Impact of intravenous antibiotics for unconfirmed pulmonary infections in patients with acute decompensated heart failure at a community health system.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: Patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) present similarly to those with respiratory infections, which may lead to administration of unnecessary intravenous (IV) antibiotics. This study was conducted to assess outcomes in patients admitted for ADHF who received IV antibiotics vs those who did not. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated adults admitted with ADHF who received IV antibiotics for at least 48 hours or did not receive IV antibiotics. Patients with an active infection were excluded. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay in the unmatched cohort; secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, all-cause mortality, amount of loop diuretic administered, total sodium and fluids received, Clostridioides difficile infection, IV antibiotic agents administered, and duration of therapy. RESULTS: The unmatched cohort included 38 patients who received IV antibiotics and 123 patients who did not receive IV antibiotics, while the matched cohort included 33 patients in each arm. In the unmatched and matched cohorts, patients receiving IV antibiotics had a longer median hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; P < 0.01 and 5 vs 4 days; P < 0.01) and received a greater median amount of total sodium (9.22 vs 0.28 g; P < 0.01 and 10.24 vs 0 g; P < 0.01) and median total volume from IV antibiotics and fluids (1,788 vs 50 mL; P < 0.01 and 1,825 vs 0 mL; P < 0.01). No significant differences were found for the other secondary outcomes. Ceftriaxone and azithromycin were the most frequently administered IV antibiotics, with a median duration of therapy of 4 days. CONCLUSION: Use of IV antibiotics in patients with ADHF was associated with longer hospital length of stay and should be avoided in patients without evidence of infection.

Antimicrobial stewardship intervention bundle decreases outpatient fluoroquinolone prescribing for urinary tract infections.

An antimicrobial stewardship bundle was implemented in 23 community health system urgent care and primary care clinics to reduce fluoroquinolone prescribing in urinary tract infections. The percentage of urinary tract infection (UTI) visits prescribed a fluoroquinolone subsequently decreased from 17.6% to 3% in urgent care and from 23.8% to 6.8% in primary care.

Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin in Combination With Beta-Lactam Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin (VAN)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is increased when VAN is combined with certain beta-lactams (BLs) such as piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) but has not been evaluated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). Our aim was to investigate the AKI incidence of VAN in combination with C/T (VAN/C/T) compared with VAN in combination to TZP (VAN-TZP). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, observational, comparative study across the United States. The primary analysis was a composite outcome of AKI and risk, injury, failure, loss, end stage renal disease; Acute Kidney Injury Network; or VAN-induced nephrotoxicity according to the consensus guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding variables and stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis to assess the time to nephrotoxicity between the 2 groups. RESULTS: We included VAN/C/T (n = 90) and VAN-TZP (n = 284) at an enrollment ratio of 3:1. The primary outcome occurred in 12.2% vs 25.0% in the VAN-C/T and VAN-TZP groups, respectively (P = .011). After adjusting for confounding variables, VAN-TZP was associated with increased odds of AKI compared with VAN-C/T; with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.560-6.993). Results of the stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis with log-rank time-to-nephrotoxicity analysis indicate that time to AKI was significantly shorter among patients who received VAN-TZP (P = .004). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that TZP was consistent with the primary analysis (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our results suggest that the AKI is not likely to be related to tazobactam but rather to piperacillin, which is a component in VAN-TZP but not in VAN-C/T.

A comparison of active versus passive methods of responding to rapid diagnostic blood culture results.

Objective: To compare 2 methods of communicating polymerase chain reaction (PCR) blood-culture results: active approach utilizing on-call personnel versus passive approach utilizing notifications in the electronic health record (EHR). Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: A tertiary-care academic medical center. Patients: Adult patients hospitalized with ≥1 positive blood culture containing a gram-positive organism identified by PCR between October 2014 and January 2018. Methods: The standard protocol for reporting PCR results at baseline included a laboratory technician calling the patient's nurse, who would report the critical result to the medical provider. The active intervention group consisted of an on-call pager system utilizing trained pharmacy residents, whereas the passive intervention group combined standard protocol with real-time in-basket notifications to pharmacists in the EHR. Results: Of 209 patients, 105, 61, and 43 patients were in the control, active, and passive groups, respectively. Median time to optimal therapy was shorter in the active group compared to the passive group and control (23.4 hours vs 42.2 hours vs 45.9 hours, respectively; P = .028). De-escalation occurred 12 hours sooner in the active group. In the contaminant group, empiric antibiotics were discontinued faster in the active group (0 hours) than in the control group and the passive group (17.7 vs 7.2 hours; P = .007). Time to active therapy and days of therapy were similar. Conclusions: A passive, electronic method of reporting PCR results to pharmacists was not as effective in optimizing stewardship metrics as an active, real-time method utilizing pharmacy residents. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal method of communicating time-sensitive information.

How to Harness the Power of Social Media for Quality Drug Information in Infectious Diseases: Perspectives on Behalf of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.

Clinicians, researchers, and the public frequently turn to digital channels and social media for up-to-the-minute information on novel therapeutics and vaccines. The value of credible infectious diseases drug information is more apparent in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This viewpoint by the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) provides guidance on utilizing social media platforms to optimize infectious diseases pharmacotherapy. It includes tips for all levels of users but primarily serves a guide for the infectious diseases clinician who has not yet joined social media. It compares various social media platforms and suggests which to begin with based on user needs, recommends efficient curation of social media content, and outlines a stepwise approach (shown below) to increasing engagement over time. This summary will hopefully spur further quality content and engagement regarding drug information from the infectious diseases social media network.