Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol ; 6(3): 174-184, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39399748

RESUMO

Objective: Irrational antimicrobial use (AMU) has led to an exponential increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in hospitals and communities, which creates challenges in treating infectious diseases caused by bacteria. This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial prescriptions and usage patterns for treating bacterial infections among outpatients at Benjamin Mkapa Hospital (BMH). Materials and Methods: A prospective descriptive study design was used to evaluate the AMU trend. The data were collected from August 2022 to October 2022 from outpatient pharmacies at BMH using the World Health Organization/International Network of Rational Use of Drugs (WHO/INRUD) indicators. The simple random sampling method was employed to select the prescriptions. The WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch, and Reserve) classification was used to classify common antimicrobials. We analyzed the prevalence of outpatient AMU, including the types of antimicrobials, indications, and compliance with treatment guidelines. We also examined the number of antimicrobials per prescription and the adherence to drug use. Results: We examined 1557 prescriptions, 406 (26.1%) (WHO recommendation 20.0-26.8%) of which included antimicrobials. All prescriptions with antimicrobials were written in generic names, drug utilization-90% (DU90%) was 100% (WHO recommendation 100%). The number of parenteral antimicrobials prescribed was 79 (19.5%) (WHO recommendation 13.4-24.1%). Furthermore, prescriptions with antimicrobials that complied with the current Standard Treatment Guidelines and National Essential Medicine List in Tanzania (STG/NEMLIT) were 369 (90.9%) (WHO recommendation 100%). Most antimicrobials were prescribed as monotherapy, accounting for 265 (65.3%). There were 1.4 (WHO recommendation 1.6-1.8) antimicrobials per prescription. Our study identified 21 commonly prescribed antimicrobials, whereby 9 (42.9%) (WHO recommendation >60%) antimicrobials were Access, 10 (47.6%) (WHO recommendation <20%) Watch, and 2 (9.5%) (WHO recommendation <1%) Reserved classes. Conclusion: Our study showed that BMH has optimal practices for prescribing and using antimicrobials for outpatients. It further underlined the need to expand and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship efforts to reinforce prescribing antimicrobials.

2.
BMJ Open ; 14(8): e083444, 2024 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39097319

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess antibiotics prescribing and use patterns for inpatients at Benjamin Mkapa Zonal Referral Hospital (BMH) using the WHO-Point Prevalence Survey (WHO-PPS). DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey. SETTING: The Benjamin Mkapa Zonal Referral Hospital, Dodoma, Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatient prescriptions, regardless of whether antibiotics were prescribed (n=286) on the day of PPS. OUTCOME MEASURES: Our study analysed the prevalence of antibiotic use at BMH for inpatients, the type of antibiotics used, the indications for use and the proportion of oral and parenteral antibiotics. We also assessed prescription-prescribed antibiotics after a positive antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) result. RESULTS: A survey was conducted on 286 prescriptions, which revealed that 30.07% of them included antibiotics. On average, each prescription contained at least 1.6 antibiotics. All prescriptions that included antibiotics were written in generic names, and 77.91% (67/86) of them followed the Standard Treatment Guidelines. Of the prescriptions that included antibiotics, 58.14% (50/86) had a single antibiotic, 20.93% (18/86) had parenteral antibiotics and 79.07% (68/86) had oral antibiotics. Based on AWaRe's (Access, Watch and Reserve) categorisation of antibiotics, 50% (8/16) were in the Access group, 31.25% (5/16) were in the Watch group, 12.50% (2/16) were in the Reserve group and 6.25% (1/16) were not recommended antimicrobial combinations. Out of 86 prescriptions included antibiotics, only 4.65% showed positive culture growth. However, antibiotics were still prescribed in 29.07% of prescriptions where there was no growth of bacteria, and in 66.28% of prescriptions, antibiotics were prescribed empirically without any requesting of bacteria culture and AST. CONCLUSION: BMH has reduced inpatient Antibiotic Use by half compared with the 2019 WHO-PPS. Adherence to National Treatment Guidelines is suboptimal. Clinicians should use AST results to guide antibiotic prescribing.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Humanos , Tanzânia/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Prevalência , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA