Enfortumab Vedotin Drug Eruption: Cutaneous Adverse Events and Histopathologic Findings.

ABSTRACT: Enfortumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against nectin-4 and, when combined with vedotin, is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers. A 75-year-old woman with stage IV papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who completed cycle 2 of enfortumab vedotin (EV) infusions presented to our dermatology department for new-onset symmetric and painful dusky erythematous patches on the extremities and trunk without mucosal involvement. Two biopsies were obtained, which revealed an interface dermatitis with notable ring mitoses within the basal and suprabasal layers of the epidermis without epidermal necrosis. The patient was diagnosed with toxic erythema of chemotherapy and improved with application of triamcinolone 0.1% ointment twice daily without discontinuation of her EV infusions. Although a targeted therapy, EV commonly exhibits cutaneous side effects due to the expression of nectin-4 in the skin. Most cutaneous side effects are mild and can be managed symptomatically. However, severe drug-induced eruptions, such as toxic epidermal necrolysis, have been described. The histologic findings of EV associated skin eruptions can aid in correctly identifying the culprit drug and assist in management. This case provides insights for dermatologists by highlighting the common cutaneous side effects of EV and the associated histologic findings as this targeted therapy becomes increasingly utilized in the treatment of refractory neoplasms.

Underrepresented Groups and Perceived Educational Barriers for Residency and Fellowship Success.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to compare barriers perceived by medical students and resident physicians identifying as of underrepresented groups in medicine (UIM) and/or as sexual and gender minorities (SGM) to individuals not identifying with these groups, especially for trainees with an interest in dermatology. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of medical students and resident physicians based in the United States from February 2021 to July 2021, with subgroup analysis of trainees with interest in dermatology. FINDINGS: Among trainees interested in dermatology, the most notable barriers for the UIM group were 1) lack of home program in specialty/fellowship of interest (4.71±1.73); 2) lack of connections/networking opportunities (4.14±1.29); 3) lack of opportunity to obtain AOA membership (4.00±1.96); 4) obtaining mentorship (4.00±1.47); and lack of diversity in specialty/fellowship of interest (3.93±1.14). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Increasing focused mentorship programs and fostering environments that embrace diversity are key to reducing perceived barriers for minority candidates. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1210-1215. doi:10.36849/JDD.7528R1.

Efficacy of Topical Cholesterol and Statin Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Porokeratosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Porokeratosis is a group of disorders characterized by aberrant skin keratinization secondary to genetic alterations in the mevalonate pathway, which participates in cholesterol synthesis. While a rare disorder, malignant transformation to squamous cell carcinoma is seen in up to 11% of cases. Recently, topical cholesterol and topical statin therapy have been suggested as a pathogenesis-directed treatment for porokeratosis. METHODS: A PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase literature search was performed using the search terms: "porokeratosis" AND "cholesterol" OR "lovastatin" OR "simvastatin" OR "atorvastatin" OR "fluvastatin" OR "pitavastatin" OR "pravastatin" OR "rosuvastatin" OR "statin." Peer-reviewed clinical trials, case series, and case reports of all porokeratosis subtypes were included. RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in the systematic review and 9 articles in the meta-analysis. The systematic review consisted of an aggregate of 33 patients, most of whom (n=31, 93.9%) applied the treatment twice daily for an average of 9.4 weeks (median=8 weeks), with 93.9% (n=31) experiencing improvement or resolution of porokeratosis. Sixteen patients (48.5%) used lovastatin and 16 (48.5%) used simvastatin with concurrent cholesterol therapy. Mild adverse events including erythema and contact dermatitis were experienced by 12.1% of patients. Our meta-analysis yielded a random effects model supporting a robust reduction in porokeratosis severity (OR = .076, 95% CI [0.022, 0.262]). CONCLUSION: This underpowered meta-analysis provides limited, preliminary evidence supporting the efficacy of topical cholesterol/statin therapy. Overall, quality studies and aggregated sample size are limited; future large clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the role of topical cholesterol/statin therapy in the treatment of porokeratosis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1160-1165. doi:10.36849/JDD.7775.

Perceived Barriers to Career Advancement: Medical Students and Resident Physicians.

BACKGROUND: The path to becoming a physician is challenging, with various barriers influencing medical student and resident physician residency and fellowship training career decisions. Studies comparing perceived obstacles at disparate training levels are limited and given these obstacles are dynamic, studies are frequently needed to evaluate perceived barriers to pursuing residency specialty or fellowship of interest for physician trainees. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare perceived barriers to obtaining residency specialty or fellowship of choice for medical students and resident physicians, respectively. METHODS: A Likert scale survey assessing perceived barriers was administered via the listservs of medical schools and organizations in 2021. Differences in the Likert scale score mean between medical students and resident physicians were measured with student t-tests (2-sided). RESULTS: A total of 404 medical trainees participated (301 medical students and 103 resident physicians). Medical students indicated lack of opportunity to obtain alpha omega alpha membership as the most crucial perceived barrier (mean Likert scale score ± standard deviation, 4.01±1.97), followed by USMLE Step 1 score (3.92±1.89) and lack of home program in specialty/fellowship of interest (3.62±1.85). Similarly, resident physicians implicated the lack of a home program in a specialty/fellowship of interest as the most prominent barrier (3.48±1.78), followed by lack of connections/networking (3.17±1.50) and probability of matching (3.14±1.44). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of a home program was an important barrier to pursuing a specialty or fellowship of choice for both medical students and resident physicians, respectively, and may have been heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(11):e17-e20    doi:10.36849/JDD.7005e.

Cutaneous hydrophilic polymer emboli following endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: a case and review of literature.

Hydrophilic polymer embolism (HPE) is a rare iatrogenic complication of the use of polymer-coated intravascular devices, which may affect several organ systems including the skin. Herein, we present a patient who developed a cutaneous eruption with associated neurologic manifestations secondary to localized HPE. This is a potentially underdiagnosed, life-threatening complication and physicians should consider HPE when evaluating skin eruptions in patients who have undergone endovascular procedures.

Complete response of Merkel cell carcinoma with talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) monotherapy.

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare neuroendocrine neoplasm, warranting surgical excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy. In later stages, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation are required owing to its aggressive malignant behavior. We describe a 62-year-old woman who presented with multifocal recurrence of MCC and was not a candidate for immunotherapy or surgery. The patient underwent four treatments of intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) and demonstrated a complete response with no histologic evidence of remaining MCC on four scouting biopsies. Although TVEC therapy is currently approved for the treatment of advanced stage melanoma, it is still being investigated in MCC. This case supports the use of TVEC as monotherapy in select patients with locally advanced MCC who are not candidates for surgery or systemic immunotherapy.