Generalizable Approach to Quantifying Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) intensity is foundational for improving heart failure (HF) care. Existing measures discount dose intensity or use inconsistent weighting. METHODS: The Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score is the average of total daily to target dose percentages for eligible GDMT, reflecting the percentage of optimal GDMT prescribed (range, 0-100). In Change the Management of Patients With HF, we computed KCMO, HF collaboratory (0-7), and modified HF Collaboratory (0-100) scores for each patient at baseline and for 1-year change in established GDMT at the time (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, ß-blocker, ACE [angiotensin-converting enzyme] inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor). We compared baseline and 1-year change distributions and the coefficient of variation (SD/mean) across scores. RESULTS: Among 4532 patients at baseline, mean KCMO, HF collaboratory, and modified HF Collaboratory scores were 38.8 (SD, 25.7), 3.4 (1.7), and 42.2 (22.2), respectively. The mean 1-year change (n=4061) for KCMO was -1.94 (17.8); HF collaborator, -0.11 (1.32); and modified HF Collaboratory, -1.35 (19.8). KCMO had the highest coefficient of variation (0.66), indicating greater variability around the mean than the HF collaboratory (0.49) and modified HF Collaboratory (0.53) scores, reflecting higher resolution of the variability in GDMT intensity across patients. CONCLUSIONS: KCMO measures GDMT intensity by incorporating dosing and treatment eligibility, provides more granularity than existing methods, is easily interpretable (percentage of ideal GDMT), and can be adapted as performance measures evolve. Further study of its association with outcomes and its usefulness for quality assessment and improvement is needed.

Impact of Social Vulnerability on Cardiac Arrest Mortality in the United States, 2016 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest is 1 of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, with an estimated 340 000 out-of-hospital and 292 000 in-hospital cardiac arrest events per year in the United States. Survival rates are lower in certain racial and socioeconomic groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a county-level cross-sectional longitudinal study using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research multiple causes of death data set between 2016 and 2020 among individuals of all ages whose death was attributed to cardiac arrest. The Social Vulnerability Index is a composite measure that includes socioeconomic vulnerability, household composition, disability, individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups status and language, and housing and transportation domains. We examined the impact of social determinants on cardiac arrest mortality stratified by age, race, ethnicity, and sex in the United States. All age-adjusted mortality rate (cardiac arrest AAMRs) are reported as per 100 000. Overall cardiac arrest AAMR during the study period was 95.6. The cardiac arrest AAMR was higher for men compared with women (119.6 versus 89.9) and for the Black population compared with the White population (150.4 versus 92.3). The cardiac arrest AAMR increased from 64.8 in counties in quintile 1 of Social Vulnerability Index to 141 in quintile 5, with an average increase of 13% (95% CI, 9.8%-16.9%) in AAMR per quintile increase. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality from cardiac arrest varies widely, with a >2-fold difference between the counties with the highest and lowest social vulnerability, highlighting the differential burden of cardiac arrest deaths throughout the United States based on social determinants of health.

What cardiac arrest registries can tell us about health differences and disparities.

Cardiac arrest is common and associated with significant mortality and morbidity among survivors. To better understand the epidemiology and outcomes of cardiac arrest, many countries and regions have developed cardiac arrest registries. In the United States, with the diversity of its population, these registries have illuminated differences and disparities in the care and outcomes of cardiac arrest patients based on their race, ethnicity, and sex. These findings raise concerns as traditionally vulnerable patient groups have lower survival rates for cardiac arrest-a condition for which overall survival is already low. Although leveraging registries to raise awareness of disparities in cardiac arrest outcomes is an important first step, further research is needed to understand the sources of these differences, narrow observed disparities and improve overall outcomes.

Hospital Variation in Epinephrine Administration Before Defibrillation for Cardiac Arrest Due to Shockable Rhythm.

