Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
F S Rep ; 3(3): 184-191, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36212571

RESUMO

Objective: To investigate cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) in cycles with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) among patients aged <35 and 35-37 years. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reporting clinics. Patients: A total of 31,900 patients aged ≤ 37 years with initial oocyte retrievals between January 2014 and December 2015 followed through December 2016. Interventions: None. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was CLBR among patients aged <35 and 35-37 years. The secondary outcomes included multifetal births, miscarriage, preterm birth, perinatal mortality, and the time to pregnancy resulting in a live birth. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) adjusting for age, body mass index, total 2 pronuclei embryos, embryos transferred, and follow-up timeframe. Results: Among patients aged <35 years, PGT-A was associated with reduced CLBRs (70.6% vs. 71.1%; aOR, 0.82; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.72-0.93). No association was found between PGT-A and CLBRs among patients aged 35-37 years (66.6% vs. 62.5%; aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.01). Overall, there was no significant difference in the miscarriage rate (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.82-1.14). Multifetal birth rates were lower with PGT-A (9.5% vs. 23.1%); however, PGT-A was not an independent predictor of multifetal birth (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.91-1.36). The average time to pregnancy resulting in a live birth was 2.37 months (SD 3.20) for untested transfers vs. 4.58 months (SD 3.53) for PGT-A transfers. Conclusions: In women aged <35, the CLBR was lower with PGT-A than with the transfer of untested embryos. In women aged 35-37 years, PGT-A did not improve CLBRs.

2.
F S Rep ; 2(1): 50-57, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223273

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of initial elective single embryo transfer (ieSET) and initial double embryo transfer (iDET) strategies on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and perinatal outcomes after IVF. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) reporting clinics. PATIENTS: 49,333 patients with initial oocyte retrievals between January 2014 and December 2015. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was CLBR, defined as up to 1 live birth resulting from a retrieval cycle and linked transfer cycles. Secondary outcomes included cycles to pregnancy, multifetal delivery rate, infant birthweight, and perinatal mortality rate. RESULTS: Compared to iDET, ieSET was associated with increased CLBR (74% vs. 57%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.26-1.38). When stratified by age, the same trend was seen in all age categories, with statistical significance for those <38 years of age. ieSET was associated with reduced multifetal delivery (8% vs. 34%; AOR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.12-0.14), increased birthweight (mean difference, 406 grams; 95% CI, 387-425), reduced preterm births (1.2% vs. 2.8%), and reduced perinatal mortality (0.5% vs. 1.2%). Compared with iDET, ieSET was associated with slightly more embryo transfer cycles (1.7 vs. 1.4 cycles; AOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.16-1.21) to achieve a pregnancy resulting in live birth. CONCLUSIONS: The association of ieSET with a higher CLBR and markedly improved perinatal outcomes outweigh the relatively minor increase in time to pregnancy, reinforcing the guidance for eSET in initial transfer cycles, particularly in younger patients with a good prognosis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA