Association Between Common Urologic Medications and Onset of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in Men With Prostate Cancer Managed by Different Primary Treatment Modalities.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the relationship between common urologic medications phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) and anticholinergics (AC) and risk of dementia onset in men who underwent different primary treatments for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (>50years) with prostate cancer (1998-2022) without Alzheimer's disease or related dementias were selected from Cancer of the Prostatic Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor Registry. Minimum medication use was 3months. Fine-Gray regression was performed to determine the association between medication exposure and dementia onset ≥12months after primary treatment in men matched on age, race, comorbid conditions, smoking, and type of clinical site, with competing risk of death. RESULTS: Among 5937 men (53% PDE5i; 14% AC), PDE5i users were younger (63 vs 70, P < .01) with less CAD, CVA, DM (all P < .01); AC users were older (68 vs 66, P < .01) with higher incidence of comorbidities (P < .01). Median months of use was 24.3 (IQR 12.1, 48.7) for PDE5i and 12.2 (IQR 6.1, 24.3) for AC users. Cumulative incidence of Alzheimer's disease or related dementias was 6.5% at 15years. PDE5i (P = .07) and AC (P = .06) were not associated with dementia regardless of primary treatment modality. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study, PDE5i and AC use do not appear independently associated with risk of dementia. Notably, our cohort was generally healthy and younger which may limit our ability to detect significance. We recommend prospective investigation into association between PDE5i and dementia and advise continued judicious stewardship of AC in older patient populations.

Impact of Stress Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy on Time to Intervention, Quality of Life and Work Status.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the incidence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after radical prostatectomy (RP), its treatment, and impact on quality of life (QoL) and work status 1year after RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate cancer patients treated by RP (1998-2016) were selected from CaPSURE. SUI was defined as any pads per day (ppd) 1 year after RP. SUI procedures were tracked by CPT codes (sling and artificial sphincter). Patients reported work status (full-time, part-time, unpaid), UCLA PCa Index urinary function (UF) and bother (UB) and SF36 Index physical function (PF). Associations of incontinence with UF, UB, and PF and work status changes were assessed (ANOVA). Lifetable estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated risk of undergoing SUI procedures. RESULTS: 664/2989 (22%) men treated with RP reported SUI at 1 year. More men with SUI had ≥GG2, intermediate to high-risk disease and non-nerve-sparing surgery (all P < .01). Cumulative incidence of SUI procedures was 1.4% at 10years after RP. Age (HR 2.68 per 10years, 95% CI 1.41-5.08) and number of ppd at 1 year (HR 3.20, 95% CI 2.27-4.50) were associated with undergoing SUI procedures. UF declined at 1year after RP, while UB and PF remained stable. UF, UB, and PF were inversely associated with number of ppd (all P < .01). Change in work status was not associated with incontinence or QoL scores. CONCLUSION: Incontinence affected QoL without impacting work status, suggesting that men with SUI after RP may continue working and go under-treated despite impact on QoL.

A diagnosis of prostate cancer and pursuit of active surveillance is not followed by weight loss: potential for a teachable moment.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for incident prostate cancer (PC) as well as risk of disease progression and mortality. We hypothesized that men diagnosed with lower-risk PC and who elected active surveillance (AS) for their cancer management would likely initiate lifestyle changes that lead to weight loss. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in the Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS), a multicenter prospective biomarker discovery and validation study of men who have chosen AS for their PC. Data from 442 men diagnosed with PC within 1 year of study entry who completed a standard of care 12-month follow-up visit were analyzed. We examined the change in weight and body mass index (BMI) over the first year of study participation. RESULTS: After 1 year on AS, 7.5% (33/442) of patients had lost 5% or more of their on-study weight. The proportion of men who lost 5% or more weight was similar across categories of baseline BMI: normal/underweight (8%), overweight (6%) and obese (10%, χ2 test P=0.44). The results were similar for patients enrolled in the study 1 year or 6 months after diagnosis. By contrast, after 1 year, 7.7% (34/442) of patients had gained >5% of their weight. CONCLUSIONS: Only 7.5% of men with low-risk PC enrolled in AS lost a modest (⩾5%) amount of weight after diagnosis. Given that obesity is related to PC progression and mortality, targeted lifestyle interventions may be effective at this 'teachable moment', as men begin AS for low-risk PC.

Prognostic value of Ki67 in localized prostate carcinoma: a multi-institutional study of >1000 prostatectomies.

BACKGROUND: Expanding interest in and use of active surveillance for early state prostate cancer (PC) has increased need for prognostic biomarkers. Using a multi-institutional tissue microarray resource including over 1000 radical prostatectomy samples, we sought to correlate Ki67 expression captured by an automated image analysis system with clinicopathological features and validate its utility as a clinical grade test in predicting cancer-specific outcomes. METHODS: After immunostaining, the Ki67 proliferation index (PI) of tumor areas of each core (three cancer cores/case) was analyzed using a nuclear quantification algorithm (Aperio). We assessed whether Ki67 PI was associated with clinicopathological factors and recurrence-free survival (RFS) including biochemical recurrence, metastasis or PC death (7-year median follow-up). RESULTS: In 1004 PCs (∼4000 tissue cores) Ki67 PI showed significantly higher inter-tumor (0.68) than intra-tumor variation (0.39). Ki67 PI was associated with stage (P<0.0001), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI, P=0.02), extracapsular extension (ECE, P<0.0001) and Gleason score (GS, P<0.0001). Ki67 PI as a continuous variable significantly correlated with recurrence-free, overall and disease-specific survival by multivariable Cox proportional hazard model (hazards ratio (HR)=1.04-1.1, P=0.02-0.0008). High Ki67 score (defined as ⩾5%) was significantly associated with worse RFS (HR=1.47, P=0.0007) and worse overall survival (HR=2.03, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In localized PC treated by radical prostatectomy, higher Ki67 PI assessed using a clinical grade automated algorithm is strongly associated with a higher GS, stage, SVI and ECE and greater probability of recurrence.

Immediate versus deferred initiation of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients with PSA-only relapse. An observational follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing to start androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as the only sign of relapse is unknown. METHODS: We identified men with prostate cancer in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavour (CaPSURE) study who would have been eligible (⩽ cT3aN0M0, primary radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, PSA relapse as the only evidence of recurrence) for a randomised trial comparing 'immediate' versus 'deferred' ADT initiation. We emulated such trial by assigning patients to the 'immediate' strategy if they initiated ADT within 3 months of PSA relapse and to the 'deferred' strategy if they initiated ADT when they presented with metastasis, symptoms or a short PSA doubling time. We censored patients when they deviated from the assigned strategy and adjusted for this censoring via inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: Of 2096 eligible patients (median age 69, interquartile range 63-75 years), 88% were white, 35% had a Gleason score ⩾ 7, 69% were treated with radical prostatectomy and 31% received radiotherapy only as primary treatment. The mean time from primary treatment to PSA relapse was 37.4 (standard deviation [SD] 34.2) months. Mean follow-up from primary treatment was 91.4 (SD 48.4) months. The adjusted mortality hazard ratio for immediate versus deferred ADT was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-1.60), which would be translated into a similar 5-year survival (difference between groups: -2.0% (95% CI: -10.0 to 5.9%). CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that prostate cancer patients undergoing immediate ADT initiation within three months after PSA-only relapse had similar survival to those who deferred ADT initiation within 3 months after clinical progression.

Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes.

PURPOSE: We describe the outcomes of patients with low risk localized prostate cancer who were upgraded on a surveillance biopsy while on active surveillance and evaluated whether delayed treatment was associated with adverse outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included men in the study with lower risk disease managed initially with active surveillance and upgraded to Gleason score 3+4 or greater. Patient demographics and disease characteristics were compared. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the treatment-free probability stratified by initial upgrade (3+4 vs 4+3 or greater), Cox regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with treatment and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the factors associated with adverse outcome at surgery. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 219 men, with 150 (68%) upgraded to 3+4 and 69 (32%) to 4+3 or greater. Median time to upgrade was 23 months (IQR 11-49). A total of 163 men (74%) sought treatment, the majority (69%) with radical prostatectomy. The treatment-free survival rate at 5 years was 22% for 3+4 and 10% for 4+3 or greater upgrade. Upgrade to 4+3 or greater, higher prostate specific antigen density at diagnosis and shorter time to initial upgrade were associated with treatment. At surgical pathology 34% of cancers were downgraded while 6% were upgraded. Cancer volume at initial upgrade was associated with adverse pathological outcome at surgery (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.19-9.29, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: After Gleason score upgrade most patients elected treatment with radical prostatectomy. Among men who deferred definitive intervention, few experienced additional upgrading. At radical prostatectomy only 6% of cases were upgraded further and only tumor volume at initial upgrade was significantly associated with adverse pathological outcome.

