Effectiveness and safety of the bevacizumab and erlotinib combination versus erlotinib alone in EGFR mutant metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The EGFR gene encodes a protein that stimulates molecular pathways that allow the growth and development of the tumor microenvironment. The current preferred tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the first-line treatment of EGFRm metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is osimertinib. However, the combination of angiogenesis inhibitors and TKI has produced discordant results. We aimed to assess the effects of the bevacizumab and erlotinib combination in EGFRm metastatic NSCLC. Methods: Using eligibility criteria focused on patients with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC treated with bevacizumab and erlotinib, we searched databases including clinical trial randomized studies and reviews published until April 15, 2023 in Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Embase. Eight clinical trials (1,052 patients) were selected from 1,343 articles for quantitative and qualitative assessment. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data were synthesized through random-effects meta-analysis. Results: The bevacizumab and erlotinib combination significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) (log(HR) = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.54-0.73, p < 0.001) and overall response ratio (ORR) (RR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97, p = 0.03). However, it did not improve the overall survival (log(HR) = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78-1.10, p = 0.38) and was associated with higher serious adverse events (SAEs) (OR = 3.48; 95% CI, 1.76-6.88, p = 0.005). A subgroup analysis suggested similar benefits in different mutation subtypes and brain metastasis condition. The evidence is limited by a moderate risk of bias across studies and heterogeneity in the reporting of SAEs. Conclusions: The bevacizumab and erlotinib combination significantly improved PFS and ORR in EGFRm metastatic NSCLC but were also associated with higher-grade (≥3) adverse events. These results suggest that while the combination therapy may enhance progression-free survival and overall response, it does not improve the overall survival and is associated with higher toxicity. Thus, the treatment should be personalized based on individual patient comorbidities. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these results. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, identifier CDR 42022364692.

A high number of co-occurring genomic alterations detected by NGS is associated with worse clinical outcomes in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma: Data from LATAM population.

BACKGROUND: Co-occurring genomic alterations identified downstream main oncogenic drivers have become more evident since the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) analyses at diagnosis and progression. Emerging evidence has stated that co-occurring genomic alterations at diagnosis might represent de novo and primary resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we assessed the prognostic role of co-occurring genomic alterations in advanced EGFRm NSCLC. METHODS: A cohort of 111 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations detected by PCR was analyzed in 5 Latin American oncological centers from January 2019 to December 2020. All eligible patients received upfront therapy with EGFR-TKI. Co-occurring genomic alterations were determined at diagnosis in every patient by the NGS (FoundationOneCDx) comprehensive platform, which evaluates 324 known cancer-related genes. RESULTS: EGFR exon19 deletion was the most frequent oncogenic driver mutation (60.4 %) detected by NGS. According to the NGS assay, 31 % and 68.3 % of patients had 1-2 and ≥ 3 co-occurring genomic alterations, respectively. The most frequent co-occurring genomic alterations were TP53 mutations (64.9 %) followed by CDKN2AB alterations (13.6 %), BRCA2 (13.6 %), and PTEN (12.7 %) mutations. Baseline central nervous system disease was present in 42.7 % of patients. First- or second-generation EGFR TKIs (gefitinib, afatinib, or erlotinib) were the most common treatment in 67.5 % of patients, while osimertinib was administered in 27.9 % of cases. The median PFS in all evaluated patients was 13.63 months (95 %CI: 11.79-15.52). Using ≥ 3 co-occurring alterations as the cut-off point, patients with ≥ 3 co-occurring genomic alterations showed a median PFS, of 12.7 months (95 %CI: 9.92-15.5) vs 21.3 months (95 %CI: 13.93-NR) in patients with 2 or less co-occurring genomic alterations [HR 3.06, (95 %CI: 1.55-5.48) p = 0.0001]. Also, patients with a TP53 mutation had a shorter PFS, 13.6 (95 %CI: 10.7-15.5) vs 19.2 months (95 %CI: 12.8-NR); in wild type TP53 [HR 2.01 (95 %CI: 1.18-3.74) p = 0.12]. In the multivariate analysis, the number (≥3) of concurrent genomic alterations and ECOG PS of 2 or more were related to a significant risk factor for progression [HR 2.79 (95 %CI: 1.49-5.23) p = 0.001 and HR 2.42 (95 %CI: 1.22-4.80) p = 0.011 respectively]. CONCLUSION: EGFR-mutant NSCLC is not a single oncogene-driven disease in the majority of cases, harboring a higher number of co-occurring genomic alterations. This study finds the number of co-occurring genomic alterations and the presence of TP53 mutations as negative prognostic biomarkers, which confers potentially earlier resistance mechanisms to target therapy.

STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Descriptive analysis and prognostic value among Hispanics (STRIKE registry-CLICaP).