OBJECTIVES: Contrary to advanced cardiac life support guidelines that recommend immediate defibrillation for shockable in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), epinephrine administration before first defibrillation is common and associated with lower survival at a "patient-level." Whether this practice varies across hospitals and its association with "hospital-level" IHCA survival remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine hospital variation in rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation for shockable IHCA and its association with IHCA survival. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Five hundred thirteen hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines Resuscitation Registry. PATIENTS: A total of 37,668 adult patients with IHCA due to an initial shockable rhythm from 2000 to 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Epinephrine before first defibrillation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using multivariable hierarchical regression, we examined hospital variation in epinephrine administration before first defibrillation and its association with hospital-level rates of risk-adjusted survival. The median hospital rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation was 18.8%, with large variation across sites (range, 0-68.8%; median odds ratio: 1.54; 95% CI, 1.47-1.61). Major teaching status and annual IHCA volume were associated with hospital rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation. Compared with hospitals with the lowest rate of epinephrine administration before defibrillation (Q1), there was a stepwise decline in risk-adjusted survival at hospitals with higher rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation (Q1: 44.3%, Q2: 43.4%; Q3: 41.9%; Q4: 40.3%; p for trend < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of epinephrine before defibrillation in shockable IHCA is common and varies markedly across U.S. hospitals. Hospital rates of epinephrine administration before defibrillation were associated with a significant stepwise decrease in hospital rates of risk-adjusted survival. Efforts to prioritize immediate defibrillation for patients with shockable IHCA and avoid early epinephrine administration are urgently needed.

Association Between Cardiovascular Event Type and Smoking Cessation Rates Among Outpatients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Insights From the NCDR PINNACLE Registry.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how the type of an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event potentially influences patients' likelihood of smoking cessation. METHODS: Using 2013 to 2018 data from the US based National Cardiovascular Data Registry Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence outpatient cardiac registry, we identified patients who were current smokers at a clinic visit and followed them over time for a subsequent ASCVD event. Self-reported smoking status was assessed at each consecutive visit and used to determine smoking cessation after each interim ASCVD event (myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, stroke/transient ischemic attack, peripheral artery disease). We constructed separate multivariable Cox models with nonproportional hazards to examine the association of each interim ASCVD event with smoking cessation, compared with not having an interim ASCVD event. We estimated the relative association of ASCVD event type with smoking cessation using contrast tests. Analyses were stratified by presence versus absence of ASCVD at baseline. RESULTS: Across 530 cardiology practices, we identified 1 933 283 current smokers (mean age 62±15, male 54%, ASCVD at baseline 50%). Among the 322 743 patients who had an interim ASCVD event and were still smoking, 41 336 (12.8%) quit smoking by their first subsequent clinic visit, which was higher among those with baseline ASCVD (13.4%) as compared with those without baseline ASCVD (11.5%). Each type of ASCVD event was associated with an increased likelihood of smoking. Patients who had an myocardial infarction, underwent coronary artery bypass graft (hazard ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.55-1.65]), or had a stroke or transient ischemic attack were more likely to quit smoking as compared with those who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention or had a new diagnosis of peripheral artery disease (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.17-1.22]). CONCLUSIONS: Only 13% of patients reported smoking cessation after an ASCVD event, with the type of event being associated with the likelihood of smoking cessation, prompting the need for patient-centered interventions.

Physician Estimates and Patient-Reported Health Status in Atrial Fibrillation.

