RESUMO
One Health (OH) is an integrative approach to human, animal, and environmental health and can be used as a comprehensive indicator for comparative purposes. Although an OH index has been proposed for comparing cities, states, and countries, to date, no practical study has compared countries using this approach. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess OH initiatives using a survey with a veterinary public health focus. The questionnaire contained 104 quantitative questions and was sent to representatives of governmental institutions of 32 countries in the Americas. After exclusion criteria were considered, a total of 35 questionnaires from 17 countries were analyzed, with country names remaining undisclosed during the statistical analyses to protect potentially sensitive information. Principal component analysis (PCA) of health parameters in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) as a function of country perception (self-vector) showed that food safety was ranked higher than public policies (p = 0.009), and that both (p = 0.003) were ranked higher than institutional routines related to zoonosis programs. National policies in accordance with international standards, regulations, recommendations, and guidelines was considered the standout topic for public policy, with higher-ranking topics including standard. Meanwhile, challenging topics included tools, preparedness, governance, and research. Food safety showed both strengths and challenges in the coordination of its activities with other sectors. Food safety communication was scored as a strength, while foodborne diseases prevention was ranked as a challenge. Institutional routines for zoonosis maintained both strong and challenging topics in the execution and implementation of attributions and daily routine. Thus, the survey showed that topics such as access to and compliance with international guidelines and intercountry integration were ranked higher than in-country articulation, particularly among food safety, zoonoses, and environmental institutions.
RESUMO
Professionals throughout the world have been working to assess the interdisciplinary interaction and interdependence between health and wellbeing in a constantly changing environment. The One Health concept was developed to encourage sustainable collaborative partnerships and to promote optimal health for people, animals, plants, the environment, and the whole planet. The dissemination of scientific discoveries and policies, by working directly with diverse communities, has been one of the main goals for Global One Health. The One Health concept has also been referred or related to as "One Medicine, One Medicine-One Health, One World-One Health, EcoHealth," and Planetary Health," depending on each fundamental view and approach. In Latin America, despite the concept still being discussed among health professionals and educators, several One Health initiatives have been used daily for more than decades. One Health action has been applied especially in rural and underserved urban areas where low socioeconomic status, lack of health professionals, and scarcity of medical resources may require professionals to work together. Local communities from diverse social and economic statuses, including indigenous populations have been working with institutions and social organizations for many years, accomplishing results through grassroots movements. These "bottom-up" socio-community approaches have also been tools for the prevention and control of diseases, such practice has preceded the One Health concepts in Latin American countries. It is strongly believed that collaborative, multidisciplinary, political, and economic initiatives with prosocial focus may become investments toward obtaining significant results in the face of global, economic and health challenges; working for a healthier world with inclusivity, equity, and equality. In this study, it is briefly presented how the One Health approach has been initiated and developed in Latin America, highlighting the events and actions taken in Brazil, Chile, and Colombia.
Assuntos
Saúde Única , Brasil/epidemiologia , Chile , Colômbia , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the coverage of the Colombian Expanded Program on Immunization among children less than 6years old, to evaluate the timeliness of immunization, to assess the coverage of newly introduced vaccines, and to identify factors associated with lack of immunization. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 80 municipalities of Colombia, using a two-stage cluster random sampling. We attempted to contact all children less than 6years old living in the sampled blocks, and asked their caregivers to provide immunization record cards. We also collected basic sociodemographic information. RESULTS: We reached 81% of the attempted household contacts, identifying 18,232 children; of them, 14,805 (83%) had an immunization record card. Coverage for traditional vaccines was above 90%: BCG (tuberculosis) 95.7% (95%CI: 95.1-96.4), pentavalent vaccine 93.3% (92.4-94.3), MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) initial dose 94.5% (93.5-95.6); but it was lower for recently introduced vaccines: rotavirus 80% (77.8-82.1), influenza 48.4% (45.9-50.8). Results for timely vaccination were not equally successful: pentavalent vaccine 44.2% (41.4-47.1), MMR initial dose 71.2% (68.9-73.4). Mother's education was significantly associated with higher immunization odds. Older age, a greater number of siblings, low socioeconomic status, and not having health insurance were significantly associated with lower immunization odds. There was significant heterogeneity in immunization rates by municipality across the country. CONCLUSIONS: Although absolute immunization coverage for traditional vaccines met the goal of 90% for the 80 municipalities combined, disparities in coverage across municipalities, delayed immunization, and decline of coverage with age, are common problems in Colombia that may result in reduced protection. Newly introduced vaccines require additional efforts to reach the goal. These results highlight the association of health inequities with low immunization coverage and delayed immunization. Identification of vulnerable populations and their missed opportunities for vaccination may help to improve the reach of immunization programs.
Assuntos
Programas de Imunização , Cobertura Vacinal , Pré-Escolar , Cidades , Colômbia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , MasculinoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Estimate the effectiveness of the monovalent rotavirus vaccine in preventing the need to hospitalize children under 2 years old for acute diarrheal disease in five Colombian cities. METHODS: A population survey was conducted based on a probability sample of children over 2 months and under 24 months of age in five Colombian cities (Barranquilla, Bogotá, Cali, Cartagena, and Riohacha) over the period from August through October 2010. The vaccine had been introduced in the Expanded Program on Immunization in January 2009. Rotavirus vaccination coverage was estimated by age group; the cumulative incidence of hospitalization for severe diarrhea was determined; and the magnitude of correlation between vaccination with one or two doses of rotavirus vaccine and hospitalization for diarrhea was calculated using the age-adjusted probability ratio (PR) and other epidemiologically significant factors. Effectiveness of the vaccine was estimated using the expression 1-PR. RESULTS: Coverage with a single dose of the rotavirus vaccine was 87.3%. During the 12 months prior to the survey, 1 453 of the children under 24 months old in the study areas (43.2%) had presented with diarrhea, and of these, 174 (5.2%) had been hospitalized for this cause. The effectiveness of two doses of the vaccine in preventing hospitalization for severe diarrhea was 68% (CI 95% = 55%-77%). CONCLUSIONS: In Colombia, rotavirus vaccination protects against hospitalization for diarrhea due to any cause. The use of cross-sectional surveys appeared to be adequate for rapid evaluation of an immunization program's effectiveness with a new vaccine.
Assuntos
Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Pré-Escolar , Colômbia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJETIVO: Estimar la efectividad de la vacuna monovalente antirrotavírica para prevenir la hospitalización por enfermedad diarreica aguda en niños menores de 2 años en cinco ciudades de Colombia. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una encuesta poblacional sobre una muestra probabilística de niños mayores de 2 meses y menores de 24 meses de edad en cinco ciudades de Colombia (Barranquilla, Bogotá, Cali, Cartagena y Riohacha) en el período de agosto a octubre de 2010. La vacuna fue introducida en el Programa Ampliado de Inmunizaciones en enero de 2009. Se estimaron las coberturas de vacunación contra rotavirus por grupos de edad y la incidencia acumulada de hospitalización por diarrea severa, y se evaluó la magnitud de la asociación entre la vacunación con una o dos dosis de vacuna antirrotavírica y la hospitalización por diarrea, utilizando la razón de probabilidades (RP) ajustada por edad y otros factores de importancia epidemiológica. La efectividad de la vacunación se estimó usando la expresión 1 - RP. RESULTADOS: La cobertura de vacunación con una dosis de vacuna fue de 87,3%. En los 12 meses previos a la encuesta 43,2% (1 453 niños) de menores de 24 meses presentaron diarrea, y de ellos, 5,2% (174 niños) fueron hospitalizados por esta causa. La efectividad de dos dosis de vacuna antirrotavírica para prevenir la hospitalización por diarrea severa fue de 68% (intervalo de confianza de 95%: 55%-77%). CONCLUSIONES: La vacunación contra rotavirus en Colombia protege contra la hospitalización por diarrea por cualquier causa. El uso de encuestas transversales se mostró adecuado para evaluar rápidamente la efectividad de un programa de vacunación con una nueva vacuna.
OBJECTIVE: Estimate the effectiveness of the monovalent rotavirus vaccine in preventing the need to hospitalize children under 2 years old for acute diarrheal disease in five Colombian cities. METHODS:A population survey was conducted based on a probability sample of children over 2 months and under 24 months of age in five Colombian cities (Barranquilla, Bogotá, Cali, Cartagena, and Riohacha) over the period from August through October 2010. The vaccine had been introduced in the Expanded Program on Immunization in January 2009. Rotavirus vaccination coverage was estimated by age group; the cumulative incidence of hospitalization for severe diarrhea was determined; and the magnitude of correlation between vaccination with one or two doses of rotavirus vaccine and hospitalization for diarrhea was calculated using the age-adjusted probability ratio (PR) and other epidemiologically significant factors. Effectiveness of the vaccine was estimated using the expression 1-PR. RESULTS: Coverage with a single dose of the rotavirus vaccine was 87.3%. During the 12 months prior to the survey, 1 453 of the children under 24 months old in the study areas (43.2%) had presented with diarrhea, and of these, 174 (5.2%) had been hospitalized for this cause. The effectiveness of two doses of the vaccine in preventing hospitalization for severe diarrhea was 68% (CI 95% = 55%−77%). CONCLUSIONS: In Colombia, rotavirus vaccination protects against hospitalization for diarrhea due to any cause. The use of cross-sectional surveys appeared to be adequate for rapid evaluation of an immunization program's effectiveness with a new vaccine.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Colômbia , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To establish priorities for zoonoses surveillance, prevention, and control in Bogotá, Colombia. METHODS: A Delphi panel of experts in veterinary and human medicine was conducted using a validated prioritization method to assess the importance of 32 selected zoonoses. This exercise was complemented by a questionnaire survey, using the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) methodology, administered in 19 districts of Bogotá from September 2009 to April 2010 to an at-risk population (workers at veterinary clinics; pet shops; butcher shops; and traditional food markets that sell poultry, meat, cheese, and eggs). A risk indicator based on level of knowledge about zoonoses was constructed using categorical principal component and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Twelve experts participated in the Delphi panel. The diseases scored as highest priority were: influenza A(H1N1), salmonellosis, Escherichia coli infection, leptospirosis, and rabies. The diseases scored as lowest priority were: ancylostomiasis, scabies, ringworm, and trichinellosis. A total of 535 questionnaires were collected and analyzed. Respondents claimed to have had scabies (21%), fungi (8%), brucellosis (8%), and pulicosis (8%). Workers with the most limited knowledge on zoonoses and therefore the highest health risk were those who 1) did not have a professional education, 2) had limited or no zoonoses prevention training, and 3) worked in Usme, Bosa, or Ciudad Bolívar districts. CONCLUSIONS: According to the experts, influenza A(H1N1) was the most important zoonoses. Rabies, leptospirosis, brucellosis, and toxoplasmosis were identified as priority diseases by both the experts and the exposed workers. This is the first prioritization exercise focused on zoonoses surveillance, prevention, and control in Colombia. These results could be used to guide decision-making for resource allocation in public health.
Assuntos
Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Prioridades em Saúde , Zoonoses/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Animais , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Saúde da População Urbana , Adulto Jovem , Zoonoses/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To establish priorities for zoonoses surveillance, prevention, and control in Bogotá, Colombia. METHODS: A Delphi panel of experts in veterinary and human medicine was conducted using a validated prioritization method to assess the importance of 32 selected zoonoses. This exercise was complemented by a questionnaire survey, using the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) methodology, administered in 19 districts of Bogotá from September 2009 to April 2010 to an at-risk population (workers at veterinary clinics; pet shops; butcher shops; and traditional food markets that sell poultry, meat, cheese, and eggs). A risk indicator based on level of knowledge about zoonoses was constructed using categorical principal component and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Twelve experts participated in the Delphi panel. The diseases scored as highest priority were: influenza A(H1N1), salmonellosis, Escherichia coli infection, leptospirosis, and rabies. The diseases scored as lowest priority were: ancylostomiasis, scabies, ringworm, and trichinellosis. A total of 535 questionnaires were collected and analyzed. Respondents claimed to have had scabies (21%), fungi (8%), brucellosis (8%), and pulicosis (8%). Workers with the most limited knowledge on zoonoses and therefore the highest health risk were those who 1) did not have a professional education, 2) had limited or no zoonoses prevention training, and 3) worked in Usme, Bosa, or Ciudad Bolívar districts. CONCLUSIONS: According to the experts, influenza A(H1N1) was the most important zoonoses. Rabies, leptospirosis, brucellosis, and toxoplasmosis were identified as priority diseases by both the experts and the exposed workers. This is the first prioritization exercise focused on zoonoses surveillance, prevention, and control in Colombia. These results could be used to guide decision-making for resource allocation in public health.
