RESUMO
Background Insulin is a mainstay of treatment in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) however controversy remains over the optimal dose and administration. An initial bolus dose of insulin prior to a continuous infusion is utilized despite a lack of data showing clinical benefit and potential for complications. Objective This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an initial insulin bolus in the treatment of DKA. Methods A retrospective chart review of patients with DKA was conducted. Fifty-nine patients met inclusion for the bolus group and 108 in the no-bolus group. The primary outcome was a composite of interruption of insulin infusion, hypoglycemia (BG <70 mg/dL), or hypokalemia (K+ <3.4 mEq/L) occurring within eight hours of starting insulin. Secondary outcomes included time to discontinuation of insulin infusion, as well as time to discharge from the ICU and the hospital. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The majority of patients were classified as having mild DKA. The primary outcome occurred significantly more frequently in the bolus group (45.8% vs 25%, P = .003) which was primarily driven by incidence of hypokalemia. Time to anion gap closure (6:39 vs 9:00, P = .063) was shorter with a bolus, although not significantly so. This finding carried forward to non-significant differences in time to stopping insulin infusion as well as ICU and hospital discharge. Conclusion An insulin bolus prior to initiation of an insulin infusion was associated with significantly more adverse effects early in therapy without a corresponding benefit in time to resolution of DKA.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Opioid overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) for use by laypersons has been shown to be safe and effective, but implementation in the emergency department (ED) setting is challenging. Recent literature has shown a discouragingly low rate of obtainment of naloxone that is prescribed in the ED setting. We conducted a study to evaluate the feasibility of point-of-care (POC) distribution of naloxone in an ED, hypothesizing a rate of obtainment higher than prescription fill rates reported in previous studies. SUMMARY: A multidisciplinary team of experts, including pharmacists, physicians, nurses, and case management professionals used an iterative process to develop a protocol for POC OEND in the ED. The protocol includes 5 steps: (1) patient screening, (2) order placement in the electronic health record (EHR), (3) a patient training video, (4) dispensing of naloxone kit, and (5) written discharge instructions. The naloxone kits were assembled, labeled to meet requirements for a prescription, and stored in an automated dispensing cabinet. Two pharmacists, 30 attending physicians, 65 resident physicians, and 108 nurses were trained. In 8 months, 134 orders for take-home naloxone were entered and 117 naloxone kits were dispensed, resulting in an obtainment rate of 87.3%. The indication for take-home naloxone kit was heroin use for 61 patients (92.4%). CONCLUSION: POC naloxone distribution is feasible and yielded a rate of obtainment significantly higher than previous studies in which naloxone was prescribed. POC distribution can be replicated at other hospitals with low rates of obtainment.