Importance: A primary objective in managing atrial fibrillation (AF) is to optimize patients' health status, which can be done only if physicians accurately quantify the outcomes associated with AF in patients' lives. Objective: To explore physicians' estimation of the health status of patients with AF and its association with subsequent care and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in 2 outpatient practices in Tokyo, Japan. Participants included patients with newly diagnosed AF or those referred for initial treatment of AF at outpatient practices and treating physicians from November 8, 2018, to April 1, 2020. Data analysis was performed from December 22, 2022, to July 7, 2023. Exposures: Participating patients completed the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire, a 20-item tool covering 4 domains with a 7-point Likert scale; 3 domains (symptoms, daily activities, and treatment concerns) were used in this study. Blinded to patients' responses, treating physicians answered a 3-item questionnaire quantifying each patient's AFEQT domain with a single item. Patients' mean Likert scale responses within each AFEQT domain were subtracted from the physicians' assessments so that higher scores (≥0.5 points) indicate physician underestimation, while lower scores (≤0.5 points) indicate physician overestimation of the health status of patients with AF. Main Outcomes and Measures: The independent association of physician-patient concordance with treatment escalation (alteration or initiation of antiarrhythmic drugs, cardioversion, or catheter ablation) and 1-year adjusted changes in AFEQT scores. Results: Among 330 patients (238 [72.1%] men; mean [SD] age, 67.9 [11.9] years; 163 [49.4%] with paroxysmal AF), physicians correctly estimated health status in 112 patients (33.9%), underestimated it in 42 patients (12.7%), and overestimated it in 176 patients (53.3%). Treatment escalation occurred in 63.6% of patients whose health status was correctly estimated, 47.6% of those whose health status was underestimated, and 66.3% of patients whose health status was overestimated. After multivariable adjustment, underestimation of health status was independently associated with less treatment escalation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.90) and less frequent AFEQT overall summary score improvement at 1 year (underestimated, 2.5 [95% CI, -1.6 to 6.7] vs correctly and overestimated health status, 8.4 [95% CI, 7.0-9.9] points; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, physician underestimation of the health status of patients with AF was common and associated with less aggressive treatment and less health status improvement at 1 year.

Time to bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation by patient sex for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Delays in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are associated with worse out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes. Whether disparities exist in time to CPR between women and men is unknown. METHODS: We included witnessed OHCAs treated with bystander CPR from the Cardiac Arrest Registry Enhancing Survival between 2013-2021. The primary outcome was time to first bystander CPR, and secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological survival. Hierarchical ordinal regression was used to model time to first CPR, which estimates the odds of having a 2-minute longer delay (from 0 to ≥10 minutes) in receiving bystander CPR. The model included sex, age, race, location of arrest, cardiac arrest etiology, day of week, and season as fixed effects and EMS agency as a random effect to account for clustering of patients within an agency. RESULTS: Of 78,043 patients with a witnessed OHCA that received bystander CPR, 25,197 (32.3%) were women. The median [IQR] time to first bystander CPR was 2 [1,5] minutes for both women and men. In adjusted analysis, time to bystander CPR was similar in men and women (p = 0.26). Moreover, there was a statistically significantly graded inverse association between time to bystander CPR and survival. CONCLUSION: For patients with witnessed OHCA that received bystander CPR, women and men had similar times to CPR, although 5-minute or greater delays in initiating CPR was not uncommon. Delays in bystander CPR in OHCA were associated with worse survival outcomes.

The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2030 Impact Goals and Call to Action to Improve Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Every 10 years, the American Heart Association (AHA) Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee establishes goals to improve survival from cardiac arrest. These goals align with broader AHA Impact Goals and support the AHA's advocacy efforts and strategic investments in research, education, clinical care, and quality improvement programs. This scientific statement focuses on 2030 AHA emergency cardiovascular care priorities, with a specific focus on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, early defibrillation, and neurologically intact survival. This scientific statement also includes aspirational goals, such as establishing cardiac arrest as a reportable disease and mandating reporting of standardized outcomes from different sources; advancing recognition of and knowledge about cardiac arrest; improving dispatch system response, availability, and access to resuscitation training in multiple settings and at multiple time points; improving availability, access, and affordability of defibrillators; providing a focus on early defibrillation, in-hospital programs, and establishing champions for debriefing and review of cardiac arrest events; and expanding measures to track outcomes beyond survival. The ability to track and report data from these broader aspirational targets will potentially require expansion of existing data sets, development of new data sets, and enhanced integration of technology to collect process and outcome data, as well as partnerships of the AHA with national, state, and local organizations. The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, disparities in COVID-19 outcomes for historically excluded racial and ethnic groups, and the longstanding disparities in cardiac arrest treatment and outcomes for Black and Hispanic or Latino populations also contributed to an explicit focus and target on equity for the AHA Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2030 Impact Goals.

Automated External Defibrillator Use After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Recreational Facilities.

