RESUMO
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Oral rehabilitation with implants is an alternative to the provision of removable dentures in all patients for whom missing teeth require replacement. However, individuals with cognitive, mental health issues, and/or physical disabilities are often excluded from implant-supported prostheses because of the high perceived risk of failure linked to poor oral health, presence of parafunction, or systemic conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this cohort study was to describe the protocols, outcomes, and survival rates of oral rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses in patients with cognitive and physical disabilities treated under general anesthesia (GA) in a French unit of Special Care Dentistry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patient files. Data collected included demographics and information about the surgical and prosthetic phases of rehabilitation. Clinical and radiological reports were retrieved to establish the survival, success, and failure rates of implant placement according to the Health Scale for Dental Implants (HDSI) classification. RESULTS: A total of 298 dental implants had been placed under GA in 57 patients between January 2007 and August 2021. The prevalence of technical and biological postoperative complications was found to be 14% and 13% respectively. Thirty implants were determined to be failures. The estimated survival time in the population studied for loaded implants was 144.7 months [138.0; 151.3]. The cumulative survival rate was estimated to be 86% at 157 months. CONCLUSIONS: Implant-supported prostheses were found to be effective, and oral rehabilitation carried out under the conditions described was determined to be stable.
RESUMO
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Implant-supported prostheses for individuals with special needs have been considered high-risk because of the prevalence of poor oral hygiene and parafunction in this population; however, systematic evidence on protocols and outcomes is scarce. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize implant procedures and outcomes for the special needs population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodological framework. Data collected included patient information, location and number of implants, surgical and prosthetic procedures, behavior support techniques, postoperative follow-up, complications, and criteria for outcome assessment. Survival rates were pooled for quantitative analysis, and a separate analysis pooling data from groups of special needs patients that present similar risks was undertaken. RESULTS: The qualitative analysis included 79 studies involving 759 patients and 2269 implants. The quantitative analysis included 65 studies concerning 666 patients with special needs and 1886 implants. The overall weighted implant survival rate was 95.4%, with a mean follow-up duration of 40.7 ±29.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with special needs considered suitable for implant-supported prostheses by their clinician, implant survival rates were similar to those reported in the general population. (J Prosthet Dent xxxx;xxx:xxx-xxx).