Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide versus epirubicin-cyclophosphamide in patients with early stage HER2-negative breast cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, Phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: This multicenter, phase II randomized, non-inferiority study reports from the first prospective two-armed randomized control trial that compared the efficacy, safety and quality-of-life of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)-based and epirubicin-based as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-II Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage I/II HER2-negative breast cancer received PLD (37.5mg/m2, Q3W, 5 cycles, LC arm) plus cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2) or epirubicin (90mg/m2, Q3W, 4 cycles, EC arm) plus cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2). Randomization was stratified by lymph node, ER and PR status. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), safety profiles, and quality of life (QoL). QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients were assigned to LC (n=148) and EC (n=108). There was no difference in 5-year DFS and OS rate between two groups. LC-based adjuvant regimens had significantly less alopecia, less grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (AEs). Significantly improved QoL was observed in the LC arm during and after treatment for symptoms including fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and systemic therapy side effects. CONCLUSION: Comparable efficacy and safety between adjuvant PLD and epirubicin for stage I-II HER2-negative breast cancer was observed. There was no difference in 5-year DFS and OS rate between the two treatment arms. However, less grade 3-4 AEs and a trend of favorable QoL symptom scales were observed in the LC arm, suggesting that PLD-containing regimen could become a new standard treatment for early stage HER2-negative breast cancer patients.

Overexpression of malic enzyme is involved in breast cancer growth and is correlated with poor prognosis.

Malic enzyme (ME) genes are key functional metabolic enzymes playing a crucial role in carcinogenesis. However, the detailed effects of ME gene expression on breast cancer progression remain unclear. Here, our results revealed ME1 expression was significantly upregulated in breast cancer, especially in patients with oestrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, upregulation of ME1 was significantly associated with more advanced pathological stages (p < 0.001), pT stage (p < 0.001) and tumour grade (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed ME1 upregulation was associated with poor disease-specific survival (DSS: p = 0.002) and disease-free survival (DFS: p = 0.003). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed ME1 upregulation was significantly correlated with poor DSS (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.08-2.52; p = 0.021) and DFS (AHR, 1.57; 95% CI: 1.03-2.41; p = 0.038). Stratification analysis indicated ME1 upregulation was significantly associated with poor DSS (p = 0.039) and DFS (p = 0.038) in patients with non-triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, ME1 expression did not affect the DSS of patients with TNBC. Biological function analysis revealed ME1 knockdown could significantly suppress the growth of breast cancer cells and influence its migration ability. Furthermore, the infiltration of immune cells was significantly reduced when they were co-cultured with breast cancer cells with ME1 knockdown. In summary, ME1 plays an oncogenic role in the growth of breast cancer; it may serve as a potential biomarker of progression and constitute a therapeutic target in patients with breast cancer.