This cohort study examines bystander automated external defibrillator (AED) application and survival outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at recreational facilities in US states with and without AED legislation.

Association Between Delays in Time to Bystander CPR and Survival for Witnessed Cardiac Arrest in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Prompt initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is critical to survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the association between delays in bystander CPR and OHCA survival is poorly understood. METHODS: In this observational study using a nationally representative US registry, we identified patients who received bystander CPR from a layperson for a witnessed OHCA from 2013 to 2021. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the association between time to CPR (<1 minute versus 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9, and ≥10-minute intervals) and survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological survival (survival to discharge with cerebral performance category of 1 or 2 [ie, without severe neurological disability]). RESULTS: Of 78 048 patients with a witnessed OHCA treated with bystander CPR, the mean age was 63.5±15.7 years and 25, 197 (32.3%) were women. The median time to bystander CPR was 2 (1-5) minutes, with 10% of patients having a≥10-minute delay before initiation of CPR. Overall, 15 000 (19.2%) patients survived to hospital discharge and 13 159 (16.9%) had favorable neurological survival. There was a graded inverse relationship between time to bystander CPR and survival to hospital discharge (P for trend <0.001). Compared with patients who received CPR within 1 minute, those with a time to CPR of 2 to 3 minutes were 9% less likely to survive to discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.95]) and those with a time to CPR 4 to 5 minutes were 27% less likely to survive (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.77]). A similar graded inverse relationship was found between time to bystander CPR and favorable neurological survival (P for trend <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with witnessed OHCA, there was a dose-response relationship between delays in bystander initiation of CPR and lower survival rates.

Bystander CPR and Long-Term Survival in Older Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

BACKGROUND: Most studies on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have focused on in-hospital or short-term survival. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between bystander CPR and long-term survival outcomes for OHCA. METHODS: Within the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival, we identified 152,653 patients with OHCA ≥65 years of age or older. Using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression, we first examined the association between bystander CPR and in-hospital survival. Then, among those surviving to discharge and linked to Medicare files, we evaluated the association between bystander CPR and long-term mortality over 5 years using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall, 58,464 (38.3%) received bystander CPR. Patients receiving bystander CPR were more likely to have an OHCA that was witnessed, in a public location, and with an initial shockable rhythm. Bystander CPR was associated with a 24% higher likelihood of surviving to hospital discharge (10.2% vs 5.5%; adjusted relative risk: 1.24 [95% CI: 1.19-1.29]; P < 0.001), and this survival benefit was similar (interaction P = 0.24) for those who were 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and ≥85 years of age. Among patients surviving to hospital discharge (median follow-up of 31 months), bystander CPR was additionally associated with lower long-term mortality vs those without bystander CPR (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.73-0.84]; P < 0.001), and this benefit was also consistent across age groups (interaction P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with OHCA, bystander CPR was associated with higher rates of in-hospital survival. This survival benefit was not attenuated by competing mortality risks but increased in magnitude after hospital discharge.

Survey of resuscitation practices at emergency medical service agencies in the U.S.

Background: Survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies across emergency medical service (EMS) agencies. Yet, little is known about resuscitation response and quality improvement activities at EMS agencies. We describe herein a novel survey to EMS agencies in a U.S. registry for OHCA. Methods: Using data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), we identified 577 EMS agencies with ≥10 OHCA cases annually between 2015 and 2019 that remained active in CARES. We administered a survey to EMS directors regarding agency characteristics, cardiac arrest response, relationships with first responders and dispatchers, quality improvement activities and perceived barriers in the community. Results: Of eligible EMS agencies, 470 (81.5%) completed the survey. The high completion rate was likely due to frequent personalized emails and phone calls, liaising with CARES state coordinators to encourage survey response, and multiple periodic drawings of an automated external defibrillator during the survey period for participating EMS agencies. The survey examined rates of resuscitation training modalities; use of resuscitation equipment and devices in the field; frequency of simulation; non-EMS stakeholder response to OHCA (dispatchers, fire, police); quality improvement; and community factors affecting bystander response to OHCA. Conclusions: In this study design paper on the RED-CASO survey, we provide summary data on EMS agency characteristics in the U.S. Upon linkage to CARES patient-level data, this survey will provide critical insights into 'best practices' at EMS agencies with the highest OHCA survival rates as well as provide insights into current disparities in outcomes.

