Prognostic utility of pulse pressure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The RICA Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prognostic role of pulse pressure (PP) in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is not well understood. Our aim was to evaluate it in acute and stable HF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This work is a retrospective observational study of patients included in the RICA registry between 2008 and 2021. Blood pressure was collected on admission (decompensation) and 3 months later on an outpatient basis (stability). Patients were categorized according to whether the PP was greater or less than 50mmHg. All-cause mortality was assessed at 1year after admission. RESULTS: A total of 2291 patients were included, with mean age 80.1±7.7 years. 62.9% were women and 16.7% had a history of coronary heart disease. In the acute phase, there was no difference in mortality according to PP values, but in the stable phase PP<50mmHg was independently associated with all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.21-2.05, p=0.001), after adjusting for age, sex, New York Heart Association functional class, previous HF, chronic kidney disease, valvular heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, score on the Barthel and Pfeiffer scales, hemoglobin and sodium levels. CONCLUSIONS: Low stable-phase PP was associated with increased all-cause mortality in HF patients with preserved LVEF. However, PP was not useful as a prognostic marker of mortality in acute HF. Further studies are needed to assess the relationship of this variable with mortality in HF patients.

Benefits of a comprehensive care model in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: The UMIPIC program.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to those with reduced ejection fraction, are older, have more comorbidities, and are not candidates for effective therapeutic measures. Therefore, they are at high risk for hospital admission and mortality. This study evaluated the benefit of a comprehensive continuous care program (UMIPIC program) in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data on 2401 patients with HFpEF attended to in internal medicine departments who form part of the RICA registry. They were divided into 2 groups: one was followed-up on in the UMIPIC program (UMIPIC group, n: 1011) and another received conventional care (RICA group, n: 1390). A total of 753 patients in each group were selected by propensity score matching and admissions and mortality were assessed during 12 months of follow-up after an episode of hospitalization due to HF. RESULTS: Compared to the RICA group, the UMIPIC group had a lower rate of HF admissions (19.2% versus 36.5%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.68; p < 0.001) and mortality (12.6% versus 28%, respectively; HR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.31-0.51; p < 0.001). There were no differences in hospitalizations for non-HF causes. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the UMIPIC program, which is based on comprehensive continuous care, for patients with HFpEF and a high degree of comorbidity reduces both admissions and mortality in the first year of follow-up.

The short-term prognostic value of C-reactive protein in elderly patients with acute heart failure. / Valor pronóstico a corto plazo de la proteína C reactiva en ancianos con insuficiencia cardíaca aguda.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Plasma c-reactive protein (crp) has been tested as a prognostic marker in acute heart failure (ahf). Whether its measurement really provides significant prognostic information when applied to elderly patients with ahf episodes remains unclear. METHODS: We measured the plasma crp values of patients admitted because of any type of ahf to internal medicine services. We evaluated the association of these values with the patients' baseline clinical characteristics and their 3-month posdischarge all-cause mortality or readmission rates. For comparison purposes, we divided the sample in tertiles of low, medium and high crp values (<2,24mg/l, 2,25-11,8mg/l and>11,8mg/l). RESULTS: We included 1443 patients with a median age of 80 years (interquartile range 73-85); 680 (47%) were men, with a moderate comorbid burden. 60.1% had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (> 50%). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent association between higher crp values and the presence of respiratory infection, lower systolic blood pressure and deteriorated renal function upon admission. Three months after the index admission, a total of 142 patients (9.8%) had died, and 268 (18.6%) had either been readmitted or died. admission crp values did not correlate with 3-month all-cause mortality (P=0.79), 3-month all-cause readmission (P=0.96) or the combination of both events (P=0.96). However, higher crp values were associated with a longer length of stay (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study does not confirm an association between admission plasma crp values in elderly ahf patients and subsequent higher 3-month mortality or readmission risks.

Target organ damage in acute heart failure.

Acute heart failure is a prognostic factor due to its high mortality during the acute phase and the increased frequency of medium to long-term adverse events. The pathophysiological mechanisms triggered during these exacerbations can persist after reaching clinical stability, remaining even after the acute episode has ended. A certain degree of neurohormonal activation, oxidative stress, apoptosis and inflammation (among other conditions) can therefore persist, resulting in organ damage, not just of the myocardium but likely the entire cardiovascular apparatus. This new insight into the persistence of harmful mechanisms that last beyond the exacerbations could be the start of a change in perspective for developing new therapeutic strategies that seek an overall control of hemodynamic and congestive changes that occur during acute decompensated heart failure and changes that remain after achieving clinical stability.

Prognostic value of glomerular filtration rate estimation equations in acute heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.

AIMS: Renal function is an important prognostic factor in heart failure. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of estimated renal function calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) and the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) equation for long-term all-cause mortality in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with both preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated patients included in the Spanish National Registry of Heart Failure (RICA). RICA is a multicentre, prospective, cohort study that included patients admitted to the Internal Medicine units with ADHF. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated with CKD-EPI and MDRD-4 equations. A total of 1805 patients admitted for ADHF were studied (52% women; median age 80 years, interquartile range 73.9-84.6 years); of these, 1044 (58%) had HF-PEF. eGFR values were lower with the CKD-EPI formula than with the MDRD-4 formula (51 ml/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 55.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2) ; p < 0.001). The two formulas provided independent prognostic information over long-term follow-up, in both HF-PEF and HF-REF patients. However, in HF-PEF patients, CKD-EPI equation was associated with a significant improvement in reclassification analyses (net reclassification improvement 6.78%; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical cohort of ADHF patients, eGFR as calculated by both the CKD-EPI and the MDRD-4 formulas offered similar prognostic information, irrespective of ejection fraction status, but in HF-PEF patients specifically, the CKD-EPI formula seems to improve clinical risk stratification as compared with MDRD-4.