RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The burden of screening for inherited cardiac conditions on health services grows ever larger, with each new diagnosis necessitating screening of additional family members. Screening these usually asymptomatic, low-risk individuals is currently performed by consultant cardiologists, consuming vital clinic resources that could otherwise be diverted to sicker patients requiring specialist consultant input. Clinical scientists now constitute a highly skilled and often underutilised group of individuals with training in areas such as clinical evaluation, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) interpretation, and echocardiography. These skills place them in a unique position to offer a full screening evaluation in a single consultation. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate a novel clinical scientist-led screening clinic for first-degree relatives of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The clinical scientist-led screening clinic was established at a London tertiary centre to allow review of asymptomatic, first-degree relatives of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HCM or DCM, independent of a cardiology consultant. Patients were evaluated with history, examination, ECG, and echocardiography, with further investigations if deemed necessary. A retrospective review was performed of the first 200 patients seen in the clinic. RESULTS: Of the 200 individuals reviewed between September 2019 and July 2022, 99 had a proband with HCM and 101 a proband with DCM. Overall, 169 individuals (85%) revealed normal screenings and were discharged. Thirty-one individuals (15.5%), all asymptomatic, revealed ECG changes and/or significant echocardiographic findings. Of these, 21 individuals (10.5% of the total cohort) were subsequently diagnosed with a cardiomyopathy or early phenotypic changes consistent with a cardiomyopathy (11 with HCM and 10 with DCM). These individuals were referred on to an inherited cardiac conditions consultant clinic for regular follow-up. Overall, 179 consultant clinic appointments were saved which could instead be allocated to patients requiring specialist consultant input. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first description of a clinical scientist-led screening clinic for first-degree relatives of patients with HCM and DCM. The findings demonstrate that implementation of such a service into routine clinical practice is feasible, effective, safe, and can free up capacity in consultant clinics for patients requiring specialist input.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, inherited cardiac conditions (ICC) centres have emerged with the aim of improving outcomes for patients and their families, through early diagnosis, genetic testing, risk assessment and specialist treatment. SOURCES OF DATA: A literature search was performed using PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Commissioned ICC service reviews from NHS England, NHS Improvement and PHG Foundation were evaluated. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: ICC patient management requires a multi-disciplinary approach. ICC services are predominantly based within tertiary centres. Despite expansion, provision of care remains inadequate to meet rising demands. Access to services is inconsistent, partly due to geographic variation and lack of standardized pathways. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The optimal ICC care model remains undecided, although there is growing interest in 'hub-and-spoke' networks, which could aid secondary and tertiary service integration and repatriation of care. GROWING POINTS: Genetic mainstreaming is a priority for the Genomic Medicine Service Alliance. The benefits of telehealth and virtual clinics have been validated by their use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Other innovations to improve resource efficiency, such as clinical scientist-led and nurse-led clinics, show promise. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: An update for the NHS ICC service specifications is planned that appears well timed given the rapid evolution of the ICC landscape in the decade since last review. This has the potential to address needs including national audit, standardized pathways and ICC networks to improve governance and equity of care. Delegation of commissioning for specialist services to integrated care systems may also provide opportunity for increased regional direction.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , SARS-CoV-2 , Cardiopatias/terapia , Testes Genéticos , Reino Unido , Telemedicina/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
