Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 8(2): 279-87, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25682124

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We examined the influence of catheter ablation and periprocedural anticoagulation regimen on trajectory of migraine in atrial fibrillation patients with or without migraine history. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with (group 1: 64 ± 8 years; men 78%) and 85 (group 2: 61 ± 10 years; men 73%) without migraine history undergoing atrial fibrillation-ablation were enrolled. Migraine status and quality of life were evaluated using standardized questionnaires. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of brain was performed for all at pre and 24 hours post procedure. Catheter ablation was performed with (88, 70%) or without (37, 30%) continuous warfarin treatment. Fifty-four patients (11 and 43 from groups 1 and 2, respectively) had subtherapeutic international normalized ratio on procedure day. At 17 ± 5 months follow-up, from group 1, 25 (63%) reported no migraine, 10 (25%) had < 1, and 3 (8%) had 2 to 3 monthly symptoms. Intensity of pain decreased from baseline 7 (Q1-Q3, 4-8) to 2 (0-4) scale points at follow-up (P < 0.001) and duration of headache from median 8 (Q1-Q3, 4-15) to 0.5 (Q1-Q3, 0-2) hours (P < 0.001). Two patients from group 1 reported increased migraine severity and 2 from group 2 had new-onset migraine. Follow-up diffusion magnetic resonance imaging revealed new infarcts in 9.6% (12/125) patients; of which 11 had subtherapeutic preprocedural international normalized ratio on or off continuous warfarin. Quality of life improved significantly in patients with successful ablation, being more pronounced in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, migraine symptoms improved substantially after catheter ablation. Interestingly, the only cases of new migraine and aggravation of pre-existent headache had subtherapeutic international normalized ratio during the procedure and new cerebral infarcts.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Ablação por Cateter , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/complicações , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Coeficiente Internacional Normatizado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Varfarina/efeitos adversos
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 23(5): 455-61, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22082312

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with the WATCHMAN device has become one of the therapeutic options in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who are at high risk for ischemic stroke. However, the incidence and evolution of incomplete occlusion of the LAA during and after placement of the WATCHMAN device has not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients who had undergone WATCHMAN device implant were included in the study. Intraprocedural, 45-day and 12-month transesophageal echocardiogram images were reviewed and analyzed. Peridevice gap was noted in 16 (27.6%), 17 (29.3%), and 20 (34.5%) patients across the 3 time points. Intraprocedural gaps are more likely to be persistent until 12 months and become larger in size over time. New gap also occurs during follow-up even if the LAA was completely sealed at implantation. One patient had an ischemic stroke 4.7 months after implant; another patient developed a left atrial thrombus over the device 21.6 months after implant. Both patients had intraprocedural gap and discontinued warfarin therapy after the 45-day evaluation. CONCLUSION: Incomplete LAA occlusion with a gap between the WATCHMAN device surface and the LAA wall is relatively common. Intraprocedural gaps are more likely to become bigger over time and persist, while new gaps also occur during follow-up. Further studies are warranted to verify whether the presence and persistence of a peridevice gap is associated with increased risk of thromboembolic event in AF patients implanted with a WATCHMAN device.


Assuntos
Apêndice Atrial , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentação , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Apêndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagem , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico por imagem , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Ecocardiografia Doppler em Cores , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Texas , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Varfarina/administração & dosagem
3.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 3(5): 445-51, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20689107

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be associated with pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) failure. The aim of the present study was to investigate if treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improved PVAI success rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2007, 3000 consecutive patients underwent PVAI. Patients were screened for OSA and CPAP use. Six hundred forty (21.3%) patients had OSA. Patients with OSA had more procedural failures (P=0.024) and hematomas (P<0.001). Eight percent of the non-OSA paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients had nonpulmonary vein antrum triggers (non-PV triggers) and posterior wall firing versus 20% of the OSA group (P<0.001). Nineteen percent of the non-OSA nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation population had non-PV triggers versus 31% in the OSA group (P=0.001). At the end of the follow-up period (32±14 months), 79% of the non-CPAP and 68% of the CPAP group were free of atrial fibrillation (P=0.003). Not using CPAP in addition to having non-PV triggers strongly predicted procedural failure (hazard ratio, 8.81; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OSA was an independent predictor for PVAI failure. Treatment with CPAP improved PVAI success rates. Patients not treated with CPAP in addition to having higher prevalence of non-PV triggers were 8 times more likely to fail the procedure.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/métodos , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/cirurgia , Veias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Sistema de Condução Cardíaco/fisiopatologia , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/complicações , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA