A case of rapidly declining glycemic control and diabetic ketoacidosis in a newly diagnosed diabetes patient after starting teprotumumab for thyroid eye disease.

PURPOSE: Teprotumumab for thyroid eye disease has a known hyperglycemic adverse effect through its impact on the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor. While most cases are mild and easily managed by adjusting diabetes medications, it appears some patients have a more dramatic response. The purpose of this case report is to highlight an example of rapidly declining glycemic control and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in a patient with newly diagnosed diabetes after starting teprotumumab for thyroid eye disease. METHODS: This was a single-patient case report assessing a severe episode of hyperglycemia leading to new-onset diabetes. The case report was approved by Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist's IRB committee. The patient was closely monitored by a pharmacist-led pharmacotherapy clinic after initial diagnosis and periodically since then to adjust therapy and assess glucose and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) trends. RESULTS: After the acute episode of DKA was managed inpatient, the patient was discharged with insulin outpatient, but this was ultimately weaned off, and the patient's glucose and HbA1c are stable on metformin alone. This patient decided to not continue teprotumumab due to extensive side effects including but not limited to severe hyperglycemia. CONCLUSION: While additional research is needed as to the cause of severe hyperglycemia in select patients, providers should consider proactively monitoring glucose throughout treatment with teprotumumab by ensuring that patients have baseline labs and labs at every visit and access to a glucometer with education for its use.

One Health security lessons from a year-long webinar series on international COVID-19 response.

Following the principles outlined by the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's International Biosecurity and Prevention Forum, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre, and the Middlebury Institute of International Studies' James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies cohosted a webinar series from April 2020 to January 2021 on COVID-19 management across Africa, Europe, and North America. We provide here an overview of the webinar series and discuss how lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic and debated during the webinars can be used to bridge One Health with biological threat-driven health security. This report can be used to inform recommendations for future One Health security approaches to strengthen global capacity and multidisciplinary cooperation.

A Severe Case of Idiosyncratic Hepatotoxicity with Unfractionated Heparin.

The authors describe a case of clinically apparent idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity in association with unfractionated heparin (UFH). A 52-year-old woman with increasingly symptomatic rheumatic mitral valvular disease and severe pulmonary hypertension underwent elective minimally-invasive bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement. The patient received 42 000 units of UFH intraoperatively 10 days after receiving 3100 units during a left heart catheterization. Standard prophylactic doses of unfractionated heparin were started on POD 2 for prevention of venous thromboembolism. On the evening of postoperative day (POD) 3, the patient was lethargic, encephalopathic, and hypoglycemic with an acute liver injury and hyperlactatemia. Similar events occurred on POD 7 after clinical improvement from the initial injury and an unintentional rechallenge with UFH. Heparins are usually not suspected of idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity due to their widespread utilization and reports of milder episodes of hepatotoxicity. This case highlights the need to consider UFH in the differential of drug-induced liver injury, including severe cases.

Efficacy of Methocarbamol for Acute Pain Management in Young Adults With Traumatic Rib Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures account for more than one-third of blunt thoracic injuries and are associated with serious complications. Use of nonopioid adjunctive agents such as methocarbamol for pain control has increased considerably. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of methocarbamol addition to the pain control regimen on daily opioid requirements for young adults with rib fractures. METHODS: This observational, retrospective study included patients aged 18 to 39 years with 3 or more rib fractures who were admitted to a level 1 trauma center between July 2014 and July 2018. Patients were dichotomized based on admission before and after methocarbamol addition to the institutional rib fracture protocol. The primary outcome was to determine the impact of methocarbamol on daily opioid requirements. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and diagnosis of pneumonia. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included, with 22 and 28 patients in the preprotocol and postprotocol groups, respectively. All patients in the latter group received methocarbamol, whereas no patient in the preprotocol group received methocarbamol. Cumulative opioid exposure was significantly less for patients admitted after methocarbamol addition to the protocol (219 vs 337 mg oral morphine equivalents; P = 0.01), and hospital LOS was also decreased (4 vs 3 days; P = 0.03). No significant differences in the incidence of pneumonia or adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This is the first study to evaluate the impact of methocarbamol on reducing opioid requirements. Given the risks associated with opioids, use of methocarbamol as an analgesia-optimizing, opioid-sparing multimodal agent may be reasonable.

Safety, efficacy, and cost of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) in patients with factor Xa inhibitor-related bleeding: a retrospective study.

Oral factor Xa (fXa) inhibitor-related bleeding is a concerning drug safety problem. There is considerable controversy surrounding available reversal strategies. The recently approved reversal agent andexanet alfa has limited data, an unclear safety profile, and imparts a substantial financial burden. This has led to the off-label use of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCC) for this indication. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of 4F-PCC for the management of major bleeding related to oral fXa inhibitors. This observational, retrospective study included adult patients admitted from 2014 to 2018 who received 4F-PCC (Kcentra®) for fXa inhibitor-related major bleeding. Efficacy was assessed using criteria described by Sarode et al. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of thromboembolism, mortality, and a cost analysis comparing 4F-PCC to andexanet alfa for reversal of oral fXa inhibitors. Thirty-one patients received 4F-PCC for major bleeding associated with apixaban (55%) or rivaroxaban (45%). Intracranial hemorrhage (58%) and pericardial effusion (16%) accounted for the majority of bleeding events. Most patients received a single weight-based 4F-PCC dose of 25 units/kg (38.7%) or 50 units/kg (51.6%). Effective hemostasis was achieved in 80.6% of patients. Five patients (16%) died due to acute bleeding and no thromboembolic events were observed. Administration of 4F-PCC was effective for most patients requiring emergent reversal of anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban and was associated with a low risk of thromboembolic events. Considerable cost differences limit the use of andexanet alfa and may warrant further study of 4F-PCC for fXa inhibitor reversal.

The Impact of Vaccine Refusal on Physician Office Visits During the Subsequent 12 Months.

We hypothesized that families who are nonadherent to the routine vaccination schedule (RVS) present less frequently for physician visits. We conducted a retrospective chart review to compare the number of visits made over the subsequent 12-month period by families that refused the RVS versus those who were adherent. Subjects were aged 0 to 4 years, enrolled to Keller Army Hospital, and had a diagnosis indicating the RVS was refused. Age-matched controls, who were adherent to the RVS, were randomly chosen for each case. Subjects made significantly more total visits than CASES: 7 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1-20) versus 6 (IQR = 2-17), p = 0.0049. When each visit type was compared independently, there was no significant difference in the number of acute (p = 0.494) or emergency department (p = 0.077) visits between groups. However, subjects who refused to follow the RVS made significantly fewer routine care visits during the 1-year follow-up period compared to those that adhered to the RVS (p < 0.001).