Cardiac Arrest Survival at Emergency Medical Service Agencies in Catchment Areas With Primarily Black and Hispanic Populations.

Importance: Black and Hispanic patients are less likely to survive an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) than White patients. Given the central importance of emergency medical service (EMS) agencies in prehospital care, a better understanding of OHCA survival at EMS agencies that work in Black and Hispanic communities and White communities is needed to address OHCA disparities. Objective: To examine whether EMS agencies serving catchment areas with primarily Black and Hispanic populations (Black and Hispanic catchment areas) have different rates of OHCA survival than agencies serving catchment areas with primarily White populations (White catchment areas). Design, Setting, and Participants: A cohort study including adults with nontraumatic OHCA from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival was conducted. Data analysis was conducted from August 17, 2022, to July 7, 2023. Exposure: Emergency medical service agencies, categorized as working in catchment areas where the combination of Black and Hispanic residents made up more than 50% of the population or where White residents made up more than 50% of the population. Main Outcomes and Measures: The unit of analysis was the EMS agency. The primary outcome was agency-level risk-standardized survival rates (RSSRs) to hospital admission for OHCA at each EMS agency, which were calculated using hierarchical logistic regression and compared between agencies serving Black and Hispanic and White catchment areas. Whether differences in OHCA survival were explained by EMS and first responder measures was evaluated with additional adjustment for these factors. Results: Among 764 EMS agencies representing 258 342 OHCAs, 82 EMS agencies (10.7%) had a Black and Hispanic catchment area. Overall median age of the patients was 63.0 (IQR, 52.0-75.0) years, 36.1% were women, and 63.9% were men. Overall, the mean (SD) RSSR was 27.5% (3.6%), with lower survival at EMS agencies with Black and Hispanic catchment areas (25.8% [3.6%]) compared with agencies with White catchment areas (27.7% [3.5%]; P < .001). Among the 82 EMS agencies with Black and Hispanic catchment areas, a disproportionately higher number (32 [39.0%]) was in the lowest survival quartile, whereas a lower number (12 [14.6%]) was in the highest survival quartile. Additional adjustment for EMS response times, EMS termination of resuscitation rates, and first responder rates of initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation or applying an automated external defibrillator before EMS arrival did not meaningfully attenuate differences in RSSRs between agencies with Black and Hispanic compared with White catchment areas (mean [SD] RSSRs after adjustment, 25.9% [3.3%] vs 27.7% [3.1%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Risk-standardized survival rates for OHCA were 1.9% lower at EMS agencies working in Black and Hispanic catchment areas than in White catchment areas. This difference was not explained by EMS response times, rates of EMS termination of resuscitation, or first responder rates of initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation or applying an automated external defibrillator. These findings suggest there is a need for further assessment of these discrepancies.

Impact of social vulnerability on cardiac arrest mortality in the United States, 2016-2020.

Importance: Cardiac arrest is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, with an estimated 340,000 out-of-hospital and 292,000 in-hospital cardiac arrest events per year in the U.S. Survival rates are lower in certain racial and socioeconomic groups. Objective: To examine the impact of social determinants on cardiac arrest mortality among adults stratified by age, race, and sex in the U.S. Design: A county-level cross-sectional longitudinal study using death data between 2016 and 2020 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database. Setting: Using the multiple causes of death dataset from the CDC's WONDER database, cardiac arrests were identified using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), tenth revision, clinical modification codes. Participants: Individuals aged 15 years or more whose death was attributed to cardiac arrest. Exposures: Social vulnerability index (SVI), reported by the CDC, is a composite measure that includes socioeconomic vulnerability, household composition, disability, minority status and language, and housing and transportation domains. Main outcomes and measures: Cardiac arrest mortality per 100,000 adults. Results: Overall age-adjusted cardiac arrest mortality (AAMR) during the study period was 95.6 per 100,000 persons. The AAMR was higher for men as compared with women (119.6 vs. 89.9 per 100,000) and for Black, as compared with White, adults (150.4 vs. 92.3 per 100,000). The AAMR increased from 64.8 per 100,000 persons in counties in Quintile 1 (Q1) of SVI to 141 per 100,000 persons in Quintile 5, with an average increase of 13% (95% CI: 9.8-16.9) in AAMR per quintile increase. Conclusion and relevance: Mortality from cardiac arrest varies widely, with a more than 2-fold difference between the counties with the highest and lowest social vulnerability, highlighting the differential burden of cardiac arrest deaths throughout the U.S. based on social determinants of health.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival when CPR is initiated by first responders.