AIM: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains under-diagnosed in clinical practice despite accounting for nearly half of all heart failure (HF) cases. Accurate and timely diagnosis of HFpEF is crucial for proper patient management and treatment. In this study, we explored the potential of natural language processing (NLP) to improve the detection and diagnosis of HFpEF according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) diagnostic criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective cohort study, we used an NLP pipeline applied to the electronic health record (EHR) to identify patients with a clinical diagnosis of HF between 2010 and 2022. We collected demographic, clinical, echocardiographic and outcome data from the EHR. Patients were categorized according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Those with LVEF ≥50% were further categorized based on whether they had a clinician-assigned diagnosis of HFpEF and if not, whether they met the ESC diagnostic criteria. Results were validated in a second, independent centre. We identified 8606 patients with HF. Of 3727 consecutive patients with HF and LVEF ≥50% on echocardiogram, only 8.3% had a clinician-assigned diagnosis of HFpEF, while 75.4% met ESC criteria but did not have a formal diagnosis of HFpEF. Patients with confirmed HFpEF were hospitalized more frequently; however the ESC criteria group had a higher 5-year mortality, despite being less comorbid and experiencing fewer acute cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients with undiagnosed HFpEF are an at-risk group with high mortality. It is possible to use NLP methods to identify likely HFpEF patients from EHR data who would likely then benefit from expert clinical review and complement the use of diagnostic algorithms.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Humanos , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Inteligência Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , PrognósticoRESUMO
Aims: Remote monitoring (RM) is the standard of care for follow up of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. The aim of this study was to compare smartphone-based RM (SM-RM) using patient applications (myMerlinPulse™ app) with traditional bedside monitor RM (BM-RM). Methods and results: The retrospective study included de-identified US patients who received either SM-RM or BM-RM capable of implantable cardioverter defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (Abbott, USA). Patients in SM-RM and BM-RM groups were propensity-score matched on age and gender, device type, implant year, and month. Compliance with RM was quantified as the proportion of patients enrolling in the RM system (Merlin.net™) and transmitting data at least once. Connectivity was measured by the median number of days between consecutive transmissions per patient. Of the initial 9714 patients with SM-RM and 26 679 patients with BM-RM, 9397 patients from each group were matched. Remote monitoring compliance was higher in SM-RM; significantly more patients with SM-RM were enrolled in RM compared with BM-RM (94.4 vs. 85.0%, P < 0.001), similar number of patients in the SM-RM group paired their device (95.1 vs. 95.0%, P = 0.77), but more SM-RM patients transmitted at least once (98.1 vs. 94.3%, P < 0.001). Connectivity was significantly higher in the SM-RM, with patients transmitting data every 1.2 (1.1, 1.7) vs. every 1.7 (1.5, 2.0) days with BM-RM (P < 0.001) and remained better over time. Significantly more SM-RM patients utilized patient-initiated transmissions compared with BM-RM (55.6 vs. 28.1%, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In this large real-world study, patients with SM-RM demonstrated improved compliance and connectivity compared with BM-RM.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of echocardiographic parameters, laboratory findings and clinical characteristics with in-hospital mortality in adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care units (ICU) in two large collaborating tertiary UK centres. DESIGN: Observational retrospective study. SETTING: The study was conducted in patients admitted to the ICU in two large tertiary centres in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria were: (1) patients admitted to the ICU with a COVID-19 diagnosis over a period of 16 weeks. and (2) underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram on the first day of ICU admission as clinically indicated.No exclusion criteria applied.Three hundred patients were enrolled and completed the follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure in this study was in-hospital mortality in patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: Older age (HR: 1.027, 95% CI 1.007 to 1.047; p=0.008), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction<35% (HR: 5.908, 95% CI 2.609 to 13.376; p<0.001), and peak C reactive protein (CRP) (HR: 1.002, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.004, p=0.001) were