BACKGROUND: Mutations in STK11 (STK11Mut) and, frequently co-occurring, KEAP1 mutations (KEAP1Mut) are associated with poor survival in metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy. However, there are limited data regarding the prognostic or predictive significance of these genomic alterations among Hispanics. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed a cohort of Hispanic patients (N = 103) diagnosed with mNSCLC from the US and seven Latin American countries (LATAM) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) alone or in combination as first-line (Cohort A). All cases were treated in routine care between January 2016 and December 2021. The main objectives were to determine the association of mutations in STK11 or KEAP1 in these patients' tumors with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), presence of KRAS mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other relevant clinical variables. To compare outcomes with a STK11Wt/KEAP1Wt population, historical data from a cohort of Hispanic patients (N = 101) treated with first-line ICI was used, matching both groups by country of origin, gender, and Programed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level (Cohort B). RESULTS: Most tumors had mutations only in STK11 or KEAP1 (45.6%) without KRAS co-mutation or any other genomic alteration. Besides, 35%, 8.7%, 6.8%, and 3.9% were KRASMut + STK11Mut, KRASMut + STK11Mut + KEAP1Mut, STK11Mut + KEAP1Mut, and KRASMut + KEAP1Mut, respectively. Based on KRAS status, STK11 alterations were associated with significantly lower PD-L1 expression among those with KRASWt (p = 0.023), whereas KEAP1 mutations were predominantly associated with lower PD-L1 expression among KRASMut cases (p = 0.047). Tumors with KRASMut + KEAP1Mut had significantly higher median TMB when compared to other tumors (p = 0.040). For Cohort A, median PFS was 4.9 months (95%CI 4.3-5.4), slightly longer in those with KEAP1mut 6.1 months versus STK11Mut 4.7 months (p = 0.38). In the same cohort, PD-L1 expression and TMB did not influence PFS. OS was significantly longer among patients with tumors with PD-L1 ≥ 50% (30.9 months), and different from those with PD-L1 1-49% (22.0 months), and PD-L1 < 1% (12.0 months) (p = 0.0001). When we compared the cohorts A and B, OS was significantly shorter for patients carrying STK1 [STK11Mut 14.2 months versus STK11Wt 27.0 months (p = 0.0001)] or KEAP1 [KEAP1Mut 12.0 months versus KEAP1Wt 24.4 months (p = 0.005)] mutations. PD-L1 expression significantly affected OS independently of the presence of mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or KRAS. TMB-H favored better OS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large Hispanic cohort to study the impact of STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in NSCLC patient treated with ICI. Our data suggest that mutations in the above-mentioned genes are associated with PD-L1 expression levels and poor OS.

Recent advances and new insights in the management of early-stage epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer.

Patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are candidates for curative surgery; however, despite multiple advances in lung cancer management, recurrence rates remain high. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to significantly prolong overall survival (OS), but this benefit is modest and there is an urgent need for effective new therapies to provide a cure for more patients. The high efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFR) in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC has led to the evaluation of these agents in early stages of the disease. Multiple clinical trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of EGFR TKIs as an adjuvant treatment, in patients with resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and shown that they significantly prolong disease-free survival (DFS), but this benefit does not translate to OS. Recently, an interim analysis of the ADAURA trial demonstrated that, surprisingly, osimertinib improved DFS. This led to the study being stopped early, leaving many unanswered questions about its potential effect on OS and its incorporation as a standard adjuvant treatment in this patient subgroup. These targeted agents are also being evaluated in locally-advanced disease, with promising results, although prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results. In this article, we review the most relevant studies on the role of EGFR TKIs in the management of early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Prognostic factors in potentially resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant treatment-a narrative review.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in worldwide. The most important treatment for patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgery. Resected stage II and III NSCLC patients should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy and in patients with resected stage IB disease and with a primary tumor >4 cm this treatment could be considered. The treatment of resectable locally advanced NSCLC should be evaluated within an experienced multidisciplinary team. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be considered in patients with resectable disease and clear candidates for complementary chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has similar impact on overall survival (OS) than adjuvant chemotherapy, however postoperative chemotherapy has more evidence-based support. Immunotherapy is being studied in early and locally advanced NSCLC as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Different prognostic factors have been described in patients with stage III who have received neoadjuvant treatment, which we intend to review in this article.

Linfomas del tracto gastrointestinal: una enfermedad neoplásica del subdesarrollo / Gastrointestinal lymphomas: malignant disease of under development

Cuatrocientos cincuentaiocho de los 3,495 casos de linfoma maligno registrados entre los años 1965 y 1992 en el Instituto de Enfemedades Neoplásicas, correspondieron a Linfomas del Tracto Gastrointestinal. Esta es una de las series de linfoma del TGI más grande entre las reportadas por hospitales de cáncer, y sugiere que esta rara patología es relativamente frecuente en nuestro medio. El análisis de esta casuística muestra una mayor frecuencia relativa de la localización en el intestino delgado de esta serie comparte algunas características con el linfoma de la enfermedad inmunoproliferativa del intestino delgado descrita en las poblaciones jóvenes y pobres del Mediterraneo. La enfermedad confinada a la viscera (estadíos I y II) es curable por cirugía en 0 por ciento de casos. La enfermedad avanzada incompletamente resecada puede beneficiarse con quimioterapia complementaria. La enfermedad irresecable quirurgicamente puede ser tratada con quimioterapia complementaria de inducción sin que el riesgo de perforación o hemorragia sea prohibitivo el 50 por ciento de los casos inoperables tratados con quimioterapia alcanzaron sobrevidas a 5 y 10 años libres de recidiva de la enfermedad