Updated trends in imaging use in men diagnosed with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found persistent overuse of imaging for clinical staging of men with low-risk prostate cancer. We aimed to determine imaging trends in three cohorts of men. METHODS: We analyzed imaging trends of men with prostate cancer who were a part of Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) (1998-2006), were insured by Medicare (1998-2006), or privately insured (Ingenix database, 2002-2006). The rates of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scan (BS) were determined and time trends were analyzed by linear regression. For men in CaPSURE, demographic and clinical predictors of test use were explored using a multivariable regression model. RESULTS: Since 1998, there was a significant downward trend in BS (16%) use in the CaPSURE cohort (N=5156). There were slight downward trends (2.4 and 1.7%, respectively) in the use of CT and MRI. Among 54 322 Medicare patients, BS, CT and MRI use increased by 2.1, 10.8 and 2.2% and among 16 161 privately insured patients, use increased by 7.9, 8.9 and 3.7%, respectively. In CaPSURE, the use of any imaging test was greater in men with higher-risk disease. In addition, type of insurance and treatment affected the use of imaging tests in this population. CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread misuse of imaging tests in men with low-risk prostate cancer, particularly for CT. These findings highlight the need for examination of factors that drive decision making with respect to imaging in this setting.

A risk-adjusted definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether a variable definition of biochemical recurrence (BCR) based on clincopathologic features facilitates early identification of patients likely to suffer from disease progression. The definition of BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) bears important implications for patient counseling and management; however, there remains a significant debate regarding the appropriate definition. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 3619 men who underwent RP for localized prostate cancer from 1989 to 2007, with data abstracted from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) registry. Patients were stratified into three risk groups according to Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment post-Surgical (CAPRA-S) score. Three single threshold PSA cut-points for BCR were evaluated (PSA > or =0.05, > or =0.2 and > or =0.4 ng ml(-1)) as well as a variable cut-point defined by risk group. After reaching the cut-points, patients were followed for further PSA progression. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with BCR differed by cut-point and risk group, ranging from 7 to 37% (low risk), 22 to 58% (intermediate risk) and 60 to 86% (high risk). The positive-predictive value (PPV) for predicting further PSA progression was 49% for the PSA > or =0.05 ng ml(-1), 62% for the PSA > or =0.2 ng ml(-1), 65% for the PSA > or =0.4 ng ml(-1) and 68% for the risk-adjusted definition. Five-year progression-free survival was 39% for the risk-adjusted definition compared with 45-52% for the other definitions of BCR. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a variable definition of BCR determined by clinicopathologic risk may improve the identification of early recurrence after RP without increasing the overdiagnosis of BCR. By using a risk-adjusted BCR definition, clinicians can better predict future PSA progression and more appropriately counsel patients regarding salvage therapies.

Active surveillance: does serial prostate biopsy increase histological inflammation?

BACKGROUND: Active surveillance (AS) is an appropriate management strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer. Most protocols recommend repeated prostate biopsy every 12-24 months. The purpose of this paper is to describe histological inflammation patterns in men on AS who underwent serial prostate biopsy for disease monitoring. METHODS: We reviewed records of men on AS from January 1999 through February 2011 who had a diagnostic plus ≥1 repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies performed at our institution. The type and degree of inflammatory infiltrate were grossly reviewed and scored for each patient's biopsy by a single pathologist. Relationship of inflammation severity and number of serial biopsies was assessed using a repeated measures mixed model. Unpaired t-test and χ(2)-square analysis assessed variance in degree of inflammation and location of inflammation relative to cancer grade progression defined as Gleason sum increase. RESULTS: Fifty-six men met study inclusion criteria. Mean age was 62.1 (6.5) years, 71% were stage cT1c, 79% had a PSA level <10 ng ml(-1), and 98% had diagnostic Gleason sum ≤6. A small, statistically significant increase in maximum chronic inflammation (CI) scores with greater number of repeat biopsies was observed. CI scores were not associated with number of biopsies based on upgrade status. The main limitation to our study is our small sample size. Potential unmeasured confounders, such as unreported antibiotic use or symptomatic prostatitis, may have also affected our findings. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study of 56 men on AS for localized prostate cancer, degree of chronic histological inflammation increased with greater number of prostate biopsies, but was not associated with subsequent risk of grade progression.

