Low-level laser therapy in treatment of chemoradiotherapy-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer: results of a randomised, triple blind, multicentre phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) also called Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) could reduce oral mucositis (OM) incidence and severity in head and neck cancer patients treated by chemoradiotherapy, however randomised data about efficacy and safety are missing with curative dose 4 J/cm2. METHODS: This phase III trial was conducted in patients with oral cavity, or oro/hypopharyngeal cancers (stage III or IV). Patients were treated by lasertherapy on OM lesions grade ≥ 2 (4 J/cm2 or placebo), during chemoradiotherapy and until recovery. Severity of OM (incidence and duration of grades ≥3) was used as primary endpoint and blindly assessed. RESULTS: Among 97 randomised patients, 83 patients (85.6%) could be assessed finally (erroneous inclusions, chemoradiotherapy interruptions) and 32 patients had no lasertherapy because of unreachable OM lesions. Randomisation and population characteristics (sex ratio, age, chemoradiotherapy procedures, toxicities incidence) were still comparable between the two LLLT/PBMT groups. An acute OM (grade ≥ 3) was observed in 41 patients (49.4%): 23 patients (54.8%) of the active laser group versus 18 (43.9%) in the control group (modified intend to treat, p = 0.32). Median time before occurrence of OM ≥ grade 3 in half of the patients was 8 weeks in active laser group (vs. 9 weeks in control group). However, 95% of patients exhibited a very good tolerance of LLLT/PBMT. CONCLUSIONS: This study assessed LLLT/PBMT according to the Multinational Association of Supportive care in Cancer recommendations but lacked power. LLLT/PBMT was well tolerated with a good safety profile, which promotes its use in clinical routine for severe OM treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01772706 . TITLE: Laser Mucite ORL: Effectiveness of Laser Therapy for Mucositis Induced by a Radio-chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (LaserMucite). Study Start Date: October 2008. Primary Completion Date: October 2016. Responsible Party: Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Paul Papin. Principal Investigator: Eric Jadaud, M.D., Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Paul Papin. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health, French national funding scheme (PHRC 2008).

Digestive toxicities after palliative three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for cervico-thoracic spinal metastases.

OBJECTIVE: The palliative treatment for cervico-thoracic spinal metastases is based on a three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Digestive toxicities are common and cause a clinical impact frequently underestimated in patients. We performed a retrospective study of digestive side effects occurring after palliative 3D-CRT for cervico-thoracic spinal metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients receiving palliative 3D-CRT at Jean Bernard Center from January 2013 to December 2014 for spinal metastases between the 5th cervical vertebra (C5) and the 12th thoracic vertebra (T12) were eligible. Three-dimensional conformal RT was delivered by a linear accelerator (CLINAC, Varian). Premedication to prevent digestive toxicities was not used. Adverse events ("esophagitis" and "nausea and/or vomiting") were evaluated according to the NCI-CTCae (version 4). RESULTS: From January 2013 to December 2014, 128 patients met the study criteria. The median age was 68.6 years [31.8; 88.6]. Most patients (84.4%) received 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The median overall time of treatment was 13 days [3-33]. Forty patients (31.3%) suffered from grade ≥ 2 of "esophagitis" (35 grade 2 (27.4%) and 5 grade 3 (3.9%)). Eight patients (6.3%) suffered from grade ≥ 2 of "nausea and/or vomiting" (6 grade 2 (4.7%), 1 grade 3 (0.8%), and 1 grade 4 (0.8%)). CONCLUSION: The high incidence of moderate to severe digestive toxicities after palliative 3D-CRT for cervico-thoracic spinal metastases led to consider static or dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to reduce the dose to organ at risk (the esophagus and stomach). Dosimetric studies and implementation in the clinic should be the next steps.