defined as the delivery of at least 1 live-born neonate. We used multivariable cluster weighted generalized estimating equations with binomial distribution and log link function to estimate the adjusted risk ratios of live birth, adjusting for donor age and body mass index, recipient age and body mass index, tubal and uterine factor infertility, and year of oocyte retrieval. RESULTS: The racial profile of our donors and recipients were similar: 73% white, 13% Black, 4% Hispanic, 8% Asian, and 2% other. Women who received oocytes from Hispanic donors had a significantly higher probability of live birth (adjusted risk ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.36) than women who received oocytes from white donors. Among Hispanic recipients, however, there was no significant difference in probability of live birth compared with white recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.26). Embryo transfer cycles using oocytes from Black donors (adjusted risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.03) and Black recipients (adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.99) had a lower probability of live birth than white donors and white recipients, respectively. There were no significant differences in the probability of live birth among Hispanic, Asian, and other race recipients compared with white recipients. CONCLUSION: Black female recipients had a lower probability of live birth following assisted reproductive technology, even when using vitrified oocytes from healthy donors. Female recipients who used vitrified oocytes from Hispanic donors had a higher probability of live birth regardless of their own race.

Impact of male partner characteristics and semen parameters on in vitro fertilization and obstetric outcomes in a frozen oocyte donor model.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which paternal variables of age, body mass index (BMI), and sperm parameters affect vitrified donor oocyte IVF outcomes. Previous studies examining the impact of male partner characteristics on in-vitro fertilization (IVF) have found conflicting results. Concerns are rising over the potential effects of paternal factors, such as age and obesity, on pregnancy and child health. Frozen donor oocyte IVF offers an ideal model to study these effects. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Private fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Nine hundred forty-nine recipients undergoing transfer of blastocyst embryo(s) from a vitrified oocyte donor bank between 2008-2015. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, rate of low birth weight singleton infants (≤2500 g), and preterm deliveries (PTD) of singleton infants (<37 wk). RESULTS: After adjusting for covariates known to affect oocyte donation cycle success, male age, BMI and sperm parameters were not associated with differences in IVF outcomes. There were higher PTD rates for men ≥51 years and BMI ≥35 kg/m2, however, these were not significant after adjustment. There were no differences in rates of low birth weight infants with men >35 years or BMI >25 kg/m2. Lastly, there were no differences in rates of PTD or low birth weight infants with abnormal sperm parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Neither advancing male age, elevated BMI, nor poor sperm quality were associated with outcomes in frozen donor oocyte IVF cycles in this study. Intracytoplamic sperm injection and "oocyte quality" likely mitigate some of the effects of male variables on outcomes following cryopreserved oocyte donation.

Sex selection for non-medical indications: a survey of current pre-implantation genetic screening practices among U.S. ART clinics.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the current percentage of United States (U.S.) assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics offering sex selection via pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) for non-medical purposes. METHODS: The authors conducted website review and telephone interview survey of 493 U.S. ART clinics performing in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2017. Main outcome measures were pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS)/pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) practices and non-medical sex selection practices including family balancing. RESULTS: Of the 493 ART clinics in the USA, 482 clinics (97.8%) responded to our telephone interview survey. Among all U.S. ART clinics, 91.9% (n = 449) reported offering PGS and/or PGD. Furthermore, 476 clinics responded to survey questions about sex selection practices. Of those ART clinics, 72.7% (n = 346) reported offering sex selection. More specifically among those clinics offering sex selection, 93.6% (n = 324) reported performing sex selection for family balancing, and 81.2% (n = 281) reported performing for elective purposes (patient preference, regardless of rationale for the request). For couples without infertility, 83.5% (n = 289) of clinics offer sex selection for family balancing and 74.6% (n = 258) for non-specific elective reasons. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of U.S. ART clinics offer non-medical sex selection, a percentage that has increased substantially since last reported in 2006.