RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: MTDM dedicated to geriatric oncology are held at the E. Herriot hospital in Lyon. They bring together oncologist and geriatrician to optimize, through their complementary expertise, the care plan for elderly cancer patients. The aim is to demonstrate the value of these MTDMs and to describe the follow-up of oncological and geriatric recommendations. METHODS: This is a descriptive, prospective, non-interventional study analyzing the MTDMs dedicated to patients over 70years old with cancer. All patients underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) with a four-month follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one patients were included with a G8 score≤14 (93 %), a slightly diminishing independence ADL<6 (36%) and IADL<4 (42%). The median CIRS-G is eight with on average, three geriatric syndromes/patient. Most cancers are non-metastatic. When oncological treatment is recommended (80 %), it is mostly curative (58 %). Geriatric recommendations were made for 75 % of patients. At four months, four patients were lost to follow-up and 34 died. No significant change in the dependency level was found. In 75 % of cases, at least one geriatric recommendation were followed and 77 % of oncological recommendations. CONCLUSION: The recommendations could be followed at four months; they were carried out in a comparable way whether they were oncological or geriatric. These MTDMs specializing in geriatric oncology appear to be beneficial in the geriatric oncology decision-making process. It is important to continue and strengthen this co-management.
Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Neoplasias , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ageing is associated with an increased prevalence of comorbidities and sarcopenia as well as a decline of functional reserve of multiple organ systems, which may lead, in the context of the disease-related and/or treatment-related stress, to functional deconditioning. The multicomponent 'Prehabilitation & Rehabilitation in Oncogeriatrics: Adaptation to Deconditioning risk and Accompaniment of Patients' Trajectories (PROADAPT)' intervention was developed multiprofessionally to implement prehabilitation in older patients with cancer. METHODS: The PROADAPT pilot study is an interventional, non-comparative, prospective, multicentre study. It will include 122 patients oriented to complex medical-surgical curative procedures (major surgery or radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy). After informed consent, patients will undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment and will be offered a prehabilitation kit that includes an advice booklet with personalised objectives and respiratory rehabilitation devices. Patients will then be called weekly and monitored for physical and respiratory rehabilitation, preoperative renutrition, motivational counselling and iatrogenic prevention. Six outpatient visits will be planned: at inclusion, a few days before the procedure and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the end of the procedure. The main outcome of the study is the feasibility of the intervention, defined as the ability to perform at least one of the components of the programme. Clinical data collected will include patient-specific and cancer-specific characteristics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ile de France 8 ethics committee on 5 June 2018. The results of the primary and secondary objectives will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03659123. Pre-results of the trial.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Exercício Pré-Operatório , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , França , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Neoplasias/terapia , Projetos Piloto , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is rising, especially in elderly patients. The elderly cancer population presents considerable challenges, yet little is known about the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of metastatic NET (mNET) patients. METHODS: The Lyon Real-life Evidence in Metastatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors study (LyREMeNET, NCT03863106) included consecutive mNET patients, diagnosed between January 1990 and December 2017. The exclusion criteria were nonmetastatic NET, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms. We aimed to compare patients ≥70 years old to patients <70 years old. RESULTS: A total of 866 patients were included, 198 (23%) were ≥70 years old. There was no significant difference in characteristics except that elderly patients had synchronous metastasis more frequently. Elderly patients received significantly fewer treatments (median of 2.0 vs. 3.0 lines, respectively, p < 0.0001), were significantly less frequently treated by chemotherapy (32 vs. 54%), targeted therapy (16 vs. 30%), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (5 vs. 16%), and they underwent significantly less frequently locoregional intervention. Median overall survival was significantly shorter in elderly patients (5.2 vs. 9.6 years). The most frequent cause of death was related to disease progression (71%). Multivariate analysis found that, after adjustment for tumor location, tumor grade, and number of metastatic sites, age remained significantly associated with overall survival (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.26-2.18), indicating a poorer survival in patients ≥70 years old in comparison with younger patients (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Patients ≥70 years old have a worse survival, die frequently from their disease, and are undertreated compared to younger patients.