independently correlated with mortality in a multivariable Cox regression model. Following multiple imputation of variables with more than 5% missing values, random forest analysis was applied to the imputed data. Right ventricular (RV) basal diameter (RVD1), RV mid-cavity diameter (RVD2), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RV systolic pressure, hypertension, RV dysfunction, troponin level on admission, peak CRP, creatinine level on ICU admission, body mass index and age were found to have a high relative importance (> 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19 in the ICU, both severely impaired LV function and impaired RV function may have adverse prognostic implications, but older age and inflammatory markers appear to have a greater impact. A combination of echocardiographic and laboratory investigations as well as demographic and clinical characteristics appears appropriate for risk stratification in patients with COVID-19 who are admitted to the ICU.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Estado Terminal , Adulto , Humanos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Teste para COVID-19 , Proteína C-ReativaRESUMO
Patients with cardiomyopathies are confronted with the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) throughout their lifetime. Despite the fact that SCD is relatively rare, prognostic stratification is an integral part of physician-patient discussion, with the goal of risk modification and prevention. The current approach is based on a concept of "acceptable risk." However, there are intrinsic problems with an algorithm-based approach to risk management, magnified by the absence of robust evidence underlying clinical decision support tools, which can make high- versus low-risk classifications arbitrary. Strategies aimed at risk reduction range from selecting patients for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to disqualification from competitive sports. These clinical options, especially when implying the use of finite financial resources, are often delivered from the physician's perspective citing decision-making algorithms. When the burden of intervention-related risks or financial costs is deemed higher than an "acceptable risk" of SCD, the patient's perspective may not be appropriately considered. Designating a numeric threshold of "acceptable risk" has ethical implications. One could reasonably ask "acceptable to whom?" In an era when individual choice and autonomy are pillars of the physician-patient relationship, the subjective aspects of perceived risk should be acknowledged and be part of shared decision-making. This is particularly true when the lack of a strong scientific evidence base makes a dichotomous algorithm-driven approach suboptimal for unmitigated translation to clinical practice.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Cardiomiopatias/complicações , Cardiomiopatias/terapia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/etiologia , Morte Súbita Cardíaca/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Medicina de Precisão , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Exercise has a deleterious effect on the phenotypic expression of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and increases the risk of sudden death. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and correlates of exercise-induced arrhythmias during exercise tolerance test (ETT) in patients with ARVC. Between 2010 and 2019, 30 (47% males, mean age 42 ± 12 years) consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC underwent a full genotypic and phenotypic characterization at our center. Exercise-induced arrhythmic response (EIAR) was defined by the development of complex or repetitive ventricular arrhythmias after stage 2 of exercise. A heart rate ≥ 85% of predicted was achieved by 23 (77%) patients. In 16 (53%) cases, a desmosomal pathogenic variant was found [most commonly PKP2 (n = 7) and DSP (n = 3)]. In 12 (40%) cases, an EIAR was observed. In 2 (6%) patients, ETT was interrupted due to the onset of ventricular tachycardia (sustained with a LBBB/inferior axis pattern in one case, and non-sustained LBBB/superior axis pattern in the other). Mean body surface area (BSA)-indexed left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volumes (EDV) were higher in the EIAR group (92 ± 12 ml/m2 vs 80 ± 7 ml/m2, p = 0.002), as well as right ventricular EDV/BSA (110 ± 18 ml/m2 vs 91 ± 27 ml/m2, p = 0.04). Subepicardial/mid-wall LV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was more common in the EIAR group (67% vs 22%, p = 0.01). ARVC patients commonly exhibit exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias. Patients with more significant RV remodeling and LV involvement (based on the presence of LV dilatation and LGE) appear more susceptible to exercise-induced arrhythmias.