Evaluating prostate cancer mortality and competing risks of death in patients with localized prostate cancer using a comprehensive nomogram.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal treatment for a patient with newly diagnosed prostate cancer weighing the individual's risk of disease progression against his risk of non-cancer death. METHODS: We developed a predictive model incorporating clinicopathological tumor variables, patient age, comorbidity status, and primary treatment modality. We identified 6091 patients with clinically-localized prostate cancer managed with radical prostatectomy (n=4117) or radiation therapy (n=1974) from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database. Fine and Gray competing-risks proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate the risks of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and non-prostate cancer death and to generate a nomogram. RESULTS: The median follow-up after treatment was 53 months (interquartile range 30, 80 months). In total, 983 men died during follow-up, including 167 who died of prostate cancer and 816 who died of non-prostate cancer causes. On multivariate analysis, higher Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score and primary treatment with radiation were associated with an increased risk of PCSM, whereas older age, African-American race, and treatment with radiation predicted non-prostate cancer death. The number of comorbidities and receipt of androgen deprivation therapy correlated with an increased risk of non-prostate cancer death, but not PCSM. The resulting nomogram allows quantification and comparison of the 10-year risk of PCSM and non-prostate cancer death. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating clinicopathological variables with comorbid conditions in a competing-risks model affords quantification and comparison of relative probabilities of PCSM and non-prostate cancer death following treatment. Our model thereby facilitates an individualized approach for counseling patients regarding prostate cancer management.

PSA screening: determinants of primary-care physician practice patterns.

BACKGROUND: The effect of practice guidelines and the European Randomised Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) trials on PSA screening practices of primary-care physicians (PCPs) is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a national cross-sectional on-line survey of a random sample of 3010 PCPs from July to August 2010. Participants were queried about their knowledge of prostate cancer, PSA screening guidelines, the ERSPC and PLCO trials, and about their PSA screening practices. Factors associated with PSA screening were identified using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 152 (5%) participants opened and 89 completed the on-line survey, yielding a response rate of 58% for those that viewed the invitation. Eighty percent of respondents correctly identified prostate cancer risk factors. In all, 51% and 64% reported that they discuss and order PSA screening for men aged 50-75 years, respectively. Fifty-four percent were most influenced by the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Also, 21% and 28% of respondents stated that their PSA screening practices were influenced by the ERSPC and PLCO trials, respectively. Medical specialty was the only variable associated with propensity to screen, with family medicine physicians more likely to use PSA screening than internists (ß=0.21, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the physicians surveyed did not routinely discuss PSA screening with eligible patients. The impact of the ERSPC and PLCO trials on PSA screening practices was low among US PCPs. USPSTF recommendations for PSA screening continue to be the strongest influence on PCPs' propensity to use PSA screening.

Quality of life in young men after radical prostatectomy.

Urinary and sexual function and bother are important outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP). Since urinary and sexual function are age-related, post-operative bother may vary by age. This study explores the disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes in young men compared with older men undergoing RP. Using CaPSURE data, we identified men who underwent RP and completed the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) before and 1-year post-RP. Men were stratified by age (< 55 years, 55-64, > or = 65). Multivariate regression models were created: a linear model for predictors of PCI scores and a logistic model for predictors of severe declines in PCI domains. Younger men scored significantly better than older men in urinary function (P=0.04), urinary bother (P=0.02) and sexual function (P<0.0001) 1-year post-RP. Severe declines in urinary bother (odds ratio (OR)=1.54, 1.01-2.35) and sexual function (OR=3.20, 1.97-5.19) were more common in men > or = 65 years. Men with relationships had less urinary bother (P=0.03) and were less likely to experience severe worsening of urinary bother (OR=0.32, 0.17-0.60) while having a greater risk of severe worsening of sexual bother (OR=2.74, 1.28-5.89). The use of sexual aids was associated with worse sexual bother (P<0.0001) and greater risk of severe worsening of sexual bother (OR=2.29, 1.54-3.30). Baseline PCI scores were independent predictors in all models. One year after RP, younger men (age < 55) have similar, or better, urinary and sexual function and bother. Baseline scores are strongly associated with post-RP scores and severity of declines. Current relationships and use of sexual aids have significant roles in post-RP bother.

Prostate cancer outcomes among older men: insurance status comparisons results from CaPSURE database.