Assuntos
Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idade de Início , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/mortalidade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma affects mainly older patients. Surgery is indicated for localized tumors while chemotherapy alone is proposed in advanced or metastatic tumors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of standard of care oncologic treatments in this population, the accuracy of the geriatric evaluation to predict the ability of patients to tolerate the recommended treatments and to identify specific geriatric prognosis factors. METHODS: We included, between 2007 and 2014, all consecutive patients over 70â¯years of age with a pathologically diagnosed pancreatic cancer. The patients underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment before therapeutic decision in a multidisciplinary team meeting. We analyzed factors independently associated with all-cause mortality with Cox survival analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (median ageâ¯=â¯77.9â¯years) were prospectively included. Among them, 42 patients underwent surgery whereas the 31 other patients not eligible for surgical treatment received chemotherapy (nâ¯=â¯22) or best supportive care alone (nâ¯=â¯9). Almost 62% of operated patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the non-surgical group, a mean of 9 cycles of palliative chemotherapy per patients were administrated. Median overall survival was 21.3â¯months in the surgical group and 6.1â¯months in the palliative group (pâ¯=â¯0.0001). Most of oncologic parameters were found to be independent survival predictors. Age was not associated with the survival, but a significant impact of Lawton's Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) impairment (IADL<4) (HRâ¯=â¯5.0, pâ¯=â¯0.047), Cumulative Index Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) ≥2 (HRâ¯=â¯19, pâ¯=â¯0.035) and weight loss >10% (HRâ¯=â¯4.6, pâ¯=â¯0.03) on survival was detected. Surgery was the only factor independently predictive of survival in multivariate analysis (pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSION: Almost 90% of selected older pancreatic patients with cancer (64 out of 73 patients) may benefit from the same standard treatments as younger patients. IADL impairment of patients, CIRS-G ≥2, and weight loss >10% constitute survival prognostic factors which should be added to the oncological criteria in the therapeutic decision-making process.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pancreatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Redução de Peso , GencitabinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: When treated with anticancer therapies, a number of issues are raised for older patients such as physical needs (coping with symptoms and side-effects) or psychological needs. Geriatric tailored interventions addressing these needs may be effective in terms of improving quality of life of our patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in September 2017 in MEDLINE. All reports assessing older patients with cancer care needs in the context of anticancer systemic therapy were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 357 articles were analyzed. From these, 35 studies were included in the analysis. Compared to younger patients, the elderly had less supportive care needs. While older patients asked for less information than their younger counterparts, they still requested information on diagnosis, seriousness of the disease, chances of cure, spread of the disease, recovery, courses of illness, possible consequences, treatment procedures, treatment options, possible side effects and how to deal with them, and what they could do in daily life. When taking into consideration the various needs as assessed by the "Supportive Care Needs Survey", physical and daily living were the most frequently reported needs with emphasis on nutrition, coping with physical symptoms, dealing with side effects of treatment, and performing usual physical tasks and activities. CONCLUSION: Information demand seemed moderate but a great deal of attention was paid to nutrition and well-being.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Avaliação das Necessidades , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/psicologiaRESUMO
The decision making process, based on screening, diagnostic, staging, therapeutic and multidisciplinary decision procedures, is very well defined in oncology. Recently the same approach has been applied to the management of senior adult cancer patients. Screening of geriatric problems and evaluation of health status are linked to the oncologic evaluation. A comprehensive knowledge of the different health problems is discussed through a multidisciplinary approach. This needs a specific organization and collaboration between oncologists and geriatricians. It requires also the elaboration of specific decision trees of cancer adapted to the case of senior adult patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Idoso , Tomada de Decisões , Geriatria , Humanos , Oncologia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapiaRESUMO
There is currently little data showing that older adults can derive benefit from cancer screening. Advancing age is associated with an increasing prevalence of cancer and other chronic conditions, or comorbidity, and questions remain about the interactions between comorbidity and cancer screening in the elderly population. In this Review, we assess the available evidence on the effects of comorbidity on cancer screening in elderly individuals. In view of the high heterogeneity of existing data, consistent recommendations cannot be made. Decisions on cancer screening in older adults should be based on an appropriate assessment of each individual's health status and life expectancy, the benefits and harms of screening procedures, and patient preferences. We suggest that Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment might be a necessary step to identify candidates for cancer screening in the elderly population. Specific clinical trials should be done to improve the evidence and show the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in older adults.