Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 387: 131098, 2023 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37290663

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of Impella support is increasingly adopted to "protect" patients with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricle (LV) dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: To evaluate the impact of Impella-protected (Abiomed, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA) PCIs on myocardial function recovery. METHODS: Patients with significant LV dysfunction undergoing multi-vessel PCIs with pre-intervention Impella implantation were evaluated by echocardiography before PCI and at median follow up of 6 months: global and segmental LV contractile function were assessed by LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion score index (WMSI), respectively. Extent of revascularization was graded using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Jeopardy score (BCIS-JS). Study endpoints were LVEF and WMSI improvement, and its correlation with revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 48 high surgical risk (mean EuroSCORE II 8) patients with median LVEF value of 30%, extensive wall motion abnormalities (median WMSI 2.16), and severe multi-vessel CAD (mean SYNTAX score 35) were included. PCIs brought a significant reduction of ischemic myocardium burden with BCIS-JS decrease from mean value of 12 to 4 (p < 0.001). At follow-up, WMSI reduced from 2.2 to 2.0 (p = 0.004) and LVEF increased from 30% to 35% (p = 0.016). WMSI improvement was proportional to the baseline impairment (R - 0.50, p < 0.001), and confined to revascularized segments (from 2.1 to 1.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with extensive CAD and severe LV dysfunction, multi-vessel Impella-protected PCI was associated to an appreciable contractile recovery, mainly determined by regional wall motion improvement in revascularized segments.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda , Humanos , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Ventrículos do Coração , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Volume Sistólico , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/terapia
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(1): 49-58, 2020 01 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31918942

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare optical coherence tomographic (OCT) guidance and fractional flow reserve (FFR) guidance in patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (AICLs) in a single-center, prospective, 1:1 randomized trial. BACKGROUND: FFR and OCT imaging may help both in the assessment of AICLs and in percutaneous coronary intervention optimization. METHODS: Patients with AICLs were randomized to FFR or OCT imaging. In the FFR arm, PCI was performed if FFR was ≤0.80. In the OCT imaging arm, PCI was performed if area stenosis was ≥75% or 50% to 75% with minimal luminal area <2.5 mm2 or plaque rupture. Angina (evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire), major adverse cardiac events, and cost were assessed at the end of follow-up. The pre-defined primary endpoint was the composite of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina (defined as Seattle Angina Questionnaire frequency scale score <90) at 13 months. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients (with 446 AICLs) were enrolled (176 randomized to FFR and 174 to OCT imaging). The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina at 13 months occurred in 14.8% of patients in the FFR arm and in 8.0% in the OCT imaging arm (p = 0.048). This result was driven by a statistically nonsignificant lower occurrence of all primary endpoint components. Up to 13 months, the rate of medically managed patients was significantly higher (p < 0.001) and total cost significantly lower (p < 0.001) with FFR in comparison with OCT imaging. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AICLs, OCT guidance is associated with lower occurrence of the composite of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina. FFR guidance is associated with a higher rate of medical management and lower costs. FFR or OCT Guidance to Revascularize Intermediate Coronary Stenosis Using Angioplasty [FORZA]; NCT01824030).


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Coronária/terapia , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico/efeitos dos fármacos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/economia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Estenose Coronária/economia , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/economia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Cidade de Roma , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(15): e012772, 2019 08 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31331219

RESUMO

Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) may help both in assessment and in percutaneous coronary intervention optimization of angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. We designed a prospective trial comparing the clinical and economic outcomes associated with FFR or OCT in angiographically intermediate coronary lesions. Methods and Results Three hundred fifty patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions (n=446) were randomized to FFR or OCT guidance. In the FFR arm, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed if FFR was ≤0.80 aiming for a postprocedure FFR >0.90. In the OCT arm, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed if percentage of area stenosis was ≥75% or 50% to 75% with minimal lumen area <2.5 mm2 or plaque ulceration. Costs, angina frequency, and major adverse cardiac events were assessed at 1 month and at 13 months. We present early data at 1 month consistent with a prespecified analysis of secondary end points. Patients randomized to FFR, as compared with OCT, were significantly more commonly managed with medical therapy alone (67.7% versus 41.1%; P<0.001), required less contrast media (245±137 versus 280±129 mL; P=0.004), and exhibited a lower occurrence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (1.7% versus 8.6%; P=0.034). At 1 month, in comparison to FFR, OCT was associated with increased total costs (2831±1288 versus 4292±3844 euros/patient; P<0.001) whereas occurrence of major adverse cardiac events or significant angina was similar. Conclusions In patients with angiographically intermediate coronary lesions, a functional guidance by FFR, as compared with OCT, increased the rate of patients treated with medical therapy alone. This translated into a significant reduction in administered contrast, contrast-induced acute kidney injury, and total costs at 1 month with FFR. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrialsgov. Unique identifier: NCT01824030.


Assuntos
Estenose Coronária/cirurgia , Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Idoso , Angiografia Coronária , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA