Clinical characteristics and treatment experience of individuals with SCN8A developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (SCN8A-DEE): Findings from an online caregiver survey.

PURPOSE: SCN8A developmental epileptic encephalopathy (SCN8A-DEE) is a rare and severe genetic epilepsy syndrome characterized by early-onset developmental delay, cognitive impairment, and intractable seizures. SCN8A gene variants are associated with a broad phenotypic spectrum and variable disease severity. A caregiver survey, solicited by the advocacy group The Cute Syndrome Foundation (TCSF), was conducted to gather information on the demographics/disease presentation, seizure history, and treatment of patients with SCN8A-related epilepsies. METHODS: A 36-question online survey was developed to obtain de-identified data from caregivers of children with SCN8A-related epilepsy. The survey included questions on genetic diagnosis, disease manifestations/comorbidities, seizure severity/type, current/prior use of antiseizure medicines (ASMs), and best/worst treatments per caregiver perception. RESULTS: In total, 116 survey responses (87 USA, 12 Canada, 12 UK, 5 Australia) were quantitatively analyzed. Generalized tonic/clonic was the most common seizure type at onset and time of survey; absence and partial/focal seizures were also common. Most patients (77%) were currently taking ≥2 ASMs; 50% had previously tried and stopped ≥4 ASMs. Sodium channel blockers (oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine) provided the best subjective seizure control and quality of life. CONCLUSION: The SCN8A-DEE patient population is heterogeneous in seizure characteristics and ASMs taken and is difficult to treat, with high seizure burden and multiple comorbidities. The high proportion of patients who previously tried and stopped ASMs indicates large unmet treatment need. Further collaboration between families, caregivers, patient advocates, clinicians, researchers, and industry can increase awareness and understanding of SCN8A-related epilepsies, improve clinical trial design, and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Clinical development of valbenazine for tics associated with Tourette syndrome.

Introduction: Significant need exists for effective, well-tolerated pharmacologic treatments for Tourette syndrome (TS). Medications that inhibit vesicular monoamine transporters (i.e. VMAT2 inhibitors) downregulate presynaptic packaging and release of dopamine into the neuronal synapse and are effective in treating hyperkinetic movement disorders such as Huntington's chorea and tardive dyskinesia (TD); thus, they may be useful in treating TS.Areas covered: This review describes the clinical program evaluating the safety and efficacy of valbenazine in the treatment of involuntary tics associated with TS in adult and pediatric subjects. While there was a trend in the 6 completed trials toward greater improvement in valbenazine-treated versus placebo subjects on the primary efficacy endpoint (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale Total Tic Score), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Valbenazine was generally well-tolerated in the studies, and treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with valbenazine studies in TD.Expert opinion: Due to the failure to meet the primary endpoint in these trials, further investigation of valbenazine for TS is unlikely. Given the need for safe and effective TS therapies and the key role of VMAT2 in modulating dopaminergic activity, it is reasonable for future studies to investigate other VMAT2 inhibitors as potential treatments for TS.

Baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have substantial unmet medical need. Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2 inhibitor that we hypothesised might have therapeutic benefit in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. METHODS: In this double-blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, 24-week phase 2 study, patients were recruited from 78 centres in 11 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus, and had active disease involving skin or joints. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) to receive once-daily baricitinib 2 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving resolution of arthritis or rash at week 24, as defined by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K). Efficacy and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02708095. FINDINGS: Between March 24, 2016, and April 27, 2017, 314 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=105), baricitinib 2 mg (n=105), or baricitinib 4 mg (n=104). At week 24, resolution of SLEDAI-2K arthritis or rash was achieved by 70 (67%) of 104 patients receiving baricitinib 4 mg (odds ratio [OR] vs placebo 1·8, 95% CI 1·0-3·3; p=0·0414) and 61 (58%) of 105 patients receiving baricitinib 2 mg (OR 1·3, 0·7-2·3; p=0·39). Adverse events were reported in 68 (65%) patients in the placebo group, 75 (71%) patients in the baricitinib 2 mg group, and 76 (73%) patients in the baricitinib 4 mg group. Serious adverse events were reported in ten (10%) patients receiving baricitinib 4 mg, 11 (10%) receiving baricitinib 2 mg, and five (5%) receiving placebo; no deaths were reported. Serious infections were reported in six (6%) patients with baricitinib 4 mg, two (2%) with baricitinib 2 mg, and one (1%) with placebo. INTERPRETATION: The baricitinib 4 mg dose, but not the 2 mg dose, significantly improved the signs and symptoms of active systemic lupus erythematosus in patients who were not adequately controlled despite standard of care therapy, with a safety profile consistent with previous studies of baricitinib. This study provides the foundation for future phase 3 trials of JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib as a new potential oral therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.

