Exercise and nutrition to improve cancer Treatment-Related outcomes (ENICTO).

Chemotherapy treatment-related side-effects are common and increase the risk of suboptimal outcomes. Exercise interventions during cancer treatment improve self-reported physical functioning, fatigue, anxiety, and depression, but it is unclear whether these interventions improve important clinical outcomes, such as chemotherapy relative dose intensity (RDI). The National Cancer Institute funded the Exercise and Nutrition to Improve Cancer Treatment-Related Outcomes (ENICTO) Consortium, to address this knowledge gap. This paper describes the mechanisms hypothesized to underpin intervention effects on clinically-relevant treatment outcomes, briefly outlines each project's distinct research aims, summarizes the scope and organizational structure of ENICTO, and provides an overview of the integrated common data elements used to pursue research questions collectively. In addition, the paper includes a description of consortium-wide activities and broader research community opportunities for collaborative research. Findings from the ENICTO Consortium have the potential to accelerate a paradigm shift in oncology care such that cancer patients could receive exercise and nutrition programming as the standard of care in tandem with chemotherapy to improve RDI for a curative outcome.

Barriers to and facilitators of improving physical activity and nutrition behaviors during chemotherapy for breast cancer: a sequential mixed methods study.

PURPOSE: Use qualitative and quantitative methods to explore factors influencing the adoption of guideline-based physical activity (PA) and dietary recommendations among participants enrolled in a lifestyle intervention during and after chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: Among women with stage I-III breast cancer who participated in the intervention arm of the Lifestyle, Exercise, and Nutrition early after diagnosis (LEANer) trial, we used stratified, purposeful sampling to interview women who met both, one, or neither intervention goal after the 1-year intervention: (1) 150 min/week moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise via a self-reported PA questionnaire and (2) improved self-reported diet quality measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2015. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: The 29 women interviewed were 52 ± 11 years old on average, with a mean body mass index of 29.6 ± 7.7 kg/m2. Three themes emerged regarding aspects of the LEANer intervention that facilitated behavior change: (1) providing a conduit of trustworthy, timely, and personalized support and education; (2) shifting mindsets and enhanced understanding of the benefits of PA and nutrition during chemotherapy; and (3) fostering a sense of control and alternative focus. Factors described as hindering adoption of goals included: (1) adverse effects of chemotherapy and (2) competing priorities. CONCLUSIONS: Women reported the external support, tailored education, and experiencing the physical and mental benefits of the LEANer intervention facilitated the adoption of the interventions' behavioral goals. Addressing chemotherapy-related symptoms and competing priorities may facilitate adherence to lifestyle interventions during chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Improving lifestyle behaviors during chemotherapy for breast cancer: The Lifestyle, Exercise, and Nutrition Early After Diagnosis (LEANer) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about improving physical activity (PA) and diet during and after chemotherapy for breast cancer. This secondary analysis examines changes in PA and diet quality during a yearlong intervention for patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and evaluates factors associated with these changes. METHODS: Newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer (N = 173) undergoing chemotherapy were randomized to a year-long nutrition and exercise intervention (n = 87) or usual care (UC, n = 86). Mixed models compared 1-year changes in PA and diet quality via the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 by study arm. Among the intervention group, baseline factors associated with change in PA and diet were assessed with multivariable linear and logistic regression. RESULTS: At 1 year, compared with UC, the intervention arm increased PA more (mean difference = 136.1 minutes/week; 95% CI, 90.2-182.0), participated in more strength training (56% vs. 15%; p < .001), and had suggestive improvements in HEI-2015 (mean difference = 2.5; 95% CI, -0.3 to 5.3; p = .08). In the intervention arm, lower fatigue was associated with improved PA (p = .04) and higher education was associated with improved HEI-2015 (p = .001) at 1 year. Higher HEI-2015 (p = .04) and married/living with someone (p = .05) were associated with higher odds of participating in strength training at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: This year-long lifestyle intervention for patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy resulted in increases in PA and suggestive improvements in diet quality. Behavior change was associated with baseline fatigue, diet quality, education, and married/living with someone. Addressing these factors in interventions may improve uptake of lifestyle behaviors in trials during and after chemotherapy.

Association between diet quality and ovarian cancer risk and survival.

BACKGROUND: Research on diet quality and ovarian cancer is limited. We examined the association between diet quality and ovarian cancer risk and survival in a large prospective cohort. METHODS: We used data from women in the prospective National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study enrolled from 1995 to 1996 who were aged 50-71 years at baseline with follow-up through December 31, 2017. Participants completed a 124-item food frequency questionnaire at baseline, and diet quality was assessed via the Healthy Eating Index-2015, the alternate Mediterranean diet score, and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score. Primary outcomes were first primary epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis from cancer registry data and among those diagnosed with ovarian cancer all-cause mortality. We used a semi-Markov multistate model with Cox proportional hazards regression to account for semicompeting events. RESULTS: Among 150 643 participants with a median follow-up time of 20.5 years, 1107 individuals were diagnosed with a first primary epithelial ovarian cancer. There was no evidence of an association between diet quality and ovarian cancer risk. Among those diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer, 893 deaths occurred with a median survival of 2.5 years. Better prediagnosis diet quality, according to the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (quintile 5 vs quintile 1: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.60 to 0.93) and alternate Mediterranean diet score (quintile 5 vs quintile 1: HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.87), was associated with lower all-cause mortality. There was no evidence of an association between Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension score and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Better prediagnosis diet quality was associated with lower all-cause mortality after ovarian cancer diagnosis but was not associated with ovarian cancer risk.