Comprehensive Review of the Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Thyroid Carcinoma.

Thyroid cancer is the most common head and neck cancer (HNC) in the world. In this article, we comprehensively cover baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up imaging recommendations for thyroid carcinomas along with the eighth edition of the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system proposed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). We include characterization and risk stratification of thyroid nodules on ultrasound (US) proposed by various international bodies. Management guidelines (depending upon the type of thyroid carcinoma) based on the international consensus recommendations (mainly by the American Thyroid Association) are also extensively covered in this article, including the role of a radioiodine scan. The management of recurrent disease is also briefly elucidated in this article. In addition, we cover the risk factors and etiopathogenesis of thyroid carcinoma along with the non-imaging diagnostic workup essential for thyroid carcinoma management, including the significance of genetic mutations. US is the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, with US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) being the procedure of choice for tissue diagnosis. The roles of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (FDG-PET/CT) in thyroid carcinoma staging are also specified. Through this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive reference guide for the radiologists and the clinicians in the pursuit of optimal care for patients with thyroid carcinoma.

Clinical outcomes of ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer with limited access to ROS1-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): experience from an Indian tertiary referral centre.

Introduction: ROS1 as a driver mutation is observed in approximately 1%-2% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given its rarity, we share our experience regarding ROS1-positive NSCLC including the access to ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in a low-middle income country like India. Methods: It is a retrospective analysis of ROS1-positive NSCLC patients registered between January 2015 to December 2021 for demographics, treatment patterns and outcomes i.e., overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Baseline characteristics were available for 70 patients of 78 patients positive for ROS1 by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Median age at presentation was 52 years, 39 (55.7%) were males, most (51, 72.86%) were non-smokers and ten patients (14.3%) had poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) i.e., PS >2 at presentation. A total of 67 patients receiving cancer directed therapy were analysed for survival. The first line (1L) therapies included - ROS1 TKIs in 38, chemotherapy in 20, epidermal growth factor receptor TKI in eight and chemotherapy-bevacizumab in one only. ROS1 TKI was provided to 20 patients as part of an assistance programme. The median OS for patients who received ROS1 TKI was not attained (95% CI 37.85-NA), while it was 8.11 (95% CI 6.31-NA) months for those who did not (HR-0.1673). The median PFS for the 1L ROS1 TKI compared to the no-TKI group was 27.07 (95% CI 24.28-NA) months versus 5.78 (95% CI 3.42-12) months (HR: 0.2047). Poor ECOG PS at presentation was the only independent prognosticator for survival. Conclusion: Using ROS1 TKI improves clinical outcomes in all-comers though statistically not significant. To further improve outcomes, future trials should pay special attention to patients with poor PS and find a way to increase the current limited access to TKI.

Clinical characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors in KRAS mutant lung cancers: experience from a tertiary care cancer center in India.

Objectives: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutations in lung cancers, long considered untargetable, have had a recent rise in interest due to promising data of agents targeting KRAS p.G12C. As Indian data are scarce, we sought to identify baseline clinical characteristics, prognostic factors and outcomes of lung cancer patients with KRAS mutations at our hospital. Methods: Patients with KRAS mutant lung cancers treated at our institute from 2016 to 2022 were analysed. Results: 133 patients with KRAS mutant lung cancers were identified. Median age was 57 (interquartile range 28-78) years, and 58 (43.6%) were smokers. 17 (12.7%) had brain metastases. The commonest variant was p.G12C, seen in 53 (39.8%) patients. Six (4.5%) had programmed death ligand 1 (PDL-1) expression >50% by Ventana SP263 PDL-1 assay, and 13 (9.7%) had epidermal growth factor mutation. Of 92 patients with available treatment details, the majority received intravenous chemotherapy, nine (9.8%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitors and four (4.4%) received immunotherapy (pembrolizumab). Median progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line therapy was 6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-9.2) months and median overall survival (OS) was 12 (CI 9.2-14.8) months. The incidence of brain metastases was higher in patients with G12C mutations (p = 0.025). Brain metastases (HR: 3.57, p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥ 2 (HR: 2.13, p = 0.002) and G12C mutation (HR: 1.84, p = 0.011) were associated with inferior PFS, while brain metastases (HR: 4.6, p < 0.001), PS ≥ 2 (HR: 2.33, p = 0.001) and G12C mutation (HR: 1.93, p = 0.01) were associated with inferior OS. Conclusion: This is the largest dataset of KRAS mutant lung cancers from India. Brain metastases were higher in patients with G12C mutations and associated with poorer PFS and OS. G12C mutation and PS ≥ 2 were also associated with inferior PFS and OS. Experience with targeted therapy for KRAS mutations remains an area of future exploration due to the unavailability of these agents in India.

Advanced Techniques in Head and Neck Cancer Imaging: Guide to Precision Cancer Management.

Precision treatment requires precision imaging. With the advent of various advanced techniques in head and neck cancer treatment, imaging has become an integral part of the multidisciplinary approach to head and neck cancer care from diagnosis to staging and also plays a vital role in response evaluation in various tumors. Conventional anatomic imaging (CT scan, MRI, ultrasound) remains basic and focuses on defining the anatomical extent of the disease and its spread. Accurate assessment of the biological behavior of tumors, including tumor cellularity, growth, and response evaluation, is evolving with recent advances in molecular, functional, and hybrid/multiplex imaging. Integration of these various advanced diagnostic imaging and nonimaging methods aids understanding of cancer pathophysiology and provides a more comprehensive evaluation in this era of precision treatment. Here we discuss the current status of various advanced imaging techniques and their applications in head and neck cancer imaging.

A case of a large solitary fibrous tumor in the thigh, displaying NAB2ex4-STAT6ex2 gene fusion.

A solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is documented in several body sites. However, there are few reports on the radiological and corresponding histopathological, including immunohistochemical, features of SFT in the lower extremities. A 58-year-old male presented with a lump in his right thigh of 6 months duration. Plain radiograph revealed a soft tissue lesion in his right thigh, involving the adjacent mid-diaphysis and showing focal cortical thickening and calcification. Magnetic resonance imaging scans displayed two well-defined, T1-isointense and T2 heterogeneously hyperintense lesions, measuring together 15 cm in the intermuscular plane and the juxtacortical location along the mid-diaphyseal region of the right femur. Radiologically, the differential diagnoses considered were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and synovial sarcoma. Microscopic examination of the core biopsy and the resected tumor revealed a tumor composed of cells with oval to spindle-shaped nuclei in a variably collagenized stroma, including hyalinized blood vessels and focal dystrophic calcification. Mitotic figures were 4/10 high power fields. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for CD34, BCL2, and STAT6. Diagnosis of malignant SFT was offered. The tumor displayed NAB2ex4-STAT6ex2 gene fusion on molecular testing. This constitutes a relatively uncommon case report of a large SFT in the thigh, including its radiological and pathological features, confirmed by STAT6 immunostaining. An SFT should be considered in cases of slow-growing, well-defined soft tissue tumors, which are isointense on T1 and heterogeneously hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences, and display calcification and cortical thickening of the adjacent bones. Various differential diagnoses and their treatment-related implications in such cases are discussed herewith.