OBJETIVO: Establecer prioridades en la vigilancia, la prevención y el control de las zoonosis en Bogotá, Colombia. MÉTODOS: Se constituyó un grupo Delfos de expertos en veterinaria y medicina que utilizó un método validado de asignación de prioridades con objeto de evaluar la importancia de 32 zoonosis seleccionadas. Esta actividad se complementó con una encuesta de cuestionario que utilizó el método de conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas (CAP) y que se administró en 19 distritos de Bogotá, de septiembre del 2009 a abril del 2010, a una población en situación de riesgo (empleados de consultorios veterinarios, tiendas de mascotas, carnicerías y mercados de alimentos tradicionales que venden aves de corral, carne, queso y huevos). Se creó un indicador de riesgo basado en el nivel de conocimiento acerca de las zoonosis mediante análisis de componentes principales para datos categóricos y análisis de regresión logística. RESULTADOS: En el grupo Delfos participaron doce expertos. Las enfermedades calificadas como de mayor prioridad fueron la gripe A(H1N1), la salmonelosis, la infección por Escherichia coli, la leptospirosis y la rabia. Las enfermedades calificadas como de menor prioridad fueron la anquilostomiasis, la escabiosis, la tiña y la triquinosis. Se recopilaron y se analizaron un total de 535 cuestionarios. Los encuestados informaron de que habían padecido escabiosis (21%), infecciones por hongos (8%), brucelosis (8%) y pulicosis (8%). Los trabajadores cuyos conocimientos sobre zoonosis eran más limitados y por consiguiente estaban sometidos a un mayor riesgo para su salud fueron los que 1) no tenían una formación profesional, 2) contaban con poca o nula capacitación en materia de prevención de zoonosis, y 3) trabajaban en las localidades de Usme, Bosa o Ciudad Bolívar. CONCLUSIONS: Según los expertos, la gripe A(H1N1) fue la zoonosis más importante. La rabia, la leptospirosis, la brucelosis y la toxoplasmosis fueron consideradas como enfermedades prioritarias tanto por los expertos como por los trabajadores expuestos. Esta es la primera actividad de asignación de prioridades centrada en la vigilancia, la prevención y el control de las zoonosis en Colombia. Estos resultados podrían servir de guía en la toma de decisiones para la asignación de recursos en salud pública.
Assuntos
Humanos , Animais , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Prioridades em Saúde , Zoonoses/prevenção & controle , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Saúde da População Urbana , Zoonoses/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with a low risk perception of zoonoses and to identify the gaps in knowledge about transmission and prevention of zoonoses in immigrant and Italian workers. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with 175 workers in the agro-livestock and agro-food industry in Piemonte, Italy, was carried out. Data were collected with a semi-structured questionnaire based on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) survey. We calculated proportions and used chi-square tests and odds ratios to assess associations. Eight individual interviews with key informants on immigration and public health in Piemonte were carried out. RESULTS: Participants were 82 (47%) Italians and 93 (53%) immigrants. Immigrants were from Romania, Morocco, Albania, India, China, Argentina, Peru, Macedonia, Ivory Coast, Ukraine and Colombia. The study revealed significant differences in risk perception at work (p = 0.001). We found associations between "not having correct knowledge about zoonoses" and the following variables: i. "being immigrant" OR = 4.1 (95%CI 1.7;9.8 p ≤ 0.01); ii. "working in the livestock industry" OR = 2.9 (95%CI 1.2;15.4 p = 0.01); and iii. "being an unqualified worker" OR = 4.4 (95%CI 2.9;15.4 p ≤ 0.01). Another strong association was found between being immigrant and having a low job qualification OR = 6.7 (IC95% 2.9 - 15.4 p ≤ 0.01). Asian immigrants were the group with the highest frequency of risky behaviours and the lowest level of knowledge about zoonoses. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that there were differences in risk perception of zoonoses between the groups participating in our study. These results suggest that immigrant status can be considered a risk factor for having lower risk perception and lower level of knowledge of zoonoses at work. There is a relationship between this specific knowledge of zoonoses and lack of training and instruction among migrant populations. Our results stress the need for developing education programs on zoonoses prevention among the immigrant population in Piemonte, Italy.
Assuntos
Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Exposição Ocupacional , Zoonoses , Adulto , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/etiologia , Animais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Zoonoses/transmissãoRESUMO
OBJETIVO: To assess factors associated with a low risk perception of zoonoses and to identify the gaps in knowledge about transmission and prevention of zoonoses in immigrant and Italian workers. MÉTODOS: A cross-sectional study with 175 workers in the agro-livestock and agro-food industry in Piemonte, Italy, was carried out. Data were collected with a semi-structured questionnaire based on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) survey. We calculated proportions and used chi-square tests and odds ratios to assess associations. Eight individual interviews with key informants on immigration and public health in Piemonte were carried out. RESULTADOS: Participants were 82 (47%) Italians and 93 (53%) immigrants. Immigrants were from Romania, Morocco, Albania, India, China, Argentina, Peru, Macedonia, Ivory Coast, Ukraine and Colombia. The study revealed significant differences in risk perception at work (p = 0.001). We found associations between "not having correct knowledge about zoonoses" and the following variables: i. "being immigrant" OR = 4.1 (95%CI 1.7;9.8 p ≤ 0.01); ii. "working in the livestock industry" OR = 2.9 (95%CI 1.2;15.4 p = 0.01); and iii. "being an unqualified worker" OR = 4.4 (95%CI 2.9;15.4 p ≤ 0.01). Another strong association was found between being immigrant and having a low job qualification OR = 6.7 (IC95% 2.9 - 15.4 p ≤ 0.01). Asian immigrants were the group with the highest frequency of risky behaviours and the lowest level of knowledge about zoonoses. CONCLUSÕES: Our results indicate that there were differences in risk perception of zoonoses between the groups participating in our study. These results suggest that immigrant status can be considered a risk factor for having lower risk perception and lower level of knowledge of zoonoses at work. There is a relationship between this specific knowledge of zoonoses and lack of training and instruction among migrant populations. Our results stress the need for developing education programs on zoonoses prevention among the immigrant population in Piemonte, Italy.
OBJECTIVE: Analisar fatores associados à baixa percepção de risco de zoonoses e identificar as lacunas no conhecimento sobre a transmissão e prevenção de zoonoses em trabalhadores imigrantes e italianos. METHODS: Estudo transversal com 175 trabalhadores da indústria agropecuária e agroalimentar em Piemonte, Itália. Os dados foram obtidos por meio de questionário semiestruturado baseado em estudo sobre conhecimentos, atitudes e práticas. Foram calculadas proporções, com uso de teste qui-quadrado e odds ratio para estimar associações. Oito entrevistas individuais com informantes-chave em matéria de imigração e saúde pública foram realizadas. RESULTS: Cerca de 47% dos trabalhadores eram italianos e 53%, imigrantes, provenientes da Romênia, Marrocos, Albânia, Índia, China, Argentina, Peru, Macedônia, Costa do Marfim, Ucrânia e Colômbia. Houve diferenças significativas na menor percepção do risco no trabalho (p = 0,001). Observou-se associação entre falta de conhecimentos corretos sobre zoonoses e ser imigrante (OR = 4,1; IC95% 1,7;9,8; p ≤ 0,01), trabalhar na indústria pecuária (OR = 2,9; IC95% 1,2;6,8; p = 0,01) e ser um trabalhador não qualificado (OR = 4,4; IC95% 1,2;15,4; p = 0,01). Outra forte associação ocorreu entre ser imigrante e ter emprego de baixa qualificação (OR = 6,7; IC95% 2,9;15,4; p ≤ 0,01). Maior frequência de comportamentos de risco e menor nível de conhecimento sobre zoonoses foram encontrados no grupo dos imigrantes asiáticos. CONCLUSIONS: Foram observadas diferenças na percepção de risco de zoonoses entre os grupos participantes. O status de imigrante pode ser considerado fator de risco para ter baixa percepção de risco e menor nível de conhecimento das zoonoses no trabalho. Existe relação entre esse conhecimento específico de zoonoses e falta de formação e instrução entre as populações migrantes. É necessário desenvolver programas de educação sobre a prevenção de zoonoses entre a população imigrante.
OBJETIVO: Analizar factores asociados a la baja percepción de riesgo de zoonosis e identificar los vacíos de conocimiento sobre la transmisión y prevención de zoonosis en trabajadores inmigrantes e italianos. MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal con 175 trabajadores de la industria agropecuaria y agroalimentaria en Piemonte, Italia. Los datos fueron obtenidos por medio de cuestionario semi-estructurado basado en estudio sobre conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas. Se calcularon proporciones y usó la prueba de Chi-cuadrado y odds ratio para estimar asociaciones. Se realizaron ocho entrevistas individuales con informantes clave en materia de inmigración y salud pública. RESULTADOS: Cerca de 47% de los trabajadores eran italianos y 53%, inmigrantes provenientes de Rumania, Marruecos, Albania, India, China, Argentina, Perú, Macedonia, Costa de Marfil, Ucrania y Colombia. Hubo diferencias significativas en la menor percepción del riesgo en el trabajo (p = 0,001). Se observó asociación entre falta de conocimientos correctos sobre zoonosis y ser inmigrante (OR=4,1; IC95% 1,7;9,8;p ≤ 0,01), trabajar en la industria pecuaria (OR = 2,9; IC95% 1,2;6,8;p = 0,01) y ser un trabajador no calificado (OR = 4,4; IC95% 1,2;15,4;p = 0,01). Otra fuerte asociación ocurrió entre ser inmigrante y tener empleo de baja calificación (OR = 6,7; IC95% 2,9;15,4;p ≤ 0,01). Se encontró mayor frecuencia de conductas de riesgo y menor nivel de conocimiento sobre zoonosis en el grupo de los inmigrantes asiáticos.
