The Risks of Phosphate Enemas in Toddlers: A Life-Threatening Unawareness.

BACKGROUND: While oral laxatives represent the first-line treatment of fecal impaction, enemas are frequently used in clinical practice in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) and by family pediatricians (FPs). OBJECTIVES: Phosphate-containing enemas (PcEs) are commonly employed, even causing the risk of rare but lethal toxicity. We investigated pediatricians' awareness of PcE risks. METHODS: We conducted an online survey by sending a multiple-choice questionnaire to the referents of 51 PEDs and 101 FPs. We collected and compared the answers with recommendations reported by the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) and the available literature about PcE administration. RESULTS: Of the institutions and pediatricians receiving the questionnaire, 23 PEDs (45%) and 63 FP (62.3%) participated in the survey. Of PEDs, 95% and 33.0% of FPs treated fecal impaction with PcE. Moreover, 54% of PEDs and 86.0% of FPs did not provide treatment according to the AIFA recommendations for the daily dose. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows limited pediatricians' awareness of the potential risks related to PcE.

Effectiveness and safety of a one-yearly elongation approach of growing rods in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: A case series of 40 patients with definitive fusion.

Background: Early onset scoliosis (EOS) can lead to marked spine and chest wall deformity and often to profound cardiopulmonary compromise. Nowadays, treatment benefits from the possibility of a growth-friendly surgical approach to avoid early spinal fusion. Growing rod spinal implants allow maximizing spine and thorax growth during childhood, performing lengthening procedures traditionally approximately every 6 months. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 40 patients affected by EOS who underwent growing rod implantations from 2000 to 2020. A 1-year interval between lengthening procedures was adopted. Data about the age at the first and final surgeries, T1-T12 length pre- and post-surgery, T1-S1 pre- and post-surgery, major coronal curve, pre- and post-surgery rate of complications, and unplanned surgeries were collected and compared with those reported in the literature to determinate the effectiveness and safety of this long period between distractions. Results: The lengthening procedures were performed, on average, every 12.3 months; children underwent an average of 4.6 lengthening procedures each. Major curve pre-first surgery was 78°, post-first surgery 45°, pre-final surgery 55°, and post-final surgery 43°. The mean absolute difference between pre-initial to post-final major curve was 35°, representing a mean relative difference of 42%. On average, the T1-T12 segment measured 15 cm before the first surgery and 24 cm after the final surgery, while the T1-S1 segment was 25 cm before the growing rods implantation and reached 37 cm after treatment. During treatment, the adverse events affected 27 of the 40 total patients (67%) who experienced at least one complication. No differences were shown concerning both outcomes and complications, comparing these data with the available literature concerning most frequent elongations. This approach avoided four to five surgical procedures in this population. Conclusion: Our results related to deformity correction and complication rate are comparable with those found in the literature, where lengthening procedures are performed approximately every 6 months rather than with a 1-year interval between distractions. We also demonstrate a higher risk of complications for patients with implants before the age of 6.

Glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus and COVID-19 lockdown: What comes after a "quarantine"?

Highlights A stable or even improved glycemic control was found in adolescents with T1DM using hybrid closed loop system not only during COVID-19 lockdown but also in the weeks after, when daily activities slowly resumed. Although the slowing down of routine daily activities might still have an influence, we believe that the continuation of the health care professional assistance through telemedicine during lockdown might have led to a "dragging effect" in these patients also after its suspension.

Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus During COVID-19 Quarantine and the Role of In-Home Physical Activity.

Background: To limit the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), governments have ordered a series of restrictions that may affect glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), since physical activity (PA) was not allowed outside home. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated glycemic control of individuals with T1DM using hybrid closed loop (HCL) system in the period before the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Italy (February 10-23, 2020-Time 1), when movements were only reduced (February 24-March 8, 2020-Time 2) and during complete lockdown (March 9-22, 2020-Time 3). Information about regular PA (at least 3 h per week) prior and during the quarantine was collected. Results: The study included 13 individuals with a median age of 14.2 years and a good glycemic control at baseline (glucose management indicator of 7%, time in range [TIR] of 68%, time below range [TBR] of 2%). All individuals continued to show good glycemic control throughout the study period. There was an increase in TIR during the study period (+3%) and TIR was significantly higher during Time 3 (72%) than during Time 2 (66%). TBR was significantly lower during Time 3 (1%) both compared with Time 1 and Time 2 (2%). A meaningful variance in TIR at Time 3 between individuals who performed or not PA during quarantine and a significant increase in TIR between Time 2 and Time 3 in individuals both doing PA at baseline and during quarantine was found. At logistic regression, only the presence of PA during quarantine significantly predicted a TIR >70%. Conclusions: Glycemic control of T1DM in adolescents using HCL system did not worsen during the restrictions due to COVID-19 pandemics and further improved in those who continued PA during the quarantine. Maintaining regular PA in a safe home environment is an essential strategy for young individuals with T1DM during the COVID-19 crisis.