Assuntos
Displasia Arritmogênica Ventricular Direita , Adulto , Arritmias Cardíacas , Displasia Arritmogênica Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico por imagem , Displasia Arritmogênica Ventricular Direita/epidemiologia , Displasia Arritmogênica Ventricular Direita/genética , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Gadolínio , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , PrevalênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Value-Based Health Care (VBHC) is an evolving model of healthcare delivery aimed at achieving better patient outcomes at lower costs to the healthcare provider. The practise of VBHC requires efficient information systems with good reporting capability and subsequent outcome measuring. Information systems within the National Health Service (NHS) are often multiple and not necessarily integrated to one another. We therefore developed a systematic approach to collecting, validating and analysing data from multiple sources and information systems, with the aim of designing and endorsing an automatic system to capture health outcomes data in heart failure to support future VBHC models. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) procedures within a limited geographical area in South London were evaluated. A purpose built database was created to integrate, transform and validate health care data from multiple information systems. RESULTS: Validation analysis shows that our implemented methodology has produced a robust dataset. Our limited cohort of 134 patients does not allow for any complex statistical analysis however has identified some important themes related to outcomes and costs. CONCLUSION: We have created a validated database specific to our Trust that can be upscaled locally with ease and transferred to other health diseases. Due to variations in local procedure from one Trust to another, this methodology now requires implementation across multiple sites to understand differences in transformation of data and outcome measuring.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Medicina Estatal , Atenção à Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Londres , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pre-procedural assessment of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is heterogenous and patients implanted with unfavorable characteristics may account for non-response. A dedicated CRT pre-assessment clinic (CRT PAC) was developed to standardize the review process and undertake structured pre-procedural evaluation. The aim of this analysis was to determine the effectiveness on patient selection and outcomes. METHODS: A prospective database of consecutive patients attending the CRT PAC between 2013 and 2018 was analyzed. Pre-operative assessment included cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Patients were considered CRT responders based on improvement in clinical composite score (CCS) and/or reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥ 15% at 6-months follow-up. RESULTS: Of 252 patients reviewed in the CRT PAC during the analysis period, 192 fulfilled consensus guidelines for implantation. Of the patients receiving CRT, 82% showed improvement in their CCS and 57% had a reduction in LVESV ≥ 15%. The presence of subendocardial scar on CMR and a peak VO2 ≤ 12 ml/kg/min on CPET predicted CRT non-response. Two patients were unsuitable for CRT as they had end-stage heart failure and died during follow-up. The majority of patients initially deemed unsuitable for CRT did not suffer from unexpected hospitalization for decompensated heart failure or died from cardiovascular disease; only 8 patients (13%) received CRT devices during follow-up because of symptomatic left ventricular systolic impairment. CONCLUSION: A dedicated CRT PAC is able to appropriately select patients for CRT. Pre-procedural investigation/imaging can identify patients unlikely to respond to, or may not yet be suitable for CRT.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) produces acute changes in electric resynchronization that can be measured noninvasively with electrocardiographic body surface mapping (ECGi). The relation between baseline acute electrophysiology metrics and their manipulation with CRT and reverse remodeling is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To test (ECGi) derived parameters of electrical activation as predictors of volumetric response to CRT. METHODS: ECGi was performed in 21 patients directly following CRT implant. Activation parameters (left ventricular total activation time [LVtat], global biventricular total activation time [VVtat], global left/right ventricular electrical synchrony [VVsync], and global left ventricular dispersion of activation times [LVdisp]) were measured at baseline and following echocardiographically optimized CRT. Remodeling response (>15% reduction left ventricular end-systolic volume) was assessed 6 months post CRT. RESULTS: Patients were aged 68.9 ± 12.1 years, 81% were male, and 57% were ischemic. Baseline measures of dyssynchrony were more pronounced in left bundle branch block (LBBB) vs non-LBBB. ECGi demonstrated a trend of greater interventricular dyssynchrony between responders and nonresponders that did not reach statistical significance (VVsync: -45.7 ± 22.4 ms vs -25.1 ± 29.3 ms, P = .227). Remaining activation parameters were similar between responders and nonresponders (VVtat 101 ± 22.0 ms vs 98.9 ± 23.4 ms, P = .838; LVtat 86.4 ± 17.1 ms vs 85.1 ± 27.7 ms, P = .904; LVdisp 28.2 ± 6.3 ms vs 27.0 ± 8.7 ms, P = .726). In volumetric responders activation parameters were significantly improved with CRT compared to nonresponders: VV sync (-45.67 ± 22.41 ms vs 2.33±18.87 ms, P = .001), VVtat (101 ± 22.04 ms vs 71 ± 14.01 ms, P = .002), LVtat (86.44 ± 17.15 ms vs 67.67 ± 11.31 ms, P = .006), and LVdisp (28.22 ± 6.3 ms vs 21.56 ± 4.45 ms, P = .008). CONCLUSION: Baseline ECGi activation times did not predict CRT volumetric response. Volumetric responders exhibited significant improvements in ECGi-derived metrics with CRT. ECGi does not select CRT candidates but may be a useful adjunct to guide left ventricle lead implants and to perform postimplant CRT optimization.