BACKGROUND: In most patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is initiated by first responders (non-transporting firefighters or police) or emergency medical service (EMS) personnel. Whether survival outcomes differ when CPR is initiated by first responders vs. EMS is unclear. METHODS: Within the CARES registry, we identified 162,896 adult patients with a non-traumatic OHCA in whom CPR was initiated by first responders or EMS during 2013-2021. Using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression to adjust for demographics, cardiac arrest characteristics and time to first CPR, we compared rates of survival to hospital admission and to discharge in patients with CPR initiated by first responders and EMS. RESULTS: CPR was initiated by first responders in 70,889 (43.5%) and by EMS in 92,007 (56.5%) patients. Time to first CPR was shorter when first responders initiated CPR (median: 8.0 [5.0-13.0] vs. 10.0 minutes [IQR: 6.0-14.0]; standardized difference 16.1%). The likelihood of survival to hospital admission was similar when CPR was initiated by first responders (27.1% [first responders] vs. 26.8% [EMS]; adjusted OR: 0.98 [0.96, 1.01], P = 0.15) whereas survival rates to discharge were higher with CPR initiated by first responders (9.4% [first responders] vs. 7.7% [EMS]; adjusted OR: 1.17 [1.02, 1.21], P < 0.001). After adjustment for time to first CPR, rates of survival to discharge were similar between the first responder and EMS groups (adjusted OR: 1.04 [1.00-1.08]; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: CPR initiated by first responders for OHCA is associated with higher overall survival rates and higher survival was largely mediated by earlier response times.

Comparison of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes Between Asian and White Individuals in the United States.

Background Disparities in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and survival have been reported for Black and Hispanic individuals with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Whether Asian individuals have lower rates of bystander CPR and survival for OHCA, as compared with White individuals, remains unknown. Methods and Results Within the US-based CARES (Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival), we identified 278 989 OHCAs in Asian and White individuals during 2013 to 2021. Using hierarchical Poisson logistic regression with emergency medical service agency modeled as a random effect and patient and OHCA characteristics as fixed effects, we compared rates of bystander CPR, survival to discharge, and favorable neurological survival between Asian and White individuals with OHCA. Overall, 14 835 (5.3%) OHCAs occurred in Asian individuals. Compared with White individuals with OHCA, Asian individuals were older (67.0±17.6 versus 62.8±16.9 years) and were less likely to have drug overdose as the cause of OHCA (1.3% versus 6.6%) and a shockable arrest rhythm (19.2% versus 22.4%). Layperson bystander CPR rates were similar between Asian and White individuals (42.6% versus 42.1%; adjusted relative risk for Asian individuals, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.02]; P=0.69). However, rates of survival to discharge were lower in Asian individuals with OHCA (8.2% versus 10.3%; adjusted relative risk 0.92 [0.86-0.98] P=0.006). Similarly, the rate of favorable neurological survival was lower for Asian individuals (6.5% versus 8.7%; adjusted relative risk, 0.85 [0.79-0.91]; P<0.001). Conclusions Despite similar rates of bystander CPR, Asian individuals with OHCA have lower survival rates than White individuals with OHCA. The reasons for the lower survival rate deserve further study to determine whether there are disparities in resuscitation care between Asian and White individuals with OHCA.