Patient Advocates' Perspectives on the Care of Sexual Assault Survivors in Chicago-Area Emergency Departments.

Emergency departments (EDs) providing care and forensic examinations for sexual assault (SA) survivors are often supported by SA patient advocates. This study explored advocates' perspectives regarding problems and potential solutions in SA patient care through a focus group with 12 advocates. Thematic analysis identified two major themes: provider-patient interactions and ED-hospital systems. Challenging aspects of provider-patient interactions included (a) provider attitudes and (b) disempowering behaviors. Within ED-hospital systems, themes included time constraints, efficiencies, and hospital preparation. Advocates surveyed were optimistic about an increased presence of SA nurse examiners and enhanced protocols and provider training to improve survivors' experiences.

Emergency Department Design in Low- and Middle-Income Settings: Lessons from a University Hospital in Haiti.

Background: Studies from high-income settings have demonstrated that emergency department (ED) design is closely related to operational success; however, no standards exist for ED design in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Objective: We present ED design recommendations for LMICs based on our experience designing and operating the ED at Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais (HUM), an academic hospital in central Haiti. We also propose an ideal prototype for similar settings based on these recommendations. Methods: As part of a quality improvement project to redesign the HUM ED, we collected feedback on the current design from key stakeholders to identify design features impacting quality and efficiency of care. Feedback was reviewed by the clinical and design teams and consensus reached on key lessons learned, from which the prototype was designed. Findings and conclusions: ED design in LMICs must balance construction costs, sustainability in the local context, and the impact of physical infrastructure on care delivery. From our analysis, we propose seven key recommendations: 1) Design the "front end" of the ED with waiting areas that meet the needs of LMICs and dedicated space for triage to strengthen care delivery and patient safety. 2) Determine ED size and bed capacity with an understanding of the local health system and disease burden, and ensure line-of-sight visibility for ill patients, given limited monitoring equipment. 3) Accommodate for limited supply chains by building storage spaces that can manage large volumes of supplies. 4) Prioritize a maintainable system that can provide reliable oxygen. 5) Ensure infection prevention and control, including isolation rooms, by utilizing simple and affordable ventilation systems. 6) Give consideration to security, privacy, and well-being of patients, families, and staff. 7) Site the ED strategically within the hospital. Our prototype incorporates these features and may serve as a model for other EDs in LMICs.

Adolescent and parent perspectives on the acceptability of financial incentives to promote self-care in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: An understanding of acceptability among potential intervention participants is critical to the design of successful real-world financial incentive (FI) programs. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore adolescent and parent perspectives on the acceptability of using FI to promote engagement in diabetes self-care in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Focus groups with 46 adolescents with T1D (12-17 years old) and 39 parents of adolescents with T1D were conducted in the Seattle metropolitan area. Semistructured questions addressed participants' current use of incentives to promote change in diabetes self-care and receptivity to a theoretical incentive program administered by a third-party. Qualitative data were analyzed and emergent themes identified. RESULTS: Three thematic categories informed participant views about the acceptability of FI programs: (a) the extent to which using FIs in the context of diabetes management fit comfortably into a family's value system, (b) the perceived effectiveness for FIs to promote improved diabetes self-care, and (c) the urgent need for improved self-care due to the threat of diabetes-related health complications. These factors together led most parents and adolescents to be open to FI program participation. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this qualitative study suggest that well-designed FI programs to support diabetes management are acceptable to families with adolescents with T1D. Additionally, the use of FIs may have the potential to support adolescents with T1D in developing strong self-care habits and ease the often-turbulent transition to independent self-care.