With growing number of older adults in the United States and complexity of issues related to Medicare and other insurances more research is needed to evaluate an effectiveness of the different insurance types in prevention, screening and treatment of cancer. With prostate cancer being highly prevalent disease in older men, the importance of appropriate treatment and favorable outcomes is imperative. In this study we examine whether prostate cancer outcomes, such as risk category at diagnosis, treatment and survival differ in relationship to insurance status in older patients in CaPSURE. Data were abstracted from CaPSURE, a longitudinal observational database of 13 124 men with prostate cancer. Men were selected for the study if they were older than 65 years old at diagnosis, newly diagnosed between 1995 and 2005 at entry to CaPSURE with localized disease and received radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), hormonal therapy or expectant management (EM). Insurance status was summarized by eight categories: Medicare only, Medicare+supplement, Medicare+HMO, Medicare+PPO, Medicare+FFS, health maintenance organization (HMO), preferred provider organization (PPO) and Veteran's Administration (VA). A total of 2983 men met the inclusion criteria. Odds ratios (OR) for the likelihood of receiving each type of therapy compared to RP by insurance status and likelihood of presenting with high-risk classification at diagnosis were derived using multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics. Difference in survival between insurance groups was evaluated by Cox's multivariate regression. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a strong association between initial treatment and insurance status. Compared to Medicare patients, men in the CaPSURE database treated at HMO, PPO and VA systems were more likely to receive BT than RP (OR, 1.71-1.92) and less likely to receive this treatment if they were in Medicare+FFS and Medicare+PPO (OR, 0.18-0.38). Hormonal treatment demonstrated similar pattern, however OR did not reached statistical significance for HMO and PPO. Use of EM was much more predominant for patients in VA system (OR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.94-11.55). Use of EBRT was significantly associated with type of insurance. Men with VA, Medicare+FFS and Medicare+PPO insurance were less likely to receive this treatment compared to RP. Survival and clinical risk at diagnosis was associated with insurance status in univariate analysis but this association diminished after adjusting for possible covariates. This study provides important information on relationship between insurance status and several outcomes in patients with prostate cancer. Even after controlling for important clinical and sociodemographic factors we found marked differences in prostate cancer treatment according to type of insurance. Future explorations of associations between health care delivery system, cancer care and outcomes are needed.

Total and specific complementary and alternative medicine use in a large cohort of men with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To assess specific complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), a large, community-based national registry of men with prostate cancer. METHODS: We examined more than 50 types of CAM use in a large, national, community-based registry of men with prostate cancer (CaPSURE). Participants completed biannual surveys within 2 years of diagnosis and treatment. We analyzed associations of CAM use with sociodemographic and clinical features, using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: One third of 2582 respondents reported using CAM. Common practices included vitamin and mineral supplements (26%), herbs (16%), antioxidants (13%), and CAM for prostate health (12%; eg, saw palmetto, selenium, vitamin E, lycopene). In multivariate analyses, users were more likely to have other comorbid conditions, worse cancer grade at diagnosis, higher incomes, more education, and to live in the West. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary and alternative medicine use was associated with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in this large sample of men with prostate cancer. These results should be considered by health care professionals counseling men with prostate cancer regarding diet and secondary prevention.

Preliminary evaluation of prostate cancer metastatic risk biomarkers.

Prostate cancer patients at high risk of metastasis need to be identified as early as possible since metastasis is invariably fatal. Treatment could be tailored to risk. Recent array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) studies of primary and metastatic prostate tumors identified 39 BAC clones capable of detecting genomic signatures of metastasis. We termed these loci the genomic evaluators of metastatic CaP (GEMCaP). Risk assessments were made on a set of men who were managed with radical prostatectomy. We compared the utility of GEMCaP loci and the Kattan nomogram, a common risk assessment tool, in relation to biochemical outcome. This preliminary evaluation experiment suggests we can use aCGH to detect genomic signatures of metastasis in primary tumors with an accuracy of 78%. The classification accuracy for the Kattan nomogram was 75%. Therefore, validation of GEMCaP is warranted in a larger, appropriately designed cohort.

History of diabetes, clinical features of prostate cancer, and prostate cancer recurrence-data from CaPSURE (United States).

OBJECTIVES: There is a growing epidemiologic literature suggesting an inverse association between history of diabetes and risk of incident prostate cancer. To our knowledge, the relationship between diabetes and tumor features and risk of recurrence among men with prostate cancer has not been examined previously. We hypothesized that men with diabetes would present with more favorable prostate cancer and experience lower risk of recurrence. METHODS: We identified 691 men with diabetes at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis, among 6722 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in 1989 to 2002 within CaPSURE(TM), a community-based prostate cancer registry study. We compared clinical and socio-demographic variables by diabetes status, using chi2 tests, t-tests, and multinomial logistic regression. We examined recurrence rates for prostate cancer among patients with and without diabetes using Kaplan-Meier log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: In multivariate analyses, history of diabetes was not associated with any diagnostic clinical parameter, and treatment-specific recurrence rates for prostate cancer generally did not differ by diabetes history. Among men with low-prognostic risk or who were younger at prostate cancer diagnosis, being diabetic (versus not) was associated with an elevated risk of recurrence after radiation therapy, in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to data suggesting that diabetes may be modestly protective against risk of incident prostate cancer, we did not observe any evidence of an inverse association between history of diabetes and aggressiveness at diagnosis or risk of recurrence, in this population of men with prostate cancer.

Health-related quality of life in men with metastatic prostate cancer: the misleading effect of lead-time bias.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether the difference in health-related quality of life, which appears to be worse in men with metastatic prostate cancer when the metastases are noted at initial diagnosis than during follow-up after treatment for clinically localized disease, can be attributed to previous local control or to some form of measurement bias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed by univariate and multivariate methods 375 men with metastatic prostate cancer who were enrolled in CaPSURE, a national observational cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated in community and academic settings throughout the USA. In particular, we assessed whether group differences in health-related quality of life were explained by the timing of metastatic diagnosis in the course of their disease. Health-related quality of life was measured with the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: After controlling for relevant covariates (age, comorbidity and ethnicity), multivariate models suggested that men whose metastases were noted at the time of initial diagnosis scored 5-15 points worse in all eight domains of the SF-36. CONCLUSION: Men who are diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer during the follow-up after treatment for clinically localized disease report a better quality of life than those who are metastatic at the time of diagnosis, not because the primary treatment confers any benefit but because they are followed more closely over time and diagnosed with metastases earlier in the course of their disease. This apparent difference in quality of life is an effect of lead-time bias in the diagnosis of metastasis.

The evolving role of androgen deprivation therapy in the management of prostate cancer.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a central role in the management of prostate cancer. ADT is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic disease; the most common method is gonadal suppression via luteinizing hormone release hormone (LH) agonists, with or without antiandrogens. Antiandrogen monotherapy remains investigational, as is the appropriate role of 5alphareductase inhibition for prostate cancer. Intermittent ADT offers the promise of improved quality of life and reduced cost without a decrease found to date in oncologic efficacy. A growing menu of options exists for secondary androgen deprivation after disease progression on primary therapy: these include high-dose antiandrogens, estrogens, and adrenal androgen suppressants. ADT is being used with increasing frequency as primary monotherapy in patients with localized disease, but only small, nonrandomized studies of highly selected patients have been reported to date. Neoadjuvant ADT (NADT) has been demonstrated in prospective, multi-institutional trials to improve outcomes for patients with high-risk or locally advanced disease undergoing external-beam radiotherapy. Trials for patients with lower-risk, localized disease are still ongoing. Neoadjuvant therapy does not improve outcomes for patients with localized disease opting for radical prostatectomy (RP) and has not been well studied in association with brachytherapy. The side effects of ADT can be managed increasingly successfully; in particular, the introduction of zoledronate may reduce the impact of ADT-associated osteoporosis. Finally, contemporary practice pattern data suggest that use of ADT is increasing across patient risk groups, both in contexts where such therapy is well supported by current evidence and in others where it is not.

Localized prostate cancer: effect of hormone deprivation therapy measured by using combined three-dimensional 1H MR spectroscopy and MR imaging: clinicopathologic case-controlled study.

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and three-dimensional (3D) proton MR spectroscopic imaging in localizing prostate cancer to a sextant of the gland in patients receiving hormone deprivation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging examinations were performed in 16 hormone-treated patients and 48 nontreated matched control patients before radical prostatectomy and step-section histopathologic analysis. At MR imaging, cancer presence within the peripheral zone was assessed on a per sextant basis by two readers. At 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, cancer was identified by using (choline plus creatine)-to-citrate ratios at cutoff values of 2 and 3 SDs above mean normal peripheral zone values. Data were compared by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the ability of combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging to localize prostate cancer in treated versus control patients. For MR imaging alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 91% and 48% (reader 1) and 75% and 60% (reader 2) in treated patients versus 79% and 60% (reader 1) and 84% and 43% (reader 2) in control patients. For 3D MR spectroscopic imaging alone (>3 SDs cutoff), higher specificity (treated, 80%; controls, 73%) but lower sensitivity (treated, 56%; controls, 53%) was attained. In treated patients, high sensitivity or specificity (up to 92%) was achieved when either or both modalities indicated cancer. CONCLUSION: When performed within 4 months after initiating hormone deprivation therapy, combined MR imaging/3D MR spectroscopic imaging had the same accuracy in localizing prostate cancer as in nontreated patients.