RESUMO
Presence of heart failure is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of the present study was to examine whether first-phase ejection fraction (EF1), the ejection fraction measured in early systole up to the time of peak aortic velocity, a sensitive measure of preclinical heart failure, is associated with survival in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. A retrospective outcome study was performed in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who underwent echocardiography (n=380) at the West Branch of the Union Hospital, Wuhan, China and in patients admitted to King's Health Partners in South London, United Kingdom. Association of EF1 with survival was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. EF1 was compared in patients with COVID-19 and in historical controls with similar comorbidities (n=266) who had undergone echocardiography before the COVID-19 pandemic. In patients with COVID-19, EF1 was a strong predictor of survival in each patient group (Wuhan and London). In the combined group, EF1 was a stronger predictor of survival than other clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic characteristics including age, comorbidities, and biochemical markers. A cutoff value of 25% for EF1 gave a hazard ratio of 5.23 ([95% CI, 2.85-9.60]; P<0.001) unadjusted and 4.83 ([95% CI, 2.35-9.95], P<0.001) when adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, hs-cTnI (high-sensitive cardiac troponin), and CRP (C-reactive protein). EF1 was similar in patients with and without COVID-19 (23.2±7.3 versus 22.0±7.6%, P=0.092, adjusted for prevalence of risk factors and comorbidities). Impaired EF1 is strongly associated with mortality in COVID-19 and probably reflects preexisting, preclinical heart failure.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Ecocardiografia , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Volume Sistólico , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , COVID-19/terapia , China/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Ecocardiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Prognóstico , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Análise de Sobrevida , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Left ventricular (LV) involvement in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is not evaluated in the revised Task Force Criteria, possibly leading to underdiagnosis. This study explored the diagnostic role of myocardial native T1 mapping in patients with ARVC and their first-degree relatives. Thirty ARVC patients (47% males, mean age 45 ± 27 years) and 59 first-degree relatives not meeting diagnostic criteria underwent CMR with native T1 mapping. C MR was abnormal in 26 (87%) patients with ARVC. The right ventricle was affected in isolation in 13 (43%) patients. Prior to T1 mapping assessment, 2 (7%) patients exhibited isolated LV involvement and 11 (36%) patients showed features of biventricular disease. Left ventricular involvement was manifest as detectable LV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in 12 out of 13 cases. According to pre-specified inter-ventricular septal (IVS) T1 mapping thresholds, 11 (37%) patients revealed raised native T1 values including 5 out of the 17 patients who would otherwise have been classified as exhibiting a normal LV by conventional imaging parameters. Native septal T1 values were elevated in 22 (37%) of the 59 first-degree relatives included. Biventricular involvement is commonly observed in ARVC; native myocardial T1 values are raised in more than one third of patients, including a significant proportion of cases that would have been otherwise classified as exhibiting a normal LV using conventional CMR techniques. The significance of abnormal T1 values in first-degree relatives at risk will need validation through longitudinal studies.
Assuntos
Displasia Arritmogênica Ventricular Direita , Displasia Arritmogênica Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico por imagem , Displasia Arritmogênica Ventricular Direita/genética , Meios de Contraste , Família , Feminino , Gadolínio , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos TestesRESUMO
Cardiac Troponin (hs-TnT) elevation has been reported in unselected patients hospitalized with COVID-19 however the mechanism and relationship with mortality remain unclear. Consecutive patients admitted to a high-volume intensive care unit (ICU) in London with severe COVID-19 pneumonitis were included if hs-TnT concentration at admission was known. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed, with cohorts classified a priori by multiples of the upper limit of normal (ULN). 277 patients were admitted during a 7-week period in 2020; 176 were included (90% received invasive ventilation). hs-TnT at admission was 16.5 (9.0 to 49.3) ng/L, 56% had concentrations >ULN. 56 patients (31.8%) died during the index admission. Admission hs-TnT level was lower in survivors (12.0 (8.0-27.8) vs 28.5 (14.0 to 81.0) ng/L, pâ¯=â¯0.001). Univariate predictors of mortality were age, APACHE-II Score and admission hs-TnT (HR 1.73, pâ¯=â¯0.007). By multivariate regression, only age (HR 1.33, CI: 1.16.to 1.51, p < 0.01) and admission hs-TnT (HR 1.94, CI: 1.22 to 3.10, pâ¯=â¯0.006) remained predictive. Survival was significantly lower when admission hs-TnT was >ULN (log-rank p-value<0.001). Peak hs-TnT was higher in those who died but was not predictive of death after adjustment for other factors. In conclusion, in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis, the hs-TnT level at admission is a powerful independent predictor of the likelihood of surviving to discharge from ICU. In most cases, hs-TnT elevation does not represent major myocardial injury but acts as a sensitive integrated biomarker of global stress. Whether stratification based on admission Troponin level could be used to guide prognostication and management warrants further evaluation.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Troponina T/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Tiresias was the blind prophet of Apollo in Thebes. Tiresias is a symbolic figure, which embodies a paradox: he is blind in the physical sense, but his knowledge surpasses all, as opposed to Oedipus who cannot see despite having a good eyesight. Cardiac imaging can be considered the technological extension of human eyes, which has clearly revolutionised the diagnostic approach in Cardiology and specifically in heart failure. Echocardiography contributed to an approach focused on the ejection fraction (EF) which is the cornerstone of the most recent classifications of heart failure. The recent advances in cardiac imaging raised our ability to understand the aetiological roots of disease. However, the increasing amount of information generated by the plethora of diagnostic imaging techniques raises the challenge of clinical significance. The explosion of "big data" in cardiac imaging may also impact on classifications and nomenclature and on our ability to cluster and categorize, an exercise that is becoming remarkably challenging when the quest for the particular is taken to the extreme and the infinitesimal. The essence of cardiac conditions causing heart failure would probably not entirely captured by an approach only focused on the direct visualization of the heart. Delivery of personalized medicine would not be based only on cardiac imaging, but through an holistic approach which overcomes the mere assessment of empiric reality as it appears to our eyes through the lens of increasingly advanced diagnostic techniques.
Assuntos
Cardiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Técnicas de Imagem Cardíaca , Ecocardiografia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina de PrecisãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patient evaluation before cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains heterogeneous across centres and it is suspected a proportion of patients with unfavourable characteristics proceed to implantation. We developed a unique CRT preassessment clinic (CRT PAC) to act as a final review for patients already considered for CRT. We hypothesised that this clinic would identify some patients unsuitable for CRT through updated investigations and review. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether the CRT PAC led to savings for the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A decision tree model was made to evaluate two clinical pathways; (1) standard of care where all patients initially seen in an outpatient cardiology clinic proceeded directly to CRT and (2) management of patients in CRT PAC. RESULTS: 244 patients were reviewed in the CRT PAC; 184 patients were eligible to proceed directly for implantation and 48 patients did not meet consensus guidelines for CRT so were not implanted. Following CRT, 82.4% of patients had improvement in their clinical composite score and 57.7% had reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15%. Using the decision tree model, by reviewing patients in the CRT PAC, the total savings for the NHS was £966 880. Taking into consideration the additional cost of the clinic and by applying this model structure throughout the NHS, the potential savings could be as much as £39 million. CONCLUSIONS: CRT PAC appropriately selects patients and leads to substantial savings for the NHS. Adopting this clinic across the NHS has the potential to save £39 million.
