Cone Beam CT Derived Laser-Guided Percutaneous Lung Ablation: Minimizing Needle-Related Complications Under General Anesthesia with Lung Separation.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous lung tumor ablations are mostly performed in computed tomography (CT) rooms under local anesthesia with conscious sedation. However, maintaining the breath-hold phase during this can be challenging, affecting image quality and increasing complications. With the advent of hybrid operating rooms (HORs), this procedure can be performed with endotracheal tube (ETGA) intubation under general anesthesia with lung separation, ensuring precise imaging in a single-stage setting. Lung separation provides surgical exposure of one lung while ensuring ample gas exchange with the other. This study evaluated tumor ablations performed in an HOR equipped with cone beam CT and laser guidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent lung tumor ablation under general anesthesia with an ETGA in an HOR between July 2020 and May 2023. Anesthesia considerations, perioperative management, and postoperative follow-ups were evaluated. RESULTS: 65 patients (78 tumors) underwent ablation using two types of lung ventilation methods including a single-lumen tube with a blocker (SLT/BL) (n = 15) and double-lumen tube (DLT) (n = 50). Most patients experienced desaturation during the apnea phase of dynamic CT and needling. The average SpO2 value was significantly lower in the DLT group than in the SLT/BL group during the procedure (81.1% versus 88.7%, P = 0.033). Five, three, and two patients developed pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, and pleural effusion, respectively. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous ablation under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation and lung separation performed in HORs was feasible and safe. The setup minimized complication risks and maintained a balance between patient safety and successful procedures.

Nontraumatic intraoperative pulmonary nodule localization with laser guide stamping in a hybrid operating room.

Lung nodule localization using conventional image-guided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery involves lung puncture, which increases the risk of needle-related complications. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a single-stage non-invasive laser-guided stamping localization technique followed by resection under general anesthesia in a hybrid operating room. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery for small pulmonary nodules using laser-guided dye-stamping localization methods in a hybrid operating room between June 2023 and October 2023. During the study period, 18 patients with 20 lesions underwent single-stage intraoperative image-guided stamping video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the hybrid operating room. The median size of the nodules was 7.4 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 5.7-9.8 mm), and median distance from the pleural surface was 9.8 mm (IQR 7.7-14.6 mm). The median localization time was 26 min (IQR 23-34 min), whereas median operation time was 69 min (IQR 62-87 min). The total median operating room time was 146 min (IQR 136-157 min). Twelve patients underwent less than two cone-beam computed tomography scans, while 6 underwent more than two scans. The total median dose area product, including cone-beam computed tomography scans, was 5731.4 uGym2. No localization-related complications were observed, and the postoperative length of stay was 1 day (IQR 1-2 days). The single-stage image-guided pleural stamping technique for localizing small pulmonary nodules in a hybrid operating room is feasible and safe. Future research with larger cohorts is required to further explore the benefits of this workflow.

Augmented fluoroscopy-guided dye localization for small pulmonary nodules in hybrid operating room: intrathoracic stamping versus transbronchial marking.

PURPOSE: We developed a novel augmented fluoroscopy-guided intrathoracic stamping technique for localizing small pulmonary nodules in the hybrid operating room. We conducted an observational study to investigate the feasibility of this technique and retrospectively compared two augmented fluoroscopy-guided approaches: intrathoracic and transbronchial. METHODS: From August 2020 to March 2023, consecutive patients underwent single-stage augmented fluoroscopy-guided localization under general anaesthesia. This included intrathoracic stamping and bronchoscopic lung marking, followed by thoracoscopic resection in a hybrid operating room. Comparative analyses were performed between the two groups. RESULTS: The data of 50 patients in the intrathoracic stamping and 67 patients in the bronchoscopic lung marking groups were analysed. No significant difference was noted in demographic data between the groups, except a larger lesion depth in the bronchoscopic lung marking group (14.7 ± 11.7 vs 11.0 ± 5.8 mm, p = 0.029). Dye localization was successfully performed in 49 intrathoracic stamping group patients (98.0%) and 67 bronchoscopic lung marking group patients (100%). No major procedure-related complications occurred in either group; however, the time flow (total anaesthesia time/global operating room time) was longer, and the radiation exposure (fluoroscopy duration/total dose area product) was larger in the bronchoscopic lung marking group. CONCLUSIONS: Augmented fluoroscopic stamping localization under intubated general anaesthesia is feasible and safe, providing an alternative with less global operating room time and lower radiation exposure for image-guided thoracoscopic surgery in the hybrid operating room.