Coexisting Retrocerebellar Arachnoid Cyst and Chiari Type 1 Malformation: 3 Pediatric Cases of Surgical Management Tailored to the Pathogenic Mechanism and Systematic Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Arachnoid cysts are benign cerebrospinal fluid collection within a duplication of arachnoid membrane and, when found in the retrocerebellar site, they may be associated with tonsils herniation. This rare situation of coexisting retrocerebellar arachnoid cyst (AC) and Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-1) have been previously reported in few cases (10 patients) with syringomyelia and hydrocephalus described to be the most relevant issues. The aim of this paper is to describe 3 pediatric cases of this condition with a systematic review of the literature, underlining the importance of surgical management tailored to the pathogenic mechanism. METHODS: A restrospective analysis of patients treated for coexisting CM-1 and ACs at the authors' institution has been carried out. RESULTS: A case of a 10-month-old baby with coexisting AC and CM-1 with tri-ventricular hydrocephalus treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy, a case of a 1-year-old child with a huge retrocerebellar AC and CM-1 treated with a cysto-peritoneal shunt, and a case of a 15-year-old child with retrocerebellar AC causing symptomatic CM-1 treated with C0-C2 decompression, AC fenestration and duraplasty are described. A long-term follow-up is reported. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of coexisting ACs and CM-1 should not aim at the complete resolution of the cyst or of tonsil herniation, especially when pediatric patients are treated. Rather, the purpose of the neurosurgeon should be to understand the underlying pathogenic mechanism, and then restoring both the cerebrospinal fluid flow in the posterior fossa and the dynamic equilibrium between ventricles, cyst, and subarachnoid space.

How Reliable Are Volumetric Techniques for High-Grade Gliomas? A Comparison Study of Different Available Tools.

BACKGROUND: Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumors. Assessment of the tumor volume represents a crucial point in preoperative and postoperative evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To compare pre- and postoperative tumor volumes obtained with an automated, semi-automatic, and manual segmentation tool. Mean processing time of each segmentation techniques was measured. METHODS: Manual segmentation was performed on preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images with the open-source software Horos (Horos Project). "SmartBrush," a tool of the IPlan Cranial software (Brainlab, Feldkirchen, Germany), was used to carry out the semi-automatic segmentation. The open-source BraTumIA software (NeuroImaging Tools and Resources Collaboratory) was employed for the automated segmentation. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess volumetric comparison. Subsequently deviation/range and average discrepancy were determined. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients with a newly diagnosed high-grade glioma were enrolled. The comparison of the volumes calculated with Horos and IPlan showed a strong agreement both on preoperative and postoperative images (respectively: "enhancing" ρ = 0.99-0.78, "fluid-attenuated inversion recovery" ρ = 0.97-0.92, and "total tumor volume" ρ = 0.98-0.95). Agreement between BraTumIA and the other 2 techniques appeared to be strong for preoperative images, but showed a higher disagreement on postoperative images. Mean time expenditure for tumor segmentation was 27 min with manual segmentation, 17 min with semi-automated, and 8 min with automated software. CONCLUSION: The considered segmentation tools showed high agreement in preoperative volumetric assessment. Both manual and semi-automated software appear adequate for the postoperative quantification of residual volume. The evaluated automated software is not yet reliable. Automated software considerably reduces the time expenditure.