Assuntos
Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/economia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Cardiopatias/economia , Cardiopatias/terapia , Ambulatório Hospitalar/economia , Seleção de Pacientes , Medicina Estatal/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Árvores de Decisões , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Feminino , Cardiopatias/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Ambulatório Hospitalar/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , Reino UnidoRESUMO
The term dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) defines a heterogeneous group of cardiac disorders, which are characterized by left ventricular or biventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of abnormal loading conditions or coronary artery disease sufficient to cause global systolic impairment. In approximately one third of cases, DCM is familial with a genetic pathogenesis and various patterns of inheritance. Although the electrocardiogram (ECG) has been considered traditionally non-specific in DCM, the recently acquired knowledge of the genotype-phenotype correlations provides novel opportunities to identify patterns and abnormalities that may point toward specific DCM subtypes. A learned ECG interpretation in combination with an appropriate use of other ECG-based techniques including ambulatory ECG monitoring, exercise tolerance test and imaging modalities, such as echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance, may allow the early identification of specific genetic or acquired forms of DCM. Furthermore, ECG abnormalities may reflect the severity of the disease and provide a useful tool in risk stratification and management. In the present review, we discuss the current role of the ECG in the diagnosis and management of DCM. We describe various clinical settings where the appropriate use and interpretation of the ECG can provide invaluable clues, contributing to the important role of this basic tool as cardiovascular medicine evolves.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Dilatada , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/genética , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/terapia , Ecocardiografia , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmia remains complex in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether scar heterogeneity, quantified by mean entropy, predicts appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. We hypothesized that higher mean entropy calculated from cardiac magnetic resonance texture analysis (CMR-TA) will predict appropriate ICD therapy. METHODS: Consecutive patients underwent CMR imaging before ICD implantation. Short-axis left ventricular scar was manually segmented. CMR-TA was performed using a Laplacian filter to extract and augment image features to create a scar texture from which histogram analysis of pixel intensity was used to calculate mean entropy. The primary end point was appropriate ICD therapy. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients underwent CMR-TA (ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM]: n = 70; nonischemic cardiomyopathy [NICM]: n = 44) with a median follow-up of 955 days (interquartile range 691-1185 days). Mean entropy was significantly higher in the ICM group (5.7 ± 0.7 vs 5.5 ± 0.7; P= .045). Overall, 33 patients received appropriate ICD therapy. Using optimized cutoff values from receiver operating characteristic curves, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated time until first appropriate therapy was significantly shorter in the high mean entropy group (P = .003). Multivariable analysis showed that mean entropy was the sole predictor of appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio 1.882; 95% confidence interval 1.083-3.271; P = .025). In the ICM group, mean entropy remained an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy, whereas in the NICM group, precontrast T1 values were the sole predictor. CONCLUSION: Scar heterogeneity, quantified by mean entropy using CMR-TA, was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy in the mixed cardiomyopathy cohort and ICM-only group, suggesting a potential role for CMR-TA in predicting ventricular arrhythmia and risk-stratifying patients for ICD implantation.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias/diagnóstico , Cicatriz/patologia , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Miocárdio/patologia , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Idoso , Cardiomiopatias/complicações , Entropia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taquicardia Ventricular/complicações , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Infection is a serious and expensive complication of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) procedures. A retrospective based cost analysis was performed to estimate Trust level savings of using the TYRX antibacterial envelope as a primary prevention measure against infection in a tertiary referral centre in South London, UK. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) procedures were evaluated. Decision-analytic modelling was performed to determine economic savings of using the envelope during CIED procedure vs CIED procedure alone. RESULTS: Over a 12 month follow-up period following CIED procedure, the observed infection rate was 3.14% (n = 5/159). The average cost of a CIED infection inpatient admission was £41,820 and, further to economic analysis, the additional costs attributable to infection was calculated at £62,213.94. A cost saving of £624 per patient by using TYRX during CIED procedure as a primary preventative measure against infection was estimated. CONCLUSIONS: TYRX would be a cost-saving treatment option amongst heart failure patients undergoing ICD and CRT device procedures based on analysis in the local geographical area of South London. If upscaled to the UK population, we estimate potential cost savings for the National Health Service (NHS).