Adjacent Level Ligamentous Injury Associated with Traumatic Cervical Spine Fractures: Indications for Imaging and Implications for Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a vital tool for detection of soft tissue injury (STI) after cervical spine injury (CSI). However, high cost, prolonged imaging time, and limited use in hemodynamically unstable patients necessitates that the utility of MRI in all patients with CSI be scrutinized. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients treated for a CSI at a Level I trauma center between 2005 and 2010. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and associated STIs were collected. STIs were classified further into same level ligamentous injury, adjacent level ligamentous injury (ALLI), cord contusion, and traumatic herniated disc. ALLI was defined as anterior or posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum, or supraspinous or interspinous ligamentous injury. RESULTS: MRI was performed in 240 of 787 patients. Evidence of STI was identified in 54.6%. ALLI was the most common STI (80 of 240 patients); these injuries were subdivided into above, below, or both above and below the concurrent fracture level. Patients with ALLI were significantly more likely to have injured C3 (P < 0.01) and C5 (P < 0.03) levels, association with widened disc space (P = 0.03), and multiple CSIs (P = 0.008). The whole ALLI was included in the fixation strategy in 100% of patients with ALLI only above the concurrent fracture level and 87% of patients with ALLI only below the concurrent fracture level. CONCLUSIONS: MRI detected an associated STI in about 55% of patients who underwent imaging. Injuries involving multiple fractured cervical levels, fractures at C3 and C5, and widened disc space should raise the treating physician's level of suspicion for ALLI. Our data show that treatment directed by MRI findings in select cases has substantial value.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation after spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To review the basic principles and techniques of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and provide information and evidence regarding its applications in spinal cord injury clinical rehabilitation. METHODS: A review of the available current and historical literature regarding TMS was conducted, and a discussion of its potential use in spinal cord injury rehabilitation is presented. RESULTS: TMS provides reliable information about the functional integrity and conduction properties of the corticospinal tracts and motor control in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of various neurological disorders. It allows one to follow the evolution of motor control and to evaluate the effects of different therapeutic procedures. Motor-evoked potentials can be useful in follow-up evaluation of motor function during treatment and rehabilitation, specifically in patients with spinal cord injury and stroke. Although studies regarding somatomotor functional recovery after spinal cord injury have shown promise, more trials are required to provide strong and substantial evidence. CONCLUSIONS: TMS is a promising noninvasive tool for the treatment of spasticity, neuropathic pain, and somatomotor deficit after spinal cord injury. Further investigation is needed to demonstrate whether different protocols and applications of stimulation, as well as alternative cortical sites of stimulation, may induce more pronounced and beneficial clinical effects.

Potential role of growth factors in the management of spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To review central nervous system growth factors and their therapeutic potential and clinical translation into spinal cord injury (SCI), as well as the challenges that have been encountered during clinical development. METHODS: A systemic review of the available current and historical literature regarding central nervous system growth factors and clinical trials regarding their use in spinal cord injury was conducted. RESULTS: The effectiveness of administering growth factors as a potential therapeutic strategy for SCI has been tested with the use of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin 3, and neurotrophin-4/5. Delivery of growth factors to injured SC has been tested by numerous methods. Unfortunately, most of clinical trials at this time are uncontrolled and have questionable results because of lack of efficacy and/or unacceptable side effects. CONCLUSIONS: There is promise in the use of specific growth factors therapeutically for SCI. However, more studies involving neuronal regeneration and functional recovery are needed, as well the development of delivery methods that allow sufficient quantity of growth factors while restricting their distribution to target sites.

Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation versus Unilateral Pedicle and Contralateral Facet Screws for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.

Study Design Retrospective clinical study. Objectives Recent biomechanical studies have shown no differences in stiffness or range of motion following minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) between unilateral pedicle and contralateral facet screw (UPFS) and bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) constructs. No studies have compared these two constructs based upon clinical outcomes. Methods Twenty-six consecutive patients who had single-level MIS TLIF were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measures collected for patients with BPS were compared with those with UPFS. Results No associations were found between construct and length of stay (p = 0.5), operative time (p = 0.2), or Odom's criteria (p = 0.7); 79% of patients in the UPFS group as compared with 71.5% in the BPS group had good or excellent outcomes. Mean follow-up was 17.7 months for the UPFS group and 20.2 months for the BPS group. There was one complication in each group, including a seroma in the BPS group and a revision operation in the UPFS group. Implant costs for the BPS group were 35% greater than the UPFS group. Conclusions The present study is the first to demonstrate that patients undergoing MIS TLIF with BPS as compared with UPFS for single-level degenerative lumbar disease had similar clinical outcomes.

Persistent first intersegmental vertebral artery in association with type II odontoid fracture: surgical treatment utilizing a novel C1 posterior arch screw: case report.

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Posterior cervical stabilization for cervical fractures is common, and numerous techniques for fixation have been described. This case describes the novel usage of C1 laminar screws due to a persistent intersegmental artery and congenital fusion of C2-C3. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old woman presented with loss of consciousness after falling down a flight of stairs. Initial CT scan showed a type II odontoid fracture with significant malalignment, as well as an anomalous congenital fusion of C2-C3 and degenerative spondylolisthesis of C3 to C4. CT angiogram demonstrated bilateral persistent first intersegmental arteries coursing through the C1-C2 neural foramina. INTERVENTION: The patient underwent C2 fracture reduction and posterior C1-C4 fusion. C1 posterior arch screws were placed due to the patient's anomalous vertebral artery location. The construct was anchored caudally by C2 pars interarticularis screws and C4 lateral mass screws. The patient experienced an excellent neurologic and radiographic outcome at 12.5 months. CONCLUSION: Posterior fixation for fractures of the cervical spine is common; however, the use of C1 posterior arch screws for fractures has not previously been described. The presence of a persistent intersegmental course of the vertebral artery, a rare but reported anomaly, should be regarded as a contraindication to placement of C1 lateral mass screws and necessitates careful consideration of the available surgical options.