Assuntos
Adulto , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Exposição Ocupacional , Zoonoses , Doenças dos Trabalhadores Agrícolas/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Itália , Inquéritos e Questionários , Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Zoonoses/transmissãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Assess the potential epidemiological and economic impact of vaccinating the over-15 Colombian population against tetanus with a booster dose every 10 years. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis of tetanus vaccination with a booster dose every 10 years was conducted in Colombia and compared with the current strategy (2, 4, 6, 18, and 60 months). Estimates of the burden of disease were based on three official data sources. A Markov model from the perspective of the third party payer was developed. The time horizon was the lifetime of a person. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: In Colombia, 30 to 48 cases of tetanus resulting in 9.6 to 10.1 deaths are reported each year. Although booster vaccination for the entire population was cost-effective (the cost per disability-adjusted life year [DALY] avoided was US$ 11,314 in the entire population), gender-based differentiation of the results showed that it would not be cost-effective in women (cost per DALY avoided was US$ 4,903 in men and US$ 22,332 in women). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a tetanus vaccine booster dose every 10 years in a developing country. Use of this measure would be cost-effective in Colombia, especially for men. As a result of the gender-based differences in the results, any decision about its use in women of childbearing age should take current vaccination into account.
Assuntos
Toxoide Tetânico/economia , Tétano/economia , Tétano/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Secundária/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJETIVO: Evaluar el potencial impacto epidemiológico y económico de la vacunación antitetánica en la población colombiana mayor de 15 años de edad, con dosis de refuerzo cada 10 años. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un análisis de costo-efectividad de la vacunación con refuerzo cada 10 años contra el tétanos en Colombia, comparándola con la actual estrategia (2, 4, 6, 18 y 60 meses). La carga de enfermedad se estimó con base en tres fuentes oficiales de datos. Se realizó un modelo de Markov desde la perspectiva del tercer pagador. El horizonte temporal fue el tiempo de vida de una persona. Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad determinístico y probabilístico. RESULTADOS: En Colombia se notifican anualmente entre 30 y 48 casos de tétanos que ocasionan entre 9,6 y 10,1 muertes. Si bien la vacunación con refuerzo resultó costo-efectiva para toda la población (el costo por año de vida ajustado por discapacidad [AVAD] evitado fue de US$ 11 314 en toda la población), al discriminar los resultados por género no sería costoefectiva en las mujeres (el costo por AVAD evitado en hombres fue de US$ 4 903, y en mujeres de US$ 22 332). CONCLUSIONES: Este es el primer estudio que evalúa la costo- efectividad de una dosis de refuerzo cada 10 años de la vacuna contra el tétanos en un país en desarrollo. La aplicación de esta medida sería costo-efectiva en Colombia, especialmente para los hombres. Las diferencias en los resultados por género obliga a que cualquier decisión de implementación deba tener en cuenta la vacunación actual en mujeres en edad fértil.