Response to baricitinib based on prior biologic use in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis.

Objective: RA patients who have failed biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) represent an unmet medical need. We evaluated the effects of baseline characteristics, including prior bDMARD exposure, on baricitinib efficacy and safety. Methods: RA-BEACON patients (previously reported) had moderate to severe RA with insufficient response to one or more TNF inhibitor and were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily placebo or 2 or 4 mg baricitinib. Prior bDMARD use was allowed. The primary endpoint was a 20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) at week 12 for 4 mg vs placebo. An exploratory, primarily post hoc, subgroup analysis evaluated efficacy at weeks 12 and 24 by ACR20 and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ⩽10. An interaction P-value ⩽0.10 was considered significant, with significance at both weeks 12 and 24 given more weight. Results: The odds ratios predominantly favored baricitinib over placebo and were generally similar to those in the overall study (3.4, 2.4 for ACR20 weeks 12 and 24, respectively). Significant quantitative interactions were observed for baricitinib 4 mg vs placebo at weeks 12 and 24: ACR20 by region (larger effect Europe) and CDAI ⩽10 by disease duration (larger effect ⩾10 years). No significant interactions were consistently observed for ACR20 by age; weight; disease duration; seropositivity; corticosteroid use; number of prior bDMARDs, TNF inhibitors or non-TNF inhibitors; or a specific prior TNF inhibitor. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates, including infections, appeared somewhat higher across groups with greater prior bDMARD use. Conclusion: Baricitinib demonstrated a consistent, beneficial treatment effect in bDMARD-refractory patients across subgroups based on baseline characteristics and prior bDMARD use. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/), NCT01721044.

Patient-reported outcomes of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and no or limited prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a double-blind, phase III study of baricitinib as monotherapy or combined with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with no or minimal prior conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and naïve to biological DMARDs. METHODS: Patients were randomized 4:3:4 to MTX administered once weekly (N = 210), baricitinib monotherapy (4 mg once daily (QD), N = 159), or combination of baricitinib (4 mg QD) and MTX (baricitinib + MTX, N = 215). PROs included the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA), patient's assessment of pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), duration of morning joint stiffness (MJS), worst joint pain, worst tiredness, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Rheumatoid Arthritis (WPAI-RA), Short Form 36 version 2, Acute (SF-36); and EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile. Comparisons were assessed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Compared to MTX, patients in both baricitinib groups reported greater improvement (p ≤ 0.01) in HAQ-DI, PtGA, pain, fatigue, worst join pain, SF-36 physical component score, and EQ-5D at weeks 24 and 52. For the SF-36 mental component score, patients in both baricitinib groups reported statistically significant improvements (p ≤ 0.01) at week 52 compared to MTX-treated patients. Statistically significant improvements (p ≤ 0.05) were observed with the WPAI-RA for the baricitinib groups vs. MTX at week 24 and for the WPAI-RA daily activity and work productivity measures for baricitinib + MTX at week 52. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, baricitinib alone or in combination with MTX, when used as initial therapy, resulted in significant improvement compared to MTX in the majority of the pre-specified PRO measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01711359 . Registered on 18 October 2012.