RESUMO
The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be translated to PrBC, because both the interests of the mother and of the unborn should be considered. Evidence remains limited and/or conflicting in some specific areas where the optimal approach remains controversial. In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary group of experts and develop statements on controversial topics that cannot be adequately addressed in the current evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The aim of this consensus-building process was to discuss controversial issues relating to the management of patients with PrBC. The virtual meeting included a multidisciplinary panel of 24 leading experts from 13 countries and was chaired by S. Loibl and F. Amant. All experts were allocated to one of four different working groups. Each working group covered a specific subject area with two chairs appointed: Planning, preparation and execution of the consensus process was conducted according to the ESMO standard operating procedures.
RESUMO
We aimed to provide comprehensive protocols and promote effective management of pregnant women with gynecological cancers. New insights and more experience have been gained since the previous guidelines were published in 2014. Members of the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy (INCIP), in collaboration with other international experts, reviewed existing literature on their respective areas of expertise. Summaries were subsequently merged into a manuscript that served as a basis for discussion during the consensus meeting. Treatment of gynecological cancers during pregnancy is attainable if management is achieved by collaboration of a multidisciplinary team of health care providers. This allows further optimization of maternal treatment, while considering fetal development and providing psychological support and long-term follow-up of the infants. Nonionizing imaging procedures are preferred diagnostic procedures, but limited ionizing imaging methods can be allowed if indispensable for treatment plans. In contrast to other cancers, standard surgery for gynecological cancers often needs to be adapted according to cancer type and gestational age. Most standard regimens of chemotherapy can be administered after 14 weeks gestational age but are not recommended beyond 35 weeks. C-section is recommended for most cervical and vulvar cancers, whereas vaginal delivery is allowed in most ovarian cancers. Breast-feeding should be avoided with ongoing chemotherapeutic, endocrine or targeted treatment. More studies that focus on the long-term toxic effects of gynecologic cancer treatments are needed to provide a full understanding of their fetal impact. In particular, data on targeted therapies that are becoming standard of care in certain gynecological malignancies is still limited. Furthermore, more studies aimed at the definition of the exact prognosis of patients after antenatal cancer treatment are warranted. Participation in existing registries (www.cancerinpregnancy.org) and the creation of national tumor boards with multidisciplinary teams of care providers (supplementary Box S1, available at Annals of Oncology online) is encouraged.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/terapia , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/etiologia , Prognóstico , Sociedades MédicasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer in pregnancy is rare, with an incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 pregnancies. Advanced disease (stage III or IV) is diagnosed more frequently in pregnant patients. We aimed to review all cases of colorectal cancer in pregnancy from the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy database in order to learn more about this rare disease and improve its management. METHODS: Data on the demographic features, symptoms, histopathology, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and outcomes (obstetric, neonatal and maternal) were analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven colon and 14 rectal cancer cases were identified. Advanced disease was present in 30 patients (73.2%). During pregnancy, 21 patients (51.2%) received surgery and 12 patients (29.3%) received chemotherapy. Thirty-three patients (80.5%) delivered live babies: 21 by caesarean section and 12 vaginally. Prematurity rate was high (78.8%). Eight babies were small for gestational age (27.6%). Three patients (10.7%) developed recurrence of disease. Overall 2-year survival was 64.4%. CONCLUSION: Despite a more frequent presentation with advanced disease, colorectal cancer has a similar prognosis in pregnancy when compared with the general population. Diagnostic interventions and treatment should not be delayed due to the pregnancy but a balance between maternal and foetal wellbeing must always be kept in mind.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/cirurgia , Adulto , Peso ao Nascer , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Tchecoslováquia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Gravidez , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/mortalidade , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/patologia , Resultado da Gravidez , Sistema de Registros , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Safety of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer during pregnancy is insufficiently explored. We investigated efficacy and local recurrence rate in a large series of pregnant patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent SLN biopsy during pregnancy were identified from the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy, the German Breast Group, and the Cancer and Pregnancy Registry. Chart review was performed to record technique and outcome of SLN biopsy, locoregional and distant recurrence, and survival. RESULTS: We identified 145 women with clinically N0 disease who underwent SLN during pregnancy. The SLN detection techniques were as follows: 99mTc-labeled albumin nanocolloid only (n = 96; 66.2%), blue dye only (n = 14; 9.7%), combined technique (n = 15; 10.3%), or unknown (n = 20; 13.8%). Mapping was unsuccessful in one patient (0.7%) and she underwent an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Mean number of SLNs was 3.2 (interquartile range 1-3; missing n = 15). Positive SLNs were found in 43 (29.7%) patients and 34 subsequently underwent ALND. After a median follow-up of 48 months (range 1-177), 123 (84.8%) patients were alive and free of disease. Eleven patients experienced a locoregional relapse, including 1 isolated ipsilateral axillary recurrence (0.7%). Eleven (7.6%) patients developed distant metastases, of whom 9 (6.2%) died of breast cancer. No neonatal adverse events related to SLN procedure during pregnancy were reported. CONCLUSIONS: SLN biopsy during pregnancy has a comparably low axillary recurrence rate as in nonpregnant women. Therefore, this method can be considered during pregnancy instead of standard ALND for early-stage, clinically node-negative breast cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Exposição Materna/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/mortalidade , Resultado da Gravidez , Traçadores Radioativos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Agregado de Albumina Marcado com Tecnécio Tc 99m/administração & dosagem , Agregado de Albumina Marcado com Tecnécio Tc 99m/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of taxane chemotherapy during pregnancy and compare maternal and neonatal outcomes with those in women who did not receive taxanes during pregnancy, and review current existing data. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study in which women were identified from the Cancer and Pregnancy Registry at Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center. A retrospective chart analysis and an independent t-test were carried out comparing patient outcomes. A literature search in Ovid, Medline and PubMed was then carried out using the terms 'breast or ovarian cancer', 'pregnancy', 'paclitaxel', 'docetaxel', 'taxanes' and 'chemotherapy'. RESULTS: Twelve of 129 women with breast cancer were exposed to taxanes during pregnancy. Three of nine women with ovarian cancer received taxane-based treatment during pregnancy. Birth weight, gestational age at delivery, rate of growth restriction, congenital anomalies and incidence of maternal and neonatal neutropenia were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Taxane-based chemotherapy does not appear to increase the risk of fetal or maternal complications when compared with conventional chemotherapy in the small cohort of women in our Registry.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos com Pontes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Peso ao Nascer , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos com Pontes/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Docetaxel , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxoides/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a multiorgan-system granulomatous disease causing respiratory complaints in most patients. Eye involvement, most commonly granulomatous uveitis, is seen in 5% of black patients with sarcoidosis. Neurosarcoidosis is also rare, affecting 5% of patients with sarcoidosis. Thoracoscopic lymph node biopsy in pregnancy has never before been reported. CASE: An otherwise-healthy, 25-year-old woman, gravida 2, para 1001, presented at 25 weeks' gestation with a painful facial palsy and visual defects. Ophthalmologic examination revealed uveitis, and a chest radiograph revealed asymmetric hilar adenopathy. At 28 weeks' gestation, the patient underwent thoracoscopic lymph node biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. The symptoms were stabilized with therapeutic corticosteroids, and the patient delivered a healthy neonate at term. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of sarcoidosis remains one of exclusion and requires a high index of suspicion. Tissue confirmation is often necessary, especially when patients have extrathoracic complaints. For patients without other lesions amenable to biopsy, thoracoscopic lymph node biopsy can be considered despite pregnancy.
Assuntos
Linfonodos/patologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico , Biópsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Paralisia Facial/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/patologia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/patologia , Sarcoidose/patologia , Toracoscopia , Uveíte/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vertebral artery dissection, occurring spontaneously or following a traumatic event, is a cause of posterior circulation stroke in young individuals, including pregnant women. CASE: A 20-year-old, primagravid woman acutely developed headache, right-sided hemiparesis and parasthesias, and blurred vision. Within days she complained of cervical neck pain. Magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with a posterior circulation cerebrovascular accident (CVA). An arteriogram, performed to exclude vasculitis, revealed bilateral vertebral artery dissection. No inciting event could be recalled. CONCLUSION: Vascular dissections occur rarely during pregnancy. Spontaneous extracranial vertebral artery dissection itself is very rare in general. Cerebral ischemia can follow vertebral artery dissection. In young patients with CVA, consideration of the diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection followed-by angiography and anticoagulation is an important component of the workup and care.
Assuntos
Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Dissecação da Artéria Vertebral/complicações , Adulto , Angiografia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Artérias Cerebrais/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Cervicalgia/etiologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Dissecação da Artéria Vertebral/diagnóstico , Dissecação da Artéria Vertebral/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine voluntary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing rates and factors influencing testing in a private obstetric practice. METHODS: Antepartum patients were offered HIV testing after completing a self-assessment questionnaire. Perceived risks and demographics were correlated with testing rates. RESULTS: Overall, 348/600 (58%) women consented to HIV testing. In a univariate analysis, patients with "any" perceived risk(s) were more likely to be tested. Single women and those with an at-risk partner(s) or a history of sexually transmitted disease (STD) were more likely to desire testing. These factors remained independently associated with voluntary testing in a multivariate regression model. No patients tested positive for HIV. CONCLUSIONS: In our private obstetric practice, 26% of women perceived themselves at risk for HIV infection, and testing rates depended on the various risks identified. A history of STDs or an at-risk sexual partner were stronger predictors of voluntary testing than was marital status. Focused HIV counseling among pregnant women at relatively low risk for infection may be possible.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Transfusão de Sangue , Demografia , Feminino , Previsões , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Humanos , Estado Civil , Análise Multivariada , Gravidez , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Comportamento Sexual , Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis/complicações , Classe Social , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosAssuntos
Coração Fetal/anormalidades , Glutaratos/urina , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Coração Fetal/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado da Gravidez , Síndrome , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
Stickler's syndrome is a much underdiagnosed entity in the ophthalmic population. It is a dominantly inherited disease of connective tissue whose ocular findings include moderate to severe myopia, vitreoretinal degeneration, retinal detachments, cataracts, and glaucoma. Non-ophthalmologic findings include cleft palate, midfacial hypoplasia, radiographic changes of spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, narrow pelvis, and broad femoral neck. Twenty percent of patients with Stickler's syndrome will have a cleft palate. We undertook a study to determine the incidence of Stickler's syndrome in patients with an isolated cleft palate, and to see if this screening process would be useful in making an early diagnosis of the syndrome and in genetic counseling. It is important to distinguish this syndrome from that of isolated cleft palate in order to: 1) insure early detection of myopia and monitor for signs of retinal detachment, cataract, and glaucoma; and 2) provide definitive recurrence counseling for families (50% vs 2.3%).