OBJECTIVE: Assess the potential epidemiological and economic impact of vaccinating the over-15 Colombian population against tetanus with a booster dose every 10 years. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis of tetanus vaccination with a booster dose every 10 years was conducted in Colombia and compared with the current strategy (2, 4, 6, 18, and 60 months). Estimates of the burden of disease were based on three official data sources. A Markov model from the perspective of the third party payer was developed. The time horizon was the lifetime of a person. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: In Colombia, 30 to 48 cases of tetanus resulting in 9.6 to 10.1 deaths are reported each year. Although booster vaccination for the entire population was cost-effective (the cost per disability-adjusted life year [DALY] avoided was US$ 11,314 in the entire population), gender-based differentiation of the results showed that it would not be cost-effective in women (cost per DALY avoided was US$ 4,903 in men and US$ 22,332 in women). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a tetanus vaccine booster dose every 10 years in a developing country. Use of this measure would be cost-effective in Colombia, especially for men. As a result of the gender-based differences in the results, any decision about its use in women of childbearing age should take current vaccination into account.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Toxoide Tetânico/economia , Tétano/economia , Tétano/epidemiologia , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Imunização Secundária/economia , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Objetivo Se realizó un estudio epidemiológico ecológico para describir la tendencia de la rabia canina desde 1976-2006 y explorar posibles factores relacionados con su presentación en Colombia. Metodología Las variables fueron recolectadas mediante un cuestionario aplicado a los responsables del programa en cada departamento y mediante fuentes de información oficiales nacionales. Se calculó la incidencia de la rabia canina entre 2001-2006. Se emplearon razones de tasas de incidencia y pruebas de correlación de Spearman. Resultados La tasa de incidencia de rabia canina estimada es de 0,4 casos de rabia por 100 000 perros-año. El promedio de las coberturas de vacunación nacionales 1994-2005 fluctuó entre 45 por ciento y 63 por ciento. Las principales asociaciones con rabia canina fueron: mayor porcentaje de la población urbana, mayores coberturas de vacunación, ausencia de red de frío propia, no participación del coordinador en el Comité Vigilancia Epidemiológica, ausencia de mapa epidemiológico, ausencia de laboratorio diagnóstico, ausencia de recurso humano adecuado, ausencia de centro de zoonosis, periodicidad del análisis de situación epidemiológica, expulsión de población humana por violencia. Conclusiones La rabia canina se ha controlado exitosamente, sin embargo es importante fortalecer el sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica activa para ratificar el descenso de la enfermedad. Los resultados encontrados permiten referir que en ausencia de las variables significativas encontradas se espera que ocurran casi la mitad de los casos en la población. Se sugiere también que la situación de violencia del país puede estar influyendo en la relación hombre-perro-reservorios silvestres y ocurrencia de la rabia.
Objective An epidemiological-ecological study was carried out on canine rabies in Colombia to describe its tendency and explore the factors associated with its incidence. Methods Socio-economic variable data was collected by questionnaire applied to the rabies control programme's regional epidemiology coordinators in each Colombian department. Statistical association analysis was carried out on the 2001-2006 historical epidemiologic data on canine rabies incidence and sources of official national survey figures. Incidence rate ratios and Spearman correlation tests were calculated. Results Canine rabies incidence rate was 0.4 cases x 100,000 dogs/year (without adjustment for 2001-2006). Average immunisation coverage from 1994 to 2005 was 45 percent to 63 percent; only 25 percent of Colombian departments had higher than 60 percent immunisation coverage. The following variables were associated with the presence of canine rabies: an urban population, immunisation coverage, a lack of a cold chain for vaccines, a lack of participation in surveillance committees, the lack of an epidemiological map, the unavailability of a rabies' diagnosis laboratory, the absence of trained human resources, the absence of a zoonosis centre for observing dogs, comparative analysis between monthly and semester basis data and the percentage of people displaced by internal violence. Conclusions The analysis suggested the need for active surveillance and rapid response. Canine rabies is associated with the weaknesses of regional control programmes. Internal human migration could influence human-dog-selvatic reservoir ratios and rabies frequency.
Assuntos
Animais , Cães , Humanos , Doenças do Cão/epidemiologia , Raiva/veterinária , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Distúrbios Civis , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Reservatórios de Doenças , Emigração e Imigração , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Incidência , Notificação de Abuso , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacina Antirrábica , Raiva/diagnóstico , Raiva/epidemiologia , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Refrigeração , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Vacinação , Vacinação/veterinária , Violência , Zoonoses/epidemiologiaRESUMO
A complete economic study was carried out to assess the economical impact of two rotavirus vaccine in Colombia. A Markov decision model was built to assess the health outcomes from birth to 24 months of age for three hypothetical cohorts: one unvaccinated, one vaccinated with 2 doses of Rotarix and the third, with 3 doses of Rotateq. Without vaccination, the annual number of medical visits by diarrhea in children under 2 years would be 1,293,159 cases, with 105,378 medical visits and 470 deaths (IC95% 295-560) related to rotavirus. Without vaccination, rotavirus disease would cost around USD$8 millions including direct and indirect costs. Assuming a cost per dose of USD$7.5, average cost-effectiveness ratio would be USD$663/DALY with Rotarix and USD$1391 with Rotateq. When price per dose falls below USD$7 both vaccines yield a similar average cost-effectiveness ratio (USD$1063/DALY). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Rotateq versus Rotarix was USD$7787/DALY. Cost-effectiveness ratio was influenced mainly by vaccine cost and cost per case hospitalized. Other programmatic aspects such as number of doses to be applied, likelihood of completing vaccination schedule with shorter versus longer schedules, and storage space within the chain cold should be considered to make decisions on which vaccine should be introduced. In conclusion, vaccinating against rotavirus in Colombia with either vaccine would be very cost effective. If cost per vaccinated children falls below USD$3 per dose vaccination would be cost saving.
Assuntos
Diarreia Infantil/economia , Infecções por Rotavirus/economia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/economia , Vacinação/economia , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diarreia Infantil/epidemiologia , Diarreia Infantil/prevenção & controle , Diarreia Infantil/virologia , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Imunização Secundária , Lactente , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: An epidemiological-ecological study was carried out on canine rabies in Colombia to describe its tendency and explore the factors associated with its incidence. METHODS: Socio-economic variable data was collected by questionnaire applied to the rabies control programme's regional epidemiology coordinators in each Colombian department. Statistical association analysis was carried out on the 2001-2006 historical epidemiologic data on canine rabies incidence and sources of official national survey figures. Incidence rate ratios and Spearman correlation tests were calculated. RESULTS: Canine rabies incidence rate was 0.4 cases x 100,000 dogs/year (without adjustment for 2001-2006). Average immunisation coverage from 1994 to 2005 was 45 % to 63 %; only 25 % of Colombian departments had higher than 60 % immunisation coverage. The following variables were associated with the presence of canine rabies: an urban population, immunisation coverage, a lack of a cold chain for vaccines, a lack of participation in surveillance committees, the lack of an epidemiological map, the unavailability of a rabies' diagnosis laboratory, the absence of trained human resources, the absence of a zoonosis centre for observing dogs, comparative analysis between monthly and semester basis data and the percentage of people displaced by internal violence. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis suggested the need for active surveillance and rapid response. Canine rabies is associated with the weaknesses of regional control programmes. Internal human migration could influence human-dog-selvatic reservoir ratios and rabies frequency.
Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/epidemiologia , Raiva/veterinária , Animais , Distúrbios Civis , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Colômbia/epidemiologia , Reservatórios de Doenças , Cães , Emigração e Imigração , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Notificação de Abuso , Raiva/diagnóstico , Raiva/epidemiologia , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antirrábica , Refrigeração , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/veterinária , Violência , Zoonoses/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Continued contact between humans and animals, in combination with the ever-increasing movement of human and animal populations that is one effect of globalization, contributes to the spread of diseases, often with detrimental effects on public health. This has led professionals involved in both animal health and public health to recognize veterinary public health (VPH) as a key area for their activities to address the human-animal interface. Veterinarians, a profession with major involvement in this field, are in need of specific knowledge and skills to prevent and control public-health problems. As a result, VPH must be directly integrated into veterinary educational programs. At present, only few veterinary schools have specific VPH programs; in most institutions, VPH does not feature as a specific subject in either undergraduate or post-graduate curricula. SAPUVET and SAPUVETNET II are network projects supported by the ALFA program of the European Union (EU). Their main objectives are to reach a common understanding between European and Latin American universities in the definition of the areas in which VPH is important in their respective countries, and to design a harmonized training program for veterinarians in VPH, by making use of new technological applications and innovative teaching methodologies. The elaboration of educational material in combination with case studies presenting real-life problems provides a basis to apply the knowledge acquired on VPH. It is envisaged that the material and modules developed during the two projects will be integrated into the veterinary curricula of the participating universities, as well as in other partner organizations.
Assuntos
Educação em Veterinária/organização & administração , Saúde Pública , Ensino/métodos , Medicina Veterinária/organização & administração , Zoonoses , Animais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Relações Interinstitucionais , Cooperação Internacional , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas , Saúde Pública/educação , América do Sul , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
Veterinary medicine is an activity related to several health hazards; during the last years, studies about the biological hazard associated to animals have been conducted, such hazards represented by the zoonotic diseases and the allergic reactions in exposed workers. Despite its importance, in Colombia the knowledge about the occupational biohazard is scarce, its magnitude is overlooked and in addition a passive attitude from practitioners exists. The few research spaces available and the scattered actions for its prevention, influence directly on the workers' health, on the quality of the services offered and obviously on the quality of life in society. The present article discusses the causes and consequences of biological hazards in veterinary medicine, shows a panorama of the national problem and contributes with alternatives for its solutions.